Bug#1075740: RM: r-cran-rgeos -- ROM; Removed from CRAN (not maintained upstream)

2024-07-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: r-cran-rg...@packages.debian.org, debia...@lists.debian.org, 1071...@bugs.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:r-cran-rgeos User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Hi, this package was removed from testing due to a

Bug#1071355: In how far are several packages affected by bug #1071355 of maptools

2024-07-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, there was a series of testing removals due to bug #1071355 of r-cran-maptools. Since maptools was removed from CRAN[1] we intend to remove this package. However, before doing so I would like to understand why packages like r-cran-factominer, r-cran-ggpubr, r-cran-vim, r-cran-systemfit,

Bug#1075739: RM: r-cran-zeligei -- ROM; Removed from CRAN (not maintained upstream)

2024-07-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: r-cran-zeli...@packages.debian.org, debia...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:r-cran-zeligei User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Hi, this package was removed from testing due to a dependency from

Bug#1075738: RM: r-cran-zeligverse -- ROM; Removed from CRAN (not maintained upstream)

2024-07-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: r-cran-zeligve...@packages.debian.org, debia...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:r-cran-zeligverse User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Hi, this package was removed from testing due to a dependency from

Bug#1075736: RM: r-cran-zeligchoice -- ROM; Removed from CRAN (not maintained upstream)

2024-07-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: r-cran-zeligcho...@packages.debian.org, debia...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:r-cran-zeligchoice User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Hi, r-cran-zeligchoice was removed from testing due to a dependency from

Bug#1074529: Bug#1074529: r-cran-dimred: autopkgtest regression with r-base 4.4.1 (i386)

2024-07-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Charles, Am Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 08:29:13AM +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy: > > For what it is worth version 0.2.6 is in good standing at CRAN with tests > > using "r-release" (ie now 4.4.1) as well as "r-devel" and "r-oldrel", see > >

Bug#1043686: Please provide a proper download location for beads

2024-07-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Ping again, Am Thu, May 23, 2024 at 07:15:40AM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Filippo, > > Am Wed, May 22, 2024 at 09:29:30PM +0200 schrieb Filippo Rusconi: > > On Wednesday, 22 May 2024 07:22:32 CEST you wrote: > > > Hi Filippo, > > > > > >

Bug#1071523: r-cran-spatstat.geom: autopkgtest regression in testing

2024-07-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 09:32:43PM + schrieb Graham Inggs: > > We did not implemented any hooks to realise this yet. > > Wouldn't removing the following line from debian/control do it? > > Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-r Well, sure. But our tooling will add this for the next upstream version

Bug#1071523: r-cran-spatstat.geom: autopkgtest regression in testing

2024-07-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Graham, Am Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 04:15:26PM + schrieb Graham Inggs: > > r-cran-spatstat.core was removed from Debian. R-cran-spatstat.geom does > > not depend from this package any more and the autopkgtest in Salsa CI is > > fine[1]. Any hint why it fails in testing would be welcome. > >

Bug#1074222: pycorrfit FTBFS with Python 3.12 as default

2024-07-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 05:01:27PM +0800 schrieb Bo YU: > > I can confirm it works(still during build but pass the failed stage on > the issue). > > It seems tille had worked a lot on this, so hope this helps. I'm fine with whatever solution you might find and you can perfectly skip me when

Bug#1071523: r-cran-spatstat.geom: autopkgtest regression in testing

2024-06-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help Hi, r-cran-spatstat.core was removed from Debian. R-cran-spatstat.geom does not depend from this package any more and the autopkgtest in Salsa CI is fine[1]. Any hint why it fails in testing would be welcome. Kind regards Andreas. [1]

Bug#1071860: not fixed in 7.0-005-2

2024-06-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Andreas, Am Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 03:55:37PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Metzler: > I have now uploaded a NMU to delayed/7-days using the attached patch. I > have gone for the mininal change, dropping the respective code instead > of switching to pkgconf. It simpler, does not make a difference on >

Bug#1073885: FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Missing dependency on camlp-streams)

2024-06-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 05:30:14PM +0200 schrieb Stéphane Glondu: > I've attached a fix. Thanks a lot, uploaded, Andreas. -- https://fam-tille.de

Bug#1071106: r-cran-sf: autopkgtest regression in testing

2024-06-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: block -1 by 1071523 The problem is connected to the removal of r-cran-spatstat.core from testing/unstable. Since r-cran-sf (Test-)Depends r-cran-spatstat.geom fixing bug #1071523 should be sufficient to let r-cran-sf migrate. Kind regards Andreas.

