Bug#762638: metaconfig source control/distribution and Debian's DFSG

2014-10-06 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 05:50:51PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:07:59PM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:16:32PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > The way it's set up now, we encourage people to simply patch Confi

Bug#479711: eval "require Foo" with binary-incompatible XS modules

2008-05-30 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Sat, 31 May 2008, Brendan O'Dea wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 15 May 2008, Niko Tyni wrote: > >> we're currently doing the 5.8.8 -> 5.10.0 transition in Debian, and the > >> binary

Bug#479711: eval "require Foo" with binary-incompatible XS modules

2008-05-16 Thread Andy Dougherty
0" (much as is done for $Config{archlib} aleady) might solve this problem. Or at least it might cause the failure to appear earlier and in a way that is easier to trap gracefully. > Details on the Debian issue can be found at <http://bugs.debian.org/479711>, -- Andy Dougherty

Bug#139537: Debian Bug#139537: empty values in %Config for some programs

2006-04-11 Thread Andy Dougherty
mail} || '/usr/sbin/sendmail'; I wouldn't bother. Those %Config{} variables are documented as being undefined and useless. In the very very rare cases where someone might have set them, it's not at all guaranteed that the path name on the machine where perl was built is the same as that on the machine where perl is running. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]