Hi,
BERTRAND Joël <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe, but NetBSD kernel does not correctly work on sun4m/SMP,
> like Linux. Today, no one OS can be used on sun4m/SMP workstations,
> and I think that it will be easier to fix linux 2.6 sparc32 kernel
> than work on debian/xBSD sparc32 port.
Hi,
Ulrich Teichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's not quite true. Dave Miller is still collecting patches, Mark
> Fortescue, Krzysztof Helt and others are producing them. See the respective
> posts on [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's just that there is no real maintainer
> for the port.
[...]
> Ca
Hi,
Ulrich Teichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What we've seen here is classic bitrot, IMHO. Of course, the main Linux
> development platform is x86 and quite a lot kernel developers only work
> on one platform. This has introduced bugs for all other ports (and will
> continue to do so), which
Hello,
Anton Andreev writes:
> Is tomcat available on Debian / kfreeBSD?
Apparently yes: http://packages.debian.org/sid/tomcat6 .
BTW, the proper name is "Debian GNU/kFreeBSD".
Thanks,
Ludo'.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Hi,
Anton Andreev writes:
> Do you think Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is stable enough for a LAMP, Tomcat
> server OS?
I don't know. I haven't used it long enough to have anything to say
about its stability.
Thanks,
Ludo'.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Hi,
Luca Favatella writes:
[...]
> on the deb package, there is a different script for GNU/kFreeBSD and
> GNU/Linux, but the GNU/kFreeBSD version needs "ifconfig" and
> "route". I considered porting and switching to BusyBox udhcpc.
(I haven't studied the question in depth, so pardon me if this
Luca Favatella writes:
> It seems it is not enough.
> It has only ifconfig
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/kfreebsd-i386/inetutils-tools/filelist
Hmm, actually it has more than this, but it seems to lack `route', for
instance:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/inetutils.git/tree/
Thanks,
Lud
Hello,
Petr Salinger writes:
> Fou our specifics, take a look at our SVN repository
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/glibc-bsd/trunk/, namely
> freebsd-libs, freebsd-util. Start with target get-orig-source
> in debian/rules.
Out of curiosity, is there any plan to get the kFreeBSD port into
upstream
Hi,
Rogério Brito writes:
> On Dec 03 2009, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> modules="$(cat /etc/modules /etc/modules.d/* 2>/dev/null | \
>> sed -e 's/#.*//g' -e '/^[ ]*$/d')"
>> ^ ^-> space
>> +> tab
>
> Are character classes (
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> There's __FreeBSD__ for plain FreeBSD, and __FreeBSD_kernel__ for
> GNU/kFreeBSD (which doesn't define the former, so that people can
> distinguish).
And ‘__GLIBC__’, which is what most applications really want to know.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Hi,
Joachim Wiedorn writes:
> Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
[...]
> But now I see it is not so easy to test it on other architectures. Does
> some now how gcc give the string for 'hurd-i386' architectures? I have
> thought it should be simple:
>
>__hurd__
>
> But it seems not.
On GNU systems (i
Hi,
Joachim Wiedorn writes:
> But I don't now how can I specify a GNU/Hurd (with mach-Kernel)
> system (hurd-i386), which is still an unofficial port of Debian. I have
> only tried 'defined (__hurd__)' which does not work.
>
> I think if I say 'defined (__GNU__)' this is always the same an ALL
>
Hi,
The Anarcat writes:
> +#if defined(__linux__) || defined(__GNU__) || defined(__GLIBC__)
Only the last one makes sense: ‘__linux__’ is for the Linux kernel and
‘__GNU__’ is for GNU (aka. GNU/Hurd).
Thanks,
Ludo’.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
13 matches
Mail list logo