Bug#1064135: bigmemory: fails to migrate to testing for too long: autopkgtest fails on arm*, ppc64el and s390x

2024-06-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Michael, I've opened issue #115 on Github four months ago but there is no activity so far. Could you please confirm that you are watching the issue tracker on Github or are you possibly using some other development platform? Just asking since the tags lagging behind the versioned tarballs at

Bug#1071860: not fixed in 7.0-005-2 (was: Bug#1071860 closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Andreas Tille ) (Bug#1071860: fixed in fis-gtm 7.0-005-

2024-06-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help Hi Andreas, strange, it has build for me. Am Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 08:03:30AM +0200 schrieb Andreas Metzler: > Control: reopen 1071860 > ... > CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:529 (message): > FATAL: libgcrypt-config not found (LIBGCRYPT_CONFIG_SCRIPT-NOTFOUND) > [...] I

Bug#1074044: libvcflib: Improve support for loongarch64

2024-06-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 pending Am Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 04:56:56PM +0800 schrieb zhangdandan: > diff -Nru libvcflib-1.0.9+dfsg1/debian/control > libvcflib-1.0.9+dfsg1/debian/control > --- libvcflib-1.0.9+dfsg1/debian/control 2023-12-03 12:29:41.0 > + > +++

Bug#1073885: FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 (Missing dependency on camlp-streams)

2024-06-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Stephane, Am Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 06:35:50AM + schrieb Stephane Glondu: > Source: mcl14 > Version: 14-137+ocaml-2 > Severity: important > Tags: ftbfs > User: debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ocaml-5.2.0-transition > > Your package FTBFS with OCaml 5.2.0 for the following

Bug#1034805: Upgrading fis-gtm and closing CVE-2021-44496 CVE-2021-44504

2024-06-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Bhaskar, it seems Amul is not actively working on fis-gtm package any more. Could you name any new contact person for the Debian package? Kind regards Andreas. Am Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 02:51:26PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Ping? > > Am Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 06:13:24PM +010

Bug#1020217: snapshot.debian.org: write a generic file driver supporting multiple backend (such as object-storage)

2024-06-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Thomas, Am Sun, Jun 09, 2024 at 12:17:05PM +0200 schrieb Thomas Goirand: > > However, it is disappointing to see it moving toward an s3 implementation, > which is a protocol from a closed-source service. I already wrote multiple > times that my company (Infomaniak) was willing to sponsor

Bug#1072070: RM: r-cran-rniftilib -- ROM; Package removed from CRAN

2024-05-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: r-cran-rnifti...@packages.debian.org, 1071...@bugs.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:r-cran-rniftilib User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Hi ftpmasters, this package was removed from CRAN. Since we want to reduce

Bug#1072069: RM: r-cran-eco -- ROM; Package removed from CRAN

2024-05-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: r-cran-...@packages.debian.org, 1071...@bugs.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:r-cran-eco User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Hi ftpmasters, this package was removed from CRAN. Since we want to reduce the

Bug#1043686: Please provide a proper download location for beads

2024-05-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Filippo, Am Wed, May 22, 2024 at 09:29:30PM +0200 schrieb Filippo Rusconi: > On Wednesday, 22 May 2024 07:22:32 CEST you wrote: > > Hi Filippo, > > > > ping again. The currently packaged beads is not at the location > > you wrote. Please fix the watch file to report latest version. > > > >

Bug#1043686: Please provide a proper download location for beads

2024-05-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Filippo, ping again. The currently packaged beads is not at the location you wrote. Please fix the watch file to report latest version. Thanks a lot Andreas. Am Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 09:41:40PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Ping? > > Am Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 12:46:17PM +010

Bug#1071535: car: Please remove r-cran-maptools from (Build-)Depends

2024-05-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Source: car Version: 3.1-2-2 Severity: normal Hi, car mentions r-cran-maptools in (Build-)Depends which is not backed up by the DESCRIPTION file. Since maptools is removed from CRAN I'd like to remove it from Debian. So it would be great if you could drop the unneeded dependency. If you might

