Bug#674859: [ITR] templates://nagvis/{nagvis.templates}

Hi Bubulle and others! * Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org [120528 14:52]: The first step of the process is to review the debconf source template file(s) of nagvis. This review will start on Thursday, May 31, 2012, or as soon as you acknowledge this mail with an agreement for us to carry

Bug#673096: Bug#674850: RM: figlet -- RoQA; license which specifically excludes the right to re-distribute

clone 674850 -1 clone 674850 -2 retitle -1 Please remove figlet 2.2.2-1 from stable retitle -2 Please remove all versions of src:figlet from snapshots.d.o reassing -1 release.debian.org reassing -2 snapshot.debian.org thanks Hi! * Bart Martens ba...@debian.org [120528 10:58]: Please remove

Bug#675213: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

Package: aclock.app Version: 0.2.3-4.2 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org - From: Mail Delivery System

Bug#675215: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

Package: gnustep-icons Version: 1.0-4 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org - From: Mail Delivery System

Bug#675214: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

Package: adplay Version: 1.6-1 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org - From: Mail Delivery System

Bug#675216: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

Package: lie Version: 2.2.2+dfsg-1.2 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org - From: Mail Delivery System

Bug#675217: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

Package: mazeofgalious Version: 0.62.dfsg2-2.2 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org - From: Mail Delivery

Bug#675218: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

Package: ree Version: 1.3-2 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org - From: Mail Delivery System

Bug#675220: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

Package: textedit.app Version: 4.0+20061029-3.1 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org - From: Mail Delivery

Bug#675221: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

Package: unadf Version: 0.7.11a-1 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org - From: Mail Delivery System

Bug#675219: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

Package: supertransball2 Version: 1.5-3 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org - From: Mail Delivery System

Bug#675222: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

Package: viewpdf.app Version: 1:0.2dfsg1-3.1 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org - From: Mail Delivery

Bug#675223: (fwd) Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender [mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org]

Package: xdms Version: 1.3.2-3.1 Severity: serious Hi! It seems that an E-Mail address listed in the maintainer or uploaders field bounces. Best regards, Alexander - Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@franck.debian.org - From: Mail Delivery System

Bug#674850: closed by Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org (Bug#674850: Removed package(s) from unstable)

Hi! * Debian Bug Tracking System ow...@bugs.debian.org [120530 12:49]: We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: figlet |2.2.2-1 | source, amd64, i386, powerpc, sparc the | 3.3~b4-1 | source, amd64, armel,

Bug#634019: RFS: supertuxkart, irrlicht

Hi! Sorry, took some time, but I finally uploaded irrlicht about 30 minutes ago, and supertux is currently uploading. Best regards, Alexander On 13.05.2012 04:48, Vincent Cheng wrote: [ Cc:ed supertuxkart's uploaders as listed in debian/control ] With a bit of help from upstream, I've

Bug#673150: RM: several -- ROP; outdated hurd-i386 binary package

Hi! On 16.05.2012 20:02, Michael Banck wrote: [..] Hrm, on second thought, we should remove all hurd-i386 binary packages of the source packages; I have only listed the source package name. Yep, makes much more sense. Should have thought about that first place. They are gone now. Best

Bug#673150: RM: several -- ROP; outdated hurd-i386 binary package

Hi Michael! * Michael Banck mba...@debian.org [120516 15:32]: The list is: [..] That results in: # Broken Depends: audacity: audacity-dbg dragonegg: llvm-gcc-4.5 iftop: iftop-dbg rrdcollect: rrdcollect-dbg I'll remove the debug packages, too, but leave dragonegg for now. It seems to me,

Bug#669150: RM: liboce-*1 -- RoM

Hi! On 14.05.2012 19:10, Anton Gladky wrote: it seems 0.8.0 version is still in testing. It prevents the migration of 0.9.1 version. Is it possible to completely remove it from testing? As explained: I haven't even removed it from unstable, as that would break elmerfem. I currently wait

Bug#597082: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics: Patch attached (was Please add support for Synaptics ClickPads)

Hi! * Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org [120507 10:59]: Please consider adding the attached patch. It is the referenced before in this bug, refreshed for ABI 12. It made my Clickpad functional again. 1.6.0 in unstable should have support for ClickPads. Please confirm. Many thanks for the

Bug#669150: RM: liboce-*1 -- RoM

clone 669150 -1 reassign -1 src:elmer retitle -1 FTBFS on arm* found -1 6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg-5.1 severity -1 serious thanks Hi! * Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org [120418 15:21]: dak disagrees, fwiw: # Broken Depends: elmerfem: elmer [amd64 armel armhf hurd-i386 i386 ia64

Bug#670177: RM: libopensc -- RoQA; orphaned, unused, no revdeps, i386-only

tags 670177 +moreinfo thanks Hi Moritz! * Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org [120423 19:30]: Please remove libopensc: - Orphaned since more than three years - No rev-deps (gst-plugins-bad0.10 was fixed yesterday) - Dead upstream - i386 only Sorry, I couldn't find this package. Nearest

Bug#624264: libapache-gallery-perl: apache::gallery revived upstream

Hi! * Rasmus B�g Hansen mo...@smaug.amagerkollegiet.dk [110427 01:10]: Apache::gallery is apparently alive again upstream with a 1.0 and 1.0.1 released. It would be nice to have them in Debian :-) Well, given that 1.0.2 is already in sid and wheezy, shouldn't this bug be closed? Best

Bug#669202: RM: feel++ [hurd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel arm armel s390] -- ROM; FTBFS

Hi! * Christophe Prud'homme prudh...@debian.org [120418 07:07]: Feel++ fails to build on these arch because it takes too much memory to compile and the builder associated have not enough memory to handle this package compilation Done for everything but arm, as that arch doesn't exist

Bug#667917: RM: gtalk -- RoQA; orphaned, low popcon, dead upstream, alternatives exist

tags 667917 +moreinfo thanks Hi Moritz! * Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org [120407 15:18]: Please remove gtalk: - Orphaned in 2008 - Low popcon - Dead upstream (last upstream release was more than 11 years ago) - Alternatives exist, e.g. ytalk Interesting that you mention ytalk, because

Bug#668160: RM: pica -- RoQA; unused, orphaned, dead upstream

clone 668160 -1 retitle -1 RM: picalib -- RoQA; unused, orphaned, dead upstream thanks * Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@debian.org [120409 13:18]: Please remova pica. It's virtually unused, dead upstream, orphaned and the previous maintainer already suggested removal in #650442. Checking reverse

Bug#667917: RM: gtalk -- RoQA; orphaned, low popcon, dead upstream, alternatives exist

Hi! On 11.04.2012 19:13, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Depends: ytalk: ytalk [armel armhf i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390x sparc] So I'm sorry, but I can't remove gtalk, yet. [..] Ah, sorry, you are right. dak detects

Bug#638234: New NagVis version uploaded to Debian experimental, please test

[ BCCed to the people participating in the nagvis bug reports; sorry if you get this mail several times ] Hi! As you might have noticed I just uploaded a new version of NagVis to Debian's experimental branch introducing usage of the mk livestatus backend, support for icinga and configuration via

Bug#661268: RM: manpages-ru -- too outdated

Hi! * Alexander Reichle-Schmehl a...@melusine.alphascorpii.net [120228 13:56]: Usually removals are requested by the package mainainters, which doesn't seem to be the case here. Dmitri, are youl still avaiable in maintaining that packe? No upload in over six years and no answer from

Bug#661268: RM: manpages-ru -- too outdated

clone 661268 -1 reassing -1 tasksel retitle -1 task-russian depends on package scheduled for removal severity -1 important thanks Hi again! Am 05.03.2012 10:40, schrieb Alexander Reichle-Schmehl: Usually removals are requested by the package mainainters, which doesn't seem to be the case

Bug#301239: mii-diag: should not be released in Wheezy without gigabit ethernet support (#301239)

