Bug#928375: Announce - swig-4.0.0

On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 23:02:32 +0200 Torsten Landschoff < tors...@landschoff.net> wrote: > On 5/3/19 10:37 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > Would be super nice to have swig 4 in Debian. > > absolutely. And I did not notice for months. I'll have a go - maybe this > weekend, but no guarantees! How

Bug#876908: Is blcr completely useless?

On 26 September 2017 at 20:28, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Source: blcr > Version: 0.8.5-2.1 > Severity: serious > Tags: buster sid > > As far as I can see: > 1. blcr is dead upstream since 2013. > 2. blcr requires both userspace and kernel parts. > 3. The -dkms package is removed in

Bug#857390: RM: libvisca -- RoQA; unmaintained; RC-buggy; very low popcon

On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 19:30:57 +0100 Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > > package: ftp.debian.org > X-Debbugs-Cc: libvi...@packages.debian.org >   > Please remove libvisca from the archive. >   > It has a very low popcon (3), and the hardware it's design to talk to is > > > not

Bug#857390: RM: libvisca -- RoQA; unmaintained; RC-buggy; very low popcon

On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 19:30:57 +0100 Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > > package: ftp.debian.org > X-Debbugs-Cc: libvi...@packages.debian.org >   > Please remove libvisca from the archive. >   > It has a very low popcon (3), and the hardware it's design to talk to is > > > not

Bug#699624: unblock: blcr/0.8.5-1

On 5 March 2013 20:56, intrigeri intrig...@debian.org wrote: Hi, Alan Woodland wrote (02 Feb 2013 13:23:22 GMT) : 0.8.5-1 is the official upstream release that adds support for more recent kernels and fixes a number of other bugs which were discovered. This version fixes #638339

Bug#699624: unblock: blcr/0.8.5-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package blcr 0.8.5-1 is the official upstream release that adds support for more recent kernels and fixes a number of other bugs which were discovered. This version fixes

Bug#638339: blcr-0.8.4-3 STILL boes not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later

On 18 December 2012 11:33, Paul Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov wrote: With all due respect to Alan, removing the blcr-dkms package from the build is *not* a fix for the reported problem blcr: Does not build/work with Linux 2.6.39 or later. I agree that this is less than ideal and will upload a

Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing

On 7 November 2012 11:15, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: Hi Alan, On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 17:56:32 +0100, Alan Woodland wrote: There's a bug outstanding for dropping the Recommends to Suggests on the kernel module, that combined with removing the -dkms package should

Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing

On 7 November 2012 11:15, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: Hi Alan, On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 17:56:32 +0100, Alan Woodland wrote: There's a bug outstanding for dropping the Recommends to Suggests on the kernel module, that combined with removing the -dkms package should

Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing

On 14 October 2012 17:07, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 16:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 14.10.2012 16:09, Ben Hutchings wrote: blcr is not usable with kernel version 2.6.39 or later (see bug #638339). It will probably be

Bug#668348: -amd64 kernel name suffix not understood by configure

tags 638339 help forcemerge 638339 668348 thanks On 11 April 2012 09:42, Steffen Moeller steffen_moel...@gmx.de wrote: Package: blcr-dkms Version: 0.8.4-2 Severity: important checking the name lister (/usr/bin/nm -B) interface... (cached) BSD nm configure: error: --with-linux argument

Bug#638339: the problem still persists with 0.8.4

On 14 January 2012 11:52, Steffen Moeller steffen_moel...@gmx.de wrote: Package: blcr-dkms Version: 0.8.4-1 Followup-For: Bug #638339 DKMS make.log for blcr-0.8.4 for kernel 3.1.0-1-amd64 (x86_64) Sat Jan 14 12:43:27 CET 2012 make: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-3.1.0-1-amd64'

Bug#645549: blcr: forgot to add armhf to the arch list :)

tags 645549 +confirmed On 16 October 2011 22:32, Konstantinos Margaritis mar...@genesi-usa.com wrote: Package: blcr Version: 0.8.4-1 Severity: important Tags: patch Forgot to actually add armhf to the arch list. The new package builds fine on armhf. Whoops! I'll add it to the next upload.

