Control: reopen -1
Hi,
looks like this didn't work:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=qt6-multimedia=powerpc=6.4.2-11=1705003199=0
Reopening the bug therefore.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 8
its testsuite on the other architectures?
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
>From d85d2f8c39e7fc6feca3ebf6f494c961dc5226d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Paul
Could you PLEASE stop posting to debian-ports@? You are sending these mails to
every Debian Ports architecture mailing list.
I already asked for the third time now.
Thank You,
Adrian
> On May 26, 2019, at 5:34 AM, wrote:
>
> Sorry if this is off-topic, but I can't help asking if that "15381
nd IBM Z,
I fear that Debian would more and more be turned into a mere development
project for Ubuntu
and other derivatives rather than being an operating system of its own.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Univer
re is actually a valid
blocker which is the lack of supply of new hardware for DSA).
Thanks for the insight!
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
On 9/29/18 8:48 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 14:16 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> [...]
>> Furthermore, several of the ports are in very healthy condition and
>> even surpass some release architectures. The powerpc and ppc64 ports,
>> for exam
On 9/28/18 11:26 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 14:16 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> So, it's not always a purely technical decision whether a port
>> remains a release architecture. It's also often highly political and
>> somehow also inf
and ppc64 once the FTP servers are in sync again. Once the
kernel packages have been rebuilt, I can try building debian-installer on
powerpc and ppc64 again and if that works, I can build new installation
images.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub
should watch out for hardware with ARM Cortex Cores.
Alternatively, X-Gene 1. ThunderX, ThunderX2 and Centriq are definitely not
supported.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`
Hi!
You should ask in a more public forum rather than on Debian mailing lists if
you want to know about potential users.
Adrian
> On Jul 7, 2018, at 8:31 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
>
> Hi, folks,
> due to lack of enough man power and build machines for 3 mips* port at
> the same time, I think
continue
to do that once the move of powerpc to ports has been completed).
I think that building on arm64 after fixing the bug in question is the
way to move forward. I'm surprised the bug itself hasn't been fixed yet,
doesn't speak for ARM.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian De
-installer
won't be needed anymore in the future. Still, I think we should
archive everything.
Adrian
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2018/04/msg00253.html
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - gl
on fixing the remaining OpenJDK issues. I'm an upstream
committer in the OpenJDK project, so I can commit all changes myself.
So, the expected changes to mpi-defaults will no longer be needed.
Yay, thanks so much for this!
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
30 (https://reviews.llvm.org/D43630)
merged in LLVM upstream. Fix the remaining 64-bit time issues in
crates like "filetime" and "time".
Cheers,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub..
working on fixing that.
Please test and report back on the individual architecture
mailing lists, i.e. please don't post to debian-ports@l.d.o
as this reaches the mailing lists of all ports.
Adrian
[1] https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/ports/
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian
tps://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/ports/
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
anInstallerImages
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
port, especially
from companies, they still haven't reached the same popularity as the
powerpc port for example. Heck, there are even more users for "hppa"
and "sparc64" which both are just unofficial ports architectures.
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1] http://popcon.debian.org/
--
.''`
ication I am missing?
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
On 09/20/2016 11:16 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>- powerpc: No porter (RM blocker)
I'd be happy to pick up powerpc to keep it for Stretch. I'm already
maintaining powerpcspe which is very similar to powerpc.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - gl
eady taking care of powerpcspe, so I think it would be a perfect fit.
Let me know what needs to be done to make this happen! I don't want to see
powerpc go too soon.
Cheers,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin
e yet.
Well, we just did a full archive rebuild of "ppc64" to be able to
support ppc64 on the e5500 cores by disabling AltiVec, didn't we?
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu
fix it and need help, just let me know :).
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
4 to Debian, we could rebuild the archive
within a few weeks.
We have one user who has two Sun T2 servers which are new-in-box (NIB),
would those be ok to set up as machines for DSA?
