Re: PPPoE support status update

2010-05-15 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 19:50:25 -0400, The Anarcat wrote: > On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 05:06:48PM +0200, Werner Koch wrote: > > On Sun, 9 May 2010 00:27, anar...@koumbit.org said: > > > That I just don't understand at all... Are you using userland PPP? From > > > what I can tell here, there's no

Re: PPPoE support status update

2010-05-10 Thread Werner Koch
On Mon, 10 May 2010 01:50, anar...@koumbit.org said: > Ah! I didn't see those packages, they're not part of the official > archive! Maybe not anymore - I didn't checked. > PS: it seems you were able to compile PPP with a lot more features than > I did. Did you patch the source or did it magi

Re: PPPoE support status update

2010-05-09 Thread The Anarcat
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 05:06:48PM +0200, Werner Koch wrote: > On Sun, 9 May 2010 00:27, anar...@koumbit.org said: > > > That I just don't understand at all... Are you using userland PPP? From > > what I can tell here, there's no ppp binary bundled with any kFreeBSD > > package I know of, I don't

Re: PPPoE support status update

2010-05-09 Thread Werner Koch
On Sun, 9 May 2010 00:27, anar...@koumbit.org said: > That I just don't understand at all... Are you using userland PPP? From > what I can tell here, there's no ppp binary bundled with any kFreeBSD > package I know of, I don't see how creating the lock directory changes I am using this: freebs

Re: PPPoE support status update: problems with netgraph?

2010-05-09 Thread The Anarcat
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 06:27:10PM -0400, The Anarcat wrote: > Right now, PPPoE doesn't work. The way I was able to compile ppp(8) was > by disabling netgraph, which makes ppp(8) complain about PPPoE (my > guess): > > Warning: deflink: PPPoE: unknown host > Warning: deflink: Device (PPPoE:vr0) mus

PPPoE support status update

2010-05-08 Thread The Anarcat
Okay, so much later I tried to make this work again... On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 06:35:01PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote: > On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:22, anar...@koumbit.org said: > > > Could you clarify this? Are you saying I duplicated existing work and > > that you already had userland ppp working? Is