Bug#614560: Fwd: [Checkpoint] Announcing the release of BLCR 0.8.4

There's a new upstream release which adds support for more recent kernels. I'm currently testing it with a view to making an upload tonight. -- Forwarded message -- From: Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov Date: 12 October 2011 02:03 Subject: [Checkpoint] Announcing the release

Bug#638339: [Checkpoint] Announcing the release of BLCR 0.8.4

On 12 October 2011 18:18, Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov wrote: Alan, I've had a quick go at putting together a patch for 3.0.0 this evening. We are aware of 2 non-trivial issues in 2.6.39 That seems to match what I've seen too, as these issues are the only big things I've encountered so

Bug#622720: blcr: please add support for armv7 cpus (armhf)

On 28 September 2011 16:19, Konstantinos Margaritis mar...@genesi-usa.com wrote: On 14 April 2011 11:58, Alan Woodland awoodl...@debian.org wrote: tags 622720 +confirmed tags 622720 +pending thanks On 14 April 2011 12:21, Konstantinos Margaritis mar...@genesi-usa.com wrote: Source: blcr

Bug#638339: Confirmed

tags 638339 +confirmed thanks Hi, Thanks for this report. I'm aware of this issue, but it may be a while until a fix is forthcoming since kernel support is lagging behind even before the 3.0 series. I hope to have this fixed in time to release with wheezy though. There's a new release out

Bug#626352: arguments for bug

On 12 May 2011 21:59, Tomáš Hnyk tomash...@gmail.com wrote: Nice to hear that others consider my decision for recommends reasonable. The original poster might like to reread the guidelines when to use Depends and when Recommends. Do you mean this:

Bug#624343: Possible workaround?

I've hit this bug from a different scenario - I have one SATA disk and one external USB disk in a root on RAID1+LVM setup. During boot it seems the USB device often doesn't settle before the md device gets to being assembled, with the net result that it boots degraded, with the USB device missing.

Bug#622720: blcr: please add support for armv7 cpus (armhf)

tags 622720 +confirmed tags 622720 +pending thanks On 14 April 2011 12:21, Konstantinos Margaritis mar...@genesi-usa.com wrote: Source: blcr Severity: important Tags: patch This patch is a backport from the Ubuntu armel package. Debian armhf uses thumb2 just as Ubuntu armel, so it has the

Bug#614560: blcr-dkms: Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 2.6.37-1-amd64 (x86_64)

On -10/01/37 20:59, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Package: blcr-dkms Version: 0.8.2-15 Severity: important Hi, I cannot install blcr-dkms on my system: [snip] Building module: cleaning build area make KERNELRELEASE=2.6.37-1-amd64 -C /lib/modules/2.6.37-1-amd64/build

Bug#597601: FTBFS : cr_atomic.h: No such file or directory

For some reason CR_LIBARCH is getting set to i686 in pbuilder on amd64 and i386 on real i386 hardware. Looking into it further. Alan signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#597601: FTBFS : cr_atomic.h: No such file or directory

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 597601 +confirmed thanks On -10/01/37 20:59, Jonathan KLEE wrote: I'm trying to build blcr (0.8.2-13) on x86_64 from scratch with pbuilder but I have the following error : libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../libcr -I..

Bug#597601: Building in a chroot

tags 597601 +patch tags 597601 +pending thanks Hi, I'm having some trouble getting x86 builds to work in an x86 chroot hosted on a x86_64 machine. The fault seems to stem from the fact that CR_LIBARCH is set to i686, not i386, which causes the building of the library later on to search in

Bug#573112: Testing a patch now

tags 573112 +patch thanks I'm testing a newer patch from upstream which adds support for newer kernels. Alan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#556135: #556135: xul-ext-weave

On 20 May 2010 14:05, Alexander GQ Gerasiov g...@debian.org wrote: Hello, Michael. On Thu, 20 May 2010 14:24:08 +0200 Michael Fladischer mich...@fladi.at wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I saw your response on #556135 offering help. There is a new upload for

