Hello Francois,
I will take a look in the next few days.
Regards
Anton
Am So., 22. Aug. 2021 um 01:57 Uhr schrieb François Mazen :
> Hello Sylwester,
>
> Thanks for your interest in F3D, I'm working on the packaging of this
> software [1].
>
> The package is already on mentors [2], so let's
SIGNATURE-
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index c7da9ab..bf983b0 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+httraqt (1.4.9-5) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Install doc-files in /usr/share/httraqt. (Closes: #990895)
+
+ -- Anton Gladky Sat, 10 Jul 2021
Control: severity -1 grave
Thanks! I am able to reproduce it now! Hopefully the fix will
be accepted into the Bullseye.
Regards
Anton
>
Am Sa., 10. Juli 2021 um 21:11 Uhr schrieb Calum McConnell <
calumlikesapple...@gmail.com>:
>
> I have no idea how else to describe how to reproduce it: the issue is
> happening on every run, regardless of what I do, or if I reinstall. The
> CLI httrack package works fine. The issue manifests
Control: gravity -1 minor
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo +unreproducible
Thanks for the bug report,
I am not able to reproduce the issue. Please provide more information about
how to reproduce it. It looks like something is broken on your side. Try to
install another similar package.
Regards
Anton
Hi Drew,
> Would you like me to push to salsa (experimental branch) for inspection?
Yes, please.
Anton
Am So., 13. Juni 2021 um 01:24 Uhr schrieb Drew Parsons :
> Package: metis
> Followup-For: Bug #961183
>
> Hi Anton, I've prepared packaging for a 64-bit that I'm happy to push
> (and
Well, theoretically we can do it. But we need to do some kind
of a transition for all dependencies.
Regards
Anton
Am Sa., 5. Juni 2021 um 13:36 Uhr schrieb Drew Parsons :
> ...
> I think the best solution is to "break" the builds of client
> applications by moving the standard header from
Control: tags -1 wontfix
Hi, I am closing this bug. See an explanation above.
Best regards
Anton
(4.1.0+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * [5c80d16] Install libsundials_*sunnonlinsol*.so.*. (Closes: #988551)
+
+ -- Anton Gladky Sat, 15 May 2021 16:51:20 +0200
+
sundials (4.1.0+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload.
diff -Nru sundials-4.1.0+dfsg/debian/libsundials-sunlinsol2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team,
please unblock package sundials.
Version 4.1.0+dfsg-4 fixes RC-Bug #988551. Diff is attached.
unblock sundials/4.1.0+dfsg-4
Thanks
Anton
should be fine.
>
> Let me know if I'm missing something.
>
> Best,
> François
>
>
> [1] https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/f/freefem++.html
> [2] https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/m/mumps/changelog-5.3.5-2
>
>
> Le jeudi 13 mai 2021 à 22:31 +0200, Anton G
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+libgetdata (0.10.0-5+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium
+
+ * Team upload.
+ * Fix CVE-2021-20204.
+
+ -- Anton Gladky Thu, 13 May 2021 23:20:53 +0200
+
libgetdata (0.10.0-5) unstable; urgency=medium
* Rebuild for python3.7 support
diff -Nru libgetdata-0.10.0/debian/patches/CVE
Your upload is fine. It fixes the FTBFS. But piuparts
identified some problems with the installation of libfreefem++-dev [1].
Could you please verify whether the problem really exists or not?
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/freefempp/-/jobs/1640984
Thanks
Anton
Am Do., 13. Mai
Control: tags -1 +pending
Hi François,
thanks for fixing this issue. I am testing it and if it works, I will
upload it.
I am not sure, whether it will be possible to reintroduce this package
in testing on this stage of the freeze. Please contact the release team
about that.
Welcome to join
Uhr schrieb Sebastian Ramacher <
sramac...@debian.org>:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 2021-05-10 22:35:28, Anton Gladky wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
> >
> > Hi Sebastian,
> >
> > Thanks for looking into this issue. Yes, it is i
Your changes look good. Let's wait for approval by
release team not to pollute unstable by unapproved uploads.
