Re: How to check for a GNU userland

* Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-26T16:21-0500]: > > "Peterll" == Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Peterll> You don't. The config.guess command reports information about the > Peterll> hardware and the kernel > > config.guess returns CPU-Vendor-OS, not CPU-VENDOR-K

bootstrapping binutils/gcc

Hi there! In my quest to bootstrap a Debian NetBSD/Alpha system, I'm trying to compile the Debian binutils/gcc packages on NetBSD/Alpha. Basically I started with a chroot of the netbsd system, and then produced the basic packages so that i now can do # dpkg-source -x foo.dsc # cd

Re: Able to put website on debian.org

* Pavel Cholakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-30T12:13+0200]: > It certainly looks very in-line with the rest of debian.org, very nice. > Could we maybe have a central Debian BSD page, which explains the idea > behind it, plus pages with the work/status of the various specific ports > - {Net,Open,F

Re: dpkg architecture and official support

* Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-30T10:55-0700]: > Two or three times now, I've run into bugs that were wishlisted or outright > closed because we are not considered an Official Architecture (tm) yet; the > determining factor in this appears to be "are you listed in dpkg's arch > list?" W

libiberty (was: Re: ed package)

* Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-02-02T22:09+]: > On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 03:00:47PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote: > > > It isn't already? *blink* > > Apparantly not. I thought I'd put it in the libc package, but... [220]% dlocate -S libiberty binutils-dev: /usr/include/libiberty.h bi

Re: dpkg patch

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-02-02T16:32-0500]: > Yes, I think we all have that problem. I'll write up a patch for > configure to support wildcards. I think that's the only place that > will actually need them. I've configured gcc to use > i386-unknown-freebsd4, so dpkg finds that when it looks for th