On 12/01/2014 13:52, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Robert Millan wrote (12 Jan 2014 12:35:56 GMT) :
>> For example, I've been trying to assess the state of GNOME in
>> general by trying to find bugs myself. I will report my findings
>> soon, however this is clearly not optimal. My quick "kick the tir
Hi,
Robert Millan wrote (12 Jan 2014 12:35:56 GMT) :
> For example, I've been trying to assess the state of GNOME in
> general by trying to find bugs myself. I will report my findings
> soon, however this is clearly not optimal. My quick "kick the tires"
> testing is much less reliable than day-to
On 12/01/2014 09:24, Niels Thykier wrote:
> It was filed as serious and then downgraded by Julien on July 9th.
> Indeed, buildd.d.o lists no build problems at all. So at first glance I
> would expect the tests to have been disabled/ignored. Assuming this is
> no a simple "error-hiding" tactics, t
On 2014-01-11 23:10, Robert Millan wrote:
> On 11/01/2014 21:32, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> As for #712848, the latest comment sent by Petr suggested that the test
>>> might be
>>> incorrect when applied to kqueue.
>>>
>>
>> I guess you are referring to comment #25 here? Quote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Se
On 11/01/2014 22:54, Robert Millan wrote:
>> Do you have an idea of the consequences of making it linux-only? If it
>> is just using (e.g.) xdm instead of and kFreeBSD losing a couple of
>> packages, it will probably not be much of an issue. But then, I assume
>> that GNOME and GDM are not tightl
On 11/01/2014 21:32, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> As for #712848, the latest comment sent by Petr suggested that the test
>> might be
>> incorrect when applied to kqueue.
>>
>
> I guess you are referring to comment #25 here? Quote:
>
>
> """
>
> This test is guarded by:
>
> [...]
>
> The kqueue
On 11/01/2014 21:32, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> So far #733122. Barring that, the GNOME desktop seems to work fine (including
>> empathy, nautilus, etc). Once the patch in #733122 is applied, it will be
>> easier
>> to gather reports from day-to-day users and provide a more complete
>> assessment.
>
On 2014-01-05 12:22, Robert Millan wrote:
> On 05/01/2014 10:30, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On 2013-12-16 23:32, Robert Millan wrote:
>>> On 15/12/2013 13:34, Niels Thykier wrote:
It would probably be good if you (i.e. the BSD porters) could start a
dialogue with the GNOME maintainers and fi
Wiadomość napisana przez Robert Millan w dniu 5 sty 2014, o godz. 19:09:
> On 05/01/2014 18:47, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
>>> We can help as porters but we can't maintain abandoned codepaths on our
>>> own. I
>>> think GDM upstream doesn't want to deal with this problem, so perhaps it is
>>>
On 05/01/2014 23:47, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Em 2014-01-05 20:34, Robert Millan escreveu:
>> On 05/01/2014 23:05, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote:
>>> So, gnome-shell is working for you?
>>
>> Yes. It just needs a patch from the bug I mentioned.
>>
>> Or you can edit config.js by h
Em 2014-01-05 20:34, Robert Millan escreveu:
On 05/01/2014 23:05, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote:
So, gnome-shell is working for you?
Yes. It just needs a patch from the bug I mentioned.
Or you can edit config.js by hand and comment out the bluetooth /
network-manager
bits.
I think the
On 05/01/2014 23:05, brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> So, gnome-shell is working for you?
Yes. It just needs a patch from the bug I mentioned.
Or you can edit config.js by hand and comment out the bluetooth /
network-manager
bits.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd
So, gnome-shell is working for you?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/3d26b6360471ca9a1164153b95fe5...@openmailbox.org
brunomaxi...@openmailbox.org (2014-01-05):
> So, gnome-shell is working for you?
Can you please stop breaking threads? That's very annoying.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 05/01/2014 18:47, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
>> We can help as porters but we can't maintain abandoned codepaths on our own.
>> I
>> think GDM upstream doesn't want to deal with this problem, so perhaps it is
>> better
>> if we accept that GDM is not a portable program anymore, and make it
Wiadomość napisana przez Robert Millan w dniu 5 sty 2014, o godz. 12:22:
> On 05/01/2014 10:30, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On 2013-12-16 23:32, Robert Millan wrote:
>>> On 15/12/2013 13:34, Niels Thykier wrote:
It would probably be good if you (i.e. the BSD porters) could start a
dialogue wi
On 05/01/2014 10:30, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-12-16 23:32, Robert Millan wrote:
>> On 15/12/2013 13:34, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> It would probably be good if you (i.e. the BSD porters) could start a
>>> dialogue with the GNOME maintainers and figure out exactly where GNOME
>>> is on kFreeBSD
On 2013-12-16 23:32, Robert Millan wrote:
> On 15/12/2013 13:34, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> It would probably be good if you (i.e. the BSD porters) could start a
>> dialogue with the GNOME maintainers and figure out exactly where GNOME
>> is on kFreeBSD (vs. where it is supposed to be). Once that is
On 15/12/2013 13:34, Niels Thykier wrote:
> It would probably be good if you (i.e. the BSD porters) could start a
> dialogue with the GNOME maintainers and figure out exactly where GNOME
> is on kFreeBSD (vs. where it is supposed to be). Once that is sorted
> out, please send the release team a su
On 15/12/13 12:34, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Uhm I think we both may have misunderstood. Perhaps 'this state'
>> just means 'as technology preview'. I.e. normal QA requirements are
>> no longer waived because of preview status.
>
> This is exactly what we meant; we intend to not do technology previe
Gnome guys is not interested in help kFreeBSD because now Gnome is
Linux-only.
FreeBSD guys is porting Gnome 3.6 yet and Debian has 3.10 incoming.
I think is more feasible to bet on a Gnome-derivative DE like MATE
and/or Cinnamon because they are portable and they are interested in
being portab
On 2013-11-30 11:46, Robert Millan wrote:
> On 28/11/2013 21:49, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> On 28/11/13 20:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> kFreeBSD was a technology preview, and has not generated enough
>>> user interest to bring in sufficient install base to continue
>>> in this state.
>>>
>>> We
On 28/11/2013 21:49, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 28/11/13 20:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> kFreeBSD was a technology preview, and has not generated enough user
>> interest to bring in sufficient install base to continue in this
>> state.
>>
>> We will review this situation after 28th January 2014.
On 28/11/2013 21:49, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 28/11/13 20:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> kFreeBSD was a technology preview, and has not generated enough user
>> interest to bring in sufficient install base to continue in this
>> state.
>>
>> We will review this situation after 28th January 2014.
On 28/11/13 20:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
> kFreeBSD was a technology preview, and has not generated enough user
> interest to bring in sufficient install base to continue in this
> state.
>
> We will review this situation after 28th January 2014.
> Architectures still causing us concern at that poi
25 matches
Mail list logo
