On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 15:02 -0500, Don Armstrong wrote:
> It certainly doesn't seem reasonable to expect the SRMs to review line
> by line, but maybe a summary of the changes would help them make a
> decision?
[...]
> SRMs: what would be the best way for Kurt to move forward? Would a list
> of the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: node-webpack-core
Version : 0.6.8
Upstream Author : Tobias Koppers @sokra
* URL : http://github.com/webpack/core
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Description : The core of webpack and enhance
On 11/24/2015 03:57 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> I changed this to print the following now, hopefully it addresses your
> concerns:
>
> ...
> 1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 196 not upgraded.
> Need to get 66.0 kB of archives. After unpacking 9,216 B will b
Source: u-boot
Version: 2015.10+dfsg1-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
please enable the A10s-OLinuXino-M target. Applying the following patch
creates a working u-boot which allows to start the Debian installer via
TFTP.
Kind regards,
Benedikt Wildenhain
--
Benedikt Wildenhain, M.Sc., Wiss
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: node-watchpack
Version : 0.2.9
Upstream Author : Tobias Koppers @sokra
* URL : https://github.com/webpack/watchpack
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Description : Wrapper library for director
Hi Tobi,
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 13:35, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Followup-For: Bug #805651
> Owner: Tobias Frost
>
> Hi Milan,
>
> if you'd like to have a Co-Maintainer for avrdude, please feel free to ping
> me.
I'm wondering why you ask me to co-maintain avrdude? I don't have any
Package: diffoscope
Version: 42
Seen on rb.d.n with openjfx/8u60-b27-4 on testing (trying it on unstable
resulted with a FTBFS of the package...)
Tue Nov 24 16:58:58 UTC 2015 - diffoscope 42 will be used to compare the two
builds:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist
Followup-For: Bug #799340
Control: found -1 0.9.0-2
Hi Alastair,
here we go again :-)
This upgrade path is still not working ...
The debdiff between -1 and -2:
--- libgetdata-0.9.0/debian/control 2015-10-30 03:20:13.0 +0100
+++ libgetdata-0.9.0/debian/control 2015-11-21 02:47:51
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: node-has-flag
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus (sindresorhus.com)
* URL : https://github.com/sindresorhus/has-flag#readme
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Description : Check
Package: cowbuilder
Version: 0.75
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I discovered that I can pass --debbuildopts='-sa' to cowbuilder by just
guessing... The man page doesn't include this option, it would be great if it
mentioned that passing --debuildopts was possible!
thanks,
micah
-- System Informatio
Package: libicinga2
Version: 2.4.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'jessie'.
It installed fine in 'jessie', then the upgrade to 'stretch' fails
because it tries to overwrite other
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2015-08-17 15:04, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun
>> wrote:
>> >> until there's a better tested and working way to transition
>> >> to ffmpeg?
>> >
>> > This really doesn't have that much to
Package: xenomai-system-tools
Version: 2.6.4+dfsg-0.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'jessie'.
It installed fine in 'jessie', then the upgrade to 'stretch' fails
because it tries to
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 17:23 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have backported the upstream patch for squeeze and it results in the
> attached patch. It does compile and I have not identified any regression
> but the build log mentions unexpected testsuite failures.
>
> Comparing with a
Package: wnpp
Owner: Lucas Kanashiro
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libregexp-stringify-perl
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : perlancar
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Regexp-Stringify
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ross Gammon
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-loader-utils
Version : 0.2.12
Upstream Author : Tobias Koppers @sokra
* URL : https://github.com/webpack/loader-utils#
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 2015-11-24 15:22, Yann Soubeyrand wrote:
I prepared a package for augeas containing a patch to fix bug #764699
(https://bugs.debian.org/764699) which affects httpd lens: files under
/etc/apache2/conf-enabled directory are not taken into account by this
lens.
