On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 07:26:12PM +0200, Jérôme Bouat wrote:
I first filed a bug into rsyslog package and someone advised me to report
this question to the Debian policy team : that is the reason of this current
bug report. I don't want to enforce a point of view but just trigger a
This can be a good starting point:
https://bitbucket.org/andrewgodwin/pypy-debian/src
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Il 26/09/2011 19:06, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann ha scritto:
If you can reproduce your problem without wpasupplicant interacting, it
is likely an issue with the rtl8187.ko kernel module - reassigning
accordingly.
You are right, it wasn't a problem with wpassuplicant. Anyway the
problem wasn't
Package: pyrit
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
While reading pyrit's README I saw Pyrit comes with a set of test-files (…)
but they aren't installed.
Can't they also be distributed as examples in pyrit package, please?
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
-- System Information:
Debian
Luca Capello l...@pca.it writes:
Please note that I have never used any of the tools below, I am simply
moving a lenny machine with manually-installed BLAST+ to squeeze with
the Debian package ;-)
Nevertheless, I appreciate your suggestions.
Some BLAST+ upstream tools are missing in the
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:52:58 +0200
John Hughes j...@calva.com wrote:
On 23/09/11 17:09, Jeff Layton wrote:
I went ahead and attached the latest one to the RHBZ above. If you can
grab it from there and test it, that would be great.
Ok, I'm now testing the current patch on my Dell
Package: libxslt
Version: 1.1.26-8
Severity: normal
User: debian-d...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: multiarch
Tags: patch
Hi,
The following patch converts libxslt to multiarch directories (by modifyin
rules)
and adds needed Multi-Arch: stanzas to control file.
Multi-Arch: same packages must
Package: libgtk2.0-0
Version: 2.24.6-1
Severity: normal
File: libgtk2
Dear Maintainer,
libgtk2.0-0 update from Unstable messes the file type filter combo box
in Gimp, Inkscape, LibreOffice, Iceweasel (most probably many others)
file picker dialog. The file type filter box is way too small,
Hi,
It looks like this time the build got past the build failure as
described in bug #634405.
At the moment I have got no plausible explanation about the Text file
busy errors. Do these errors happen reproducible?
Best regards,
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 07:50:17PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Have you restarted nm-applet/your desktop session/your system after the
upgrade?
Yes/yes (also the network-manager service)/yes.
Could you send me a complete debug log of NetworkManager following the
instructins at [1].
tag 639880 + pending
thanks
Some bugs in the libsvn-hooks-perl package are closed in revision
3ceb222051277e53470e75f70075ce6642cd5326 in branch 'master' by
Salvatore Bonaccorso
The full diff can be seen at
I tried the same on my PC,
testsuite of all available (stable, sid, experimental) libffi passes.
On asdfasdf.d.n they fails.
Could be this related to CPU ?
My is Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750
asdfasdf's AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3000+
Petr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: xul-ext-firetray
Version: 0.3.1-1
Severity: grave
I create a topic branch and rebuild a firetray 0.3.1-2 for unstable[2].
It's build against xulrunner-dev 6.*.
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/firetray
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.16.1
$ apt-get source -qq python-pipeline
[snip]
$ cd python-pipeline-0.1.3/
$ echo '# hack, hack' setup.py
$ dpkg-buildpackage -S
[snip]
dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are:
python-pipeline-0.1.3/setup.py
dpkg-source: info: you can
Source: libdbd-firebird-perl
Version: 0.60-2
Severity: important
User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: perl-5.14-transition
As discussed on Debian bug #628522, this package fails to build with
perl 5.14.1 (in experimental) on i386 because $Config{ccflags} is being
overridden by local
How do you add a name? Typically by clicking on the + sign in the define
names dialog accessible via Edit-Modify-Names.
How do you delete a name? By clicking on the - sign in front of the name
to delete in the same dialog.
Note: the + and - signs may look differently for you (ie. possibly not
Hi,
On Montag, 26. September 2011, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
The bug was fixed by reading the manual of sudo. Sorry for any hassle.
no problem and little hassle as you closed the bug yourself, thanks!
cheers,
Holger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Source: 3depict
Version: 0.0.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: warning: file
Source: abcm2ps
Version: 5.9.22-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 12:16 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Of course the strange bit is that it says it has 36bit physical
address with 32bit virtual address, which would require a PAE capable
CPU.
36bit physical addressing here probably refers to PSE36[0], which was a
different, pre-PAE,
Source: acgvision-agent
Version: 5.1.4-6
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110823 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source -b
tags 640648 + pending
thanks
Hi Scott,
On Dienstag, 6. September 2011, Scott Schaefer wrote:
Attached patch addresses TODO item in sbuject.
applied to feature/640648 branch, will merge into develop once I find time to
test it. Please review the debian/changelog entry I wrote - also it would
Package: opendnssec-signer
Version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
In the last upgrade to 1.3.2 the signer doesn't really work with the ods-signer
command line tool. I get this error message in the logs:
Sep 26 21:09:51 vic20 ods-signerd: ../../../signer/src/daemon/cmdhandler.c:322:
I see that 'tun0' interface is actually created (presumably by
openvpn). So the problem is something else than what the subject says.
Send us the relevant lines from syslog (that contain ovpn string)
while you try to connect.
Cheers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
thank you for your bug report! I am sorry for my late reply. May you
come up with some patch to fix the issue? Or something similar, maybe
more detailed instructions? Any example property file?
Thanks!
Torsten
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:20 AM, R B rjbbu...@gmail.com wrote:
Package:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.1
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
The following change:
* Changed dpkg-source --after-build to automatically unapply patches
that it
has applied during --before-build.
causes a problem where the clean rules of the upstream
Hi,
after the installation is completed, the installation syslog is moved to
/var/log/installer.
I believe the syslog you sent is from the running system, Can you check
/var/log/installer ?
Thanks in advance!
--
Melhores cumprimentos/Best Regards,
Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 08:12:23PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 12:16 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Of course the strange bit is that it says it has 36bit physical
address with 32bit virtual address, which would require a PAE capable
CPU.
36bit physical addressing
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:34:36PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Ehm, how can PSE introduced by the Pentium III be pre-PAE (which was
introduced by the Pentium Pro)?
PSE may be simpler but it's still newer than PAE.
Well actually PSE (support for larger than 4k pages) predates PAE, but
Package: a2ps
Version: 1:4.14-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1.6
Usertags: libreplanet
The license notice in afm/MustRead.html says the following:
This file and the 35 PostScript(R) AFM files it
accompanies may be used, copied, and distributed for any purpose and
Source: altree
Version: 1.0.1-4
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: info: local
Package: iceweasel
Version: 6.0.2-1
I run testing/wheezy and upgraded to iceweasel 6.0.2 this weekend,
closing my running copy of iceweasel first. When I tried to load it
again, it got as far as loading all the windows and showing all of the
tabs, but before the pages had finished loading it
Source: apertium
Version: 3.1.0-1.3
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: info:
Source: argtable2
Version: 12-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: info:
Source: asciijump
Version: 1.0.2~beta-4
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source: info:
Source: autodir
Version: 0.99.9-7
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source -b
Source: awesome
Version: 3.4.10-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source -b
Source: axiom
Version: 20110301a-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source -b
Source: bareftp
Version: 0.3.8-2
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source -b
Source: bibclean
Version: 2.11.4.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source -b
Package: sudo
Version: 1.8.2-1
Followup-For: Bug #519700
Hi,
on my server recent sudo changes produces following output in auth.log:
Sep 12 00:02:32 nostromo sudo: pam_ck_connector(sudo:session): cannot determine
display-device
Sep 12 00:02:41 nostromo sudo: pam_ck_connector(sudo:session):
Source: bsdgames
Version: 2.17-19
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
dpkg-source -b
Package: geeqie
Version: 1:1.0-9
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I updated my testing version of OS today and after this update geeqie
effectively stopped working. It is possible that this is really a bug
associated with an updated package not geeqie. All images I am trying to
view are
Hi Pavel,
I've just committed (upstream) the below patch.
I'll close this bug when nut-2.6.3 hist unstable.
thanks for your report,
Arnaud
--
Linux / Unix Expert RD - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer
1) fn-spacebar works, but NO notifications
Need in shengine.sh all string as 'S. H. Engine: Performance' insert in /
Example: 'S. H. Engine: Performance' 'S. H. Engine: Performance'
Then OSD work fine.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Petr Salinger wrote:
I tried the same on my PC,
testsuite of all available (stable, sid, experimental) libffi passes.
On asdfasdf.d.n they fails.
Could be this related to CPU ?
My is Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750
asdfasdf's AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3000+
I think so -- libffi's
verbose 5
2011/9/26 Teodor MICU mteo...@gmail.com
I see that 'tun0' interface is actually created (presumably by
openvpn). So the problem is something else than what the subject says.
