Bug#1024135: marked as done (rust-sysinfo: please upgrade to 0.24)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2022 07:51:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024135: fixed in rust-sysinfo 0.26.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1024135, regarding rust-sysinfo: please upgrade to 0.24 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#985701: marked as done (python-mako-doc: broken symlinks: /usr/share/doc/python-mako/rst -> ../python-mako-doc/rst -> html/_sources)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2022 07:15:52 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#985701: python-mako-doc: broken symlinks: /usr/share/doc/python-mako/rst -> ../python-mako-doc/rst -> html/_sources has caused the Debian Bug report #985701, regarding python-mako-doc: broken symlinks:

Bug#1023234: marked as done (gnuradio FTCBFS: unsatisfiable sphinx dependency)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2022 02:35:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1023234: fixed in gnuradio 3.10.4.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1023234, regarding gnuradio FTCBFS: unsatisfiable sphinx dependency to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#960278: marked as done (python-debian: Don't loose whitespace information when editing Copyright.files)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2022 01:06:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#960278: fixed in python-debian 0.1.49 has caused the Debian Bug report #960278, regarding python-debian: Don't loose whitespace information when editing Copyright.files to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1011937: marked as done (Make python-debian (more) portable)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2022 01:06:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011937: fixed in python-debian 0.1.49 has caused the Debian Bug report #1011937, regarding Make python-debian (more) portable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1018909: marked as done (libkf5wallet-bin: Cannot disable Freedesktop Secret Service)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2022 00:51:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1018909: fixed in kwallet-kf5 5.100.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1018909, regarding libkf5wallet-bin: Cannot disable Freedesktop Secret Service to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1024313: marked as done (amgcl: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2022 00:19:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024313: fixed in amgcl 1.4.3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1024313, regarding amgcl: b-d on python3-all-dev, but not built for all supported Python3 versions to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1024265: marked as done (opengv: Build for all supported python3 versions or Build-Depend on python3-dev)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2022 00:06:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024265: fixed in opengv 1.0+1git91f4b1-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1024265, regarding opengv: Build for all supported python3 versions or Build-Depend on python3-dev to be marked as done. This means

Bug#328498: marked as done (switch to cdebconf as default)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2022 00:04:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#328498: fixed in cdebconf 0.265 has caused the Debian Bug report #328498, regarding switch to cdebconf as default to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#1022124: marked as done (libdbd-oracle-perl needs binaries uploaded for the perl 5.36 transitions)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2022 00:05:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1022124: fixed in libdbd-oracle-perl 1.80-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1022124, regarding libdbd-oracle-perl needs binaries uploaded for the perl 5.36 transitions to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1006492: marked as done (cdebconf should not depend on debconf)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2022 00:04:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1006492: fixed in cdebconf 0.265 has caused the Debian Bug report #1006492, regarding cdebconf should not depend on debconf to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: RFS: fuzzel/1.8.2-1 [ITP] -- Application launcher for wlroots based Wayland compositors

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 982145 Bug #982145 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: fuzzel/1.8.2-1 [ITP] -- Application launcher for wlroots based Wayland compositors Marked Bug as done > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 982145:

Bug#1023101: marked as done (llvm-15 ftbfs on mips64el)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 23:39:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1023101: fixed in llvm-toolchain-15 1:15.0.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1023101, regarding llvm-15 ftbfs on mips64el to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1022577: marked as done (llvm-toolchain-15: Mesa on armel,armhf fails with LLVM ERROR: Cannot select)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 23:39:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1022577: fixed in llvm-toolchain-15 1:15.0.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1022577, regarding llvm-toolchain-15: Mesa on armel,armhf fails with LLVM ERROR: Cannot select to be marked as done. This

Processed: closing 1022523

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1022523 Bug #1022523 [src:lttnganalyses] lttnganalyses: FTBFS: AssertionError: "Error: Cannot open trace: 'utf-8' codec [53 chars]byte" != 'Timerange: [1970-01-01 00:00:01.[1221 chars]3%\n' Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping

Bug#999863: marked as done (gnome-subtitles: new upstream release 1.7.2)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2022 01:17:23 +0200 with message-id and subject line 1.8 is now in unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #999863, regarding gnome-subtitles: new upstream release 1.7.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#1023420: marked as done (libvirt FTBFS: missing Build-Depends: mount)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 23:06:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1023420: fixed in libvirt 8.9.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1023420, regarding libvirt FTBFS: missing Build-Depends: mount to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: Merge duplicates

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1022375 llvm-14-dev Bug #1022375 [src:halide] halide: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [debian/rules:97: perform_stage_build] Error 2 Bug reassigned from package 'src:halide' to 'llvm-14-dev'. No longer marked as found in versions halide/14.0.0-2.

Processed: Re: llvm-15's cmake now requires clang-tools-15, clang-tidy-15, clangd-15, even if unused

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > fixed -1 1:15.0.5-1 Bug #1022551 [llvm-15-dev] llvm-15's cmake now requires clang-tools-15, clang-tidy-15, clangd-15, even if unused Marked as fixed in versions llvm-toolchain-15/1:15.0.5-1. > close -1 Bug #1022551 [llvm-15-dev] llvm-15's cmake now requires

Bug#1020064: marked as done (tcsh: FTBFS: | ./conftest.c:20: undefined reference to `crypt')

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 22:10:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1020064: fixed in tcsh 6.21.00-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1020064, regarding tcsh: FTBFS: | ./conftest.c:20: undefined reference to `crypt' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#999754: marked as done (tcsh: character class expansion is badly broken)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 22:10:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#999754: fixed in tcsh 6.21.00-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #999754, regarding tcsh: character class expansion is badly broken to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1022283: marked as done (python-wikkid: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'breezy.merge3')

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 21:22:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1022283: fixed in python-wikkid 0.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1022283, regarding python-wikkid: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'breezy.merge3' to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1023227: marked as done (breezy: autopkgtest regression: Non-UTF-8 code starting with '\xf2' in file /usr/bin/brz)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 20:37:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1023227: fixed in breezy 3.3.0+bzr7661-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1023227, regarding breezy: autopkgtest regression: Non-UTF-8 code starting with '\xf2' in file /usr/bin/brz to be marked as done.

Bug#973922: marked as done (New upstream (2.19))

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 19:53:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#973922: fixed in radvd 1:2.19-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #973922, regarding New upstream (2.19) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: RFS: cbonsai/1.3.1-1 -- terminal-based bonsai tree generator

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1024452 Bug #1024452 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: cbonsai/1.3.1-1 -- terminal-based bonsai tree generator Marked Bug as done > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1024452:

Bug#1024267: marked as done (krb5: CVE-2022-42898: integer overflows in PAC parsing)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 19:47:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024267: fixed in krb5 1.18.3-6+deb11u3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1024267, regarding krb5: CVE-2022-42898: integer overflows in PAC parsing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1024249: marked as done (wordpress: update to 5.7.8+dfsg1-0+deb11u1 have missing dependencies in bullseye-security)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 19:49:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024249: fixed in wordpress 5.7.8+dfsg1-0+deb11u2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1024249, regarding wordpress: update to 5.7.8+dfsg1-0+deb11u1 have missing dependencies in bullseye-security to be marked as

