On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 08:58 +0100, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
Concerning povray, I had forgotten (or did not realize)
that it is non-free. I am aware that there are some
licensing issues with the beta version, but did not
imagine that the stable version was anything other than
open source...
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 03:13:53PM +0700, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 08:58 +0100, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
Concerning povray, I had forgotten (or did not realize)
that it is non-free. I am aware that there are some
licensing issues with the beta version, but did not
imagine that
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:25:46AM +0100, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
Some applications are simply missing and compile (and run)
seemingly without problems from Debian sources. One such
example that I have found is povray. Why is this so?
povray is in non-free; it is very much possible that there
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 10:25 +0100, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
Being optimistic and naively believing that kfreebsd is near to being
released for mainstream Debian, I installed kfreebsd-i386 on an older
machine that was in need of a complete re-install from scratch.
My conclusions for the moment is
Paul Wise wrote:
[Please CC me in reply, not subscribed to either list]
With the upcoming Debian squeeze release, the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port
will be available in release form. As such, the installation of it on
specific machines will be a candidate for documentation in the
Hi all,
[Please CC me in reply, not subscribed to either list]
With the upcoming Debian squeeze release, the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD port
will be available in release form. As such, the installation of it on
specific machines will be a candidate for documentation in the
InstallingDebianOn section of
6 matches
Mail list logo
