On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 03:13:05PM +0200, Guy Durrieu wrote:
> Yes it does.
Thanks for testing.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
On April 2, 2023 12:41:46 PM GMT+02:00, Guy Durrieu
wrote:
>My system worked fine with kernel 6.1.15, but stopped booting after
>upgrading to 6.1.20 and resulted in a kernel panic:
Does this fix it:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/log/?h=x86/urgent
Thx.
--
Sent
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 10:07:31 +0900 Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
Dear Jobst,
one more thing: On the TeX Live mailing list Qing Lee send a fix:
**8
It seems that listings used brace trick in a wrong way since 2014/03/04 v1.5c:
...
%
of a sudden a second channel appears.
Reported-and-tested-by: Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov b...@suse.de
---
drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 9 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
index
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 04:00:52PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
There's a typo in the subject line. :-)
Yep, looks like I've gradually gotten unnaccustomed to typing amd ...
it's not in the fingers anymore. :-)
Thanks, fixed.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:04:49AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
This is absolutely stable material. Most of the people affected are
not going to work out that they plugged their memory in wrong. (And
maybe some of them only have one module.)
Hmm, not from my experience. This is the first report
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 08:19:26PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Ben's patch does allow me to boot the system with the memory in this
configuration on a 3.10 kernel.
Ok, I actually think we can fix it the way below. It should be
equivalent to Ben's patch in current functionality with the difference
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:24:17PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
I've tested it against 3.10 and I can confirm that it works. I've
booted the system with the DRAM on the same channel, and on
separate channels, and it's working without problems in both cases.
That's good news, thanks for testing
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 06:41:52PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 09:54 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
If the bug is in amd64_edac_mod, there are only two possible commits
which could cause the problem:
1eef12825 amd64_edac: Correct DIMM sizes
94c1acf2c amd64_edac: Add
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 05:26:07PM +0400, vita...@yourcmc.ru wrote:
When you do a suspend/resume cycle.
OK, yes, I've found it there.
The bug says The photo shows a BUG in hrtimer_interrupt() after
making
the hibernation image and while resuming the non-boot CPUs. so I'm
guessing with
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 07:08:42PM +0400, vita...@yourcmc.ru wrote:
Looks like we can't do anything about that in the HPET code itself.
Vitaliy, could you try that patch ?
Thanks, I've tried it several days ago (and still using a patched
kernel :)) - the box survives.
But at which moment
+ tglx.
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 01:38:33AM +0400, vita...@yourcmc.ru wrote:
Stack trace picture is here:
http://vmx.yourcmc.ru/var/pics/IMG_20130306_141045.jpg
Vitaliy reported that his system crashes when suspending to disk.
This
was a regression from 3.2 to 3.7, and remains in 3.8. Some
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 04:15:55PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
I have prepared a personal package and put it in my personal Debian repo
under http://people.debian.org/~agmartin/debian-store/misc. Changes file is
signed with my Debian gpg key, available from the Debian keyring.
Tested with
-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=08_do_not_use_dev_mem.patch
Author: Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de
Description: Do not use /dev/mem as a randomFile
diff --git a/debian/man/wdm.1x b/debian/man/wdm.1x
index 5f468d5fcc36..968acf293f2f 100644
--- a/debian/man/wdm.1x
Package: wdm
Version: 1.28-13
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream patch
Hi,
this is my first reporting a bug against a debian package so I very well
might've missed something in the process.
Here's the deal: wdm still uses /dev/mem in genauth.c to generate a tmp
key and it shouldn't. The kernel
Hi Agustin,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 07:17:53PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
Thanks for your contribution. Nice to see a way to get rid of the
program wdm tried to access /dev/mem ... messages.
Yeah, it was about time. :-)
wdm is currently orphaned and no maintainer is explicitly caring of
16 matches
Mail list logo