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Univer
2154
glaubitz@wuiet:~$
The rest is arch:all:
glaubitz@wuiet:~$ wanna-build -A all -d unstable --list=installed | wc -l
15672
glaubitz@wuiet:~$
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`
Debian
releases.
Thanks,
Adrian
PS: If other Debian people are interested in joining our efforts to work on the
sparc64
port or making a Debian port for the J-Core happen, I would be happy to provide
access
to porterboxes.
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub..
uid Debian Ports Archive Automatic Signing Key (2016)
<ftpmas...@debian-ports.org>
glaubitz@z6:~/m68k>
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84
ports architectures.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
I'm in favor of the old design because I think it's important to havw a list
which can be used to make announcements about important issues that all porters
should be aware of.
It's not really that mails going to debian-ports@ appear that often.
PS: Excuse my quoting style, currently on
On 07/17/2015 09:31 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
using build profiles breaks debian-ports architectures, all of them:
What exactly is a build profile in this context?
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin
-linux
is updated in the main archive again.
Cheers,
Adrian
[1]
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=util-linuxsuite=sid
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG
http://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian/ unreleased main
yamato:~#
Do you know what could be wrong?
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006
the dependency problems.
gcc-4.9 has been building since Wednesday but it's looking good. I hope
to have the packages uploaded over the weekend.
Cheers,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
(not incoming, this is where the package goes once it's
been ACCEPTED), you can always have it rejected.
It's the cleaner solution in my opinion instead of uselessly bumping
the package revision to fix minor issues before the package isn't
even ACCEPTED.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
- --
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http
or Sunday.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
failed?
Cheers,
Adrian
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/
[2] http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=radeontopsuite=sid
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF
.
But when you say the logs are properly uploaded now, I'm happy. So,
please don't reschedule the package, it will updated in the very
near future anyway.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub
On 11/23/2013 11:51 PM, Helge Deller wrote:
What else am I missing?
Please add hppa
Assuming that you are one of the hppa guys, how is the port doing? Any
chance that the buildds will be up and running again anytime soon?
Cheers,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian
On 11/24/2013 12:22 AM, Helge Deller wrote:
On 11/24/2013 12:21 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 11/23/2013 11:51 PM, Helge Deller wrote:
Please add hppa
Assuming that you are one of the hppa guys, how is the port doing? Any
chance that the buildds will be up and running again anytime
On 11/24/2013 12:47 AM, John David Anglin wrote:
On 23-Nov-13, at 6:35 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Crossing my fingers! It's been sad to see the number of up-to-date
packages in hppa dropping over the time.
It should be going up now.
So, the buildds are already up and running
On 11/24/2013 01:20 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz dixit:
So, the buildds are already up and running? Shouldn't they be showing
up on buildd.debian-ports.org [1]?
I think I saw buildd uploads for hppa on incoming.d.o this week.
Indeed:
http://incoming.debian
a rebuild of sane-backends on kfreebsd*?
Cheers,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 07/25/2013 05:27 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 14:16:57 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 07/25/2013 12:55 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
I'm preparing the upload right now.
I'm ready and waiting with an updated libgphoto2 here. Just ping
me once you have uploaded
libusb2-dev
it suffices to build libgphoto2.
Hmm, Steven claimed it would work with just the patched libusb.h.
However, we'll just wait until libusb2-dev has been updated, then
we'lll give it another shot and apply the ENODATA fix if necessary.
Cheers,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
on the kfreebsd porterbox before uploading the package.
We want to avoid uploading packages which FTBFS anyway.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546
Sorry for the bad formatting, sending from mobile.
Anyways, what keeps us from just integrating a patch in the libusb2-dev Debian
package and do a quick upload. Be it a normal upload or an NMU.
Adrian
On Jul 24, 2013, at 11:47 PM, Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de wrote:
On 24.07.2013 12:51,
49 matches
Mail list logo
