On 14:47, Petr Salinger wrote:
> BTW, many thanks for your time spent on 10.1 preparing.
Thanks for you help! It is the first time I've updated the userland
to newer upstream, happily it seems to have worked okay with a
test-rebuild of glibc and some essential and toolchain packages. I
managed t
On 16:02, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Petr Salinger writes:
> > BTW, many thanks for your time spent on 10.1 preparing.
>
> Speaking of which .. can we go to usntable there?
We can do this today, I think! The d-i Beta 2 builds are finished, but
just waiting for an official announcement in case any
BTW, many thanks for your time spent on 10.1 preparing.
Speaking of which .. can we go to usntable there?
IMHO, we should wait before "beta2 d-i" is officially released and announced.
Otherwise, I do not see any other blockers for kernel upload into sid.
For kfreebsd-kernel-headers, I would
Petr Salinger writes:
> BTW, many thanks for your time spent on 10.1 preparing.
Speaking of which .. can we go to usntable there?
Christoph
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@
Hi.
How did you strip the revision tag here?
- * $FreeBSD: stable/10/sys/sys/queue.h 251887 2013-06-18 02:57:56Z lstewart $
+ * $FreeBSD$
Currently if I get-orig-source then the patches don't cleanly apply.
Refreshing them would only change it to "$FreeBSD: releng/10.1/..." etc.
Did you
5 matches
Mail list logo