Bug#1071380: RM: r-cran-randomfields -- ROM; Package removed from CRAN

2024-05-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: r-cran-randomfie...@packages.debian.org, debia...@lists.debian.org, 1071...@bugs.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:r-cran-randomfields User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Hi ftpmasters, this package was removed from

Bug#1071379: RM: r-cran-randomfields -- ROM; Package removed from CRAN

2024-05-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: r-cran-randomfie...@packages.debian.org, debia...@lists.debian.org, 1071...@bugs.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:r-cran-randomfields User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Hi ftpmasters, this package was removed from

Bug#1071358: r-cran-rgeos: FTBFS: geos.c:102:13: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments

2024-05-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: block -1 by 1071375 thanks Hi Santiago, Am Fri, May 17, 2024 at 10:41:36PM +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila: > Package: src:r-cran-rgeos > Version: 0.6-4-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs thanks a lot for your QA effort. It turns out that the package is not maintained at CRAN any more.

Bug#1071376: RM: r-cran-randomfieldsutils -- ROM; Package removed from CRAN

2024-05-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: r-cran-randomfieldsut...@packages.debian.org, debia...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:r-cran-randomfieldsutils User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Hi ftpmasters, this package was removed from CRAN. Since

Bug#1071375: RM: r-cran-rgeos -- ROM; Removed from CRAN, just remove maintenance burden of R pkg team

2024-05-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: r-cran-rg...@packages.debian.org, debia...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:r-cran-rgeos User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Hi ftpmasters, this package was removed from CRAN and there is no point in

Bug#1070839: r-cran-data.table: autopkgtest regression on i386

2024-05-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/Rdatatable/data.table/issues/6133

Bug#1070839: [Help] Re: Bug#1070839: r-cran-data.table: autopkgtest regression on i386

2024-05-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help Hi Graham, Am Fri, May 10, 2024 at 10:44:48AM + schrieb Graham Inggs: > Source: r-cran-data.table > Version: 1.15.4+dfsg-1 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: regression > > r-cran-data.table's autopkgtest has regressed on i386 [1]. I've

Bug#1070723: bullseye-pu: package bart/0.6.00-3+deb11u1

2024-05-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Wed, May 08, 2024 at 01:18:44AM +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: bullseye > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > X-Debbugs-Cc: b...@packages.debian.org, sanv...@debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:bart > > [

Bug#1070515: dipy: FTBFS with nocheck profile

2024-05-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help thanks Hi Grahamm Am Mon, May 06, 2024 at 02:08:25PM + schrieb Graham Inggs: > Source: dipy > Version: 1.8.0-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs patch thanks a lot for the patch which looks perfectly sensible. Unfortunatly the build runs into a different error as you

Bug#1069370: shasta: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: cannot continue due to the error above

2024-05-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help Hi, I pushed some potential fix to Git but this does not help[1]. :-( Any idea is welcome Andreas. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/shasta/-/jobs/5695708 -- https://fam-tille.de

Bug#1070459: Tagging help

2024-05-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help thanks

Bug#1057562: Forwarded upstream (Was: gcr4: FTBFS: failing tests)

2024-05-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gcr/-/issues/119 thanks Hi, this issue was reported upstream. I would have pointed the issue to the Debian BTS but for whatever reason my login is not accepted. Santiago, since you can provide VMs where the problem is reproducible which

Bug#1070459: psortb: FTBFS: binding.c:52:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘free’

2024-05-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I've fixed the original error in Git but Salsa CI shows another one[1] which is more tricky since it involves a header file for a perl module and I have no idea how to fix this. Any help from the team is welcome. Kind regards Andreas. [1]

Bug#1070243: dicomnifti 2.33.1-5: ROM; Obsolete

2024-05-03 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Am Thu, May 02, 2024 at 09:57:57PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Beckmann: > I assume you wanted to file a RM request for ftpmaster. I've reassigned and > retitled the bug accordingly. I've removed dicomnifti from the Debian Med tasks (med-imaging metapackage) thus the recommends will be dropped