Bug#1022575: marked as done (wordpress: Wordpress 6.0.3 security release 16 issues)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 19:49:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1022575: fixed in wordpress 5.7.8+dfsg1-0+deb11u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1022575, regarding wordpress: Wordpress 6.0.3 security release 16 issues to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1024227: marked as done (gpodder: please change suggests from youtube-dl to yt-dlp)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 19:35:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024227: fixed in gpodder 3.11.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1024227, regarding gpodder: please change suggests from youtube-dl to yt-dlp to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1020799: marked as done (transition: pkg-config)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 19:41:36 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1020799: Transition: pkg-config to pkgconf: 2022-11-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #1020799, regarding transition: pkg-config to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1021668: marked as done (xen: CVE-2022-33749 CVE-2022-33748 CVE-2022-33747 CVE-2022-33746)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 18:17:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1021668: fixed in xen 4.14.5+86-g1c354767d5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1021668, regarding xen: CVE-2022-33749 CVE-2022-33748 CVE-2022-33747 CVE-2022-33746 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1023427: marked as done (pixman: CVE-2022-44638)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 18:17:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1023427: fixed in pixman 0.40.0-1.1~deb11u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1023427, regarding pixman: CVE-2022-44638 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#961365: marked as done (ITP: jacksum -- Computes checksums, CRCs and message digests)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 17:56:37 +0100 with message-id <5d8ca557-c50f-8214-f63c-5ad41f792...@debian.org> and subject line Close Bug #961365 has caused the Debian Bug report #961365, regarding ITP: jacksum -- Computes checksums, CRCs and message digests to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1024243: marked as done (python3-dbus-fast: significant increase in installation size due to new dependencies)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 17:49:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024243: fixed in dbus-fast 1.75.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1024243, regarding python3-dbus-fast: significant increase in installation size due to new dependencies to be marked as done. This means

Bug#950284: marked as done (Remove me from Uploaders)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 17:05:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#950284: fixed in libclass-dbi-plugin-abstractcount-perl 0.08-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #950284, regarding Remove me from Uploaders to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1024272: marked as done (jhead: CVE-2021-34055: heap-buffer-overflow of exif.c in function Put16u)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 16:35:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024272: fixed in jhead 1:3.06.0.1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #1024272, regarding jhead: CVE-2021-34055: heap-buffer-overflow of exif.c in function Put16u to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1019007: marked as done (rfkill(8): List options for supported device types)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 16:18:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1019007: fixed in util-linux 2.38.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1019007, regarding rfkill(8): List options for supported device types to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1003095: marked as done (/usr/bin/script: hangs when child doesn't read input fast enough)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 16:18:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1003095: fixed in util-linux 2.38.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1003095, regarding /usr/bin/script: hangs when child doesn't read input fast enough to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1021971: marked as done (python3-pychopper: New upstream release available, but routine-update fails.)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 16:14:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1021971: fixed in pychopper 2.7.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1021971, regarding python3-pychopper: New upstream release available, but routine-update fails. to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#437035: marked as done (gkrellm-x86info: not handling nostrip build option (policy 10.1))

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:44:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024411: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #437035, regarding gkrellm-x86info: not handling nostrip build option (policy 10.1) to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#998977: marked as done (gkrellm-x86info: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:44:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024411: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #998977, regarding gkrellm-x86info: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This

Bug#669731: marked as done ([PATCH] gkrellm-x86info: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:44:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024411: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #669731, regarding [PATCH] gkrellm-x86info: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#967415: marked as done (gkrellm-x86info: depends on deprecated GTK 2)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:44:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024411: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #967415, regarding gkrellm-x86info: depends on deprecated GTK 2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#501280: marked as done (gkrellm-x86info shows garbage frequency)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:44:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024411: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #501280, regarding gkrellm-x86info shows garbage frequency to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#253524: marked as done (gkrellm-x86info ignores Pentium 4 modulation)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:44:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024411: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #253524, regarding gkrellm-x86info ignores Pentium 4 modulation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1002714: marked as done (gkrellm-x86info: Obsoleted by gkrellm-cpufreq?)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:44:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024411: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1002714, regarding gkrellm-x86info: Obsoleted by gkrellm-cpufreq? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1024411: marked as done (RM: gkrellm-x86info -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy, dead upstream, replacement exists)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:44:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024411: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1024411, regarding RM: gkrellm-x86info -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy, dead upstream, replacement exists to be marked as done.

