Re: A request from the NetBSD folks [ please discuss ]

2003-12-02 Thread Michael Ritzert
Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 02.12.03 21:51:20: > > I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the > general opinion seems to be that "Debian GNU/KNetBSD" is a better name for > the port than "Debian GNU/NetBSD", both because it is more specific about If t

Re: Glibc-based Debian GNU/KNetBSD

2003-12-02 Thread Michael Ritzert
Nathan Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 02.12.03 19:40:27: > Absolutely not. One of the reasons I want to use FreeBSD is because > Linux is too unstable for me. I've begun to conclude that the glibc port That's also my impression (and the reason why i'm getting back again to NetBSD on old

Re: glibc vs BSD libc

2003-01-23 Thread Michael Ritzert
Pavel Cahyna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 23.01.03 19:14:41: > > To David Brownlee: I doubt NetBSD 1.0 binary could run against > a NetBSD 1.6 libc. They don't care much about binary compatibility. You > could not even run a statically linked 1.0 app without some COMPAT_ > option in the kernel,

debian/netbsd-sparc

2002-12-11 Thread Michael Ritzert
Hi, i am new to this project but have been thinking of something like debian/netbsd for a while. My motivation: i am using netbsd on my old sparc machine(s) and debian linux on a few (meanwhile also old) PCs and solaris on two machines i cannot run with BSD. While i like netbsd on the sparc, i

Re: Hello

2003-01-07 Thread Michael Ritzert
Hello Dan, a few weeks ago i posted about NetBSD-Debian, but i did not get any reply :-(( Dan Walrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 06.01.03 17:58:52: > Hello everyone, > > I have a SparcServer 20 lying about doing nothing, so I fancied > installing the NetBSD port of Debian onto it. It appears

Re: Hello

2003-01-10 Thread Michael Ritzert
Hi, Dan Walrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 10.01.03 00:02:10: > Obviously the kernel. I and think there's something else like glibc. Why glibc? Wouldn´t that make debian netbsd incompatible to the netbsd mainstream? IMHO, the core libraries should remain identical. I'm aware that this will

Re: glibc vs BSD libc

2003-01-21 Thread Michael Ritzert
Momchil Velikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 20.01.03 15:20:56: > > > "Atifa" == Atifa Kheel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Atifa> e)Other Streams(like string streams,Obstack streams,etc) > Atifa> glibc: Supported > Atifa> BSD libc: Not Supported. > Why is it important for d