Source: glibc
Version: 2.31-10
Severity: important
Tags: security upstream
Forwarded: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28524
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for glibc.
CVE-2021-43396[0]:
| In
Hi Étienne
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 00:03, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> From Andreas Tille's discussion with upstream, this might be
> caused by numpy or scipy, possibly Debian specific.
This sounds a lot like #994457 which was due to a change in lapack 3.10.
Regards
Graham
Il 04/11/2021 12:27, Sébastien Villemot ha scritto:
I happen to have access to a machine with exactly the same CPU (and
Debian Bullseye). I fail to replicate your problem there. I can start
octave with libopenblas0-pthread and there is no segfault.
So there must be another factor at play.Uhm...
On 2021/11/05 05:55, Florian Schlichting wrote:
> However, Max: behind this hides another problem, which is why I asked
> Ryan to delete the pid_file configuration: as part of 0.23.3 you added
> the "RuntimeDirectory=mpd" directive to both mpd.service units. In the
> absence of User and Group
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 7:16 PM Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> On 2021-11-02 17:40, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> >
> > sorry but that's not how RC severity works, that's for policy
> > violations, which in this case there are none.
> >
> > I understand you may want to see this fixed sooner rather than later,
> >
Hi Ryan (and Max please see below):
> and have the following minimal mpd.conf:
>
> --
> music_directory "/var/lib/mpd/music"
> db_file "/var/lib/mpd/tag_cache"
> pid_file "/run/mpd/pid"
> state_file
Hello,
Igor Kovalenko solution work for me only if
libspa-0.2-bluetooth
package is installed.
The solution is described in
https://wiki.debian.org/PipeWire#Bluetooth
1) Only pulseaudio-module-bluetooth is installed; it is impossible to pair.
2) Both pulseaudio-module-bluetooth and
Package: pavucontrol
Version: 4.0-2
Followup-For: Bug #954159
Upstream bug here:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/pavucontrol/-/issues/75
Attracting the usual level of developer interest for a freedesktop
project.
This seems to be the patch that introduced the broken behaviour:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
I request to remove package python-dexml (as shown on
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-dexml ) from Sid. This package
* Shows no upstream activity since 2012, and upstream abandoned the project in
2018 (see https://github.com/rfk/dexml )
*
Hi Guido,
On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 07:15:37PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Hi Ron,
>
> Sorry for the broken boot. That's always annoying.
Thanks for looking at the details. I filed these bugs because even
though I can step around the problem in the permutation that involves
something I
package*
Regards
Chris - DarkTrick
* Yes, I'm trying to promote my updates here :)
On 2021/11/05 2:38, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: gjiten
Version: 2.6-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi
Upstream version 0.11.14 seems to fix this issue, but the patch seems to
create a new bug:
https://gitlab.com/sublime-music/sublime-music/-/issues/325
Currently waiting for feedback from upstream.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org
Package: bind9
Version: 1:9.17.19-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Named began crashing several times a day after updating from bind 9.16.21-1 to
9.17.19-1 on Oct 30.
Wanted to report this before dropping back to 9.16.21.
Some examples of the logs during a crash:
> After 2 weeks, the bug has finally been fixed. But I wonder why the bug
> wasn't tested out in the unstable branch and was pushed into the testing
Because on unstable everything worked. The bug happens only due to
different transition times from unstable to testing. This cannot be
tested in
After 2 weeks, the bug has finally been fixed. But I wonder why the bug
wasn't tested out in the unstable branch and was pushed into the testing
branch.
On Thu, 04 Nov 2021 16:39:09 +0200, Graham Inggs writes:
>Please either replace the b-d python3-all-dev with python3-dev,
python policy 7.1:
"The python3-all-dev should be used when building extensions for any or
all Python 3 versions"
>or build for all supported Python3 versions.
what
On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 20:45 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: git-imerge
...
> > ERROR: Could not install packages due to an EnvironmentError:
> > [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/usr/lib/python3.9/dist-packages'
This is apparently caused by a change in dh-python that will be
reverted. For
Hi there, our IP is also blocked by the wiki. Can you add an exception
for us?
50.251.200.225
Please and thank you!
Jack
Hi,
Thanks for reporting this bug and adding more info. It seems this was
reproduced in bug #997482 and I can reproduce it locally when running
the testsuite.
I still have to upload the latest upstream version of sublime-music. I'm
hoping it will fix the problem? Otherwise, I'll try to debug
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
makedeb-makepkg's version has to have a Debian revision -1.
Please keep only the latest packaged version in the changelog with a line
closing the ITP.
When you are done and have uploaded a version with fixed changelog please untag
moreinfo.
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Please untag moreinfo when you have provided a fixed upload.
Package: aptly
Version: 1.4.0+ds1-6
Followup-For: Bug #990821
Hi all,
conflicting with gpgv1 is *not* the correct solution.
The correct solution is to fix aptly, not conflicting with other
programs that are reasonably important.
gpg v1 is still necessary for the creation of old style keyrings
Source: lebiniou
Version: 3.62.1-3
Severity: important
The d/copyright files misses some copyright info, e.g.:
Copyright 2019-2021 Laurent Marsac
Copyright 2021 Jérémie Astor
Copyright 2014-2021 Frantz Balinski
Copyright 2019-2021 Tavasti
Copyright (C) 2001-2002 FUKUCHI Kentaro
Copyright (C)
> bind9-dev : Depends: bind9-libs (= 1:9.16.21-1) but it is not going to be
installed
It looks like bind8 no longer builds the bind9-dev package. It's still present
in
unstable as a cruft package but is uninstallable due to version constraints,
it's
completely gone from testing.
Bind
Package: libsane1
Version: 1.0.32-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I've upgraded libsane1 package from 1.0.31-4.1 to 1.0.32-4 and my Epson
Perfection 164SU stopped working.
I tried to debug the issue with:
~$ SANE_DEBUG_EPSON2=255 scanimage
Hi,
maybe do you know a way to make a chainload from shim.efi ?
Best Regards,
Juri Grabowski
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 04.11.21 22:21, François Mazen wrote:
Hello Bastian,
Please consider relicensing debian/* or at least debian/patches/*
I've relicensed to BSD-3, in order to match upstream license.
Ken Martin, Will Schroeder, Bill Lorensen's copyright is missing.
I guess you
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Yanko,
thanks for your report! Please help me to understand what's happening
by providing the following information:
* How exactly is arpwatch invoked? Please provide the output of
`ps -U arpwatch -F` or (in case that doesn't show any processes)
`ps -eF |
Same problem. Also there was often freezing in Xfce, mostly when
switching between windows, SysRc+r help unfreeze.
Setting init_on_alloc=0 help with this (suspend and freezing).
But now, if second monitor connected (VGA or HDMI), after login Xfce
freeze. Maybe it's different issue, something about
Maybe I am wrong, but, for me, the simplest method to track this bug
down is to check the changes between the two versions, 93.0 and
93.0-1+b1. Firefox code has not changed, only one or some libraries it
depends on. I thought that the only change is in libvpx version, but,
surprisingly, a
Hello Bastian,
> Please consider relicensing debian/* or at least debian/patches/*
I've relicensed to BSD-3, in order to match upstream license.
> Ken Martin, Will Schroeder, Bill Lorensen's copyright is missing.
I guess you are referencing classic VTK's copyright. F3D's copyright is
Maybe i missed a comment but can someone give a try with the upstream
binary? To see if it happens for you too there?
Merci
Sylvestre
Le jeu. 4 nov. 2021 à 23:15, Josh Triplett a écrit :
> Some additional information that might help track this down: several
> times, I've observed one tab
I have fixed gmsh. It will appear in NEW soon.
Regards
Anton
Some additional information that might help track this down: several
times, I've observed one tab freezing, but the browser itself is still
responsive for a *short* time. I can open a new tab, and close it again,
and the previous tab then renders as a busy symbol.
I'm wondering if one of the tab
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Thu, 02 Jan 2020 12:18:40 +0100 Tobias Frost wrote:
- Can you please merge the d/changelog entries for (in Debian)
unreleased versions?
- The Debian changelog seems incomplete, I see (packaing) changes which
are not documented. Please also try to expand a bit on
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc:debian-fo...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fonts-jetbrains-mono":
* Package name: fonts-jetbrains-mono
Version : 2.242+ds-2
Upstream Author : Phillip Nurullin
* URL
On 2021-11-04 21:41, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2021-11-03 22:33:01 +0100, Drew Parsons wrote:
...
The problem that hypre 2.18.1-1 (un-versioned libhypre) intended to
solve is
that hypre is ABI-ignorant
(https://github.com/hypre-space/hypre/issues/56),
so each point patch release would have
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2021-10-29 13:44:16 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hello,
>
> libsepol and libsemanage have both bumped their soname from 1 to 2, the
>
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 08:49:47PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > sip: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/PyQt5/bindings/QtCore/QtCoremod.sip:23:
> > syntax error
It looks like a
apt policy gnome-shell gnome-core thunderbird-l10n-fr firefox
gnome-shell:
Installé : 41.0-2
Candidat : 41.0-2
Table de version :
*** 41.0-2 500
100 https://deb.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 Packages
500 https://deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
The packages that will fix this (rust-cargo-util and rust-im-rc) are in NEW.
