Le 29/12/2018 à 22:39, Santiago Vila a écrit :
> Package: src:libnet-server-mail-perl
> Version: 0.25-4
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> Dear maintainer:
>
> I tried to build this package in buster but it failed:
>
> --
On Sun, 2018-12-30 at 17:39 +1100, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> Comments or thoughts?
Looks good to me.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 01:56:11PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> You you get the compile flags from Kbuild, or do you reinvent them on
> your own?
---end quoted text---
This is the DKMS build line:
MAKE[0]="cd ${dkms_tree}/sl-modem/#MODULE_VERSION#/build; make -C drivers USB=1
KERNEL_DIR=$kern
Source: groff
Version: 1.22.4-1
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
groff fails to cross build from source, because it now fails running the
native cross. It uses two build passes (native and cross) since it needs
a native groff. That used to be located in
build-native/src/r
Package: supercat
Version: 0.5.5-4.3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Usertags: fileordering locale umask
Dear Maintainer,
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that supercat could not be built reproducibly.
The attached patch (make-reproducible-adding-debhelper.patc
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Saturday, 16 June 2018 16:48:13 AEDT Paul Wise wrote:
> It would be a useful feature to have the iter_paragraphs method from
> the deb822 Sources and Packages classes support returning Version
> objects in the Version field. This would help with sorting versions.
>
> S
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> it would be nice if you could upgrade to the current upstream version
https://lists.debian.org/debian-tex-maint/2018/12/msg00019.html
Norbert
--
PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info
Accelia Inc. +JAIST +
Hi,
This is because upstream deleted the "YES" alias from astroid on
https://github.com/PyCQA/astroid/commit/36fa294e9b84885d95a03b1fbc07da63e6d6a79b
This issue was opened on pylint-django (
https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint-django/issues/201)
They resolve the issue adding on setup.py the requirem
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Clark Wang
* Package name: sexpect
Version : 2.1.8
Upstream Author : Clark Wang
* URL : https://github.com/clarkwang/sexpect
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Expect for Shells
Expect is for Tcl.
Package: python3-astroid
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The Homepage "www.astroid.org" Doest not exist.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.6
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 (S
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xrandr-invert-colors
Version : git
Upstream Author : Zoltan Padrah
* URL : https://github.com/zoltanp/xrandr-invert-colors
* License : GPL-3.0+
Programming Lang: C
Description : invert colors on all scree
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: rubygems-roda
Version : 3.15.0
Upstream Author : Jeremy Evans
* URL : http://roda.jeremyevans.net/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : routing tree web toolkit for Ruby
Roda is a routing
> You are right, I didn't notice the new matplotlib2 package and sagemath
> failed to build due to the missing matplotlibrc in python-matplotlib-data.
this should be fixed, does sagemath build fine now?
--
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.or
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 7:57 PM Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 9/5/18 01:08, Attila Kinali wrote:
> > Package: gimp
> > Version: 2.10.6-2
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > No matter what I do, Gimp does not load properly. Most times it
> > just gets stuc
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 05:36:32PM -0800, Ryan Tandy wrote:
I have attached a test program
Actually attached this time.
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#define LDAP_DEPRECATED 1
#include
static const char *server
Hi John,
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 06:42:37PM +0200, John Hughes wrote:
Sendmail, on start, closes all fd's above 2.
Since sendmail is linked to libldap, which is linked to gnutls this
means sendmail closes fd 3, on which gnutls has opened /dev/urandom.
Later on in the sendmail run fd 3 gets r
Upon reviewing this bug, I've found that in stretch and later, GnuTLS
actually uses getrandom() instead of opening /dev/urandom. This was
introduced in GnuTLS 3.5.3 and requires Linux 3.18 and Glibc 2.25. The
fd-clobber program that I attached to an earlier comment [1]
demonstrates the issue in
No, I think this has long since been overcome by events. Please feel free
to close. We live in a world of systemd today. Thanks for following up.
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 1:33 PM Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>
> control: tags -1 +moreinfo
>
> Dear submitter, are you still going to implement your suggest
Hi Dmitry,
Dmitry Bogatov writes:
> Dear co-maintainers, what do you think? While personally I never used
> this feature, I believe it would not introduce much of complexity into
> initscripts. Neither I believe this functionality deserves separate
> binary package. So, objections to inclusion?
Source: shadow
Severity: normal
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
Hi,
the /etc/shadow as created by debootstrap does not respect the
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment variable anymore. This bug was formerly
fixed in #857803. Steps to reproduce:
$ sudo SOURCE_DATE
Source: java-common
Version: 0.70
Severity: normal
User: debian-sup...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: sh4
Hello!
I have successfully bootstrapped OpenJDK 11 for sh4, thus we can
bump the default Java version for sh4 in the java-common package
to 11:
--- debian/java_defaults.mk.orig2018-10-03
Le dimanche 30 décembre 2018 à 01:24:23+0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue a écrit :
> Le samedi 29 décembre 2018 à 21:26:50+0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 09:11:23PM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> > > It's in new now. :)
> >
> > Thanks! :-)
>
> You're very welcome.