Bug#1070009: r-cran-data.table: Update to current upstream

2024-04-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Dirk, thanks for the bug report. I even tried to upgrade to 1.15.0 in Februar but stumbled about a test suite error[1] of the Debian package which prevented me from uploading. Am Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 09:03:08AM -0500 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: > > This should likely reduce some autopkgtest

Bug#1065810: Correction: New appointments for the Debian Technical Committee: csmall

2024-04-26 Thread Andreas Tille
Dear fellow developers, sorry, the list of CTTE members in my last mail contained Simon McVittie but his term has ended already. Thanks to Simon for his previous work and here comes the corrected text (with no change but the correct list of members). As defined by our constitution (§6.2.2),

Bug#1065810: New appointments for the Debian Technical Committee: csmall

2024-04-26 Thread Andreas Tille
Dear fellow developers, As defined by our constitution (§6.2.2), the Debian Technical Committee has recommended the appointment to the committee of: * Craig Small I agree with their recommendation, and hereby appoint Craig as member of the Technical Committee, effective immediately. For

Bug#1065810: tech-ctte: Call for votes on TC membership of Craig Small

2024-04-26 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sean, Am Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 10:53:41AM +0100 schrieb Sean Whitton: > > Possibly I need to send some delegation mail like this[1]? > > It's an appointment, not a delegation, but yes something like that mail. So something I could copy-n-paste from

Bug#1069876: libsbml: autopkgtest regression

2024-04-26 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Am Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 09:27:55AM +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: > 95s autopkgtest [21:29:51]: test autodep8-python3: [--- > 95s Testing with python3.12: Short note: If I understood upstream correctly they currently support Python3.11 only. In any case they

Bug#1065810: tech-ctte: Call for votes on TC membership of Craig Small

2024-04-26 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Craig, Am Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 08:12:02AM +1000 schrieb Craig Small: > Hi Andreas, > Congratulations on your appointment, hopefully you can find a way to > balance work, life and DPL because it seems like a very busy role. Thank you vor the congratulations and your empathy. > Not sure if

Bug#1024889: Pending

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 pending Control: block -1 by 1064596 thanks Pplacer needs to be build against the old version of MCL which is featuring some OCAML patch. This old version was just uploaded to new. Kind regards Andreas. -- https://fam-tille.de

Bug#1069745: magics-python: wrong arch: any packaging builds potentially uninstallable packages

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Tille
ndreas. > regards > > Alastair > > On 24/04/2024 07:23, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Control: tags -1 pending > > thanks > > > > Hi Alastair, > > > > as far as I learned in past example cases its rather by chance that > > you

Bug#1069509: r-cran-metamix: FTBFS on armhf: tests fail

2024-04-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Lucas, thanks a lot for all your work on rebuilding the archive on different architectures. That's really appreciated. In this specific case I wonder whether your build host has simply trouble initialising MPI given I find strings like MPI_ERRORS_ARE_FATAL Kind regards Andreas. Am

Bug#1055847: Please check python-sparse issue at Github

2024-04-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Diane and Ghislain, you are listed as Uploaders of python-sparse. Since I now have other tasks than maintaining team maintained packages I would be really happy if you could subscribe upstream issue https://github.com/pydata/sparse/issues/628 and continue what I have started. Thanks a

Bug#1069745: magics-python: wrong arch: any packaging builds potentially uninstallable packages

2024-04-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 pending thanks Hi Alastair, as far as I learned in past example cases its rather by chance that you did not set Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers in packages that are residing in science-team space on Salsa. I took the freedom to fix this in Git as well as applying

Bug#1068314: python-inflate64_1.0.0+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2024-04-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Hiroshi, Am Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 01:14:27AM +0900 schrieb yokota: > > please also mention Ma Lin in your debian/copyright. Thanks for fixing this issue. I've uploaded to new again. > I was updated Debian salsa repository to fix the issue. >

Bug#1033028: fixed in pydata-sphinx-theme 0.15.2-1

2024-04-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Gianfranco, Am Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 08:52:56PM +0200 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: > control: notfixed -1 0.15.2-1 > control: reopen -1 > Hello Andreas, I tried to upload your package, Not really "my" package - I used "QA upload". > but I failed due to some nodejs failures. > Looks like the