On 11/3/21 21:12, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
On 11/3/21 20:30, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
So my advise would be instead:
"A good password will not need rare characters, but rather be as long
as possible. Having a memorable random password can help it be
longer, and
Here is the (now closed) upstream ticket:
https://github.com/jirka-h/haveged/issues/66
Here is the commit where the patch has been applied:
https://github.com/jirka-h/haveged/commit/a4b69d65a8dfc5a9f52ff8505c7f58dcf8b9234f
The new version of rust-memchr which will fix this is in NEW.
Am Sat, 30 Oct 2021 16:04:35 +0200
schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso :
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:16:56AM +0200, Georg Müller wrote:
> > > But for other configurations it is worse:
> > >
> > > config NO_HZ_FULL
> > > bool "Full dynticks system (tickless)"
>
reassign 998536 src:commons-io
found 998536 commons-io/2.11.0-1
affects 998536 src:osmosis
retitle 998536 Missing dependency on junit5 for junit-bom
thanks
On 11/4/21 20:56, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Putting task artifact state for task ':osmosis-pbf2:compileJava' into context
took 0.0 secs.
Am Donnerstag, dem 04.11.2021 um 20:54 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> Source: gradle
> Version: 4.4.1-13
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During
On 2021-11-03 22:33:01 +0100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On 2021-11-03 20:57, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Source: hypre
> > Severity: serious
> ...
> > The real blocker is hypre, specifically:
> >
> > hypre (2.18.1-1) experimental; urgency=medium
> > .
> >* Team upload.
> >* New upstream
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-crccheck
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Martin Scharrer
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/crccheck/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang:
Hi David,
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 7:14 AM David Bremner wrote:
>
> I think Debian would be better off if
> we eliminated sections
Without sections my request would go away, but that's as much of a
side as I will take.
> do you have some numbers
Thank you for that idea! I added a Lintian
* Adam Borowski , 2021-10-12, 22:09:
Some programs are very confused about the terminal width when run
under pipetty, e.g.:
[...]
Apparently this is because pipetty never sets windows size, so the
size is reported as 0:
$ strace -f -o '|grep -w TIOCGWINSZ >&2' pipetty gallery-dl --help
On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 04:29:18PM +0100, Marco M. F. De Santis wrote:
> * Package name: hoteldruid
>Version : 3.0.3-1
> hoteldruid (3.0.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* New upstream release
> - Fixes multiple sql injection and XSS vulnerabilities.
>(Ref:
On 27.10.21 21:24, Dylan Aïssi wrote:
Could you check if you have both wireplumber and libspa-0.2-bluetooth
installed on your system?
(Sorry for the late reply, I just learned by accident, that the BTS
silently ate my two previous mails.)
Hy Dylan,
yes. In fact, I had to manually install
Source: retro-gtk
Version: 1.0.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: libisocodes
Version: 1.2.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: rust-tokio-executor
Version: 0.1.8-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: canl-java
Version: 2.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: appstream-glib
Version: 0.7.18-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: node-cli-truncate
Version: 2.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: gnome-logs
Version: 3.36.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: gradle
Version: 4.4.1-13
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: matplotlib
Version: 3.3.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: wala
Version: 1.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: krita
Version: 1:4.4.8+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: weston
Version: 9.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: libconfig-model-itself-perl
Version: 2.022-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: jengelman-shadow
Version: 4.0.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: mdevctl
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: distro-info
Version: 1.0
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: python-pyproj
Version: 3.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: sysprof
Version: 3.40.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: pyqwt3d
Version: 0.1.8-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: php-raphf
Version: 2.0.1+1.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: bdebstrap
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Source: glade
Version: 3.38.2-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: arch-test
Version: 0.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: frogr
Version: 1.6-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
&
Source: pyopencl
Version: 2021.2.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: isoquery
Version: 3.2.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: gnome-shell
Version: 41.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: libgxps
Version: 0.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: pillow
Version: 8.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: orc
Version: 1:0.4.32-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: gnome-desktop3
Version: 41.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: liquidsoap
Version: 1.4.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: git-imerge
Version: 1.2.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: gnome-connections
Version: 41.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: mako-notifier
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: packagekit
Version: 1.2.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: python-dmsh
Version: 0.2.11-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: squeekboard
Version: 1.14.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: bind-dyndb-ldap
Version: 11.9-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ionit
Version: 0.3.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: git-buildpackage
Version: 0.9.24
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: pytools
Version: 2021.2.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: image-factory
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: phosh
Version: 0.13.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: rust-tokio-io
Version: 0.1.12-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: libtime-tiny-perl
Version: 1.08-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: qgis
Version: 3.16.12+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211104 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> If this sou
1 - 100 of 307 matches
Mail list logo
