Thanks very much for the report. Turns out that Martin also reported
this earlier, so am merging this report with #818841
-Bryan Sutula
On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 11:45 -0600, Mohan wrote:
> make rpm and installing the rpm's works well with 755 permissions. make
> install creates /usr/local/var/lib/openhpi with 777 permissions. This
> was fixed.
> https://sourceforge.net/p/openhpi/bugs/1883/
Thanks, Mohan. So it's fixed in upstream
readable. Can you investigate whether that's a real issue
> or otherwise mitigated in the Debian packagin?
Sorry for the slow reply. I wanted to acknowledge this report. I will
discuss it with upstream, as well as make any necessary corrections
during the next (planned) Debian version.
-Bry
Sorry for trickling in more details...
As suggested in this thread:
http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-1163070.html
...killing gvfs-gphoto2-volume-monitor before connecting the camera both
avoids the error message and allows the camera to be accessed by other
tools. Thi
As of today, this bug still exists for my setup as well. I'm at version
2.4.14-2 of libgphoto2-2:i386.
When the camera is plugged in, it acts like something automatic is
trying to run that accesses the camera, and then fails. This results in
an error like "Unable to mount KODAK EasyShare Z740 Zo
Package: evolution
Version: 3.2.2-1+b1
Severity: important
There is an important evolution upstream bug here:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=675595
A good description of the issue is discussed here:
http://code.google.com/p/sabredav/issues/detail?id=213
In short, Evolution 3.2.2 inse
Package: libapache-poi-java
Version: 3.6+dfsg-2
Severity: minor
The current Debian copyright file includes the following text:
Except "src/resources/scratchpad/org/apache/poi/hdgf/chunks_parse_cmds.tbl"
which is licenced under GPLv3:
Per upstream svn:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/poi/trunk/src/
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 12:25 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Ping? squeeze has been released for a while now, and openhpi is not
> buildable in testing or unstable.
I am definitely overdue. If anyone has time to do a simple fix for the
current version, please go ahead. Otherwise, I will try to fr
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 09:43 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Can you please check with upstream to prepare a migration away from
> libsysfs to using plain /sys or libudev?
I've posted to the upstream -devel list and will continue to work this
there. Thanks for the early warning!
Bryan
--
To UNSU
Package: mythtvfs
Version: 0.6.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Storage directories are commonly used to separate MythTV recordings. It seems
that mythtvfs doesn't pay attention to the storage options on the backend
server, and instead expects all the recordings to be flat, under the directory
specified wh
Thanks for the report. I will package a new upstream as soon as Squeeze
is released, which should include the upstream fix.
Bryan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 12:13 -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> The short description for openhpid is not very informative and I
> believe also not policy compliant.
>
> Neither gives much of an indication of what OpenHPI is and what the
> daemon does?
I didn't hear back on any specific suggestions.
There seems to be a related bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495587
It it possible that either of the reporters could try the original init
script code against lsb-base >= 3.2-20? It would be helpful to know if
the fix included there solved this problem.
Thanks,
Br
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 12:13 -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Package: openhpid
> Version: 2.12.0-1
> Severity: normal
> The short description for openhpid is not very informative and I
> believe also not policy compliant.
>
> Neither gives much of an indication of what OpenHPI is and what the
> da
Package: openhpi
Version: 2.11.2-1
Severity: normal
The current version of OpenHPI (2.11.2) is a development branch, not a
released version of the project. Now that 2.12.0 has been released,
please update OpenHPI to the new, supported version.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
A
Package: libglib2.0-dev
Version: 2.16.2-1
Severity: normal
A simple test program using GStaticMutex and g_static_mutex_lock()
produces a warning on ia64, but not on i386 or amd64. It appears that
upstream glib did a clean-up change before 2.16.2, which now causes
warnings on some platforms.
The
tags 474897 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ault-Start: 2 3 4 5
# Default-Stop: 0 1 6
# Short-Description: Start OpenHPI daemon at boot time
# Description: Enable OpenHPI service which is provided by openhpid.
### END INIT INFO
Thanks much,
Bryan Sutula
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
to run.
We don't. In fact, we could care less. What we want is $usr, but that
doesn't exist. :-)
Again, we'd really appreciate any clarification or pointers to further
information.
--
Bryan Sutula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to incorporate this patch sooner
than that.
--
Bryan Sutula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
we shouldn't? Or is
> someone trying to configure it and leaving it in the state we see?
Hoping to get some additional information on this report.
--
Bryan Sutula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to pool/main/l/ltsp/ltsp-server_5.0.31debian1_all.deb
Requesting this version in etch-backports as soon as it's practical to
do so. Thanks for your efforts.
--
Bryan Sutula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ltsp-server
Version: 5.0.8debian3
Severity: normal
After apt-get install ltsp-server, I try to execute ltsp-build-client. It
completes, but the created chroot is missing some of config settings. The
most important is the keyboard layout. Without this, the clients fail to
boot into X.
Package: ltsp-server
Version: 5.0.8debian3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
X server settings from lts.conf are lost during client boot.
In the chroot's /etc/init.d/ltsp-client-setup, X server settings are
preseeded before running dexconf or dpkg-reconfigure. The script omits
the "-e" option to echo
n't have an
understanding of the various sound systems, so won't be much help
documenting what it really takes to get sound working.
Is there someone who would know what Ubuntu has done in this area, that
could contribute a write-up of how to get sound working well under
Debian/LTSP?
--
B
owto
As with #422962, I will try to test this next week (week of 8/26).
--
Bryan Sutula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
've been unable to test this to date. I will try to do so next
week (week of 8/27) as my LTSP installation is in pretty heavy use until
then.
--
Bryan Sutula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 22:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 10:55 -0700, Bryan Sutula wrote:
> [...]
> > When 2.6.2-3 was uploaded, I responded to the override e-mail, but nothing
> > was done, or it got lost, or maybe I screwed up somehow. Anywa
Package: ltsp-server
Version: 0.99debian11
Severity: normal
After installing ltsp-server and getting clients to run, sound does not work
on the clients. Within the package, I'm not finding any notes or pointers
to other documentation for getting sound to work.
The two main things I needed to do
Package: ltsp-server
Version: 0.99debian11
Severity: normal
I am trying to use NBD swap to compensate for a client with little memory.
Following the brief instructions in the /usr/share/doc/ltsp-server/swap
file, I find that when the client crashes, the two swap processes on the
server:
nobody
valid install to load only the library and not the daemon.
Probably, the best solution is to use "Suggests:" so that there is a
hint that the daemon is probably needed.
Downgrading severity based on this new info.
--
Bryan Sutula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
The symptoms of this problem look like:
$ hpiinv
hpiinv ver 1.5 HPI-B
CreateConnx: Could not open client socket
saHpiSessionOpen: Could not create client connection
saHpiSessionOpen error -1012
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
Package: libopenhpi2
Version: 2.6.2-3
Severity: important
As of OpenHPI 2.6, the OpenHPI daemon is necessary for any library
functionality. Given this change, libopenhpi2 should depend on openhpid
so that the daemon can be accessed by the library.
The original Debian version (2.5.2) didn't have
Package: libopenipmi0
Version: 2.0.7-1
Severity: normal
After openipmi/libopenipmi0 is installed, kernel drivers aren't
functional. The example programs don't run. Apparently, kernel modules
need to be modprobed to get IPMI working, at this point.
In the upstream source, I see two files, ipmi.i
somehow. Anyway, the
openhpi metapackage (openhpi_2.6.2-3_all) needs to be extra because it
depends on a package which is extra.
Override e-mail is enclosed below for reference.
Thanks,
Bryan
From: Bryan Sutula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Installer &
Package: libopenhpi2
Version: 2.5.2-2
Severity: important
The current version of OpenHPI in Debian (testing) is 2.5.2 which was
released on June 14, 2006. That's about 8 months out of date.
Major architectural improvements were made between 2.5 and 2.6. These
would be useful to users. In parti
Package: openhpi
Version: 2.6.2-2
Severity: minor
As per Debian policy, optional packages must not depend on extra
packages. The binary package openhpi-2.6.2-2 depends on
openhpi-plugin-sysfs-2.6.2-2, which is extra.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy:
Package: libopenhpi2
Version: 2.5.2-2
Severity: normal
Users are asking (in IRC: FreeNode/#openhpi) for support of the
following architectures:
arm
sparc
mips (lower priority)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Package: openhpi-plugin-sysfs
Version: 2.5.2-2
Severity: minor
Needs to be moved from optional to extra to comply with Debian policy
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked
Package: evolution
Version: 2.6.3-1
Severity: normal
When I've accepted a meeting invite, I can't edit most of the information
in the calendar entry.
I understand that since I'm not the organizer, I can't change a lot of
stuff about the real meeting. But it's my calendar. If I want to add
a not
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bryan Sutula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: openhpi
Version : 2.5.2
Upstream Author : Tariq Shureih et. al. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://openhpi.sourceforge.net/
* License : other (enclosed below)
41 matches
Mail list logo