Bug#573112: It is just a 2.6.33 problem

On 13 April 2010 07:26, Yves Caniou yves.can...@ens-lyon.fr wrote: Le Thursday 25 March 2010 19:34:35 Alan Woodland, vous avez écrit : retitle 573112 Please support 2.6.33 kernels tags 573112 +confirmed thanks I've taken a closer look at this problem and can confirm that it is just

Bug#556135: Uploaded my package

On 29 March 2010 15:04, Michael Fladischer mich...@fladi.at wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've uploaded my package to mentors.debian.net: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/weave/weave_1.2b2-1.dsc It works well and I was able to seamlessly replace the

Bug#573112: It is just a 2.6.33 problem

retitle 573112 Please support 2.6.33 kernels tags 573112 +confirmed thanks I've taken a closer look at this problem and can confirm that it is just a problem with 2.6.33. Quite a few files have moved around. I've got partial patches for a few of the changes, but I just noticed the upstream author

Bug#556135: ITP #556135 Weave

On 22 March 2010 19:05, Fladischer Michael michael.fladisc...@medunigraz.at wrote: Hi! I saw your response on ITP #556135 saying that you intend to package Mozilla Labs Weave and I wanted to ask you on how far your progress is. Maybe you want to take a look at my approach on packaging Weave.

Bug#573112: blcr-dkms: Does not install: configuration problem due to missing UTS_RELEASE

On 9 March 2010 02:24, Yves Caniou yves.can...@ens-lyon.fr wrote: Package: blcr-dkms Version: 0.8.2-9 Severity: normal Compilation with the line provided in the package (but with full path for the manually installed and running kernel) cd /var/lib/dkms/blcr/0.8.2/build env -i

Bug#573112: blcr-dkms: Does not install: configuration problem due to missing UTS_RELEASE

On 9 March 2010 11:29, Yves Caniou yves.can...@ens-lyon.fr wrote: Le Tuesday 09 March 2010 12:21:49 Alan Woodland, vous avez écrit : On 9 March 2010 02:24, Yves Caniou yves.can...@ens-lyon.fr wrote: Package: blcr-dkms Version: 0.8.2-9 Severity: normal Compilation with the line provided

Bug#573112: blcr-dkms: Does not install: configuration problem due to missing UTS_RELEASE

On 9 March 2010 13:26, Yves Caniou yves.can...@ens-lyon.fr wrote: Le Tuesday 09 March 2010 14:12:50 Alan Woodland, vous avez écrit : On 9 March 2010 11:29, Yves Caniou yves.can...@ens-lyon.fr wrote: Le Tuesday 09 March 2010 12:21:49 Alan Woodland, vous avez écrit : On 9 March 2010 02:24

Bug#572021: openmpi-checkpoint: orte-checkpoint is not installed by package, ompi-checkpoint is a link to it

2010/3/1 Fernando Tarlá Cardoso Lemos fernando...@gmail.com: Package: openmpi-checkpoint Version: 1.4.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable /usr/bin/ompi-checkpoint is a symlink to orte-checkpoint, but orte-checkpoint isn't installed by this package. Does indeeed

Bug#481951: Patch?

There seems to be patches for this issue: http://code.google.com/p/distcc/issues/detail?id=34#c7 Are they sane/sensbile? Is this still a problem in Sid/Squeeze? It certainly exists in Lenny still, but if a subsequent release has been packaged this bug could probably be closed or tagged

Bug#572229: openmpi-checkpoint should depend on blcr-util

2010/3/2 Fernando Tarlá Cardoso Lemos fernando...@gmail.com: Package: openmpi-checkpoint Version: 1.4.1-1 Severity: important openmpi-checkpoint does not currently depend on blcr-util. However, ompi-restart will segfault unless blcr-util (upstream bug maybe, I reported to the OpenMPI

Bug#572229: openmpi-checkpoint should depend on blcr-util

On 2 March 2010 14:59, Fernando Lemos fernando...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/3/2 Alan Woodland awoodl...@debian.org: 2010/3/2 Fernando Tarlá Cardoso Lemos fernando...@gmail.com: Package: openmpi-checkpoint Version: 1.4.1-1 Severity: important openmpi-checkpoint does not currently depend on blcr

Bug#524746: Fwd: Sponsor for player

/player/examples/libplayerc/speech_c_client', automatically rejected package. robot-player: If you have a good reason, you may override this lintian tag. Regards, Martijn van Brummelen On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 05:36:47PM +, Alan Woodland wrote: Hi, I've just sponsored an NMU for player

Bug#556135: Working on a package now

retitle 556135 ITP: xul-ext-weave -- Syncronize personal data between Mozilla browsers owner 556135 ! thanks I'm using weave myself quite a lot now, so I'll take a look at providing this soon. Alan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#560983: Help please?

tags 560983 +help tag 557310 pending thanks Hi, I had a look at doing this today and it's not as trivial as I'd hoped. If someone else wanted to take a look at this I'd very much appreciate it. Thanks, Alan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug#542490: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] RFS: tabmixplus 0.3.8.2-1 (was: packaging tabmixplus)

2010/1/5 Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com: Am Dienstag, den 05.01.2010, 17:34 +0100 schrieb Christoph Anton Mitterer: Sorry for the late reply,.. No problem. On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 18:29 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: * The license block (BEGIN LICENSE BLOCK to END LICENSE BLOCK) needs to

Bug#562080: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#562080: xul-ext-traybiff: mail LED notification does not work on Asus laptops

2009/12/22 Jakub Adam jakub.a...@ktknet.cz: Subject: xul-ext-traybiff: mail LED notification does not work on Asus laptops Package: xul-ext-traybiff Version: 1.2.3-7 Severity: normal Tags: patch This plugin is able to autodetect LEDs present on some laptops and use them for notifications

Bug#561365: requires libtool to install

tags 561365 +confirmed thanks 2009/12/16 Yuri D'Elia wav...@thregr.org: Package: blcr-dkms Version: 0.8.2-6 Severity: normal In the current package version, libtool is executed during the build phase of the module. libtool is not listed as a dependency, and thus the build fails. libtool

Bug#560983: gmail-notify: egg.trayicon is deprecated, use gtk.StatusIcon instead

tags 560983 +confirmed thanks 2009/12/13 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org: Package: gmail-notify Severity: normal User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: oldlibs eggtrayicon Hi, gmail-notify uses egg.trayicon, but it should use gtk.StatusIcon which is better

Bug#559267: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#559267: Bug#559267: Sage Firefox extensions vulnerabilities

diff -uNr sage.orig/content/createhtml.js sage/content/createhtml.js --- sage.orig/content/createhtml.js 2009-12-10 14:01:59.0 + +++ sage/content/createhtml.js 2009-12-10 14:41:04.0 + @@ -136,7 +136,8 @@ return this.entityEncode(feed.getTitle()); case **LINK**: -

Bug#559267: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#559267: Bug#559267: Sage Firefox extensions vulnerabilities

diff -uNr sage.orig/content/createhtml.js sage/content/createhtml.js --- sage.orig/content/createhtml.js 2009-12-10 14:01:59.0 + +++ sage/content/createhtml.js 2009-12-10 14:41:04.0 + @@ -136,7 +136,8 @@ return this.entityEncode(feed.getTitle()); case **LINK**: -

Bug#559267: Diff for Lenny

lenny-xss-fix.debdiff Description: Binary data signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#559267: Sage Firefox extensions vulnerabilities

Hi, For my sins I'm the maintainer of the Debian package of Sage. I'm looking at fixing the security bug that was recently reported [1]. Both of your names were mentioned in [2] as reporting the bug. I'm looking to either prepare my own patch, in which a test case and some advice would be

Bug#559267: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#559267: CVE-2009-4102: RSS Feeds Cross Domain Scripting Vulnerability

2009/12/3 Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org: Package: firefox-sage Severity: grave Tags: security -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was published for firefox-sage. CVE-2009-4102[0]: | Sage 1.4.3 and earlier

Bug#559267: [Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#559267: CVE-2009-4102: RSS Feeds Cross Domain Scripting Vulnerability

2009/12/3 Alan Woodland alan.woodl...@gmail.com: 2009/12/3 Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org: Package: firefox-sage Severity: grave Tags: security -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was published for firefox

Bug#524746: Fwd: Sponsor for player

Hi, I've just sponsored an NMU for player to DELAYED/7, which makes only one change, a fix for the RC bug #524746. If you'd like me to cancel this to give you more time drop me an email. Thanks, Alan -- Forwarded message -- From: Alan Woodland alan.woodl...@gmail.com Date: 2009

Bug#507218: Songbird RFP

retitle 555700 ITP: songbird -- desktop Web player, a digital jukebox and Web browser forcemerge 412437 507218 555700 thanks Hi, Thanks for this RFP. There are currently two existing ITP bugs for Songbird. Currently packaging Songbird is blocked by the large(ish) number of custom patches [0] for

Bug#555714: mpich2: Please add support for blcr

) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Add BLCR checkpoint library support + + -- Alan Woodland awoodl...@debian.org Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:22:37 + + mpich2 (1.2-2) unstable; urgency=low * Upload to unstable. (Actually, 1.2-1 was already uploaded to unstable)

Bug#547351: l7-filter-userspace: [FTBFS] 'nfct_sprintf_protocol' was not declared

2009/11/10 Alan Woodland alan.woodl...@gmail.com: 2009/11/10 Jakub Wilk uba...@users.sf.net: tags 547351 + patch thanks I've finally managed to write a patch: http://hg.debian.org/hg/collab-maint/l7-filter-userspace/raw-file/tip/debian/patches/netfilter-conntrack-0.100.diff Testing

Bug#555714: mpich2: Please add support for blcr

Ok, that makes sense to wait for 1.3.x then I guess. I also forgot in my patch to point out that BLCR only exists in Debian for i386, amd64, armel and powerpc. The patch I submitted for OpenMPI which enabled BLCR support did indeed add an extra binary package, openmpi-checkpoint which avoids

Bug#555475: lib32cr0: installs libraries in old /emul/ia32-linux hierarchy

2009/11/9 Aaron M. Ucko u...@debian.org: Package: lib32cr0 Version: 0.8.2-4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 9.1.1 lib32cr0 installs into /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib. Although that was once the correct location for 32-bit libraries on amd64 Debian systems (with /usr/lib32 a mere

Bug#547351: l7-filter-userspace: [FTBFS] 'nfct_sprintf_protocol' was not declared

2009/11/10 Jakub Wilk uba...@users.sf.net: tags 547351 + patch thanks I've finally managed to write a patch: http://hg.debian.org/hg/collab-maint/l7-filter-userspace/raw-file/tip/debian/patches/netfilter-conntrack-0.100.diff Testing will be *much* appreciated. Excellent, I'll have a fiddle

Bug#545919: [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Bug#545919: openmpi: Please add support for BLCR

schrieb Alan Woodland: The attached patch builds an extra binary package, openmpi-checkpoint on architectures which have BLCR available. (Option #3 from the earlier mail). I think it all works sanely, and shouldn't introduce any new problems. As said, I did some minor modifications

Bug#549740: mozilla-traybiff: FTBFS: nscore.h:51:21: error: prtypes.h: No such file or directory

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 fixed 549740 1.2.3-6 thanks Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Source: mozilla-traybiff Version: 1.2.3-5 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all

Bug#549592: RM: mozilla-traybiff-common -- NBS; No longer needed

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal mozilla-traybiff-common used to share files between icedove-traybiff and iceape-traybiff. Iceape was dropped late on in the Lenny release cycle, and the minimal change for mozilla-traybiff kept the -common package rather than merging it. Since iceape

Bug#549216: ITP: libvisca -- Implementation of VISCA cameras control protocol

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alan Woodland awoodl...@debian.org * Package name: libvisca Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : Damien Douxchamps ddouxcha...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://damien.douxchamps.net/libvisca/ * License : LGPL-2

Bug#548587: hurd: bashisms in MAKEDEV

Package: hurd Version: 20090404-1 Severity: important /dev/MAKEDEV seems to assume the default shell is bash, which is no longer true in sid. nostradamus-hurd:~# cd /dev nostradamus-hurd:/dev# ./MAKEDEV hd2 ./MAKEDEV: 53: function: not found eval: 1: hd2: not found ./MAKEDEV: 56: Syntax error:

Bug#548239: ITA gmail-notify

retitle 548239 ITA: gmail-notify -- A Gmail Notifier owner 548239 ! thanks I'll adopt gmail-notify, hopefully making an upload over the weekend. Alan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#547725: Bug#548239: ITA gmail-notify

2009/9/25 Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org: On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:05, Alan Woodland awoodl...@debian.org wrote: retitle 548239 ITA: gmail-notify -- A Gmail Notifier owner 548239 ! thanks I'll adopt gmail-notify, hopefully making an upload over the weekend. you might also consider joining

Bug#547725: gmail-notify: broken maintainer address

Hi, I was the original sponsor for gmail-notify. I've been aware of the absent maintainer for sometime now, although I know no more than you do about the reasons. I prepared an NMU almost exactly 10 days ago that addresses most of the outstanding bugs for this package, and emailed the maintainer

Bug#547351: l7-filter-userspace: [FTBFS] 'nfct_sprintf_protocol' was not declared

2009/9/19 Jakub Wilk uba...@users.sf.net: * Alan Woodland awoodl...@debian.org, 2009-09-18, 21:51: Justification: Policy 5.8.2 My copy of Debian Policy does not have such a section: $ zgrep -cF 5.8.2 /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.txt.gz 0 Whoops, not sure where that came from! How

Bug#546665: l7-protocols: overwrites user configuration files

2009/9/18 Jakub Wilk uba...@users.sf.net: * Alan Woodland awoodl...@debian.org, 2009-09-17, 19:44: 2) Patch l7-filter-userspace to look into /usr/share/l7-protocols for protocol definitions rather than /etc/l7-protocols. Then l7-protocols could provide no /etc/l7-protocols at all

Bug#547351: l7-filter-userspace: [FTBFS] 'nfct_sprintf_protocol' was not declared

Subject: l7-filter-userspace: [FTBFS] 'nfct_sprintf_protocol' was not declared Package: l7-filter-userspace Version: 0.11-1 Justification: Policy 5.8.2 Severity: serious The buildd logs from the original build (e.g.

Bug#546665: l7-protocols: overwrites user configuration files

2009/9/17 Piotr Lewandowski piotr.lewandow...@gmail.com: Hi Alan, I need your advice what to do with my first RC-bug. :) I would normally recommend CC'ing discussions relating to how to fix the bug to the bug report itself - someone else might read the bug and have something relevant to offer

Bug#545919: [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Bug#545919: openmpi: Please add support for BLCR

@@ +openmpi (1.3.3-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Build with BLCR support on i386,amd64,ppc,armel + * Adds openmpi-checkpoint package, which includes the binaries for checkpointing + + -- Alan Woodland awoodl...@debian.org Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:41:22 +0100 + diff -u openmpi-1.3.3/debian/rules

Bug#546464: gmail-notify: diff for NMU version 1.6.1.1-0.1

window patch from Ubuntu (Closes: #432676) + * Replace with amp; in popups (Closes: #420871) + * Add debian/watch + + -- Alan Woodland awoodl...@debian.org Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:31:01 +0100 + gmail-notify (1.6.1-3) unstable; urgency=low * Chance default x-www-browser to www-browser (closes

Bug#537275: icedove-traybiff: Tray icon does not work in KDE 4

2009/7/16 Tim Gokcen hexe...@gmail.com: Package: icedove-traybiff Version: 1.2.3-4.3 Severity: important After upgrading to KDE 4 in the 'testing' distribution, the tray icon for Icedove no longer functions. Instead of showing a 'letter' icon, the tray has a blank space where the icon

Bug#545919: [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Bug#545919: openmpi: Please add support for BLCR

2009/9/10 Alan Woodland awoodl...@debian.org: 2009/9/10 Manuel Prinz man...@debian.org: Hi Alan! Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2009, 00:33 +0100 schrieb Alan Woodland: BLCR is now in main. It would be nice if openmpi were built using this where it is available. I've attached a short patch

Bug#545919: [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Bug#545919: openmpi: Please add support for BLCR

2009/9/12 Alan Woodland alan.woodl...@gmail.com: 2009/9/10 Alan Woodland awoodl...@debian.org: 2009/9/10 Manuel Prinz man...@debian.org: Hi Alan! Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2009, 00:33 +0100 schrieb Alan Woodland: BLCR is now in main. It would be nice if openmpi were built using this where

Bug#545919: [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Bug#545919: openmpi: Please add support for BLCR

2009/9/12 Alan Woodland alan.woodl...@gmail.com: I'll try and convert the I've got into a repeatable, automated test and then add it to this bug report in a bit too. As promised I've attached a somewhat crude test for the BLCR checkpointing to this email. run_test.sh compiles and runs everything

Bug#545919: [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Bug#545919: openmpi: Please add support for BLCR

2009/9/10 Manuel Prinz man...@debian.org: Hi Alan! Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2009, 00:33 +0100 schrieb Alan Woodland: BLCR is now in main. It would be nice if openmpi were built using this where it is available. I've attached a short patch adding options to configure, and build-depends

Bug#545919: openmpi: Please add support for BLCR

-1.3.3/debian/changelog +++ openmpi-1.3.3/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +openmpi (1.3.3-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Build with BLCR support on i386,amd64,ppc,armel + + -- Alan Woodland awoodl...@debian.org Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:41:22 +0100 + openmpi (1.3.3-1) unstable; urgency=low * New

Bug#543263: closed by Alan Woodland awoodl...@debian.org (Bug#543263: fixed in blcr 0.8.2-3)

2009/8/25 Martin Zobel-Helas zo...@ftbfs.de: reopen 543263 retitle 543263 Fails with Assembler messages version 543263 0.8.2-3 thanks Hi, now it fails with | libtool: compile:  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../libcr -I.. -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -I../include -I../../include

Bug#543263: Discussions on upstream mailing list about this bug

http://www.nersc.gov/hypermail/checkpoint/1250.html http://www.nersc.gov/hypermail/checkpoint/1245.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#543263: blcr_0.8.2-2 FTBFS on sparc (dist=unstable)

tags 543263 confirmed thanks 2009/8/23 Martin Zobel-Helas zo...@ftbfs.de: Package: blcr Version: 0.8.2-2 Severity: serious checking for value of CR_ASM_OP_HAND_CHKPT... 2147787009 checking for value of CR_ASM_CHECKPOINT_STUB... 16384 checking for value of CR_ASM_OP_HAND_ABORT... 2147787010

Bug#542643: Does not build with 2.6.30-1-686

2009/8/22 Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov: Alan Woodland wrote: 2009/8/22 Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov: Removing the check for _end will negate the validation that is being performed. Instead, I would suggest that an alternative symbol should be used for validation. Does

Bug#542643: Does not build with 2.6.30-1-686

2009/8/22 Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov: Removing the check for _end will negate the validation that is being performed. Instead, I would suggest that an alternative symbol should be used for validation. Does the build work after replacing ' [AB] _end' with ' [TD] sys_open' in the

Bug#541818: blcr: Support for more arches.

On 16 Aug 2009, at 21:16, Paul H. Hargrove wrote: [snip] I'll keep that info around for anyone else who asks about other architectures. Regarding the question of *BSD or Hurd (ignoring that L in BLCR stands for Linux): While I don't want to totally rule-out the possibility, I doubt that

Bug#541818: blcr: Support for more arches.

(For readers on checkpo...@lbl.gov blcr was accepted into Debian last night) It seems that your package currently doesn't work on all arches. It fails with errors like: checking build system type... alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu checking host system type... alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu

Bug#537275: Suggestions?

tags 537275 +help thanks Hi, This is a general call for help really - I don't have KDE 4 available to test things with, and I'm not too familiar with egg tray icons... patches would be much appreciated. Alan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#538407: libmagic1: Please add support for recognising BLCR context files

Package: file Version: 5.03-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch I'm currently packaging BLCR (ITP: #529619), and the source for it includes blcr.magic, which would be useful to see in the main libmagic packages. Thanks, Alan # This is file type detection data for the file(1), as described in the

Bug#529619: Fwd: BLCR Debian Packages

Forgot to CC the ITP bug... -- Forwarded message -- From: Alan Woodland alan.woodl...@gmail.com Date: 2009/7/23 Subject: BLCR Debian Packages To: checkpo...@lbl.gov checkpo...@lbl.gov Cc: Alan Woodland awoodl...@debian.org Hi, A Debian user has requested packages of BLCR

Bug#529619: BLCR Debian Packages

2009/7/23 Guy Coates g...@sanger.ac.uk: I'm not a DD, but I do have some experience with packaging (including the joy of module-assistant), so I'd be happy to review the packages. Wow, quite a lot of interest in a short space of time! First rough cut packages are online @

Bug#529619: ITP BLCR

package wnpp owner 529619 Alan Woodlandawoodl...@debian.org retitle 529619 ITP: blcr -- Berkeley Lab Checkpoint/Restart thanks I've been using this quite a lot lately on several clusters as well as my desktops. Would be very handy to see this in Debian, and I can probably do some packaging as

Bug#503631: confirmation

wrote: Hi all! First of all, this bug is ages old, it's been around at least from 4.3. onwards. Second, it is amd64-only; I can reproduce it with 100% certainty on all amd64-machines, but nowhere else (including, btw, one 64-bit alpha). Third, dx works fine nevertheless: executive

Bug#412437: getdeb.net deb source (+ Alioth project)

2009/1/18 Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com: Hi, (sorry for the late response) On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:14:18AM +, Alan Woodland wrote: Savvas Radevic wrote: Also this personal package archive (Fabien Tassin): http://ppa.launchpad.net/fta/ubuntu/pool/main/s/songbird/ The project

Bug#412437: getdeb.net deb source (+ Alioth project)

Savvas Radevic wrote: I don't know if this helps, but the getdeb.net team has already packaged version 1.0.0 Here's the deb source along with some ubuntu 8.10 intrepid ibex deb packages: http://archive.getdeb.net/getdeb/ubuntu/intrepid/so/ The getdeb packages are basically just a wrapper

Bug#412437: start the team?

2009/1/2 Alan Woodland alan.woodl...@gmail.com: 2008/12/31 Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com: Hi, Alan, since you've already worked on this a bit, do you want to start the team and the repository with what you already have done? Then any of us can work on integrating in some of the work

Bug#412437: start the team?

2008/12/31 Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com: Hi, Alan, since you've already worked on this a bit, do you want to start the team and the repository with what you already have done? Then any of us can work on integrating in some of the work that Ubuntu did. Sounds like a plan. I'm away for a

Bug#412437: songbird

2008/12/1 Ryan Niebur [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, It looks like there isn't much happening with packaging songbird. I'm interested in helping with songbird, too. Would you like to start an alioth team to work on it? I'd be happy to help. If you're gonna start a team, I really don't care about

Bug#503631: Re: Bug#503631: dx: Visual Program Editor doesn't shows networks

Mark Purcell wrote: Package: dx Followup-For: Bug #503631 tags 503631 unreproducible severity 503631 important subscribe 503631 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks David, Daniel, I am unable to reproduce this RC bug on lenny. I obtain an empty window titled Untitled which allows me to add

Bug#493247: FTBFS on armel - uses -fshort-wchar option

Riku Voipio wrote: Package: mozilla-traybiff Version: 1.2.3-4.1 Severity: serious armel buildlog: g++ -L/usr/lib/iceape -lxpcom -lplds4 -lplc4 -lnspr4 -lpthread -ldl -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0

Bug#486170: not compatible with iceweasel 3.0

tags 486170 +upstream tags 486170 +confirmed thanks Hi, Thanks for the bug report. I'm currently waiting for upstream to make a new release fixing this: http://www.mozdev.org/pipermail/sage/2008-May/001560.html Alan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#480822: Don't build depend on libxul-dev

2008/5/17 Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:32:49AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: tag 480822 + patch thanks On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:07:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: Package: mozilla-traybiff Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags:

Bug#470124: ogle: diff for NMU version 0.9.2-5.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 470124 +confirmed thanks Marc Brockschmidt wrote: Package: ogle Version: 0.9.2-5 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, Attached is the diff for my ogle 0.9.2-5.1 NMU. Thanks for doing that, sorry I didn't get round to it before you made

  1   2   3   >