Tha
Package: libextutils-autoinstall-perl
Version: 0.63-3
Severity: normal
User: autopkgtest-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: autopkgtest
Hi,
As you can see on
https://ci.debian.net/packages/libe/libextutils-autoinstall-perl/unstable/amd64/
the test suite for libextutils-autoinstall-perl is ti
Source: kdbusaddons
Version: 5.15.0-1
Severity: normal
User: autopkgtest-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: autopkgtest
As you can see on
https://ci.debian.net/packages/k/kdbusaddons/unstable/amd64/
the test suite for kdbusaddons is timing out on ci.debian.net.
Looking at the latest test log
Hi Antonio,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 03:16:55PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> As you can see on
> https://ci.debian.net/packages/m/mysql-5.5/unstable/amd64/
> the test suite for mysql-5.5 is timing out on ci.debian.net.
>
> Can you please confirm whether there is something wrong with it, or if
Package: libmail-gnupg-perl
Version: 0.21-1
Severity: normal
User: autopkgtest-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: autopkgtest
As you can see on
https://ci.debian.net/packages/libm/libmail-gnupg-perl/unstable/amd64/
the test suite for libmail-gnupg-perl is timing out on ci.debian.net.
I am bl
Package: mona
Version: 1.4-15-1.1
Severity: normal
User: autopkgtest-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: autopkgtest
Hi
As you can see on https://ci.debian.net/packages/m/mona/unstable/amd64/
the test suite for mona is timing out on ci.debian.net.
I am blacklisting the package on ci.debian.n
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 05:08:17PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 05:39:16PM +0100, Hendrik Brueckner wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:00:13PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:38:16PM +0100, Hendrik Brueckner wrote:
> >> >
> >> >To correct thi
Source: pytest-httpbin
Version: 0.1.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Control: block -1 by 805041
Would be great if also a Python 3 package of pytest-httpbin would be available.
DS
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x
Source: saods9
Version: 7.4~b7+repack-4
Severity: normal
User: autopkgtest-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: autopkgtest
Hi,
As you can see on
https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/saods9/unstable/amd64/
the test suite for mysql-5.5 is timing out on ci.debian.net.
Looking at the test logs there
Source: mysql-5.5
Version: 5.44-0+deb8u1
Severity: normal
User: autopkgtest-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: autopkgtest
Hi,
As you can see on
https://ci.debian.net/packages/m/mysql-5.5/unstable/amd64/
the test suite for mysql-5.5 is timing out on ci.debian.net.
Can you please confirm whe
On 24 November 2015 at 17:07, Iain Lane wrote:
| Control: reopen -1 =
| Control: block 805814 by -1
|
| On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 09:12:09AM +, Iain Lane wrote:
| > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 02:17:16PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > >
| > > On 11 November 2015 at 11:45, Iain Lane wrote:
| >
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 05:39:16PM +0100, Hendrik Brueckner wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:00:13PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:38:16PM +0100, Hendrik Brueckner wrote:
>> >
>> >To correct this problem, please update the memory location to which
>> >the initrd is lo
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:57:50AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Santiago,
>
> thanks for your report, very interesting. I am using the same
> stanza in my rules file since quite some time, and never got
> any problems.
Just try "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (as I explain in the bug report)
and yo
I attached a new debdiff with a more meaningful changelog.
+servefile (0.4.4-1~deb8u1) jessie; urgency=high
+
+ * Upstream bugfix release
+ * Fix for path traversal bug in directory listing mode
+ * SSL hardening (prefer TLS1.2/TLS1)
If this is not detailed enough I could also just copy over t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Donncha O'Cearbhaill
* Package name: python-schedule
Version : 0.3.2
Upstream Author : Daniel Bader
* URL : https://github.com/dbader/schedule
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Job scheduli
Package: trac
Version: 1.0.8+dfsg-1
Severity: wishlist
According to
http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracDev/ReleaseNotes/1.0#MaintenanceReleases
18 bugs are fixed, 17 of them probably affecting Debian users.
Control: reopen -1 =
Control: block 805814 by -1
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 09:12:09AM +, Iain Lane wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 02:17:16PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> >
> > On 11 November 2015 at 11:45, Iain Lane wrote:
> > | Package: gsl
> > | Version: 2.0+dfsg-1
> > | Severity: norm
Package: src:horgand
Version: 1.14-5
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
--
David Matthew Mattli wrote:
> So now it checks for either SOLARIS_64BIT_ENABLED or __LP64__ to
> determine whether the sparc platform is 64bit. With this change the package
> builds on my sparc64 system and it shouldn't affect any other archs.