Bug#1065222: O: pychm -- Python binding for CHMLIB - Python 3

2024-04-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Am Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 09:02:41AM +0900 schrieb yokota: > Debian pychm was updated. Good job. > I can't upload the new package because I don't have upload rights. > Please upload the new package by someone in debian-python who has upload > rights. In case you might become Debian

Bug#922907: Does anybody intent to adopt openmx -- nano-scale material simulations

2024-04-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, since openmx is listed on the list of blockers for t64 transition and long time orphaned I wonder whether it is better to remove the package from Debian. According popcon its usage has basically zero votes[2] (which might be caused by the fact that it was not included into the last two

Bug#1012893: Status of the t64 transition

2024-04-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sebastian, thank you for your work on t64 transition. Am Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 09:22:02PM +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: I've spotted these Debian Med packages. > gentle > jellyfish > quorum > sbmltoolbox No idea how we can help here. Please let us know if we can do something. > anfo

Bug#1069098: emboss: all executables segfault on s390x

2024-04-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Andrius, I'd recommend following the procedure you supposed in https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2024/04/msg00034.html Someone needs to file removal requests for s390x for the rdepends from emboss, thought. Kind regards Andreas. -- https://fam-tille.de

Bug#1069122: RM: sambamba [armhf i386] -- ROM; Does not build on 32bit architectures any more

2024-04-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: samba...@packages.debian.org, 1067...@bugs.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:sambamba User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Hi, sambamba does not build on i386 architectures any more and also has no practical

Bug#1066334: Redefinition of _Int (Was: acedb: FTBFS: acein.c:2045:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘add_history’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

2024-04-14 Thread Andreas Tille
H again, Am Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 07:17:41AM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Am Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 10:46:17PM +0100 schrieb Jeremy Sowden: > > > > The one after this looks like a GTK problem, and that's the point at > > which I bow out. I was able to fix some more missi

Bug#1066334: cython/bison issue (Was: acedb: FTBFS: acein.c:2045:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘add_history’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

2024-04-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Jeremy, Am Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 10:46:17PM +0100 schrieb Jeremy Sowden: > > The one after this looks like a GTK problem, and that's the point at > which I bow out. Thanks a lot for your help so far. Your patches are pushed to Git. Kind regards Andreas. -- https://fam-tille.de

Bug#1066334: cython/bison issue (Was: acedb: FTBFS: acein.c:2045:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘add_history’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration])

2024-04-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help thanks Hi, while I was able to fix the origininal cause of the failure I'm now blocked by some issue that cython seems to miss adding some #include but I have no idea how to accomplish this. The Salsa CI build log[1] says: ... y.tab.c: In function 'yyparse':

Bug#1067957: [[maude-bugs]] [EXTERNAL] Re: Maude fails to build on armhf

2024-04-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Am Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 03:33:53PM -0700 schrieb Steven Eker: > I like that solution since I believe there are 64-bit platforms where long > is 32-bits. I've updated my development version thus: > >   // >   //    timeValue.tv_sec is 64-bit since Linux kernel 5.6 but GMP doesn't > yet have

Bug#1067957: [[maude-bugs]] [EXTERNAL] Re: Maude fails to build on armhf

2024-04-10 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I'd suggest to set Build-Depends: architecture-is-64-bit, architecture-is-little-endian and remove 32bit architectures of maude. Kind regards Andreas. -- https://fam-tille.de

Bug#1065221: O: py7zr -- pure Python 7-zip library

2024-04-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Hiroshi, Am Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 08:34:23AM +0900 schrieb yokota: > > When writing this I'm wondering whether it might be better to remove > > this in Files-Excluded. On one hand this saves us from mentioning the > > copyright on the other hand we could be really sure that it is not used. > >

Bug#1068561: ITS: argtable2

2024-04-07 Thread Andreas Tille
or future cases. Kind regards Andreas. > Shachar > > > On 07/04/2024 12:46, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Source: argtable2 > Version: 13-1.1 > Severity: important > X-Debbugs-Cc: Shachar Shemesh , Debian Med Packaging > Team , 1066...@bugs.debian

Bug#1068576: tar: Please provide autopkgtest

2024-04-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Source: tar Version: 1.35+dfsg-3 Severity: wishlist Hi, I used $ PGPASSWORD="udd-mirror" psql --port=5432 --host=udd-mirror.debian.net --username=udd-mirror udd < 1000 ORDER BY vote DESC, source LIMIT 5; EOT source| vote | maintainer