On 2018-12-23 01:14, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> control: reassign -1 nocache
> control: tag -1 + patch
>
> On 2018-12-14 07:44, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/Feh/nocache/issues/34
> >
> > On 2018-12-14 13:33, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > Package: nocache/1.0-1,libc6/2.
Le samedi 29 décembre 2018 à 21:26:50+0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 09:11:23PM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> > It's in new now. :)
>
> Thanks! :-)
You're very welcome.
Let's go back to fava.
As any flask app, it could be served as a true website, but I'm no
t; Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
That's #917143 in t-coffee which affects libbio-tools-run-alignment-tcoffee-perl
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. https://info.comodo.pr
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017, Hans Joachim Desserud wrote:
> Source: kitchensink-clojure
> Version: 2.3.0-1
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> kitchensink-clojure currently fails to build from source with the
> following error message:
>
> dh_auto_test
> (cd test && find . -name "*_test.clj"
안녕하세요, 저는 Lisa Jaster입니다. 당신을 알게되어 대단히 기쁩니다.이 매체를 통해 연락하는 것을 허락 해 주시기 바랍니다. 저는
매우 중요하고 기밀 사항이 있습니다. 제가 당신과상의하고 싶습니다. 친절하게 답장을 보내서 소개하겠습니다. 내 자신을 당신에게, 고마워,
관련
리사 재 스터.
Found 917598 3.10.0-3
thanks.
Unfortunately it seems it still fails with the same error.
On 29/12/18 20:21, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the petsc4py package:
#917598: petsc4py FTBFS error: ‘SNESTEST’ unde
Source: python-pywebview
Version: 2.2.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justication: Policy 12.5
X-Debbugs-CC: Jochen Sprickerhof ,
ftpmas...@debian.org
Hi,
I just ACCEPTed python-pywebview from NEW but noticed it was missing
attribution in debian/copyright for at least examples/todos/README.
This is
Package: dump1090-mutability
Version: 1.15~20180310.4a16df3+dfsg-3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
selected user to run dump1090-mutability service is not added automatically to
plugdev group, which causes permissions problems with rtl-sdr udev rules and
prevents service start.
Versions of p
On 2015-01-19 21:06:22 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: tags 746204 + upstream wontfix
>
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 at 11:03:33 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > since the step to 3.12 gnome-terminal ignores any
> > -t
> > --title
> > option.
>
> This appears to be a deliberate upstrea
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
* Package name: golang-github-tealeg-xlsx
Version : 1.0.3+git20181024.dbf71b6-1
Upstream Author : Geoffrey J. Teale
* URL : https://github.com/tealeg/xlsx
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Go
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 10:39:07PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
...
> > ! LaTeX Error: File `footnotehyper.sty' not found.
> >
> > Type X to quit or to proceed,
> > or enter new name. (Default extension: sty)
> >
Package: refcard
Tags: patch
There are three languages which have a smaller font size set: Bulgarian,
Spanish
and French.
This has been set in the past in intend for sure, but these days it can be
reverted for Spanish and French without any disadvantage.
It would lead to better readability.
[Adding felix.lech...@lease-up.com to CC]
Hi Lucas,
Looks like we have a number of issues here.
> > +I: changes-upstream-signature-not-missing source:
> > public-upstream-key-unusable upstream/signing-key.asc cannot be processed
Felix, not sure your MR/branch handles this one?
> > -W: debhelp
Package: gnome-terminal
Version: 3.30.2-2
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream
Forwarded: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-terminal/issues/42
When one starts gnome-terminal from the command line, it outputs
useless debug messages such as:
# watch_fast: "/org/gnome/terminal/legacy/" (establishing: 0
Control: merge 917654 917735
Hi,
I'm sorry for having used your time by not reporting this myself. As far
as I can say, one of the last TeX updates introduced this FTBFS. I have
yet to find the exact cause.
Regards,
Carsten
You are right, with wmaker I don't have a desktop icon but the .desktop file
gives me the command to run.
$ anbox launch --package=org.anbox.appmgr
--component=org.anbox.appmgr.AppViewActivity
[ 2018-12-29 22:38:20] [launch.cpp:214@operator()] Session manager failed to
become ready
$ journalctl
Control: reassign -1 linux-signed-amd64
Control: found -1 4.17.0-3
Just a note, bugs.debian.org is the package for reporting issues with
the bug tracking system itself, not general issues in packages (or the
kernel.)
I've reassigned this bug for you.
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
Package: refcard
Tags: patch
The attached patch gives some improvement to the layout of the following
languages:
ca, de, eu, fi, gl, hu, it, nl, pl, pt, ro, uk.