>
> I've attached a patch to implement this change.
On 22/11/15 23:26, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> afl-clang is also involved in this transition, as it depends on:
> clang (<< 1:3.6), clang (>= 1:3.5)
>
> Hence it is currently uninstallable in sid, which was reported as #804852.
Thanks for catching that. I have updated the t
Santiago Vila writes:
> Sorry not to have a fix, as I am reporting many bugs similar to
> this one, but I can give some general hints:
No problem; thanks for the report and the general tips.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://st
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:00:13PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:38:16PM +0100, Hendrik Brueckner wrote:
> >Package: debian-cd
> >Version: 3.1.17
> >Severity: important
> >
> >Dear debian-cd Maintainers,
> >
> >I recently encountered a problem at the installation of Debi
[ Cc the security team if they want to use it to prepare a DSA ]
Hello,
since the wheezy eglibc is relatively close to squeeze's version, I have
updated my former backport for wheezy as well.
Please find the patch attached. It does build but the resulting
package has not been tested and I did no
Package: origami-pdf
Severity: serious
Version: 1.2.7-2
User: autopkgtest-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: autopkgtest
Hello,
origami-pdf's tests [1] started failing since ruby-defaults was
switched from 2.1 to 2.2:
| adt-run [13:15:30]: test command1: pdfcop samples/digsig/signed.pdf
| a
Control: found -1 src:rrdtool/1.5.4-5
Control: notforwarded -1
Control: tags -1 + help
Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> "make check-TESTS" fails
I tested previous version on mips, and it now FTBFS too. It used to work
ok. [1] (thanks Tobias, upstream, for suggesting that.)
So I suppose it is related t
Package: ruby-spreadsheet
Version: 1.0.0-1
User: autopkgtest-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: autopkgtest
Hello,
ruby-spreadsheet's tests [1] started failing since ruby-defaults was
switched from 2.1 to 2.2:
| adt-run [13:19:42]: test command2: [---
| /usr/lib/ruby/ven
reassign 806021 ftp.debian.org
thanks
On Tue, 24 Nov 2015, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: src:ekg2
> Version: 1:0.4~pre+20120506.1-10
> User: sanv...@debian.org
> Usertags: binary-indep
> Severity: important
>
> Dear maintainer:
>
> I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
> (
Hello,
I have backported the upstream patch for squeeze and it results in the
attached patch. It does compile and I have not identified any regression
but the build log mentions unexpected testsuite failures.
Comparing with a build of the the previous version, I get only one
supplementary failure
Hello Alejandro,
are you still maintaining 2048-qt?
If not or if you lack time for it I would consider NMU'ing it to
fix several open bugs. I use the German port now for several month
without any problem.
Also the experimental version has not yet been uploaded to Debian.
Finally, a new upstream
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello Tony,
Am Di den 24. Nov 2015 um 6:49 schrieb tony mancill:
> > With the latest version, ctrl-q is crashing cssh completely! Even worse,
> > error code of cssh is 0.
> >
> > This was working in earlier versions. As it is a very important key
> libx11-dev is not installed by
> default. As far as I'm concerned this is a non-bug.
Policy says:
`Recommends'
This declares a strong, but not absolute, dependency.
The `Recommends' field should list packages that would be found
together with this one in all
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.2.6-1
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Dear Debian Kernel Maintainers,
while trying out the Debian Installer and setting up multipath, I encountered
the problem that the multipath tool uses the service-time path selector as
default (this has been changed some months ago ac
Shattered is a fork.
Hi Santiago,
thanks for your report, very interesting. I am using the same
stanza in my rules file since quite some time, and never got
any problems.
> This usually happens because there is a binary-indep target in debian/rules
> which is either empty or does not do anything useful.
Hmmm, I don'
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 04:26:58PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
> (i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Thanks for the report, I will look into this.