Hi! Am 04.03.2012 18:45, schrieb Carsten Hey: There are also a lot of network interfaces that don't have MDIO-managed PHYs, and then there are 10G PHYs with a different register set (see IEEE 802.3 clause 45). This is why Linux provides the ethtool API to get PHY state with a little more

Bug#661683: RM: pspp -- RoM; version 0.7.9+git20120219-1 has QA issues

tags +moreinfo thanks Hi! * bojo42 boj...@gmail.com [120229 11:01]: While debugging an issue specific to the autobuilders i accidentally give upstream's testsuite an false exit code by simply cat'ing the testsuite log. Therefore the binaries for all architectures passed upstreams QA even

Bug#661683: RM: pspp -- RoM; version 0.7.9+git20120219-1 has QA issues

Hi! Am 29.02.2012 12:57, schrieb bojo42: Hmm, the problem is that the builds should have failed definitely for some architectures as they didn't pass upstreams QA requirements and even when we have Bug#660854 fixed some will still fail for other reasons, especially ia64 and big endian. I

Bug#661268: RM: manpages-ru -- too outdated

tags 661268 +moreinfo thanks Hi! * Sergey Slipchenko faerg...@gmail.com [120225 19:06]: Hi, manpages-ru package is too outdated (last released in 2005). It contains Russian translations of some manual pages. Since they're outdated they confuse users reading it. I think is better to

Bug#661594: RM: valgrind [s390] -- ANAIS; s390 isn't supported anymore

tags 661594 +moreinfo thanks Hi! * Pierre Habouzit madco...@debian.org [120228 11:36]: Note: this was a request for a partial removal from testing, converted in one for unstable Unless you meant armel instad of s390 I have no idea what you are talking about. Best Regards, Alexander --

Bug#660381: RM: scim-python-englishwriter -- RoQA, no upstream, outdated, not useable

tags 660381 +moreinfo tags 660382 +moreinfo thanks Hi! * Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com [120218 19:25]: One of the most important dependency of scim-python-englishwriter, package scim-python is requested to be removed from archive in #659308. scim-python has dead upstream and is not useable

Bug#660264: RM: emoslib [hurd-i386 mips s390x sparc] -- RoQA; ANAIS

tags 660264 +moreinfo thanks Hi! * Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org [120217 21:21]: Please remove binaries from emoslib source on hurd-i386, mips, s390x, and sparc, it depends on grib-api which is not built for those ports. Sorry, can't do: Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken

Bug#654474: Doesn't contain source for waf binary code

Hi! Am 07.02.2012 14:16, schrieb Ian Jackson: * Upstream waf should be packaged somehow. Upstream's declared policy of asking packages to ship a copy of waf suggests that there won't be much API stability so we will need to encode the waf version number in the package name, and

Bug#637015: RM: libgdata-java -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

tags 637015 +moreinfo thanks [ CC to Debian OpenStreetMap Team ] Hi! * Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org [110807 21:01]: - it has no reverse dependencies Actually, it has: # Broken Depends: josm: josm # Broken Build-Depends: josm: libgdata-java Best Regards, Alexander -- To

Bug#592797: That's more than a whishlist

severity 657536 important tags 592797 +moreinfo block 592797 by 657536 thanks Hi! As of the time reporting this bug, package smarty is requested to be removed from the distribution. [..] Which IMHO deserves more than a whishlist bug. Best Regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#637015: RM: libgdata-java -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

Hi! Am 27.01.2012 18:02, schrieb David Paleino: - it has no reverse dependencies Actually, it has: # Broken Depends: josm: josm # Broken Build-Depends: josm: libgdata-java Oh. It seems like an old B-D. I removed it, and josm just built fine, and also a couple of greps didn't return

Bug#657433: RM: salome -- ROM; Not maintained and too much issues

Hi! * Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org [120126 09:49]: Could you remove salome from Debian ? Sure, as there are no reverse depends. It has many RCs (10). However, due to the multiple versions in the archive, we couldn't close the bugs automatically. So please do so by hand. Best

Bug#657433: RM: salome -- ROM; Not maintained and too much issues

Hi! Am 26.01.2012 14:54, schrieb Adam C Powell IV: I guess if we want it to go in again we'll need to do a new ITP? You don't have to do a new ITP. While it is recommended to fill ITPs to prevent multiple people packaging the same software, it is not a requirement. And also it doesn't sound

Bug#646474: What to do if FTBFS bug is not reproducible?

