On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 19:07, Robert Millan wrote:
> I'm proposing a new plan to factor in the lack of libstdc++6-udeb:
>
> 1- Add devd-udeb package (by linking libstdc++ statically into the executable)
For me this looks the the right way to go for now.
--
O
idn't you?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
/xterm installed -> I committed this
> to GIT, D-I folks is it okay to upload now?
It was uploaded.
> - rootskel sets TERM=cons25 but only when this variable wasn't set.
> This probably has no effect.
I did the change on rootskel but can't upload it as it fails to build
27;s list.
>
> If you mean in to 6.0.3, is there any particular benefit to trying to
> push that particular update at this late stage in the process, given
> that the partman-* changes won't be included? Might it not make more
> sense to look at the remaining changes as a set for 6
unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive:
> http://lists.debian.org/aanlktim=c2tuvoa3s30vzkd42ujcdhuea=s+yc4xd...@mail.gmail.com
>
>
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www
Hello Bastian,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:07:02PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> I'd suggest getting it commited in the package and uploaded to sid;
>> Bastian, do you object?
>
> Well, there is a 1.15.1 alre
ng this? How?
I'd suggest getting it commited in the package and uploaded to sid;
Bastian, do you object?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBS
ahead and commit it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&q
nch for a while.
Fine with me :-D
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
because I used it only /dev/ttyv console.
Fine with me.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.
e; the only thing I'd do different is to merge both
changelog lines in a single one.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCR
hcpc. You need to use the script I've commited in Bastian's
branch of busybox and remove few files to udhcpc to be choosen (look
at mailing list how to test it) but it ought to make your testing
easier.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.
ad netcfg later today so we can figure if
someone find a any regression with it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-
Hello Luca,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Luca Favatella wrote:
> On 22/06/2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Hello Luca,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Luca Favatella wrote:
>>> This patch (against d-i trunk) aims to handle libc the same way also
>>
Hello Luca,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Good work; IMO the best way of doing it is to moving it to
> kernel-wedge to make the work for other arches easier in future and
> avoid duplication.
The only thing that could be done in kernel-wedge is the ntfs one
Hello Luca,
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Luca Favatella wrote:
> This patch (against d-i trunk) aims to handle libc the same way also
> on GNU/kFreeBSD (libc0.1) and GNU/Hurd (libc0.3).
You've forgotten the changelog entry ;-)
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
een commented by Frans :-)
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
take a look and try to
update it. If you can't do that in near future please speakup and
we'll try to find someone to handle it.
Thanks a lot by looking at it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Luca Favatella wrote:
> On 16/03/2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> [..]
>> Please take a look on the comments Colin has raised and refactorise it.
>>
>> So we can go ahead and continue the reviewing.
>
> I'm afraid i will not
Luca Favatella writes:
[...]
> In the diff attached I removed a sentence in the man page referring to
> the old file in scripts/porters (one of the 2 files that should go to
> the wiki).
Please take a look on the comments Colin has raised and refactorise it.
So we can go ahead and continue th
Luca Favatella writes:
> On 15/03/2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Luk Claes writes:
>>
>>> Otavio Salvador wrote:
> [...]
>>>> While I understand why those options are required I dislike the idea to
>>>> have them at official deboostrap.
>
Luca Favatella writes:
> On 15/03/2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Luca Favatella writes:
> [...]
>>> I tried to run kbsd-debootstrap.sh (the refreshed one by me). I got:
> [...]
>> First I'm curious why to use another script to install instead of
>> r
Luk Claes writes:
> Otavio Salvador wrote:
[...]
>> This looks to be the wrong way to fix missing dependencies for a
>> specific kernel. I belive the right way to fix it is to have override
>> based on kernel and then allow packages to have different sections and
>>
Luca Favatella writes:
> On 13/03/2009, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Luca Favatella (12/03/2009):
>>> Can you please tell me if
>>> - someone already wrote patches for debootstrap to support more than a
>>> suite (at the same time, i.e. sid and unreleased)?
>>
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd
Martin Michlmayr writes:
> * Colin Watson [2009-03-09 00:01]:
>> Martin Michlmayr persuaded me to tentatively volunteer for mentoring
>> the addition of mtd support, but actually I'd be much more excited
>> about mentoring this project if it had a good student. Martin, is it
>> possible that som
Gunnar Wolf writes:
> Luca Favatella dijo [Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:57:22PM +0100]:
>> (I don't know if I have to cc other Debian mailing lists)
>
> Probably debian-boot would be the one - I am adding a Cc: to this
> mail, and quoting it fully. Debian-boot is [1] for «Developing the
> installation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Latest kernel-wedge has been uploaded today to sid and we should start
the updating the installer to 2.6.25 kernel. I have uploaded the
packages for amd64 and i386 and would like to ask porters to handle it
for your pet architecture(s).
Thanks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Porters,
I've done first set of updates on kernel-wedge and also did trivial
changes ones on the architecture specific packages of kernel. I'd like
to ask for a last look on them so we can upload 2.6.24 based packages
to sid.
Please take a look
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
While we're in the way to release Debian Installer Lenny Beta1, some
work can start to be done for Beta2.
As you probably know, we plan to do a fast release after Beta1 gets
out using 2.6.24 kernels. This is where development can start to be
d
make Lenny the best release ever made!
Cheers,
Otavio Salvador
on behalf of Debian Installer Team
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
- -
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home
[ I've dropped the non-related mail addresses from the CC line ]
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 08:08:26PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>>
>> I'm sorry. Please feel free to disable the patch; I'm thinking it was not a
>> good idea to apply it in the package bef
31 matches
Mail list logo