--
Romain Francoise
http://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/
Package: src:iipimage
Version: 0.9.9-3
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:itcl3
Version: 3.4.1-2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
---
Package: src:guile-1.8
Version: 1.8.8+1-10
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:gtkglext
Version: 1.2.0-3.2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
--
Package: src:itk3
Version: 3.3-5.1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:heimdal
Version: 1.6~rc2+dfsg-10
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
-
Package: fonts-radisnoir
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
The homepage http://www.radisnoir.net/ no longer points to a valid webpage.
Searching for the URL does not yield further results.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (
Hi, thanks for the report.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 03:09:52PM +0100, Simon Bin wrote:
* What outcome did you expect instead?
slapd should not crash during disconnect.
Indeed.
I appreciate any input.
It's hard to tell without symbol information, but at a glance this
doesn't look like an
Package: src:indigo
Version: 1.1.12-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
-
Package: src:qt-gstreamer
Version: 1.2.0-3
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:libapache2-mod-perl2
Version: 2.0.9-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:licq
Version: 1.8.2-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:mc
Version: 3:4.8.13-3
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
---
Source: linux
Version: 4.2.6-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
thanks for your work in the linux kernel.
I'm experimenting reports like this:
[mar nov 24 16:38:16 2015] [ cut here ]
[mar nov 24 16:38:16 2015] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 4 at
/build/linux-CrHvZ_/linux-4.2
Package: src:opentoken
Version: 6.0b-3
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:pinball
Version: 0.3.1-13.2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
--
Package: src:relion
Version: 1.3+dfsg-3
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
---
Package: src:pcb
Version: 20140316-3
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
--
Package: src:mahimahi
Version: 0.91-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
-
Package: src:scim
Version: 1.4.15-5
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
---
Package: src:icedove
Version: 38.3.0-2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:linkchecker
Version: 9.3-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
---
Package: src:openmprtl
Version: 3.7.0-3
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
---
Package: src:libaria
Version: 2.8.0+repack-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
--
Package: src:libxml2
Version: 2.9.2+zdfsg1-4
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
--
Package: src:mmass
Version: 5.5.0-4
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
---
Package: src:openafs
Version: 1.6.15-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:mapserver
Version: 7.0.0-7
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
---
Package: src:mandos
Version: 1.7.1-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
--
Package: src:python-numpy
Version: 1:1.9.2-5
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
--
Package: src:multipath-tools
Version: 0.5.0+git1.656f8865-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
---
Package: src:speech-dispatcher
Version: 0.8-7
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
-
Package: src:probabel
Version: 0.4.5-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:ocaml
Version: 4.02.3-5
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
--
Package: src:libpcap
Version: 1.7.4-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
-
Package: src:speech-tools
Version: 1:2.4~release-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:singular
Version: 4.0.2-p2+ds-3
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
--
Package: src:nsd
Version: 4.1.2-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
-
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:08:47 +0100 Nils Dagsson Moskopp
wrote:
> For reasons I still do not understand, systemd was unable to mount
> /boot as ext2. I have been unable to make the Linux kernel load the
> ext2 module â modprobe exited zero, but lsmod did not show the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear release managers,
I prepared a package for augeas containing a patch to fix bug #764699
(https://bugs.debian.org/764699) which affects httpd lens: files under
/etc/apache2/conf
Package: src:zope2.13
Version: 2.13.22-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
--
Package: debian
Version: current version includeing all updates
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
the freeze happened twice after the computer had been on for more then 24 hours
contineously, but only if libreoffice writer was open. and it started happening
after either the last libreoffice up
Package: src:tiff
Version: 4.0.5-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
Package: src:staden-io-lib
Version: 1.14.6-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
--
Package: src:xsane
Version: 0.999-2
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
---
Package: src:zoneminder
Version: 1.28.1-8
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
-
Package: src:tacacs+
Version: 4.0.4.27a-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
-
Package: src:xfdesktop4
Version: 4.12.3-1
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
-
Package: src:xbase64
Version: 3.1.2-5
User: sanv...@debian.org
Usertags: binary-indep
Severity: important
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(i.e. only architecture-independent packages), and it failed:
-
101 - 200 of 396 matches
Mail list logo
