Bug#983752: request-tracker5.service uses /usr/bin/true, which isn't present on all systems

Package: request-tracker5 Version: 5.0.1+dfsg-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, The request-tracker5 service file uses /usr/bin/true, on some Debian systems this doesn't exist, and is actually located in /bin/true . The cloud image I used for testing this has /bin symlinked to /usr/bin.

Bug#983751: dosfstools-4.2 breaks vfat formatting of entire device

Package: udisks2 Version: 2.9.1-3 A new version of dosfstools (4.2) just landed on testing, and we're suddenly seeing a new failure in cockpit's integration testing: specifically, attempting to create a fat filesystem on /dev/sda (the direct device, not a partition) fails. This works correctly

Bug#983748: dh-r: pkg-r-autopkgtest breaks autopkgtests

Hi Andreas On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 10:49, Andreas Tille wrote: > However, the issue should have been become obvious even in unstable > 10 days ago. Well, it was visible in unstable, e.g. in r-bioc-destiny [1], and also on the tracker page [2] it says "Debci reports failed tests", but certainly

Bug#982904: mumble: CVE-2021-27229

Salvatore Bonaccorso: Source: mumble Version: 1.3.3-1 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Justification: user security hole Forwarded: https://github.com/mumble-voip/mumble/pull/4733 X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Hi, The following vulnerability was published for

Bug#983748: dh-r: pkg-r-autopkgtest breaks autopkgtests

Hi Graham, I've uploaded a change that (hopefully!) fixes the issue. On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 08:24:09AM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > The recent upload of dh-r causes autopkgtests using pkg-r-autopkgtest > to fail. See for example the output of r-bioc-affy [1] below. > Presumably caused by this

Bug#983749: The autopkgtest test depends are not available on s390x

Package: r-cran-sf Version: 0.9-7+dfsg-2 debian/tests/control has a Depends on r-cran-lwgeom which isn't build on s390x anymore since https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961211 , it makes the s390x autopkgtests fail (Debian has currently no builder set, but log from Ubuntu

Bug#983547: [Pkg-julia-devel] Bug#983547: Bug#983547: julia-common: julia-config.jl does not find libjulia.so

> Mo, Norbert, do you think we should add libjulia-dev to julia's Recommends? Hmmm, I don't think so. Those who want to use this packaging feature should probably also find out that it is the -dev package they need. Just my 2c Best Norbert -- PREINING Norbert

Bug#983486: zipl: allow other packages to provide config snippets

On 27.02.21 05:59, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Feb 2021, 07:51 Christian Borntraeger, > wrote: > > > > On 24.02.21 23:40, dann frazier wrote: > > Source: s390-tools > > Version: 2.15.1-2 > > > > I'm one of the maintainers

<    1   2   3