Hi,
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 19:57:52 +1100 "Trent W. Buck" wrote:
> Is it reasonable to delete the output file when something goes wrong?
> If so, please do.
> (I'm thinking of "git clone" which works like this.)
This should be fixed upstream since version 0.9.1.
Greetings,
David
On 10/22/19 9:15 PM, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:45 PM Johannes Schauer wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 11:51:00 +0200 László Böszörményi (GCS)
>> wrote:
>>> * Package name: squashfs-tools-ng
>> I see the package is still waiting in NEW.
>>
>> Where did you put
Hi,
I'm currently maintaining upstream mtd-utils. I saw that Debian Sid is
currently at mtd-utils 2.0.1, which (as of yesterday) is now 2 years old.
Version 2.0.2 suggested by bug #921392 includes a number of bug fixes
over 2.0.1 and was also released quite a bit over a year ago.
I wondered if t
Hi,
I published an early 0.5 release based on the latest "stable point" of the
git tree:
https://infraroot.at/pub/squashfs/squashfs-tools-ng-0.5.tar.xz
The stable point has been chosen to be right after fixing stuff from multiple
hours of chewing on the Debian live CD squashfs image and pushing
On 7/22/19 12:40 PM, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 8:21 AM David Oberhollenzer
> wrote:
>> Both packages have a few features that the other doesn't have and
>> the tooling in squashfs-tools-ng is *by intention* completely
Hi,
upstream maintainer here. I saw that this was moved from package
'squashfs-tools-ng' to the package 'squashfs-tools'.
Both packages have a few features that the other doesn't have and
the tooling in squashfs-tools-ng is *by intention* completely
different than the one in squashfs-tools. So I
was fixed in upstream commit 5a806911, shortly after the release of
mtd-utils 2.0.0.
This patch includes the changes made by commit 5a806911 for Debian stretch
which currently contains an unpatched mtd-utils 2.0.0.
Signed-off-by: Torsten Fleischer
Signed-off-by: David Oberhollenzer
7 matches
Mail list logo