Regards
Anton
Am Mo., 10. Mai 2021 um 11:40 Uhr schrieb Torrance, Douglas <
dtorra...@piedmont.edu>:
> On Sun 09 May 2021 05:16:38 PM EDT, Anton Gladky wrote:
> >
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Hi Sebastian,
Thanks for looking into this issue. Yes, it is intentional. We should always
check whether first_raw is NULL or not.
I have reproduced the issue in the CI-pipeline [1], and the proposed patch
fixes
the issue [2]: no more segfault, just an error message
Hi Doug,
I will review/upload the package tomorrow,
Please file a pre-approval request against release.debian.org. Thanks
Regards
Anton
Am So., 9. Mai 2021 um 22:48 Uhr schrieb Torrance, Douglas <
dtorra...@piedmont.edu>:
> Control: tags -1 pending
>
> On Sun 02 May 2021 12:46:50 AM EDT,
: #988239)
+
+ -- Anton Gladky Sun, 09 May 2021 14:27:38 +0200
+
libgetdata (0.10.0-9) unstable; urgency=medium
* Fix FTBFFS on binary-all build (missing file). Closes: #966522
diff --git a/debian/patches/CVE-2021-20204.patch
b/debian/patches/CVE-2021-20204.patch
new file mode 100644
index
tags 988239 +pending
thanks
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/libgetdata/-/commit/d874e3e63fc9c5c5f3008e9803aa1976cc222125
Anton
=medium
+
+ * Team upload.
+ * [9fb3053] Add .gitlab-ci.yml
+ * [634d5c0] Link against X11. (Closes: #987935)
+
+ -- Anton Gladky Wed, 05 May 2021 22:03:32 +0200
+
gfsview (20121130+dfsg-6) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload.
diff --git a/debian/patches/02_use_system_gl2ps.patch
b
-time version of g++ instead of
+the virtual libstdc++-dev provided by multiple packages.
+(Closes: #984838)
+
+ -- Anton Gladky Sat, 13 Mar 2021 09:21:38 +0100
+
boost1.74 (1.74.0-8) unstable; urgency=medium
* [85a2610] Fix compilation warnings. (Closes: #980497)
diff --git a/debian
Hi,
maybe it makes sense to revert the upload of a newer version?
There is a risk of dropping this and all dependent packages from
Bullseye.
Cheers
Anton
Hi Adrian,
thanks for bugreport. core-package ist still in NEW queue. So, no way
to fix this bug right now.
Regards
Anton
Am Fr., 12. Feb. 2021 um 16:27 Uhr schrieb Adrian Bunk :
> Package: python3-luma.led-matrix
> Version: 1.5.0+dfsg1-1
> Severity: serious
>
> The following packages have
Yes, that's it. "Yet" another.
Anton
Am Do., 28. Jan. 2021 um 23:06 Uhr schrieb Philipp Kern :
> On 28.01.21 21:44, Anton Gladky wrote:
> > * Package name: smbus2
> > Version : 0.4.1
> > Upstream Author : Karl-Petter Lindegaard
> > *
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anton Gladky
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: smbus2
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Karl-Petter Lindegaard
* URL : https://github.com/kplindegaard/smbus2
* License : MIT
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anton Gladky
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: smbus2
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Karl-Petter Lindegaard
* URL : https://github.com/kplindegaard/smbus2
* License : MIT
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anton Gladky
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: pyftdi
Version : 0.52.9
Upstream Author : Emmanuel Blot
* URL : https://github.com/eblot/pyftdi/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anton Gladky
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: luma.led-matrix
Version : 1.5.0
Upstream Author : Richard Hull and contributors
* URL : https://github.com/rm-hull/luma.led_matrix
* License : MIT
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anton Gladky
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: luma.core
Version : 2.2.0
Upstream Author : Richard Hull and contributors
* URL : https://github.com/rm-hull/luma.core/
* License : MIT
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear FTP team,
please remove solvespace on armel, where the newer version fails
to copmile.