Bug#1065221: O: py7zr -- pure Python 7-zip library

2024-04-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, Am Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 11:54:00AM +0900 schrieb yokota: > Hello, > > I think these packages are now ready for upload to NEW queue. > Please examine them. > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-brotlicffi See

Bug#1068561: ITS: argtable2

2024-04-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Source: argtable2 Version: 13-1.1 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: Shachar Shemesh , Debian Med Packaging Team , 1066...@bugs.debian.org, m...@qa.debian.org Hi, on behalf of the Debian Med team I intend to salvage[1] this package since the following criteria from Wiki[2] are met There is

Bug#1065221: O: py7zr -- pure Python 7-zip library

2024-04-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Am Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 11:54:00AM +0900 schrieb yokota: > Hello, > > I think these packages are now ready for upload to NEW queue. > Please examine them. > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-brotlicffi Uploaded. Please note that the clean process failed in my pbuilder

Bug#1065222: Adopting pychm (Was: Packaging multivolumefile?)

2024-04-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Hiroshi, Am Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 02:51:51AM +0900 schrieb yokota: > Thanks a lot for your detailed document. You are welcome. > I will try to fixup other packages. Just ping me once done. > PS: > If py7zr is done, I will also try package pychm to use for Debian > Calibre package. > Please

Bug#1065221: Packaging multivolumefile?

2024-04-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Yokota, Am Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 08:39:36PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > Nevermind, YOKOTA Hiroshi already has done this and more and is looking > > for sponsors. > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065221#17 > > Thanks a lot for your packaging

Bug#1068401: Pending uplad (Was: Bug#1068401: ltrsift dependencies unsatisfiable on 32-bit non-i386 architectures.)

2024-04-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sascha, Am Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 10:33:16PM +0200 schrieb Sascha Steinbiss: > Interesting to see that there is no ltrsift-examples package indeed. But > I must have had my reasons back then... > > Anyway, to be honest I don't see much long-term future for LTRsift. I am > actually surprised to

Bug#1065339: src:r-cran-rstanarm: FTBFS on mips64el and risc64

2024-04-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: retitle -1 src:r-cran-rstanarm: FTBFS on mips64el and risc64 Control: reopen -1 Control: tags -1 upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/stan-dev/rstanarm/issues/619 thanks As per autobuilders log[1] the package fails to build on mips64el and risc64 with ... g++ -std=gnu++17

Bug#1068401: Pending uplad (Was: Bug#1068401: ltrsift dependencies unsatisfiable on 32-bit non-i386 architectures.)

2024-04-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 pending thanks Hi Sascha, after routine-update dh_missing failed due to compat level 13 which defaults to fail if some files are not installed. This made me aware that upstream in principle installs a test suite we could use for an autopkgtest. I also realised that you once

Bug#1068341: bioawk: FTBFS randomly due to Makefile bug: cp: cannot create regular file 'ytab.c': File exists

2024-04-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Santiago, Am Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:58:07PM +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila: > Hi. I've just realized that (as a member of Debian Med) > I could fix this myself. > > Nilesh: Would it help if I do a "team upload" to fix this? > (Using the proposed patch) > > Or would you prefer to fix it

Bug#1065221: Packaging multivolumefile?

2024-04-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Yokota, Am Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 06:31:54PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Metzler: > On 2024-03-30 Andreas Metzler wrote: > > I originally intended to file an ITP, but it probably makes more sense > > to ask here: > > > py7zr >= 0.16.0 requires multivolumefile by the same author. How about > >

Bug#1034805: Upgrading fis-gtm and closing CVE-2021-44496 CVE-2021-44504

2024-04-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Ping? Am Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 06:13:24PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Amul, > > I realised that fis-gtm is lagging behind upstream some versions and the > Debian packaged fis-gtm is featuring CVE-2021-44496 and CVE-2021-44504. > It would be great if you could upgrade the

Bug#1068164: bart: please add support for loong64

2024-03-31 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Martin, can you please comment on this? Kind regards Andreas. Am Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 01:22:03AM + schrieb wuruilong: > Source: bart > Severity: normal > User: debian-loonga...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: loong64 > X-Debbugs-Cc: wuruil...@loongson.cn > > Dear Maintainer, > > bart

Bug#1043686: Please provide a proper download location for beads

2024-03-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Ping? Am Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 12:46:17PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Filippo, > > I intended to have a look at bug #1043686 noticing that beads is > shipping a copy of cimg (which is packaged and should probably be > excluded from upstream source in favour of the package

Bug#1067959: sambamba: FTBFS on armhf (supported compiler issue)

2024-03-29 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Am Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 10:32:25PM +0900 schrieb Kentaro HAYASHI: > sambamba fails to build on armhf. Thanks a lot for this bug report. I'd recommend to drop 32bit architectures for this package. Kind regards Andreas. > FYI: > >

Bug#1065199: RM: pprintpp -- ROM; leaf package

2024-03-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi ftpmasters, Am Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 11:55:24AM +0100 schrieb Alexandre Detiste: > > > > ? #1065199 RM: pprintpp -- ROM; leaf package > > Do we need this package? > It looks dead upstream & was a trivial utility, let's drop it. For the package pprintpp there is consens that this can be

Bug#1067098: mpl-sphinx-theme: please make the build reproducible

2024-03-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 pending thanks Hi Vagrant, sorry about your work was lost. I confirm the new upstream version in Git contains the patch. Unfortunately it needs new dependencies. If it might help you I could upload your NMU again. Kind regards Andreas. -- https://fam-tille.de

Bug#790235: basemap: [PATCH] please make the build reproducible

2024-03-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 - patch thanks Hi, I applied the suggested patch in basemap (1.2.2+dfsg-4) but according to Salsa CI[1] the package does not build reprducibly yet. Since bug #827361 that might have affected this bug is closed I removed the tag patch. Any further suggestions how to make

Bug#1060104: dcmtk: FTBFS on armel: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100)

2024-03-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Emanuele. Am Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 12:16:16PM +0100 schrieb Emanuele Rocca: > I've uploaded a NMU to DELAYED/2: https://bugs.debian.org/1067147 Thanks a lot for your attempt to help. In principle we have a team wide low threshold NMU - so undelayed NMUs are fine. The kind of race condition

Bug#1060104: dcmtk: FTBFS on armel: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100)

2024-03-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, sorry, I did not checked the situation. Am Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 10:34:13AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Testing removals are happening automatically if some RC bug exists > for a certain time without pinging. Just writing some additional > information to the bug in quest

Bug#1066146: #1066146 RM: flask-basicauth (Re: morph's abandoned packages (list))

2024-03-19 Thread Andreas Tille
to make sure it has finally some positive use. Kind regards Andreas. Am Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 07:06:18AM +0100 schrieb Carsten Schoenert: > Hello Andreas, > > Am 18.03.24 um 21:15 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > Hi Carsten, > > > > Am Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 08:18:58AM +010

Bug#1060736: Would you agree with swapping Maintainer and Uploaders in eric?

2024-03-18 Thread Andreas Tille
that this all is OK before I upload (feel free to upload yourself which is perfectly fine for me). Kind regards Andreas. Am Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 10:13:50PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Gudjon, > > in case you agree with the suggested change of policy discussed on the > debian-python ma

Bug#1063980: Mark affected test xfail and reduce bug severity + report upstream

2024-03-18 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 important Control: tags -1 upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/jnothman/UpSetPlot/issues/273 thanks Hi, I've checked the new upstream version of python-upsetplot which shows the same problem. Thus I marked the one affected test xfail and reported the problem

Bug#1066409: Reassign nodejs and merge bug (Was: Linker fails to find libraries in unstable but succeeds in testing)

2024-03-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: reassign -1 nodejs Control: forcemerge 1066399 -1 thanks Hi Jochen, Am Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 08:46:11AM +0100 schrieb Jochen Sprickerhof: > > I guess that's the same as #1066399. > > libnode-dev: > libv8.so -> libnode.so > libnode.so -> libnode.so.108t64 > > But libnode.so.108t64

Bug#1066409: Linker fails to find libraries in unstable but succeeds in testing

2024-03-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, thanks to the next round of Lucas' FTBFS QA rebuilds (at least) one package of the R pkg team is affected by some strange linker issue #1066409 r-cran-v8: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lv8: No such file or directory which boils down to[1] g++ -std=gnu++17 -shared -L/usr/lib/R/lib -Wl,-z,relro -o