Send us the relevant lines from syslog (that contain ovpn string)
while you try to connect.
Cheers
--
Hi again Pavel,
I forgot to attach another patch, that allows at least one of the
default v4 *or* v6 address to work.
could you please test it and report back?
cheers,
Arnaud
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Source: alexandria
Version: 0.6.6-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: bbdb
Version: 2.36-2
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules clean
Source: buildbot
Version: 0.8.3p1-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: burgerspace
Version: 1.9.0-3
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot
Source: bup
Version: 0.24b-1.1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory
Source: buthead
Version: 1.0-16
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: bzr-dbus
Version: 0.1~bzr51-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: bzr-explorer
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot
Source: bzr-gtk
Version: 0.100.0+bzr737-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot
Source: bzr-search
Version: 1.7.0~bzr86-4
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot
Source: bzr-svn
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
reopen 618026
thanks
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 19:57 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Your message dated Mon, 26 Sep 2011 19:55:21 +
with message-id e1r8hgr-0002zz...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#618026: fixed in ibid 0.1.0+dfsg-2+squeeze1
has caused the Debian Bug report
reassign 642730 src:ocaml-http
severity 642730 important
affects 642730 src:matita
retitle 642730 ocaml-http: should use dh-ocaml 0.9
thanks
Le 24/09/2011 21:32, Mònica Ramírez Arceda a écrit :
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
[...]
Error: Files
Source: cabextract
Version: 1.4-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Package: debhelper
Version: 8.9.7
Severity: wishlist
Having converted samba over to use of dh(1), I find the option handling for
dh_auto_* somewhat suboptimal. Because the upstream source being built is
contained in a 'source3' subdirectory of the package root, I now have a
debian/rules that
Source: camltemplate
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[4]: Entering
Source: canna-shion
Version: 0.0.20010204-10
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]:
Source: catdoc
Version: 0.94.2-2
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: cba
Version: 0.3.6-4
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules clean
Source: cbmc
Version: 4.0-3
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
Source: cdargs
Version: 1.35-7
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: cdcover
Version: 0.9.1-9
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: cenon.app
Version: 3.93-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: cfflib
Version: 2.0.5-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: cgoban
Version: 1.9.14-16
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: cl-launch
Version: 3.011-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: codeville
Version: 0.8.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: cronutils
Version: 1.1-3
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 15:38 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:34:36PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Ehm, how can PSE introduced by the Pentium III be pre-PAE (which was
introduced by the Pentium Pro)?
PSE may be simpler but it's still newer than PAE.
Well
Source: connectagram
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: cutter-testing-framework
Version: 1.1.7-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]:
Source: ddns3-client
Version: 1.8-9
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: dee
Version: 0.5.18-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules clean
Source: dhex
Version: 0.65-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: dia-newcanvas
Version: 0.6.10-5.3
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot
Source: diakonos
Version: 0.8.14-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: dict-gcide
Version: 0.48-8
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: dipy
Version: 0.5.0-3
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory
Source: django-filter
Version: 0.5.3-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot
Source: djview4
Version: 4.8-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: djvulibre
Version: 3.5.24-8
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: dlume
Version: 0.2.4-6
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: docvert
Version: 4.0-4
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: dopewars
Version: 1.5.12-12
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: dossizola
Version: 1.0-8.3
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: drush
Version: 4.5-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules clean
Package: fso-gsmd
Version: 0.5.0+git20110804-1
Severity: normal
Hi, please consider applying the attached patch, it allows showing timestamps
in SMS messages. It's already commited to
http://git.freesmartphone.org/?p=cornucopia.git.
Thanks!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
user debian-...@lists.debian.org
usertag 642928 + kfreebsd
usertag 642162 + kfreebsd
--
Could be this related to CPU ?
My is Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750
asdfasdf's AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3000+
After changing configure.ac and propagating it into
configure, the testsuite of
tags 643038 upstream fixed-upstream pending
thanks
-=| Dominic Hargreaves, 26.09.2011 19:51:44 +0100 |=-
Source: libdbd-firebird-perl
Version: 0.60-2
Severity: important
User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: perl-5.14-transition
As discussed on Debian bug #628522, this package
Source: dvbstream
Version: 0.6+cvs20090621-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]:
Source: dwarves-dfsg
Version: 1.9-1
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
fakeroot debian/rules
Source: dyndns
Version: 2010.0301+gitdd160bd-2
Severity: important
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]:
201 - 300 of 586 matches
Mail list logo