Hi! Am 25.01.2012 08:58, schrieb Vasudev Kamath: I'm working on to prepare QA upload for surf which is orphaned by its previous maintainer. There is a FTBFS bug reported against this package [1]. But I'm not able to reproduce this bug. Package builds fine on the pbuilder clean chroot. I've

Bug#656573: RM: freediams -- ROM; Non-free data used in package

Hi! * Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org [120120 15:41]: In case the version in Squeeze would be considered free also all other versions are free (which would be *really* good news). So please, please prove me wrong in my opinion that this database is not distributable. I'm specifically

Bug#657128: RM: sextractor [mips mipsel armhf s390x] -- RoM; ANAIS

Hi! * Ole Streicher deb...@liska.ath.cx [120124 12:20]: I recently adopted this package and brought it up to the recent debian policy and upstream version. The new upstream version has some requirements (libatlas-dev) that are still not met on armhf and s390x, and fails to build on mips and

Bug#656573: RM: freediams -- ROM; Non-free data used in package

clone 656573 -1 reassing -1 snapshot.debian.org thanks Hi! Am 20.01.2012 09:40, schrieb Andreas Tille: it turned out that the database which is used in freediams (file global_resources/databases/drugs/master.db) is a compilation of data with different licenses. Some of the original data

Bug#238245: license choice - consensus on dual MIT/GPL-2 ?

Hi! Am 17.01.2012 23:11, schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli: Looking at past discussions in both #238245 and #388141, I believe there can already be consensus on re-licensing www.debian.org content [2] under a dual-license MIT/Expat + GPL version 2 or above. Would anyone object such a choice?

Bug#648705: Please help with fixing a bug on kfreebsd [Was: Processed: unarchiving 648705]

Hi! Am 16.01.2012 19:18, schrieb Andreas Tille: Why not enabling others having the experience to have fixed a bug on freebsd? The package is team maintained. To cite you in the mail which started this thread: any hint, how to fix this problem? And the previous mail you claimed you can't

Bug#656131: RM: kdissert -- ROM; obsolete and unmaintained

tags 656131 +moreinfo thanks Hi! * Peter Eisentraut pet...@debian.org [120116 19:34]: This package is obsolete and unmaintained upstream (successor package is WNPP bug #474299), it has build problems, and it's in the way of removing old libraries from Debian. Can't do, it was already

Bug#631738: Marking bugs pending

tags 631738 +pending tags 655401 +pending thanks Hi! Bugs are solved on my harddisk, however currently alioth is down, so I can't commit my work to the svn repository, so I won't upload for now. Anyone reading this mail after alioth came to live again and this two bugs are still open: Please

Bug#648705: Please help with fixing a bug on kfreebsd [Was: Processed: unarchiving 648705]

Hi! Am 16.01.2012 18:09, schrieb Andreas Tille: ... and voila! You can indeed fix (or at least investigate further) these bugs while sitting before a Linux box. Well, what your are summerizing with a voila is quite a bit of work [..] Well, actually it is: 1) Looking up a server name 2) ssh

Bug#98841: koules doesn't include svgalib version

tags 98841 +wontfix thanks * RISKO Gergely ri...@atom.hu [010527 02:14]: Why koules doesn't include the svga version on i386? Having an svgalib version doesn't seem to offer any benefits, but (slightly) increase maintainance. So unless there's a very good reason to add svgalib support, that

Bug#624991: RFS: logkeys (fixing RC bugs)

tags 624991 +pending thanks Hi! Am 12.01.2012 10:33, schrieb Helmut Grohne: The current unstable package has: * 1 lintian error * 2 lintian warnings * 2 RC bugs (FTBFS and missing dep) * out of date standards version The upload above fixes a non-rc bug, it also seems to solve the

Bug#624991: RFS: logkeys (fixing RC bugs)

clone 624991 -1 severity -1 important retitle -1 Fails if only german utf-8 locale is available thanks Hi again! * Alexander Reichle-Schmehl alexan...@schmehl.info [120112 11:21]: $ sudo /etc/init.d/logkeys start Starting logkeys: /usr/bin/logkeys: LC_CTYPE locale must be of UTF-8 type

Bug#637594: Please hold the upload of ding-libs for now

Hi! Am 12.01.2012 00:27, schrieb Timo Aaltonen: I've talked with Jonathan Carter (the packager) about the ding-libs upload, and I believe we agree that the package should be held until a newer version is ready for sponsoring. The issue I see is that the -dev library names shouldn't have

Bug#654634: override: python-html2text:oldlibs/extra

Hi Stefano! * Stefano Rivera stefa...@debian.org [120104 19:09]: This is a transitional package. I assume oldlibs is preferred, not metapackages? Yes, it is. See also http://lintian.debian.org/tags/transitional-package-should-be-oldlibs-extra.html and the bug linked from there for details.

Bug#655230: ITP: pushkey -- ITP: pushkey - Pushes your ssh key to a remote location. It tries to create a .ssh folder remotley then it adds your ssh key to authorized_keys.

merge 655230 655232 thanks [ merging the bugs, as the ITP was sent twice ] Hi! Am 09.01.2012 15:43, schrieb Al Biheiri: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Al Biheiri abihe...@gmail.com * Package name: pushkey Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Al Biheiri

Bug#645190: waf binary code not DFSG compliant

user ftpmas...@debian.org reopen 645191 usertags 645190 + waf-unpack clone 645190 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 -17 -18 -19 -20 -21 -22 -23 -24 -25 -26 -27 -28 -29 -30 -31 -32 -33 -34 -35 -36 -37 -38 -39 -40 -41 -42 -43 -44 -45 -46 -47 -48 -49 -50 -51 -52 reassign -1

Bug#651296: (no subject)

Subject: Re: Bug#651296: uninstallable on kfreebsd-amd64 Reply-To: In-Reply-To: caofdtxnfd+_5d0ic+hatxsmbt1pf+vb2jgt-j14tzhvybjz...@mail.gmail.com severity 651296 important retitle 651296 Doesn't support kfreebsd-* thanks Hi! * Robert Millan r...@debian.org [111220 21:31]: So, the easiest

Bug#651296: uninstallable on kfreebsd-amd64

severity 651296 wishlist retitle 651296 ntfs-config misses support for kfreebsd-* thanks Hi! * Robert Millan r...@debian.org [111220 21:31]: So, the easiest solution seems to be, to make that a linux-only package and get the old kfreebsd-* and hurd-i386 binary packages removed. No big

Bug#615210: Uses deprecated HAL

Hi! * Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [110226 12:34]: ntfs-config has a build dependency on libhal-dev and libhal-storage-dev, so it would ftbfs once hal is removed. I can't find in the source why that build dependency is necessary. Yes, I just checked, and ntfs-config builds fine without

Bug#651296: uninstallable on kfreebsd-amd64

clone 651296 -1 retitle -1 Package should be arch:all block -1 by 651296 thanks Hi again! * Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org [111221 10:31]: So, the easiest solution seems to be, to make that a linux-only package and get the old kfreebsd-* and hurd-i386 binary packages removed

Bug#652670: RFA: time -- The GNU time program for measuring cpu resource usage

Hi! Am 19.12.2011 19:40, schrieb Tollef Fog Heen: I don't really use it any longer since shells tend to have this built-in. ... and I use it regularly. If it's okay with you, I'd like to adopt it. Best regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#651296: uninstallable on kfreebsd-amd64

Hi Robert! * Robert Millan r...@debian.org [111207 14:46]: Due to dependency on udev (see attached patch) I just checked, and while that makes the package installable, it sadly doesn't make it usable. On my kfreebsd test machine I get after applying your patch: debian:~# ntfs-config

Bug#634060: binutils-z80 -- Should this package be removed?