Bug#1066409: [Help] Re: Bug#1066409: r-cran-v8: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lv8: No such file or directory

2024-03-15 Thread Andreas Tille
"Action needed for R-pkg Uploaders"-mail I would be happy if you would pronounce whether you are up for maintaining this package actively or not. You are mentioned as only Uploader but the changelog says: $ grep '^ --' debian/changelog -- Andreas Tille Fri, 22 Dec 2023 10:19:13 +0100 -- A

Bug#1018336: Is it OK to switch Uploader and Maintainer in deap [Was: Suggesting change in DPT policy]

2024-03-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Miriam, Am Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 08:33:13PM +0100 schrieb Miriam Ruiz: > I am totally okay with team maintenance. Lots of thanks!!! Updated to latest upstream which fixes the bug. Thanks a lot for your quick response Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Bug#1018336: Is it OK to switch Uploader and Maintainer in deap [Was: Suggesting change in DPT policy]

2024-03-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Tille - Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:48:21 +0100 From: Andreas Tille To: Miriam Ruiz Subject: Is it OK to switch Uploader and Maintainer in deap [Was: Suggesting change in DPT policy] Hi Miriam, as you can read below I doubt that the situation in several packages is the interpretation

Bug#1064946: morph's abandoned packages (list)

2024-03-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, this package is team maintained. I have to assume its former maintainer has decided to leave the team. Please delay the removal until it is perfectly clear that no other team member intends to take over this package. Thank you for your work as ftpmaster

Bug#1066814: plotly: Please upgrade to latest upstream version

2024-03-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Josue, Am Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 06:19:05PM -0600 schrieb Josue Ortega: > > Hopefully, I'll be uploading the latest version next weekend. I've been quite > busy with $DAILY_JOB. Thank you for your quick response. As a volunteer your $DAILY_JOB has definitely preference. To cover such

Bug#1059308: Tag bugs pending

2024-03-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 pending I'm just marking these bugs pending for next upload. They were even closed in recent Debian package but since they are concerning CVEs it might be better to close these inside a changelog of next upload. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Bug#1065908: multiqc: Please drop dependencies on python3-distutils

2024-03-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 pending Hi, this bug is fixed in Git. Since I used the chance to upgrade to latest upstream which is blocked by a needed upgrade of plotly the upload will be delayed. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Bug#1066814: plotly: Please upgrade to latest upstream version

2024-03-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Source: plotly Version: 5.15.0+dfsg1-1 Severity: normal Hi, I want to upgrade multiqc but this package requires a higher version of plotly as you can see in Salsa CI[1]. It would be great if you could upgrade the package. BTW, I would consider it a good idea if plotly would be maintained in

Bug#1065841: Taking over datalad to either Debian Med or Debian Science team

2024-03-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Yaroslav, Am Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 03:50:22PM -0400 schrieb Yaroslav Halchenko: > Let's keep DataLad under our (NeuroDebian) umbrella for now, since we > are also upstream there and project is active. We are also > working with Vasyl (CCed) to experiment with some semi-automation for > package

Bug#1065759: Retitle libbio-samtools-perl: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: lib/Bio/DB/Sam.xs:324:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘bam_sort_core’; did you mean ‘bam_format1_core’? [-Werror=implicit-fun

2024-03-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: retitle -1 libbio-samtools-perl: FTBFS: lib/Bio/DB/Sam.xs:324:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘bam_sort_core’; did you mean ‘bam_format1_core’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Control: tags -1 help thanks I can confirm that this bug also occures on amd64 thus

Bug#1063376: Create bugs against ftp.debian.org to enable removal of 32bit architectures for all r-bioc-rhtslib rdepends

2024-03-12 Thread Andreas Tille
clone 1063379 -1 block 1063376 by -1 retitle -1 RM: r-bioc-ballgown [armel armhf i386 hppa m68k powerpc sh4] -- ROM; r-bioc-rhtslib does not support of 32 bit architectures any more affects -1 + src:r-bioc-ballgown clone 1063379 -2 block 1063376 by -2 retitle -2 RM: r-bioc-cner [armel armhf i386

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >