tags 338174 - upstream
thanks
Hello Frank,
Thanks for good news. It will be possible to get systemtap into Debian
than.
13 квітня 2006 о 16:35 -0400 Frank Ch. Eigler написав(-ла):
Please be aware that, at long last, elfutils has been relicensed under
the GPL plus an exception. Please see
Package: totem-xine
Version: 1.2.1-3
Severity: normal
Totem does not redraw window border areas not occupied by video to
black. There is fixed bug #242150 which apparantly dealt with that
problem on initialization, which does indeed seem to be fixed.
Borders are always initialized to black, but
I'm having a related problem.
The fragment of code listed by Peter De Wachter in the initial report
does not break pygame for me, but using serif instead does.
I traced the problem down to incorrect parsing of a fonts.dir file (as
opposed to a fonts.cache-1 file, as in the earlier case).
My
Package: xserver-xorg-input-mouse
Version: 1:1.0.4-2
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I miss the manpage for the mouse driver in this package. Could this
manpage please be added? But be aware, that the manpage package already
installs a mouse(4) manpage (Linux
Package: x11-common
Version: 7.0.11
Severity: important
I had also upgraded yesterday, and today get this.
Setting up x11-common (7.0.11) ...
rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty
x11-common postinst error: Could not remove /usr/X11R6/bin. Is not yet empty
$ find /usr/X11R6/bin
Just glorious Cutie
sucking Dicck!
http://markjule.info/ftcumsfuns.htm?GGBHDD.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd
U-N-$-U-B-$-C-R-I-B-E
http://markjule.info
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gaim-otr
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: important
Hi,
gaim-otr is not compatible to gaim 2.0 - please either update the
package for the new gaim version or at least add
gaim ( 1:2.0)
as dependency.
thanks,
Bernd
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers
Teemu Ikonen wrote:
(...)
Hi Teemu,
The baz-import plugin does not work due to pybaz not being in the depencies:
$ bzr baz-import
This command is disabled. Please install PyBaz.
Right, it was already reported in #346332. Since this bug doesn't break
all bzrtools plugins, it isn't
Package: gaim-encryption
Version: 2.38-1
Severity: important
Hi,
gaim-encryption is not compatible to gaim 2.0 - please either update the
package for the new gaim version or at least add
gaim ( 1:2.0)
as dependency.
thanks,
Bernd
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT
Package: gtetrinet
Version: 0.7.9-1
gtetrinet crashes the first time it is launched.
Subsequent starts are successful.
I've seen this on 4 systems so I'm sure this bug does exist. But I
haven't been able to reproduce it, after it has happened once, because
I'm not sure what change is being made
severity 362684 normal
tags 362684 experimental
thanks
On 4/15/06, Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: gaim-otr
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: important
Hi,
gaim-otr is not compatible to gaim 2.0 - please either update the
package for the new gaim version or at least add
gaim (
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 1:7.0.0-2
Severity: important
After upgrading to modular X, startx and the rest of the X initialization
process stopped honoring .xsession and .Xresources. I had to rename
.xsession to .xinitrc and add an explicit xrdb -load .Xresources to it to
restore the
Package: xresprobe
Version: 0.4.18-1
Severity: normal
Hi!
I just needed to configure an unknown monitor and tried to use your tool
xresprobe. Since it missed any manpage or any other documentation, I
just called it and got asked to specify a driver. Didn't knowing how to
do this, I called it
This bug can be easily fix, a dllmap is missing.
The evolution-sharp.dll library P/Invokes the glibsharpglue
(libglibsharpglue.so) directly which is not in /usr/lib anymore (the CLI
Policy requires this). Means evolution-sharp.dll needs a dllmap
(evolution-sharp.dll.config) that tells where the
Hi David,
Thank you for the bug report. Could you give me an example that
illustrates what you observe.
Thanks,
Graham
Received Sat 15 Apr 2006 3:38am +1000 from David Liontooth:
Package: wajig
Version: 2.0.31
Severity: minor
wajig purge package no longer changes the status of that
I think this can all be put down to ongoing problems with Xorg and the various
x11 libs. I have upgraded to etch and therefore Xorg-6.9.0.dfsg.1-6. We´ll
have to see if that improves matters any.
