it, no one wants to actively maintain it.
Recently another person wrote me he maintains a current PPA for Ubuntu - I
wasn't even aware of that.
Aaron
On Wed 11. Nov 2020 at 20:41, Aaron Zauner (azet) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 11.11.2020, at 20:30, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
Hi,
> On 11.11.2020, at 20:30, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> Hi Aaron,
>
>> On 11-11-2020 20:11, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>> Hi Aaron,
>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 7:02 PM Aaron Zauner (azet) wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>>
Hey,
Thanks for working this out guys! I think arch:all is a good solution
having the Lua paths fixed upstream.
Aaron
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 1:45 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26/10/20 at 11:19 +0100, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, 15 Sep
d, it should probably be reported (and fixed) upstream.
>
>> On 17/02/20 at 19:49 +0100, Aaron Zauner wrote:
>> Since I'm barely keeping this package updated I'd suggest that you use the
>> upstream Lmod project source with the dependencies that come with this
>> package,
version as debian's package, we're currently using
> the packages from:
> http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20200217T030244Z/
>
> (We started upgrading the system this morning, so the date of the archive
> is this morning's)
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 8:40 PM Aa
It might be related to the version. Keep in mind that the version packaged
for Debian is quite old. Did you try with the same version?
On Mon 17. Feb 2020 at 19:39, Tamar Klein wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for your suggestion.
>
> When downloading the source package and building it locally, the paths
Hi Tamar
This is something you need to bring up with the upstream maintainer of
lmod. Replacing hard coded paths for one architecture with another will
just break it for most users except for you.
I suggest opening a GitHub PR with reference to this Debian bug report and
an explanation what
lmod up for the
user.
Aaron
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:39 AM, Aaron Zauner <a...@azet.org> wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> Thanks for working on this. I'm fine with the changes you've made. Haven't
> tested to be honest as I had limited time since you've worked on these
Sorry for the late reply.
Thanks for working on this. I'm fine with the changes you've made. Haven't
tested to be honest as I had limited time since you've worked on these
changes to do so.
Again thanks for updating,
Aaron
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Ana Guerrero Lopez
Hi,
+1 on removal of this CA from the default system trusted CA
certificates. I get why back in the day CAcert and similar
projects looked like a valid idea, but the CA landscape has changed
significantly [0] since then and a CA that does not conform with
modern technical and operational
Hi,
I was wondering what the status of this RFP is? I'd also be
interested in seeing this available as a debian package.
Thanks,
Aaron
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Hilboll wrote:
Package: lmod
Version: 5.8-1
For some months now, a new upstream version 6.0.1 of the lmod package is
available (see http://sourceforge.net/projects/lmod/).
It would be great if this could be packaged for Debian; currently sid
includes lmod version
Hi,
I think we should take this discussion to an appropriate PostgreSQL
mailing list (please feel free to include me in a thread if you start
one). But I think it's best to close this bug for now. I agree that MD5
needs to be replaced, but using plaintext instead is certainly no option.
Aaron
Michael Samuel wrote:
Hi,
On 5 March 2015 at 19:58, Christoph Berg m...@debian.org wrote:
That's an excellent thought.. I wasn't aware of this. Unfortunately,
I'm not sure that we could make it the default in Debian as it requires
server-side certificates be configured and used properly
Hi Stephen
Stephen Frost wrote:
That's an excellent thought.. I wasn't aware of this. Unfortunately,
I'm not sure that we could make it the default in Debian as it requires
server-side certificates be configured and used properly (correct?) but
I don't see a reason to not support it and
Hi,
Stephen Frost wrote:
PG supports client-side certificate based authentication which would be
far better than any kind of password-based authentication. If password
based auth is insisted upon then TLS to verify the server-side and
protect the network connection would be good and remove
Hi Stephen,
* Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net [04/03/2015 01:45:56] wrote:
Aaron,
* Aaron Zauner (a...@azet.org) wrote:
Debian ships a set of Perl scripts to configure for PostgreSQL server
configurations, these are quite outdated and are currently configuring
authentication to use MD5
Package: postgresql
Severity: important
Tags: security
Hi,
Debian ships a set of Perl scripts to configure for PostgreSQL server
configurations, these are quite outdated and are currently configuring
authentication to use MD5 when 'password' should be used instead.
Hi Valentin,
* Valentin Plugaru valentin.plug...@uni.lu [141010 16:27]:
Package: lmod
Version: 5.6.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Please package the upstream 5.7.5 Lmod [1,2], as several important bugs
have been fixed [3].
[1]
JRmJCmZ63P79ag3Mg2k7alUT1o2YX97MfqU0btKFzeVvwduK3wxMJzHXHuNJ8fEj
jERUrdGDVRR6DefUZmMOZMip1sGyyasPUaluL2uY57rbn/UrV0nlOcYYa4a3eCuW
gHQ83r6smMOO23+LknBQ
=VHg2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Add Aaron Zauner a...@azet.org as a Debian Maintainer
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 01:42:17 +0200
Action: import
Data
Aaron Zauner a...@azet.org as a Debian Maintainer
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 01:42:17 +0200
Action: import
Recommended-By:
Christian Hofstaedler z...@debian.org
Agreement:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2014/04/msg9.html
Advocates:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2014/04
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aaron Zauner a...@azet.org
* Package name: lua-term
Version : 0.03
Upstream Author : Rob Hoelz r...@hoelzro.net
* URL : https://github.com/hoelzro/lua-term
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Lua
Description : a Lua
Package: libbotan1.10-dev
Version: 1.10.5-1
Severity: wishlist
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.9-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=UTF-8
Hi,
reportbug(1) seems to have discarded my bug description:
```
Botan may build with optional Python language support that can be
configured by the configure.py option --with-boost-python and
optionally --with-python-version=$version. Although Python bindings
are currently considered Alpha by
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aaron Zauner a...@azet.org
* Package name: lmod
Version : 5.3.2
Upstream Author : Robert McLay
* URL : https://www.tacc.utexas.edu/tacc-projects/lmod
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Lua
Description : Lua
25 matches
Mail list logo