2011/1/26 Ed Maste :
> If you mean "kFreeBSD should ship with a quota-enabled kernel" then I'd
> say go for it. The reason we don't have it on in upstream FreeBSD is
> largely historical; enabling quotas used to require additional locking
> that caused performance and other issues. The additional
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 09:14:44PM +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> It is my firm belief that GNU/kFreeBSD will need activated
> support for file system quotas.
If you mean "kFreeBSD should ship with a quota-enabled kernel" then I'd
say go for it. The reason we don't have it on in upstream Fr
Dear all experts,
after diligent work on porting the quota management source
from upstream FreeBSD to GNU/kFreeBSD, I am now ready to
see it ground to smithereens by the experts hereabouts!
Except the complaints on `kfreebsd-any` there were no other
issues at mentors.debian.net. I find myself mor
3 matches
Mail list logo
