sysvinit: FTBFS on kfreebsd due to missing sys/signalfd.h

2012-01-27 Thread Roger Leigh
Package: sysvinit Version: 2.88dsf-19 Severity: normal cc -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Wformat-security -Werror=format-security -W -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -DACCTON_OFF -c -o last.o last.c cc -Wl,-z,relro last.o oldutmp.h -o last cc -g -O2 -fstack-protector --para

Re: sysvinit: FTBFS on kfreebsd due to missing sys/signalfd.h

2012-01-27 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 21:42:17 +, Roger Leigh wrote: > Package: sysvinit > Version: 2.88dsf-19 > Severity: normal > > cc -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat > -Wformat-security -Werror=format-security -W -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE > -DACCTON_OFF -c -o last.o last.c >

Re: sysvinit: FTBFS on kfreebsd due to missing sys/signalfd.h

2012-01-27 Thread Roger Leigh
severity 657676 serious thanks On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:50:15PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 21:42:17 +, Roger Leigh wrote: > > startpar.c:45:26: fatal error: sys/signalfd.h: No such file or directory > > This needs a kfreebsd workaround (also fails on kfreebsd-i386).

Re: sysvinit: FTBFS on kfreebsd due to missing sys/signalfd.h

2012-01-27 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 27/01/12 23:10, Roger Leigh wrote: > Looking at the source, I see no evidence of actual signalfd usage, > so just not including the header may fix this universally. Certainly > removing it on Linux does not break compilation. Hi, Seems you're right, I just tried building on kfreebsd-i386 and

Re: sysvinit: FTBFS on kfreebsd due to missing sys/signalfd.h

2012-01-27 Thread Roger Leigh
tags 657676 + pending thanks On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:50:15PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 21:42:17 +, Roger Leigh wrote: > > Package: sysvinit > > Version: 2.88dsf-19 > > Severity: normal > > > > This needs a kfreebsd workaround (also fails on kfreebsd-i386)