Hi Daf,
Today at 18:34, Dafydd Harries wrote:
> Is this problem only with Nimbus Mono? Perhaps you could provide a
> screenshot with a font that isn't broken for comparison purposes.
Yes, this is a problem only with Nimbus Mono, and only with Oblique,
Bold and Oblique Bold. I've checked Debian
Yesterday at 1:46, Dafydd Harries wrote:
> http://muse.19inch.net/~daf/dump/271427/
I see many problems with these fonts.
In particular, many Cyrillic glyphs are incorrectly scaled (perhaps
due to different em-sizes? I don't know). Metrics are also wrong
(and they seem to be wrong in the
Today at 1:46, Dafydd Harries wrote:
> Ok, I now have a list of glyphs to copy based on your list and the ones
> which I've identified as broken. I've uploaded a new .deb, plus the
> latest versions of my scripts and their various outputs to the same
> location as before:
>
> http://muse.19i
Hi Steve,
Today at 1:38, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I don't imagine that a private use glyph is anything we should be overly
> worried about release-wise...
Provided how simple it is to actually integrate them as well, I see no
reason not to. Adobe PUA is guaranteed to be static, and it's not
real
Today at 17:04, Dafydd Harries wrote:
> Ah, this list is just what I need. However, there are some glyphs which
> are not in your list (see my previous mail to the bug report for
> details), but which also seem to be broken. Perhaps some non-Serbian
> Cyrillic glyphs are also broken.
Yes, I've no
5 matches
Mail list logo
