re: bsd make

2004-08-04 Thread matthew green
that get ported can Provide: (since something like 90%+ of packages don't need anything that isn't shared between all four variants I know of in common use), and stop trying to pretend they're mergeable into a single utility. i'd expect macos & freebsd to converge on the same tool.

Re: bsd make

2004-08-04 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 02:52:19PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > > >Make tree which compiles on FreeBSD doesn't compile on > >debian... No I'm not insane, it compiled after I > >ported freebsd's make to debian. Would you like to > >have a look at the port ? Would it be of use ? How can > >I make

Re: bsd make

2004-08-04 Thread Joel Baker
gt;I make it usefull to others ? Its been "debianized". > > That might be useful, yes. I'm copying the debian-bsd list on this > too; more people there might be interested in what you have. There was > some discussion a while back about re-merging some of the different &g

re: bsd make

2004-08-04 Thread matthew green
the most "merged" BSD make i'm aware of is: http://www.crufty.net/help/sjg/bmake.html .mrg.

Re: bsd make

2004-08-04 Thread Steve McIntyre
list on this too; more people there might be interested in what you have. There was some discussion a while back about re-merging some of the different BSD make implementations, but I've heard nothing in a while. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED]