Antonio: The version number comes from the source code itself.
repository. Since SVN
commits are not expected now either, I've staged a package with the
latest snapshot. It would still need to be reworked for current Debian
Policy before it can be accepted. Here is the debdiff, relative to
jessie:
https://launchpad.net/~daniel-gimpelevich/+archive/ubunt
Dererk, you don't need a phone line. If you make the package use dkms,
the only test that needs to succeed is for the module to autobuild and
autoload on the relevant hardware, which you say you still have.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
Package: xchat
Version: 2.8.8-6
Severity: important
Source: xchat
The upstream for xchat has been inactive for some time. A fork called
hexchat has taken over development. The odd commits still occasionally
made to xchat are auto-mirrored to hexchat. Please rebase the package on
this fork instead
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 08:35 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Daniel Gimpelevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Please merge the wpasupplicant and hostapd source packages. They are
> > built from the same sources anyway, and using the hostapd source from
> > th
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 21:38 +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
> > Please merge the wpasupplicant and hostapd source packages. They are
> > built from the same sources anyway, and using the hostapd source from
> > the wpasupplicant package should also f
Please merge the wpasupplicant and hostapd source packages. They are
built from the same sources anyway, and using the hostapd source from
the wpasupplicant package should also fix Debian bug #429734 for 2.6.26
or later kernels. I have merged them in my Ubuntu Personal Package
Archive, so you may r
DS wrote:
Now I can just produce unofficial package, if you want.
Denis Sirotkin
That's all I ask.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you so much for finally packaging this program. It would be much
appreciated if you could update the package to version 3.0.1, which was
released exactly three weeks after you packaged 3.0.0, как на зло. TIA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Sep 23, 2006, at 3:15 AM, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 00:41:05 -0700 (-0700), Daniel Gimpelevich
wrote:
I'd like to apologize in advance for the tone of this message, but
the situation with this package is really irritating. Ten months
ago, I added a "me-too&quo
I'd like to apologize in advance for the tone of this message, but the
situation with this package is really irritating. Ten months ago, I
added a "me-too" type message to bug #268471 begging for the current
upstream version to replace the one in Debian. Not only did nothing
ever come of that,
It looks like JCM requested to take over the ITP, then did nothing with
it. Now it says RFP. Will this package ever enter Debian?
--
"No gnu's is good gnu's." --Gary Gnu, "The Great Space Coaster"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Mar 22, 2006, at 12:54 AM, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
The simplest argument against it is: Its just not possible to use
the non-free runtime classlibraries with a free runtime. AFAIK, for
interaction between a runtime and the class library a VM interface is
needed. And thats not the same between th
On Mar 22, 2006, at 12:13 AM, Wolfgang Baer wrote:
Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
Package: java-package
Version: 0.27
Severity: wishlist
I would be very interested in any arguments against making
java-package enable this to happen. Thank you.
The simplest argument against it is: Its just not
Package: java-package
Version: 0.27
Severity: wishlist
Java is intended to be architecture-independent. This architecture
independence is achieved through architecture-dependent JREs and JDKs.
However, much of the contents of JRE and JDK packages created by
make-jpkg are architecture-independe
On Dec 15, 2005, at 9:17 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
Guillem Jover wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:45:23PM -0800, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
If that release is imminent, there is something that I would
like to take care of beforehand: I think I have found a bug that
causes
random garbage to
On Dec 15, 2005, at 7:26 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 05:51:39PM -0800, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
Attached is a patch that was tested on an Ubuntu system. It allows the
current sid and dapper (0.7.2-1ubuntu1) sources to build on PowerPC
with binutils 2.16.1
Attached is a patch that was tested on an Ubuntu system. It allows the
current sid and dapper (0.7.2-1ubuntu1) sources to build on PowerPC
with binutils 2.16.1-2ubuntu6, but not with binutils
2.16.1cvs20051117-1ubuntu1.
ppc.diff
Description: Binary data
--
"No gnu's is good gnu's." --Gary G
All attempts at getting this version of xmcd to work on my system have
failed due to insufficient support for ATAPI drives and CDDA
extraction, both required with my setup. The changelogs show that the
current version, 3.3.2, supports these properly. Please package the
current version. I unders
Package: libtheora-dev
Version: 0.0.0.alpha4-1.1
In the version of libavcodec-dev currently in Unstable
(0.cvs20050626-2), `ffmpeg-config --plugin-libs` spits out options that
include -ltheora_pic on powerpc, alpha, mips, and mipsel. The
libtheora-dev package should provide a PIC build of the
20 matches
Mail list logo
