.cgi?bug=961607. The ideal
would be to install delta as an executable named "delta", since that
is how the executable is referred to in upstream documentation and
current user configuration files.
On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 at 12:17, Dan Davison wrote:
>
> Hi all, I'm the package aut
Hi all, I'm the package author and maintainer; let me know if I can help.
It seems that debian will need to install delta with an executable name
other than "delta" since that is taken: if so I suggest the installed
executable name should be "git-delta", since that is the proposed name of
the pack
Hi Adam, thanks! I definitely still want to get it into Debian, I just need
to decide what to do about the name clash, whether I'm prepared to rename
the project etc.
Alas, git-delta is written in some heathen language
> I don't know how to deal with (Rust's own package manager pollutes quite a
>
On Sun, 8 Dec 2019 at 22:31, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 9:36 PM Dan Davison wrote:
>
> > Currently (FreeBSD, Rust Cargo, Arch Linux, Homebrew) the package name
> is "git-delta", which installs an executable named "delta". Can it do the
> sam
>
>
>
> > It builds the following binary package:
> >
> > delta - A syntax-highlighting pager for git and diff output
>
> That name is already used by an unrelated package.
>
Currently (FreeBSD, Rust Cargo, Arch Linux, Homebrew) the package name is
"git-delta", which installs an executable named
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "git-delta":
* Package name: git-delta
Version : 0.0.15
Upstream Author : Dan Davison dandavis...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/dandav
6 matches
Mail list logo