Bug#999301: marked as done (vsdump: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024409: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #999301, regarding vsdump: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#999150: marked as done (cryptcat: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:41:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024406: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #999150, regarding cryptcat: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means

Bug#998948: marked as done (ibam: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #998948, regarding ibam: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#998928: marked as done (scim-canna: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:42:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024407: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #998928, regarding scim-canna: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means

Bug#994639: marked as done (O: dvbsnoop -- DVB / MPEG stream analyzer)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:44:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024410: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #994639, regarding O: dvbsnoop -- DVB / MPEG stream analyzer to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#967534: marked as done (ibam: depends on deprecated GTK 2)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #967534, regarding ibam: depends on deprecated GTK 2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#965868: marked as done (vsdump: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024409: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #965868, regarding vsdump: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#965497: marked as done (dvbsnoop: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:44:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024410: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #965497, regarding dvbsnoop: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#965470: marked as done (cryptcat: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:41:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024406: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #965470, regarding cryptcat: Removal of obsolete debhelper compat 5 and 6 in bookworm to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#948599: marked as done (cryptcat FTCBFS: builds for the build architecture)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:41:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024406: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #948599, regarding cryptcat FTCBFS: builds for the build architecture to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#928162: marked as done (ibam FTCBFS: uses the build architecture toolchain)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #928162, regarding ibam FTCBFS: uses the build architecture toolchain to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#780222: marked as done (dvbsnoop: out-of-bounds read)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:44:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024410: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #780222, regarding dvbsnoop: out-of-bounds read to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#670928: marked as done ([PATCH] cryptcat: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:41:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024406: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #670928, regarding [PATCH] cryptcat: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#829917: marked as done (vsdump: Uses deprecated gnome-common macros/variables)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024409: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #829917, regarding vsdump: Uses deprecated gnome-common macros/variables to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#790506: marked as done (Please support ARM64 (add arm64 to architecture line))

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #790506, regarding Please support ARM64 (add arm64 to architecture line) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#715415: marked as done (cryptcats "hashingfunction" is stupid)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:41:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024406: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #715415, regarding cryptcats "hashingfunction" is stupid to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#670977: marked as done (cryptcat: Update 2003 version to 1.2 2005)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:41:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024406: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #670977, regarding cryptcat: Update 2003 version to 1.2 2005 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#700157: marked as done (ibam: doesn't work if battery isn't BAT0)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #700157, regarding ibam: doesn't work if battery isn't BAT0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#670935: marked as done ([PATCH] cryptcat: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:41:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024406: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #670928, regarding [PATCH] cryptcat: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#669862: marked as done ([PATCH] ibam: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #669862, regarding [PATCH] ibam: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#664396: marked as done ([PATCH] vsdump: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024409: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #664396, regarding [PATCH] vsdump: Helping to update to packaging format 3.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#656286: marked as done (ibam FTBFS on armhf, architecture list mismatch in debian/control)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #656286, regarding ibam FTBFS on armhf, architecture list mismatch in debian/control to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#650377: marked as done (ibam --plotdeviations causes a syntax error in gnuplot)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #650377, regarding ibam --plotdeviations causes a syntax error in gnuplot to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#558631: marked as done (Missing autoreconf to fix 554821 or similar bugs in the future)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:42:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024407: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #558631, regarding Missing autoreconf to fix 554821 or similar bugs in the future to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#644248: marked as done (dvbsnoop: continuity counter checking wrong in presence of adaptation field)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:44:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024410: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #644248, regarding dvbsnoop: continuity counter checking wrong in presence of adaptation field to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#498302: marked as done (gkrellm-ibam: Typo in german description)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #498302, regarding gkrellm-ibam: Typo in german description to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#414560: marked as done (ibam: Doesn't work with more than one battery)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #414560, regarding ibam: Doesn't work with more than one battery to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#407367: marked as done (scim-canna: incorrect source character encoding)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:42:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024407: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #407367, regarding scim-canna: incorrect source character encoding to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#243259: marked as done (ibam: Misbehaving)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #243259, regarding ibam: Misbehaving to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#260530: marked as done (The ibam package needs an init.d script + a mini daemon)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #260530, regarding The ibam package needs an init.d script + a mini daemon to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#171766: marked as done (wishlist: more explanation of output)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #171766, regarding wishlist: more explanation of output to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#243258: marked as done (ibam: Bad graph)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #160091, regarding ibam: Bad graph to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#160091: marked as done (ibam: Plot needs annotation!)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #160091, regarding ibam: Plot needs annotation! to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#153713: marked as done (gkrellm-ibam: Default text is too wide)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #153713, regarding gkrellm-ibam: Default text is too wide to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#153421: marked as done (ibam doesn't seem to know about suspend/standby)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #153421, regarding ibam doesn't seem to know about suspend/standby to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1024410: marked as done (RM: dvbsnoop -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy, dead upstream)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024410: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1024410, regarding RM: dvbsnoop -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy, dead upstream to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1024409: marked as done (RM: vsdump -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy, dead upstream)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:43:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024409: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1024409, regarding RM: vsdump -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy, dead upstream to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1024408: marked as done (RM: ibam -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy, dead upstream)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:42:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024408: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1024408, regarding RM: ibam -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy, dead upstream to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1024407: marked as done (RM: scim-canna -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy, dead upstream)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:42:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024407: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1024407, regarding RM: scim-canna -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy, dead upstream to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1024406: marked as done (RM: cryptcat -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy, dead upstream)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:41:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024406: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1024406, regarding RM: cryptcat -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy, dead upstream to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#1024393: marked as done (RM: pyparsing2 -- ROM (team); no rdeps; newer version in Debian)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:41:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024393: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1024393, regarding RM: pyparsing2 -- ROM (team); no rdeps; newer version in Debian to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1005986: marked as done (Please migrate away from dpatch)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:44:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024410: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1005986, regarding Please migrate away from dpatch to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1005984: marked as done (Please migrate away from dpatch)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:42:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024407: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1005984, regarding Please migrate away from dpatch to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#996331: marked as done (llvm-toolchain-11: [mips64el] LLVM ERROR: 64-bit code requested on a subtarget that doesn't support it!)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:36:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000941: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #996331, regarding llvm-toolchain-11: [mips64el] LLVM ERROR: 64-bit code requested on a subtarget that doesn't support it! to be

Bug#995140: marked as done (llvm-11-runtime: replace "which" by "command -v" in postinst script)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:36:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000941: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #995140, regarding llvm-11-runtime: replace "which" by "command -v" in postinst script to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#992349: marked as done (libclang-common-11-dev: Cannot install amd64 and armhf together)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:36:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000941: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #992349, regarding libclang-common-11-dev: Cannot install amd64 and armhf together to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#990101: marked as done (clang-11: Problem building mixed C & C++ code with UBSan sanitizer)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:36:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000941: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #990101, regarding clang-11: Problem building mixed C & C++ code with UBSan sanitizer to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#987090: marked as done (O: ion -- NASA implementation of Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN))

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:37:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024339: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #987090, regarding O: ion -- NASA implementation of Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#986746: marked as done (systemd: Symbols are missing when building systemd by Clang)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:36:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000941: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #986746, regarding systemd: Symbols are missing when building systemd by Clang to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#979495: marked as done (clang_delta (creduce, cvise) segfaults when built with LLVM 11)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:36:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000941: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #979495, regarding clang_delta (creduce, cvise) segfaults when built with LLVM 11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#984936: marked as done (O: setcolortemperature -- Set screen color temperature)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:37:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1024338: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #984936, regarding O: setcolortemperature -- Set screen color temperature to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#981610: marked as done (libllvm11: segfault in writeConstants () llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h:613 on i386)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:36:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000941: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #981610, regarding libllvm11: segfault in writeConstants () llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h:613 on i386 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#978943: marked as done (clang-check dumps stack trace with no CLI args)

2022-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:36:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1000941: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #978943, regarding clang-check dumps stack trace with no CLI args to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

  1   2   >