Bug#872252: Debian squeak-vm bug #862576 etoys: Doesn't get beyond Squeak security key generation

2017-08-30 Thread David T. Lewis
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 08:08:57AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > Hi, and thank you for reaching out. > Hi Petter, You raised a number of questions in your reply. I do not know the answers, but I will try to add some clarifications where I can. > > One thing that would help the

Bug#872252: Debian squeak-vm bug #862576 etoys: Doesn't get beyond Squeak security key generation

2017-08-30 Thread David T. Lewis
re: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzi8Tf4EvjhoYTNEUDRCc09KOEk/view?usp=sharing Thank you very much! Dave > > Hi, and thank you for reaching out. > > [David T. Lewis] >> I am an upstream maintainer for the traditional Squeak VM, which is >> package squeak-vm on Debian. Etoy

Bug#862576: etoys: Doesn't get beyond Squeak security key generation

2017-06-07 Thread David T Lewis
Thanks Bert. Adrian, all, Please treat me as a newbie with respect to Debian package support, but I'd like to help with this if I can. I don't currently have a Debian development system (I only have Ubuntu 15.04 on a laptop for the moment), and my time will be very limited for the next couple of

Bug#693633: [Vm-dev] [unix] Unrecognized opcode in FFI on PowerPC SPE

2012-11-25 Thread David T. Lewis
To summarize my understanding of this issue (see below for background): - powerpcspe is variant of powerpc that lacks certain parts of the powerpc instruction set, as explained here: http://wiki.debian.org/PowerPCSPEPort - The FFI plugin has architecture-specific assembler modules that set up