In concrete, that means:
The copyright notice is moved to the bottom of the middle column of page 1,
as it is for English (taking Eng
Source: node-redis
Version: 0.12.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: python-periodictable
Version: 1.5.0-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: lintian
Version: 2.5.118
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: python-xarray
Version: 0.11.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/&
Source: statsmodels
Version: 0.8.0-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory '
Source: postgresql-11
Version: 11.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory '/
Source: jabberd2
Version: 2.6.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory '/&l
Source: hoel
Version: 1.4.8-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/bu
Source: phpmyadmin
Version: 4:4.6.6-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/&l
Source: php-zeta-console-tools
Version: 1.7-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: openhft-chronicle-wire
Version: 1.1.13-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh
Source: ccdproc
Version: 1.3.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: node-object-path
Version: 0.11.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: cross-toolchain-base
Version: 30
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> linux: 4.1
Source: php-monolog
Version: 1.23.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: astropy-healpix
Version: 0.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: octave-msh
Version: 1.0.10-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '
Source: golang-github-rackspace-gophercloud
Version: 1.0.0+git20161013.1012.e00690e8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: globus-xio-gridftp-driver
Version: 3.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering direct
Source: ca-cacert
Version: 2011.0523-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: uglifyjs
Version: 2.8.29-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> test -x debian
Source: clj-time-clojure
Version: 0.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: php-zeta-base
Version: 1.9-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
> Having that spelled out explicitly in a searchable internel-accessible
> post would likely help more than just me.
For me,
override_dh_auto_test:
# Disable fakeroot because of
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839387
env -u LD_PRELOAD make check
was good enough!
S
Control: reassign -1 python3-aplpy 1.1.1-4
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/aplpy/aplpy/issues/406
On 28.12.18 19:55, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> warnings.warn('np.asscalar(a) is deprecated since NumPy v1.16, use '
>>> 'a.item() instead', DeprecationWarning, stackleve
Source: ocaml-qtest
Version: 2.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<&g
Source: python-acora
Version: 2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<
Source: openhft-chronicle-bytes
Version: 1.1.15-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
&
Source: caffeine
Version: 2.9.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh
Source: bacula-doc
Version: 9.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory '/<&
Source: ocaml-atd
Version: 2.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<&g
Source: ocaml-rope
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<
Source: flexpart
Version: 9.02-19
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory '/<&g
Source: openhft-chronicle-core
Version: 1.1.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh
Source: flextra
Version: 5.0-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory '/<>
Source: weresync
Version: 1.0.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh
Source: globus-gass-copy
Version: 10.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering directory '
Source: openhft-chronicle-threads
Version: 1.1.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
&
Source: openhft-lang
Version: 6.7.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh
Hi Daniel,
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 01:00:08PM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote:
> Thanks for your reply, I was trying build this new version with
> pbuilder --host-arch=... but doesn't build fine (please log attached),
> However I will upload this new version to unstable. Feel free to sent
> me the n
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-extras"
* Package name: budgie-extras
Version : 0.7.0-1
Upstream Author : Ubuntu Budgie Developers
* URL : https://github.com/ubuntubudgie/budgie-ex
Control: forwarded -1
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-disk-utility/merge_requests/11
Thanks, let's see what upstream says about your patch.
Jeremy Bicha
Source: lizzie
Version: 0.6+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<&
Source: pylint-django
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: sunpy
Version: 0.9.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh build --with p
Source: pybind11
Version: 2.2.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering directory '/<&
Source: openconnect
Version: 7.08-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering directory '/
Source: libbio-tools-run-alignment-tcoffee-perl
Version: 1.7.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: libbiod
Version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dpkg-query: no pa
Source: libuv1
Version: 1.24.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory '/<
Source: pyscanfcs
Version: 0.3.2+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
severity 879538 grave
thanks
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 09:56:18PM +0200, Teddy Hogeborn wrote:
>> plugins.d/mandos-client.c actually uses GnuTLS OpenPGP support. This
>> code was marked deprecated in 3.5.9 and was removed in 3.6.0. Noop stub
>> functions are still shipped to avoid ABI breakage but r
Source: grantlee5
Version: 5.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory '/<&
Source: bolt
Version: 0.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: golang-github-gin-gonic-gin
Version: 1.3.0+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: gitano
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/&l
Source: gnome-settings-daemon
Version: 3.30.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering direct
On 29/12/2018 18:47, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I've been contacted by Elana, and an MR is in progress for this package;
> if it passes review, I'll submit other MRs for the remaining packages
> (as fixes are almost identical), or I can push to the Java repositories
> directly, as you folks prefer.
Source: nfs-utils
Version: 1:1.3.4-2.3
Severity: wishlist
Upstream has released 2.3.3 and is getting close to 2.3.4, while
Debian remains on 1.3.4, which was released in mid-2016.
An update in time for buster would be very much appreciated.
Thanks,
Christopher Martin
Source: golang-gopkg-macaroon.v2
Version: 0.0~git20171017.bed2a42-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
1 - 100 of 361 matches
Mail list logo
