On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 11:47:55AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
With the fixed xulrunner packages I successfully compiled
epiphany-browser and with the few websites I tested it even seems to
work fine.
Tha patch contains a bad bugzilla bug reference. Could you point to the
real one, please
reassign 397645 metacity
severity 397645 wishlist
retitle 397645 /usr/share/menu/metacity considered harmful
quit
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 12:33:14PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
We can either be strict about them, asking them to implement the XSM
protocol, or simply ask the maintainer to be
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:43:12PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
Package: debian-archive-keyring
Version: 2006.11.22
Severity: serious
debian-archive-keyring does not depent on an apt that comes with
apt-key, so in the course of upgrading from sarge to etch one can
end up with a system
severity 368485 serious
quit
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 06:15:16PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Package: amarok
Version: 1.4.0-1
Severity: important
Hello Adeodato,
Amarok involves two circular dependencies:
Here are the current dependencies:
amarok :Depends: amarok-engines |
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 10:56:27PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
At least 4 major packages are presently affected by conffile prompts
during upgrades from Sarge to current testing, because the name of the
package owning some conffile changed. When dpkg queries what is the
md5sum of the old
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 02:09:02PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
http://www.dpkg.org/ConffileHandling
The problem is that the conffiles have moved to different packages (ssh
to openssh-{config,server}). The wiki page above doesn't explicitly
cover this case, although I may be able to work
6 matches
Mail list logo