Thanks
Anton
Hi Drew,
this header is according to documentation deprecated.
I tried to use the proposed header, but some more changes
in the code are needed.
Please verify it and close the bug, if nothing more can be done
on vtk9 side.
Regards
Anton
Am Di., 5. Jan. 2021 um 23:49 Uhr schrieb Drew Parsons :
Hi Drew,
could you please push the version of avogadrolibs which your working on
into the git? So I could probably test it against newer vtk9. Thanks.
Regards
Anton
Am Di., 5. Jan. 2021 um 05:09 Uhr schrieb Drew Parsons :
>
> Package: libvtk9-qt-dev
> Version: 9.0.1+dfsg1-6
> Severity: normal
Hi Pierre,
sure, I will! Please push your changes in master-branch. It looks
only the tags were pushed.
Regards
Anton
Am Sa., 2. Jan. 2021 um 19:41 Uhr schrieb Pierre Saramito
:
>
> Hi Anton, hi all,
>
> I just commit with git a new release 7.1-3 of the debianisation
> of the rheolef package:
It looks like the main problem is here [1]:
[1]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=boost1.74=mipsel=1.74.0-5=1608350424=0
===
/<>/b2 -j4 -q -d2 --disable-long-double --layout=system
--ignore-site-config --user-config=/<>/user-config.jam
debug-symbols=on
tags 977243 -pending
thanks
CC-ing on of upstream contributors.
@Casey could you please take a look? This part of the code
fails with the newer boost_1.74? Thanks!
It looks like the last version in git still fails to build.
===
ceph/src/common/async/completion.h: In instantiation of 'void
Hi Christoph,
Thanks for the feedback!
I just generated a new symbols-file. Can you recommend
a better fix for that?
Regards
Anton
tags 977229 +pending +patch
user team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
usertag 977229 +boost174
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I have prepared an NMU (versioned as 0.11.99.0-1.1) and
uploaded to DELAYED/5.
Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer, cancel
or reschedule.
Diff is attached. MR is
Forgotten diff.
Anton
nmu.debdiff
Description: Binary data
tags 977265 +pending +patch
user team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
usertag 977265 +boost174
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I have prepared an NMU (versioned as dds_2.9.0-8.1) and
uploaded to DELAYED/5.
Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer, cancel
or reschedule.
Diff is attached. MR is
tags 977226 +pending +patch
user team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
usertag 977226 +boost174
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I have prepared an NMU (versioned as 0.46.0-1.1) and
uploaded to DELAYED/5.
Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer, cancel
or reschedule.
Diff is attached. MR is
I have checked and your package can easily be switched to the unversioned
dev-package.
Regards
Anton
severity 976909 normal
tags 976909 +moreinfo
thanks
Hi Lucas,
thanks for filing the bug. But I cannot reproduce this failure
and it looks like the last upload of the package h2o into the
archive was successfully built of ppc64el [1].
Could you please check your setup and provide more
tags 977449 +pending +patch
user team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
usertag 977449 +boost174
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I have prepared an NMU (versioned as 1.3.0+dfsg1-3.2) and
uploaded to DELAYED/5.
Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer, cancel
or reschedule.
Diff is attached. MR
reassign 977351 facter 3.14.12-1
fixed 977351 3.14.12-1+b2
thanks
Hi Stefan,
thanks for filing a bug. We are in the middle of transition from
boost_1.71 to boost_1.74, and leatherman was built earlier than
facter. Thus such a problem occurred.
facter is already also rebuilt and the issue should
tags 977219 +pending +patch
user team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
usertag 977219 +boost174
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I have prepared an NMU (versioned as 0.3.7-1.3) and
uploaded to DELAYED/5.
Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer, cancel
or reschedule.
Diff is attached.
Best
Dear maintainers,
MR is here [1]. Please consider to accept it.
