Package: autotools-dev
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Given that these scripts are often used by system users, these scripts
should be somewhere found on the $PATH. I propose /usr/bin as a reasonable
place to put them.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.6
APT prefers
Package: autotools-dev
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The upstream config.guess/sub repository includes manual pages. These should be
included
in the Debian autotools-dev package for completeness.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.6
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500,
After weeks of troubleshooting, I have come to the conclusion that
Debian kernels no longer work on the Via C7. Even newly available
motherboards were released over 6 years ago.
I fixed this problem by running: systemctl enable radvd. This created
a new sym link that was not present before:
/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/radvd.service ->
/lib/systemd/system/radvd.service
My problem is now fixed, but is this a problem with the packaging or
was this just a
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.9.88-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
For several weeks I have been experiencing hard lockups of my system (running a
Via C7 CPU).
When the system locks up, there is no panic message on the console,
numlock/caps lock are
inoperative, and a hard reset is the
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 03:55:57PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> I really have no other idea that???s in scope. After all,
> CC_FOR_BUILD is the *only* tool guaranteed to correspond to the
> target (in FreeWRT speak; --build= in GNU autotools speak) system.
We're trying to guess the build
Package: radvd
Version: 1:2.16-1
Severity: important
Tags: ipv6
Dear Maintainer,
radvd is not starting on system boot (which runs systed). However, once
the system is running, 'service radvd start' works fine. I confirmed this
by grepping /var/log/daemon.log:
Dec 4 16:19:11 mailhub
Package: mailman
Version: 1:2.1.23-1+deb9u1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
At some point (not necessarily the most recent Mailman update), list traffic
has been shunted due to the following exception:
Oct 14 10:56:46 2017 (5640) SHUNTING:
As a workaround, I have switched to using the IMAP server that runs on
localhost.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 11:00:10PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> How does the corruption looks like?
One partial message in my mbox, then a From line for the start of the
next message, and the rest of the mbox is OK.
> Well, is it possible to open your mbox?
Yes, but not in mutt.
> Maybe
Hi Ellmar
> > mutt is corrupting my mbox when writing back the mbox after deleting
> > messages
> > (and quiting mutt). I have a partial message in the start of the mbox,
> > which
> > makes mutt unable to read any of the messages in the mbox.
>
> The following predication I don't understand?
Package: mutt
Version: 1.8.3+neomutt20170609-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
mutt is corrupting my mbox when writing back the mbox after deleting messages
(and quiting mutt). I have a partial message in the start of the mbox, which
makes mutt unable to
Package: mutt
Version: 1.8.3+neomutt20170609-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Mutt segfaults, intermittently, when paging through a message. It happens
several times a week, so hardly a rare occurrence.
* What outcome did you expect instead?
No segfault.
I upgraded to the latest
Package: debianutils
Version: 4.4+b1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The which(1) man page says: "It does not follow symbolic links". However
`which' does in fact:
$ ln -s /usr/bin link
$ export PATH=~/link:$PATH
$ which uptime
/home/bje/link/uptime
In a modern Linux system, not following
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:35:56AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
If you're happy with using -a, do you mind if this bug is closed?
Fine with me. It's really no different to displaying a very long
domain name.
Cheers, Ben
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: sysvinit-utils
Version: 2.88dsf-34
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
When running last(1), IPv6 addresses are truncated, eg:
bje pts/02402:b800:7003:7 Sat Feb 2 10:07 - 10:07 (00:00)
It would be nice if these could be shown in full.
-- System Information:
Debian
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:31:34AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
I think this is just a limitation of the field width for this output
format--it's not IPv6 related as far as I can tell. Does last -a
look better?
Yes, the addresses are printed correctly when -a is used.
Cheers, Ben
--
To
Thanks, using the WSGI method works much better (and is probably
preferrable).
Cheers,
Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: radicale
Version: 0.6.4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After a while (days), the radicale server no longer negotiates SSL connections
with clients. openssl s_client shows CONNECTED, but no certificate is sent.
This only happens on the IPv4 interface, not IPv6.
Package: python-radicale
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: normal
The version of python-radicale in stable depends on a version of Python (=
2.6.6-7~)
that is not available in stable. Is this dependency really accurate? Can
python-radicale
really not run under Python 2.6.6-3+squeeze6?
-- System
Hi.
Please find attached a patch to add config.guess support for the ARM
hard-float gnueabi variant (armhf, arm-*-linux-gnueabihf).
This is fine, thanks.
Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:20:29PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Should you accept the patch, I'd appreciate if you could email me a
notice when it gets pushed to your public git repository.
Done.
Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 01:18:52PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Is this issue so severe that we should consider ripping out the
daemons also from the stable release of Debian?
I think so, yes. If it had been removed earlier, it would have
prompted me to seek out a newer/better IMAP server.
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 01:23:21AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
...there's obviously also the approach of actually reading the full
bugreport (as I did only after replying to your earlier post) and
try follow one of the solutions proposed by Mike Young.
For the record, tried all of the
This problem persists in squeeze. IMHO, it needs to have a higher
priority! Corrupting mailboxes is not cool.
Cheers, Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hmm. This is a complex one. The addresses of local variables are
always non-NULL, as required by the C/C++ standards (and common
sense). And its often the case explicitly testing this in code
indicates a potential logic error, assert (hwparams) instead of
assert (hwparams) for example.
26 matches
Mail list logo