--
cheers,
tim hall
http://glastonburymusic.org.uk/tim
Package: xfce4-session
Version: 4.2.3-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
In my xsession-errors file I have this:
sh: /usr/X11R6/bin/iceauth: No such file or directory
A little detective work shows that it is xfce4-session trying to execute
it, but the path is hardcoded as that and obsolete as of Xorg 7 in
Pierre M [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Outside of Debian, you see this :
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=debian
(may be not up to date, may be same problems as dehs, but interesting)
Looking at this briefly, it appears to be mostly nonsense. The accuracy
rate of statements on it
Package: phpmyadmin
Severity: minor
Depends in debian/control specifies a non-existant package --
php5-mysqli.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel:
reassign 362594 gtk+2.0
severity 362594 serious
merge 362594 362451
thanks
If the packages xlibs-pic and xlibs-static-pic are now removed with xorg
7.0 feel free to reassign the bug to libgtk2.0-0 and remove the
xlibs-pic and xlibs-static-pic packages from unstable.
Yep, this is bug #362451,
Package: octave2.1
Version: 1:2.1.73-6
Severity: serious
Hello,
Octave fails to run,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
octave2.1: error while loading shared libraries: liblapack.so.3: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
despite having all dependencies satisfied. The problem looks
If 3.1.2-1 cannot be built from source on the amd64 architecture, is it possible to put the 3.1.1-8 arch:any binary packages back in the amd64 repository? If 3.1.1-8 is kosher for amd64 but 3.1.2-1 isn't, why would eclipse be left in a mixed state in the repository on
amd64.debian.net?This seems
Package: gnuplot
Version: 4.0.0-2
Severity: normal
...and I tracked it down to two statements being in the wrong order.
I suggest this patch (which I have already submitted to the upstream
development sources).
- Jim Van Zandt
--- term/cgm.trm2004-04-13 13:24:16.0
OK, this is apparently an ipw2200 problem, not a NetworkManager problem.
I installed NM on my other laptop, which has ndiswrapper set up for that
prism54 card I mentioned, and it worked perfectly. On the WPA network,
it prompted for a password and WPA was the *only* option in the security
Subject: xlockmore: uninstallable
Package: xlockmore
Version: 1:5.21-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
After a recent dist-upgrade, which included an upgrade of Xorg, xlockmore
is uninstallable. It was removed in the
Graham Williams wrote:
Hi David,
Thank you for the bug report. Could you give me an example that
illustrates what you observe.
# just list linux-image-2.6.16-alsa-agp
rc linux-image-2.6.16-alsa-agp
6 Linux kernel binary image for
After upgrading to
ii xserver-xorg 7.0.11 the X.Org X server
(and related packages), the problem does not occur any longer. (Things
aren't perfect, but this particular bug is no longer present.)
--
Greg Wooledge | Truth belongs to everybody.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.9.16
Followup-For: Bug #356959
tags 356959 +patch
thanks
This warnings problem, appeared when using regexes in the uri, and no
action nor lastversion specified.
Here I include a patch that fixes this problem, and cleans up the
handling of this special
An updated ipw2200-source would definitely be useful -- the version
included in the kernel (even in 2.6.16) is 1.0.8, which doesn't support
connecting to WPA networks with network-manager. (Even though WPA works
when using wpasupplicant directly, network-manager has problems that [1]
says are
Package: xserver-xorg-video-all
Version: 1:7.0.11
Severity: important
Just noticed that aptitude wanted to remove the s3 xorg driver, looking
closer, it seems that xserver-xorg-video-all no longer depends on any of
the xserver-xorg-video-* packages. A rebuild did not fix this. Looking
at the
Package: openafs-client
Version: 1.4.1-1
Severity: important
If the module has not been installed, this package will not install
either. The postinst script runs the initscript to start afsd, but if
there is no module, the initscript returns 1, causing dpkg to fail the
installation.
I don't
Hello,
I have recei ved your form applied.
http://www.geocities.com/LeliaBowen8340
Please visit the site above, Our office shall then re-confirm your data.
With Ref to: paul favors
and your past track record is not an issue.
All cash out types have been Ap prove d for you paul
Hi,
My colleague has recei ved your form applied.
http://www.geocities.com/EllenBowman4646
Please hit the site above, Our office shall then re-confirm your info.
With Ref to: pat hysler
and your past track record is not an issue.
All debt consol types have been Ap prove d for you
Ruussian splendiferous Girls here doing delicious blowjoob.
http://redjule.info/ftcoolass.htm?GFJACE.iPdR,gfibjW,VSd
UN$$UB$CRlBE
http://redjule.info
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the target machine is configured with two identical 3C905B
boards:
eth0 gets assigned to IRQ 11 and shared with uhci_hcd:usb1.
eth1 gets assigned to IRQ 10 and shared with cs46xx.
With two 3C509B boards installed and configured, the kernel can also
assign an IRQ to one ISA-PNP
Package: coreutils
Version: 5.94-1
Severity: important
File: /usr/bin/install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A few days ago I upgraded to this version of coreutils, after it moved into
testing, which was a big jump, skipping these versions:
5.2.1-3
5.93-1
5.93-2
5.93-3
5.93-4
merge 157305 352554
thanks
I guess this is the same bug. It seems really hard to believe that
this race happens as often as I've seen it:
1 if (!found)
2 return;
3 clear(killed);
4 for (p = found; p; p =
Hey,
My colleague has received your form applied.
http://www.geocities.com/JulietteYeager8688
Please visit the site above, Our office shall then re-confirm your
infomation.
With Ref to: paul gordon
and your past track record is not an issue.
All fin ance types have been Ap prove d
Package: rzip
Version: 2.1-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Found a few typos in '/usr/share/man/man1/rzip.1.gz', see attached '.diff'.
(Really a new bug, since the patch is different, but the same typo.)
Hope this helps...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers
On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 13:26 +0200, Jörg Sommer wrote:
* Package name: xindy
Thanks for packaging this, it looks really interesting.
* Debian package : http://www.minet.uni-jena.de/~joergs/debian/
Some comments:
* debian/control: misses a Homepage, see the devref 6.2.4
*
Well, it took longer, but I got the same crash I got with 3.5.1. Oh well.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This problem seems to have gone away in the last couple of days (I am not sure
what software update did the trick) so this bug report could be closed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.20
Severity: normal
The following version error seems mistaken:
% reportbug -b freeguide
stuff deleted
Getting status for freeguide...
Verifying package integrity...
Checking for newer versions at packages.debian.org...
Your version of
Package: freeguide
Version: 0.10.3-1
Severity: minor
The dates of the files in '/usr/share/doc' help readers
find what's new and different. But:
# how many files in '/usr/share/doc/freeguide'?
% ls /usr/share/doc/freeguide | wc -l
16
# count repeats of the 16 file dates in
* Martin Guy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 4/7/06, Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this problem exist with recent firefox packages? Paul Brook on
#debian-arm said that this fixed itself some time ago.
If so, could you try to give details about the specific illegal
reassign 362696 checkinstall
thanks
I should have done this sooner, but...I ran plain sudo make install instead
of sudo checkinstall and it worked. I've never had a problem with
checkinstall before. Anyway, I'm reassigning this to checkinstall.
(By the way, I don't know why the signature on
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 1:7.0.0-3
Followup-For: Bug #345446
This bug has reappeared in 7.0.0-3.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux
Package: xfe
Version: 0.84-4
Severity: important
I have noted that this bug has been submitted before, for an AMD 64bit
version of Debian. So far as I can tell, it appears to exist within the
32bit Debian Etch environment as well.
Debian Testing (Etch), kernel 2.6.12-1-686-smp, xfe
Received Sat 15 Apr 2006 12:52pm +1000 from David Liontooth:
Graham Williams wrote:
Hi David,
Thank you for the bug report. Could you give me an example that
illustrates what you observe.
# just list linux-image-2.6.16-alsa-agp
rc linux-image-2.6.16-alsa-agp
I've just uploaded a fresh build of gcpegg. I incorporated the change to
testing for the daemon being executable, but the few quick things I tried
failed to yield a working configuration without openvt and/or eggsh having
root privs. If you get motivated to work on this before I do, a patch to
Package: kmail
Version: 4:3.5.2-1
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There are some serious IMAP bugs in KMail as of now and several previous
versions, like:
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106030
However, at
301 - 351 of 351 matches
Mail list logo