Hi! Am 17.12.2011 19:34, schrieb Alberto Garcia: Looking at popcon, there seems be a handfull of users, but most seem to just have it installed but not in active use. Hey, I need binutils-z80 to build opense-basic, which is what allows us to have the Fuse Spectrum emulator in main

Bug#649709: gs-common removed: this bug is now RC.

Hi Miguel! * Miguel de Val-Borro miguel.de...@gmail.com [111203 18:52]: [..] The attached patch removes the Build-Dependency on gs-common. Thanks for your patch, I uploaded it the other day. Just one minor remark continueing the discussion from the BSP: As this package is orphaned (meaning it

Bug#652618: cwdaemon: FTBFS, build-depends can no longer be fullfilled

Package: cwdaemon Version: 0.9.4-7.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi! I'm sorry, but I fear your package will FTBFS starting with the next dinstall run. Background is that unixcw dropped to build the package unixcw-dev on which cwdaemon build-depends. And well... I cruft-removed

Bug#652618: cwdaemon: FTBFS, build-depends can no longer be fullfilled

tags 652618 +wheezy +sid thanks Only wheezy and sid are affected, squeeze still has the removed package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#652618: cwdaemon: FTBFS, build-depends can no longer be fullfilled

tags 652618 +patch thanks [ adding the unixcw maintainer to the loop ] [ also adding Michael as Cc, as last NMUer of the package he might have interest in it ] Hi! * Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org [111219 11:09]: I'm sorry, but I fear your package will FTBFS starting

Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

reopen 651452 found 651452 0.11.0-12 thanks Hi! * Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org [111214 15:33]: Better to rip out the -llam and replace LLAM in the patch with -lmpi. I'll test then upload -12 with this change and let's see how it builds. That didn't work, too: It fails to build on

Bug#634060: binutils-z80 -- Should this package be removed?

reassign 634060 ftp.debian.org retitle 634060 RM: binutils-z80 -- RoQA: RC Buggy low popcon, can't be easily be maintained/tested thanks Hi! Well, no answer so far, I guess that means it really can be removed. Longer justification was in my last mail: * Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli

Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

reopen 651452 retitle 651452 illuminator: FTBFS on archs where petsc uses liblam (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte') found 651452 0.11.0-8.2 clone 651452 -1 retitle -1 illuminat: Build-Conflicts on libmpich2-dev to strict thanks Hi! * Alexander Reichle-Schmehl

Bug#651712: RM: libnvpair-dev, libnvpair0, libnvpair0-udeb, libumem-dev, libumem0, libumem0-udeb, libuutil-dev, libuutil0, libuutil0-udeb, libzfs-dev, libzfs0, libzfs0-udeb, libzpool-dev, libzpool0, l

Hi! * Robert Millan r...@debian.org [111212 23:01]: # Broken Build-Depends: grub2: libnvpair-dev       libzfs-dev Those Build-Depends were removed in 1.99-13. I think the above is caused by: grub2 | 1.98+20100804-5 | unstable | source, hurd-i386 So I guess it's okay to ignore

Bug#650536: [new check] test for missing hardening build flags

[ Good god... did I really send a full quote in that mail? Sorry. ] Hi! * Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org [111208 10:13]: If we can get a reliable backporter for hardening-wrapper as well, most of my concerns here covered. On the lintian.d.o side, it means we may have

Bug#645300: tidy: diff for NMU version 20091223cvs-1.1

Hi! * Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org [111203 11:07]: I've prepared an NMU for tidy (versioned as 20091223cvs-1.1). The diff is attached to this message. You might have noticed, that this upload never reached the archive. Apparently it run into a bug in the archive software

Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

tags 651452 + patch tags 651452 + pending thanks Hi! * Alexander Reichle-Schmehl alexan...@schmehl.info [111209 14:41]: However I get now the same FTBFS as originally reported. I guess we call that progress... I think I solved the problem, however I only found a kind of grude workarround

Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

Hi! Am 12.12.2011 13:45, schrieb Alexander Reichle-Schmehl: That being said, I uploaded the fix to delayed/4. Please tell me, if I should delay it longer. Ups. I haven't, but did a direct upload. Sorry, forget the -e 4 when dput-ing it :( Best regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#650536: [new check] test for missing hardening build flags

HI! Am 08.12.2011 23:40, schrieb Kees Cook: Backporting concerns and output stability: == Both the FTP-masters and Lintian.d.o needs everything in stable (or stable-backports). [..] Given that dpkg-buildflags won't be backported, perhaps just having

Bug#651452: [b-d][sparc] illuminator (sid)

Hi! To investigate #651452 could you please install the needed build-depends on a sparc porter boxes sid chroot? Thanks, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

Hi! Am 08.12.2011 20:00, schrieb Julien Cristau: See https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=illuminatorarch=sparcver=0.11.0-8.1stamp=1323062646 /usr/lib/lam/bin/mpicc -g -O2 -o .libs/tsview tsview-tsview.o libluminate/.libs/libluminate.so -lpetsc -lncurses -lhistory -lreadline

Bug#649339:

Hi! Am 09.12.2011 12:49, schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: volview appears to not even be in the archive, nor in NEW? In that case I fail to see how the content of testing can possibly be relevant to the package. VolView requires KWWidgets and vtk = 5.8.0 that's the whole issue. Maybe there's a

Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

Hi! Am 09.12.2011 12:57, schrieb Alexander Reichle-Schmehl: Just a small update: I got the b-d installed smetana.debian.org. However, I fail to reproduce this bug: When I try to build the package, it FTBFS even sooner: checking for dgemv_ in -lblas... (cached) yes checking for dgetrf_

Bug#647098: Probably a contrib package

Hi! * Ole Wolf o...@naturloven.dk [111209 14:09]: The package has been updated a few times since the original IFP. The most important change is that the install script now downloads the necessary libraries instead of including them as binaries in the package itself. This probably classifies

Bug#650536: [new check] test for missing hardening build flags

Hi! As you fellow backporter I took a quick glance at the hardening-wrapper package, and didn't spotted any problems so far (as in: I could create a backport, install it, and can still compile stuff). However, as I'm not very familiar with it, I'll ping the maintainers for their opinion. Also

Bug#650536: [new check] test for missing hardening build flags

Hi! Am 08.12.2011 10:13, schrieb Alexander Reichle-Schmehl: As you fellow backporter I took a quick glance at the hardening-wrapper package, and didn't spotted any problems so far (as in: I could create a backport, install it, and can still compile stuff). However, as I'm not very familiar

Bug#634060: binutils-z80 -- Should this package be removed?

Hi! * Joost Yervante Damad and...@debian.org [110716 16:02]: Popcon shows some usage. No longer use it myself. I skimmed over RC bugs open against orphaned packages, and stumbled over this one. On a first glance it seems trivial to fix (just update build-depends, and build-with, the symlink

Bug#639590: binutils-z80: unbuildable in unstable

needed) + + -- Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org Wed, 07 Dec 2011 15:45:01 +0100 + binutils-z80 (2.21.52-2) unstable; urgency=low * temp fix build by overriding tc-z80.c from the binutils tarfile diff -Nru binutils-z80-2.21.52/debian/control binutils-z80-2.22/debian/control

Bug#651302: RM: multicd -- RoQA; Outdated, RC bugy, better solutions exist

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi! Reasons for the removal: * Last maintainer upload was 2004 * RC bugy sinde over a year (bug was open since 2007 but only bump to serious a year ago) * Quite low popcon (for a backup software) * limited to CDs, no support for other media * If

Bug#647796: pcscada: diff for NMU version 0.6-2.1

Hi! * Reto Buerki r...@codelabs.ch [21 22:45]: Thanks for preparing a NMU for pcscada. But this is not needed in this case because I got the new PCSC/Ada version 0.7 almost ready for upload. Cool! I've rescheduled upload to DELAYED-15, so you'll have time to prepare the upload.

Bug#651112: pdnsd: FTBFS(kfreebsd): undefined reference to pthread_*

tags 651112 +unreproducible thanks Hi! As last uploader of this package I took a look at this bug, but I failed to reproduce it. On both io.debian.net and asdfasdf.debian.net the package compiles just fine (see attached build logs) in the sid chroots. Missing knowledge of kfreebsd and our

Bug#651112: pdnsd: FTBFS: undefined reference to pthread_*

Hi! Am 06.12.2011 10:44, schrieb Petr Salinger: The key difference seems be automake-1.9 installed on porter box. So adding automake-1.9 to the build depends would solve the FTBFS on the buildds? Best regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#651112: pdnsd: FTBFS: undefined reference to pthread_*

tags 651112 -unreproducible thanks Hi! Am 06.12.2011 11:38, schrieb Petr Salinger: So adding automake-1.9 to the build depends would solve the FTBFS on the buildds? Probably. Or extend 01_support_kfreebsd_properly.patch for needed changes in pdnsd-1.2.8/src/Makefile.in I just installed a

Bug#651112: pdnsd: FTBFS: undefined reference to pthread_*

tag 651112 patch pending tag 630209 patch pending tag 617659 patch pending thanks Hi! Am 06.12.2011 13:34, schrieb Alexander Reichle-Schmehl: So adding automake-1.9 to the build depends would solve the FTBFS on the buildds? Probably. Or extend 01_support_kfreebsd_properly.patch for needed

Bug#650885: Dupe of 650880

reassign 650885 aptitude forcemerge 650885 650880 thanks Hi! This bug seems to be related with the recent change in the FTP adding metapackages, introspection and other sections. Actually not, ftp-team changed they way package index files get created. (A change with was activated on the main

Bug#592979: Bug#630621: mined: Broken README link etc.

Hi! * Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org [110615 18:21]: Maybe no one uses this thus no bug report exists but this is no excuse for the maintainer. Uhm... You might not have noticed, but this package is currently orphaned. (Also Anibal seems to have shown interest... some month ago.) Anyway,

Bug#613382: Disk not found on GLAN Tank

reassign 613382 release.debian.org thanks Hi Martin! * Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com [22 16:32]: ftp-master: please change the priority of pata-modules-2.6.32-5-iop32x-di in stable to standard Sorry I can't. That's done by the stable release managers. Best Regards, Alexander

Bug#650880: aptitude safe-upgrade segfaults, aptitude update fails: E: Encountered a section with no Package: header

reassign 650880 ftp.debian.org thanks Hi! Am 04.12.2011 10:01, schrieb Ralf Spenneberg: Package: aptitude Version: 0.4.11.11-1~lenny2 [..] E: Encountered a section with no Package: header E: Problem with MergeList

Bug#418480: Patch

Hi! Am 03.12.2011 19:01, schrieb Martin Schauer: I prepared an NMU to fix the cdrecord-wodim transition. Thanks for your work so far, but your patch seems to be incomplete: are@NB-LX13927:/var/cache/pbuilder/result$ dpkg -l|grep multicd ii multicd 7.3-1.1 Backup your

Bug#643411: italc: FTBFS: ./src/classroom_manager.cpp:437:30: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]

Hi! * Felix Geyer debfx-...@fobos.de [27 13:44]: diff -Nru italc-1.0.13/debian/patches/series italc-1.0.13/debian/patches/series --- italc-1.0.13/debian/patches/series1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ italc-1.0.13/debian/patches/series2011-11-27

Bug#643411: italc: diff for NMU version 1:1.0.13-1.1

+ + -- Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org Sun, 04 Dec 2011 12:08:19 +0100 + italc (1:1.0.13-1) unstable; urgency=low * Added a watch file for italc diff -Nru italc-1.0.13/debian/patches/fix-format-string.patch italc-1.0.13/debian/patches/fix-format-string.patch --- italc-1.0.13/debian

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >