Bug#333333: rageircd: extremely high lag on encrypted connections

2005-10-12 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
. As stated I'm going to be taking some time to investigate the socket engine issues that have arisen recently. On 12 Oct 2005, at 07:03, Marc Haber wrote: On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:24:27PM +0100, Alasdair McWilliam wrote: What socket engine module is 2.0.1-1 compiled with? rt

Bug#333333: rageircd: extremely high lag on encrypted connections

2005-10-11 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
On 11 Oct 2005, at 13:10, Marc Haber wrote: On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:55:34AM +, Johannes Berg wrote: Subject: Bug#33: rageircd: extremely high lag on encrypted connections ^^ you know that you got to buy all Debian Developers a drink for hi

Bug#331089: rageircd stays connected to peer server for about 6 hours, then quits

2005-10-08 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
o, a great mystery. Alasdair McWilliam wrote: Hi From the lack of communication I assume your server has stabilised by compiling with -O0 instead of -O2? Rather odd I have a gut feeling this is going to take a serious amount of debugging. :-( -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#331089: rageircd stays connected to peer server for about 6 hours, then quits

2005-10-07 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
Hi From the lack of communication I assume your server has stabilised by compiling with -O0 instead of -O2? Rather odd I have a gut feeling this is going to take a serious amount of debugging. :-( -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Bug#331089: rageircd: stack trace of where it ends up

2005-10-04 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
Phil, I believe your observations are correct. That is, two manifestations of the same bug. I've had this problem for a number of months, as I said, on a FreeBSD server. However we have an almost identical server (also running FreeBSD) and the ircd has an uptime of almost six months. Ga

Bug#331089: rageircd: stack trace of where it ends up

2005-10-04 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
PS. I can never actually re-create the issue; it happens at random. I've found that if I wait for it to happen, it doesn't!! On 4 Oct 2005, at 17:37, Philip Craig wrote: Marc Haber wrote: One time it again broke at m_away.c line 88. Another time it broke at m_away.c line 68 That, how

Bug#331089: rageircd: stack trace of where it ends up

2005-10-04 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
On 4 Oct 2005, at 10:46, Philip Craig wrote: The server has 0 users connected and 1 other server connected. It's a backup server in case of connectivity loss on the main server. The crashes happen at random, after say 3-6 hours. When the crashes happen, no one on the server that crashes h

Bug#331089: rageircd: stack trace of where it ends up

2005-10-04 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
Rather an interesting one. What strikes me is that AWAY verifies sptr->user is non-NULL before it does anything. However just because sptr->user is non-NULL does not mean it's valid memory space. Methinks a heap corruption. What are you doing on the server prior to this occurring? How long

Bug#330887: rageircd: My listen section from config file as requested by Alasdair McWilliam

2005-09-30 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
Now, I see the following on stdout: No random state, generating entropy from /dev/random. I see this repeatedly if I ctrl-c that process. Yeah, rageircd uses a 1024-byte random key to establish an encrypted session server-to-server. If the ircd can't get enough entropy from the system

Bug#330887: rageircd: My listen section from config file as requested by Alasdair McWilliam

2005-09-30 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
Basically, listen * { ... }; will make the ircd bind to _all available interfaces_ on the specified ports. So, if your server has two network interfaces (i.e. 192.168.0.1 and 10.0.0.1) it will bind to these, and (| think) 127.0.0.1 too. It's possible that if for any reason any ports on an i

Bug#330887: rageircd on amd64 with default config file doesn't even bind to the ports

2005-09-30 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
Could you include a copy of the 'listen' configuration in your rageircd config file? Cheers On 30 Sep 2005, at 10:49, Philip Craig wrote: Package: rageircd Version: 2.0.1-1 Severity: important On my system, rageircd starts up but doesn't even beind to 6667, according to netstat. The /etc/i

Bug#309196: retitle to include CAN-2005-2096 reference

2005-07-13 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
y - gcc 2) On 13 Jul 2005, at 22:15, Florian Weimer wrote: * Alasdair McWilliam: The original 2.0.0 release does indeed include a vulnerable zlib verison. Patch to use the system zlib is attached. A compiled package is temporarily available from: http://static.enyo.de/fw/volatile/rag

Bug#309196: retitle to include CAN-2005-2096 reference

2005-07-13 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
The original 2.0.0 release does indeed include a vulnerable zlib verison. However 2.0.1 (currently post-rc1) development has wound down and will be released within a few days, and will be near enough the current build/revision. On 13 Jul 2005, at 13:26, Florian Weimer wrote: retitle 309

Bug#309999: [Debian normal bug #309999] rageircd: Looks for ircd.motd in /usr at SIGHUP

2005-05-21 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
Quoted from ./configure --help --with-bindir=DIR Sets binaries to live in DIR (default: PREFIX) --with-moddir=DIR Sets modules to live in DIR (default: PREFIX/modules) --with-confdir=DIR Sets conf files to live in DIR (default: PREFIX) --wit

Bug#309196: Bug#307231: RageIRCd build failure on s390

2005-05-16 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
Thanks. So I can upload the patched version to unstable, fixing the s390 issue? Yes :-) It is an issue which makes the current rageircd unsuitable for release with a stable version. We have missed sarge anyway, so the package wouldn't migrate from unstable to testing anyway. That bug report doesn't

Bug#309196: Bug#307231: RageIRCd build failure on s390

2005-05-16 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
I expect you know more than me about this so I'll go with the patch you've given. Thanks for your input on this issue too it's really appreciated. :-) I'll re-fix the BLUEMOON branch tomorrow evening probably. Is it possible to close the other bug associated with rageircd as it's not really a

Bug#309196: Re. previous messages

2005-05-16 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
Package: rageircd Version: 2.0.0-2 Sorry, the previous messages were attached to this bug report by mistake. Whoops! Re. zlib, yes it's been sorted out in the next version, 2.0.1, ETA June. Cheers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM

Bug#307231: Fwd: Bug#307231: RageIRCd build failure on s390

2005-05-16 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
See messages forwarded below. Sent to the wrong bug report in error.Begin forwarded message:From: Alasdair McWilliam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: 16 May 2005 14:45:15 BDTTo: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Fwd: Bug#307231: RageIRCd build failure on

Bug#309196: Fwd: Bug#307231: RageIRCd build failure on s390

2005-05-16 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
Package: rageircdVersion: 2.0.0-2Re. the below message, the configure.ac line number may be incorrect as autoconf has changed a bit between 2.0.0 and the current BLUEMOON revision. It shouldn't be too far out though.AlasdairBegin forwarded message:From: Alasdair McWilliam <[EMAIL PROTECT

Bug#309196: Bug#307231: RageIRCd build failure on s390

2005-05-16 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
Package: rageircd Version: 2.0.0-2 Hi Marc, Apologies for not getting back to you sooner - I've been working hard. I've got around to the proper bug fix so bare with me. Firstly, replace all the current VA_COPY declaration statements in include/common.h with: #ifdef HAVE___VA_COPY #define VA_COP

Bug#307231: RageIRCd build failure on s390

2005-05-07 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
17:13, Marc Haber wrote: tags #307231 thanks On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:44:56PM +0100, Alasdair McWilliam wrote: The compile failure is in src/ircsprintf.c as follows. cc -g -Wall -O2 -export-dynamic -I../adns -I../include -I../zlib -c ircsprintf.c ircsprintf.c: In function `ircvsprintf

Bug#307231: RageIRCd build failure on s390

2005-05-02 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
y 2005, at 06:36, Marc Haber wrote: severity #307231 serious thanks Justification: hidden FTBFS Hi, On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:44:56PM +0100, Alasdair McWilliam wrote: I've checked the build logs for rageircd 2.0.0-2 in unstable and have noticed that the actual rageircd binary doesn'

Bug#307231: RageIRCd build failure on s390

2005-05-01 Thread Alasdair McWilliam
Package: rageircdVersion: 2.0.0-2HiI've checked the build logs for rageircd 2.0.0-2 in unstable and have noticed that the actual rageircd binary doesn't build on the s390 architecture. Hence I am reporting it here.The compile failure is in src/ircsprintf.c as follows.cc  -g -Wall -O2 -export-dynami