Hi,
I mentioned this on debian-devel already in the thread about Buster
maybe losing sysvinit support, but I thought it was worth flagging to
the HURD/BSD lists since it seems relevant to your interests :-)
There's a couple of posts in the archive of where the elogind for buster
work is:
http://
Ian Jackson writes:
> Also we are hampered by the lack of a safe space to communicate and
> coordinate. I looked at some of the technical work done in other
> distros to try to make desktoppy stuff continue to work well, and it
> generally seems sane. But some of those projects are quite toxic
Holger Levsen writes:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 06:01:43AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > Has policy changed regarding support for multiple inits, or is it just that
>> > no one is maintaining the shim and sysvinit-core?
>>
>> The latter. systemd-shim has been orphaned for over 2 years, and h
Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 06:30:27PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
>
> > Honestly? I'd really love to see GRUB achieve it's nominal purpose - GRand
> > Unified Bootloader. Making it capable of compiling on, and booting, *BSD
> > machines seems like a majo
"Joel Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[ls-lR.gz and md5sums.gz]
> I'll look into arranging this.
Any progress on this front?
Cheers,
Matthew
--
"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle."
http://www.debian.org
Jimmy Kaplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 02:04:23PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> > and SCP does not, AFAIK, allow for limiting an account to file-copies and
> > disallowing shell access reliably (so I can't make an anonymous-upload
> > account).
>
> Can't you just se
"Joel Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[ls-lR.gz and md5sums.gz]
> Probably - but debarchiver doesn't have hooks for calling other scripts when
> it's done, either. I suppose I could try to hack something into the cronfile
Oh, that's not very good. Probably worth a wishlist bug.
> itself. Jus
"Joel Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 06:41:52PM +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > Any chance of an indices directory (preferably containing md5sums.gz)
> > and an ls-lR.gz, please? That way I can mirror this properly.
>
>
"Joel Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> fqdn => 'debian-bsd.lightbearer.com',
Any chance of an indices directory (preferably containing md5sums.gz)
and an ls-lR.gz, please? That way I can mirror this properly.
Thanks,
Matthew
--
"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True.
"Joel Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's apparently being caused by stack corruption... lord knows how THAT
> is happening. Time to dig out the toolkit. Or rather, try to compile the
> toolkit... (GDB should be up, now, for the record).
I suspect Crap Code(TM). Or someone relying on a beh
"Joel Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> Currently, my copy of ed is throwing SEGV; gdb says this is caused by a
Is this the ed package I built the other day? If not, what source did
you use
matthew green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>
>> On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> > getopt is in libiberty. It's also in glibc, and people have a bad
>> > habit of not checking for that in configure. I'm thinking about
>> > packaging libiberty, an
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > getopt is in libiberty. It's also in glibc, and people have a bad
> > habit of not checking for that in configure. I'm thinking about
> > packaging libiberty, and
>
> Also a BSD-licensed getopt (a
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > getopt is in libiberty. It's also in glibc, and people have a bad
> > habit of not checking for that in configure. I'm thinking about
> > packaging libiberty, and
>
> Also a BSD-licensed getopt (a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
ed package (binary) is at
http://www.pick.ucam.org/~matthew/netbsd/ed_0.2-19_netbsd-i386.deb
md5sum is 0d08768459c589722584903fc658fa0c
The package is of course unsigned, but this mail is signed :)
Matthew
- --
"At least you know where you are with Mic
Ooops. here's the promised typescript
Script started on Thu Jan 31 01:42:10 2002
bash-2.05# cd /debian
bash-2.05# ls
apt-get.core dev home lost+found sbin
bin etc import mnt tmp
boot floppy initrd proc usr
cdrom
Hi folks,
I'm using an nfs-mount as my chroot, and am getting strange ln
behaviour, which is causing builds to fail.
In this case, it's ed I'm trying to build, and things are failing
because the symlink of red.1.gz->ed.1.gz is producing rubbish - you'll
see in the typescript that trying to read f
Hi,
Further to my previous mail, if I make the red.1.gz->ed.1.gz link in
the chroot's /import/ed-0.2/debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/ from linux
or bsd, then the linux machine with the chroot nfs-mounted can
recognise the link, but BSD doesn't (neither the chroot'd bsd, or the
native netbsd box). A
Hi,
chroot /debian /bin/bash is SEGVing on me; attached is the output of
ktrace -i chroot /debian /bin/bash; kdump.
Matthew
318 ktrace EMUL "netbsd"
318 ktrace RET ktrace 0
318 ktrace CALL execve(0xbfbfd7bc,0xbfbfdc4c,0xbfbfdc5c)
318 ktrace NAMI "/sbin/chroot"
318 ktra
19 matches
Mail list logo
