On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 18:55, Mats Erik Andersson
wrote:
> to plan some sort of work schedule. As was mentioned earlier the
> prospects of upstream FreeBSD accepting an entry in linprocfs
> are bright.
That would be the best option for me, since any linux-centric utility
would then work out of t
Dear all!
tisdag den 29 mars 2011 klockan 20:50 skrev Timo Juhani Lindfors detta:
> Mats Erik Andersson writes:
> > Has someone looked into this matter before yesterday?
>
> I've just ran iostat from FreeBSD chroot :-)
What is our present status on 'iostat', or a linprocps interface
to establis
Mats Erik Andersson writes:
> Has someone looked into this matter before yesterday?
I've just ran iostat from FreeBSD chroot :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.d
Wiadomość napisana przez Mats Erik Andersson w dniu 2011-03-29, o godz. 18:29:
> måndag den 28 mars 2011 klockan 16:50 skrev Steve Schnepp detta:
>> Package: sysstat
>> Version: 9.0.6.1-2
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> On the kfreebsd-* architecture, iostat doesn't output any disk-related stats.
>
> T
måndag den 28 mars 2011 klockan 16:50 skrev Steve Schnepp detta:
> Package: sysstat
> Version: 9.0.6.1-2
> Severity: normal
>
> On the kfreebsd-* architecture, iostat doesn't output any disk-related stats.
The problem here is that GNU/kFreeBSD has no compatibility layer present
in "/proc/diskstat
Package: sysstat
Version: 9.0.6.1-2
Severity: normal
On the kfreebsd-* architecture, iostat doesn't output any disk-related stats.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.1
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.1-1-amd64
Lo
6 matches
Mail list logo