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/puppet-team/leatherman/-/merge_requests/2
Best Regards
Anton
severity 975430 serious
severity 975588 serious
severity 975593 serious
severity 975660 serious
severity 975665 serious
severity 975666 serious
severity 975667 serious
severity 975672 serious
severity 975863 serious
thanks
boost1.74 is already default in unstable. Thus raising the bug's severity.
Merge request ist here [1].
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/s3cmd/-/merge_requests/2
Regards
Anton
Package: s3cmd
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream patch
Dear Maintainer,
package s3cmd fails to work due to python3.9:
Traceback (most recent call last):
===
File
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear release team,
this is a transition request to upgrade boost-defaults from 1.71 to 1.74.
Most of issues in packages are tracked
reassign 975446 boost1.74[
retitle 975446 b2 is not installed bz boost
thanks
The problem is in boost, thus I am reassigning it to it.
Thanks
Anton
Am Mi., 25. Nov. 2020 um 20:16 Uhr schrieb Giovanni Mascellani
:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 08:19:29 +0100 "Maarten L. Hekkelman"
> wrote:
Package: leatherman
Version: 1.12.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 10.1
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package ships some
files, which are now shipped
notfound 975661 0.4.12-1
thanks
Hi Dirk,
I have tested with the rebuilt libquantlib0 it rquantlib builds
fine then. Thus I am closing the bug.
Thanks!
Anton
Am Di., 24. Nov. 2020 um 21:57 Uhr schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel :
> Thanks, that is pertinent. The error is actually from the final step
Package: xylib
Version: 1.3-1.1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most
Package: uhd
Version: 3.15.0.0-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most
Excuse me for the wrong template in the initial message.
Here is the fixed version:
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most relevant
part is probably this:
[ 16%] Building C object
Package: supercollider
Version: 3.10.4+repack-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here
Package: sslsniff
Version: 0.8-8.1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most
Package: slic3r-prusa
Version: 2.2.0+dfsg1-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here
Package: rquantlib
Version: 0.4.12-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most
Package: scram
Version: 0.16.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most
Package: python-mapnik
Version: 1:0.0~20200224-7da019cf9-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be
Package: pdns-recursor
Version: 4.3.5-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1].
Package: pdns
Version: 4.3.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most
Package: openms
Version: 2.5.0+cleaned1-5
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1].
Package: odil
Version: 0.12.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most
eeks now.
>
> regards, -maarten
>
> Op 22-11-2020 om 13:28 schreef Anton Gladky:
>
> Package: libzeep
> Version: 5.0.2-3
> Severity: important
> Tags: ftbfs
> User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
> Usertags: boost174
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Ha
Package: libzeep
Version: 5.0.2-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most
Package: libktorrent
Version: 2.2.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most
Package: libkolabxml
Version: 1.1.6-8_
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most
Package: libgdf
Version: 0.1.3-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most
Package: libetonyek
Version: 0.1.9-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most
Package: libcutl
Version: 1.10.0+ds1-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most
Package: inkscape
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most
Package: icinga2
Version: 2.12.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most
Patch is here:
https://salsa.debian.org/bottoms/pkg-gnuradio/-/merge_requests/1
Regards
Anton
Package: gnuradio
Version: 3.8.2.0-9
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most
Package: gazebo
Version: 11.1.0+dfsg-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most
Package: freecad
Version: 0.18.4+dfsg2-5
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1].
Package: enblend-enfuse
Version: 4.2-6
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be found here [1]. Most
Hi Drew,
The patch works for both versions, so it
shoe safely be applied by upstream.
That is the reason why i decided to
make this minimal team upload. But
reverted it because of FTBFS.
Regards
Anton
Drew Parsons schrieb am Mi., 18. Nov. 2020, 10:39:
> Source: dolfin
> Followup-For: Bug
tags 974948 + patch
thanks
The fix is available here [1]. It was reverted because
of #975012 but it looks those two bugs are independent.
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/fenics/dolfin/-/commit/972649229ed95ad3dad2abc4000133b86d192c8e
Anton
Hi Sebastian,
Thanks for your bug report. I am preparing a transition to boost 1.74
and tested my minimal changes to fix #974948. It worked locally.
Anyway I have reverted the fix for #974948 and it did not help. So the reason
is somewhere else. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Best regards
Anton
Package: dolfin
Version: 2019.2.0~git20200629.946dbd3-5
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be
Package: dolfin
Version: 2019.2.0~git20200629.946dbd3-5
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: team+bo...@tracker.debian.org
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build
against boost_1.74. Logs can be
Thanks, OdyX, for the fast response!
I have cancelled my NMU,
Best regards
Anton
Am Fr., 13. Nov. 2020 um 17:22 Uhr schrieb Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
:
>
> Dear Anton,
>
> Le jeudi, 12 novembre 2020, 22.04:45 h CET Anton Gladky a écrit :
> > I have prepared an NMU (versi
Thanks! Cancelled
Regards
Anton
Am Fr., 13. Nov. 2020 um 00:36 Uhr schrieb Ralf Treinen :
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 10:02:57PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
>
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > I have prepared an NMU (versioned as 1.9.4-2.1) and
> >
tags 974603 +pending +patch
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I have prepared an NMU (versioned as 0.1.12-6.1) and
uploaded to DELAYED/10.
Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer, cancel
or reschedule.
Diff is attached.
Best regards
Anton Gladky
nmu.debdiff
Description: Binary data
tags 974539 +pending +patch
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I have prepared an NMU (versioned as 1.9.4-2.1) and
uploaded to DELAYED/10.
Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer, cancel
or reschedule.
Diff is attached.
Best regards
Anton Gladky
nmu.debdiff
Description: Binary data
* edit, int rangeStart = 0, int
rangeEnd = std::numeric_limits::max());
|
^~~
^~
It is planned to push boost_1.74 as the default version in Debian/Bullseye.
[1]
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/10/27-boost/boost/colobot_0.1.12-6_unstable_boost.log
Best regards
Anton Gladky
- -- System Information:
Debian Rele
Package: aspcud
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Usertags: boost174
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build against boost_1.74.
Logs can be found here [1]. Most relevant part is probably this:
libcudf/src/dependency.cpp:476:85: error: _2 was not declared in
Package: aspcud
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Usertags: boost174
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build against boost_1.74.
Logs can be found here [1]. Most relevant part is probably this:
Package: aspcud
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Usertags: boost174
Dear maintainer,
it was discovered that your package failed to build against boost_1.74.
Logs can be found here [1]. Most relevant part is probably this:
libcudf/src/dependency.cpp:476:85: error: _2 was not declared in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Anton Gladky
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: vtk9
Version : 9.0.1
Upstream Author : Kitware
* URL : https://vtk.org/
* License : BSD
890657 fixed 2.0.1+dfsg1-1
thanks
The newer qcustomplot has a fix for this problem [1].
Thus I am closing this bug.
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/qcustomplot/-/blob/master/qcustomplot.h#L83
Thanks for your contribution!
Best regards
Anton
Hi Stefano,
thanks for NMU, feel free to upload it immediately. Just push your changes
into the git.
Best regards,
Anton
Am Sa., 17. Okt. 2020 um 22:15 Uhr schrieb Stefano Rivera :
>
> Control: tags 972372 + patch
> Control: tags 972372 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU
Hello Jakob,
thanks for work on this huge and difficult packages! Just to let you know,
i am
going to start to work on recently released VTK9. We can coordinate our work
and to try to solve this problem, if it is possible.
Best regards
Anton
Am Fr., 28. Aug. 2020 um 12:09 Uhr schrieb Jakob
966871 fixed 3.3.7-3
thanks
arratt <
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk>:
> Apologies for letting this sit for a while.
>
> On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 18:08 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Mar 2020, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2020-03-15 at 21:37 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> &g
101 - 200 of 1371 matches
Mail list logo
