Re: Kernel capabilities in buildd machines

2011-03-18 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
måndag den 14 mars 2011 klockan 20:06 skrev Petr Salinger detta: Why is this capability needed in running kernel on buildd ? No, the headers come from kfreebsd-kernel-headers package, the 0.54 will be based on 8.2. My question is why is this capability needed in running kernel. It clearly

Re: Kernel capabilities in buildd machines

2011-03-15 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Mats Erik Andersson a écrit : Dear all, granted that we are striving to get support for Quota and IPsec into kernel release 8.2, to what extent are the installed kernel images on the buildd machines Fasch and Finzi keeping up with this? In what time span will they be reacting correctly to

Kernel capabilities in buildd machines

2011-03-14 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Dear all, granted that we are striving to get support for Quota and IPsec into kernel release 8.2, to what extent are the installed kernel images on the buildd machines Fasch and Finzi keeping up with this? In what time span will they be reacting correctly to packages requiring the above

Re: Kernel capabilities in buildd machines

2011-03-14 Thread Petr Salinger
granted that we are striving to get support for Quota and IPsec into kernel release 8.2, to what extent are the installed kernel images on the buildd machines Fasch and Finzi keeping up with this? In what time span will they be reacting correctly to packages requiring the above capacities? Why

Re: Kernel capabilities in buildd machines

2011-03-14 Thread Petr Salinger
Why is this capability needed in running kernel on buildd ? Well, the build log for ipsec-tools at Fasch , points out that NATT support has been desired at configuration time, yet it can not locate NAT-T in the kernel headers available, thus the build fails. On my own machine I have activated