Having just swatted away this bug while installing bullseye
on a laptop that has 1xUSB3, 2xUSB-C and no ethernet, I thought
I should share the workaround here. This is only necessary,
I'm led to believe, when installing by WiFi without the
installation of a Desktop.
Before tearing down the WiFi in
Package: release-notes
The PDF file at https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/i386/release-notes.en.pdf
has headings which have letter substitutions a->thorn b->a c->b etc.
The french version is similar. I haven't checked other languages.
The data on page one is July 5, 2015. (256492 bytes.)
Che
Package: binfmt-support
Version: 2.1.5-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Booting up; now happening about once in four times. One reads that:
[ Cylon eye ] A start job is running for Enable support for additional
executable binary formats (3h 7min 57s / no l
I'm not clear about the status of this bug. Will it ever be closed in
wheezy? If not, what is the workaround? My cache just grows and grows,
and there appears to be no way of expiring it bacause of this bug.
Cheers,
David.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
Package: tex-common
Version: 5.03
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
The following lines (50--55) in the postinst script appear to be
redundant since the removal of a large chunk of postinst.
--8>
cleanup()
{
rc=$?
[ -n "$tempdir" ] && rm -rf "$tempdir"
exit $rc
}
--8>
cle
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> David Wright (2015-02-08):
> > Wishlist: I would like to be able to copy the installation logs to
> > /target/home// (using the option "Mounted Filesystem") so
> > that when first-user reboots the system, the logs are al
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: USB image
Image version: CD Debian GNU/Linux testing "Jessie" - Official Snapshot i386
NETINST Binary-1 20150126-04:46
Date: 20150129-12:00
Machine: OptiPlex GX520 A11 (11/30/06)
Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz
Memory: 2.0 GB 533 MHz Dual I
Package: openclipart
Version: 1:0.18+dfsg-14
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Some of the images in this package are far too large. For example
-rw-r--r-- 1 3769493 Jun 4 2012 microchip_v.2_havok_redh_01.png
-rw-r--r-- 1 3055767 Jun 4 2012 salad_mateya_01.png
-rw-r--r-- 1 2829335 Jun 6 201
Quoting Phillip Susi (ps...@ubuntu.com):
[...]
> Let me make sure I've got this right: you have two different entries
> in /etc/fstab that correspond to the same partition, and one of them
> says it is fat?
Yes. Years ago, it contained:
# root filesystem
/dev/hda1 / ext2 ... 0 1
... some lines ..
Quoting Phillip Susi (ps...@ubuntu.com):
>
> That is very odd... what happens if you manually try running fsck -N
> on this partition?
Well, that revealed what's going on.
west ~# fsck -N /dev/sda1
fsck from util-linux 2.25.1
[/sbin/fsck.vfat (1) -- /media/vfat-a1] fsck.vfat /dev/sda1
west ~# f
Quoting Andreas Henriksson (andr...@fatal.se):
> [...]
>
> # udevadm info -n /dev/whatever1 -q property | grep ID_FS_TYPE
>
> ...and...
>
> # blkid -p /dev/whatever1
west ~# udevadm info -n /dev/sda1 -q property | grep ID_FS_TYPE
ID_FS_TYPE=ext3
west ~# blkid -p /dev/sda1
/dev/sda1: LABEL="john
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.25.1-5
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
My jessie/sid laptop's root filesystem, partition 1, is no longer
fsck'd at reboot. After issuing a message, fsck then appears to try
and run a FAT fsck on what is an ext3 filesystem that mounts as such.
This started happenin
by 'purging' update-manager, I assume you mean removing update-manager-gnome
I preformed the following:
$ sudo apt-get remove update-manager-gnome
$ sudo apt-get install update-manager-gnome
$ sudo apt-get install update-manager-core
however I still recieve a similiar experience to the one descri
Package: update-manager-gnome
Version: 0.200.0~rc4-1
Severity: important
run: gksudo update-manager
Prompted for password:
-> enter password
GUI popup:
Upgrading may require removal or installation of new packages.
Do you want to perform a safe-upgrade, which does not remove packages or
install
Package build can be found here
http://www.dwright.us/misc/libcriticism-perl_1.02.tar.gz
# tar ztvf libcriticism-perl_1.02.tar.gz
-rw-r--r-- dwright/dwright 17608 2009-09-30 00:35:11
libcriticism-perl_1.02-1_all.deb
-rw-r--r-- dwright/dwright 9551 2009-09-30 00:35:05
libcriticism-perl_1.02-1.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: david wright
* Package name: libcriticism-perl
Version : 1.02
Upstream Author : Jeffrey Thalhammer
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/criticism/
* License : Artistic | GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Description
>- Original Message
>From: Jonathan Yu
>To: david wright ; 548...@bugs.debian.org
>Sent: Tue, September 29, 2009 6:24:52 AM
>Subject: Re: Bug#548618: ITP: libdeclare-constraints-simple-perl -- Perl
>module to validate data
>
>On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 3:43
I am confused by the RT bug filed against this ITP.
>WAITS for copyright clarification from upstream.
>https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=50049
>* Initial Release (Closes: #548618)
At the bottom of the module it states:
http://search.cpan.org/~phaylon/Declare-Constraints-Simple-0.03/lib/D
FWIW. I use this package, runs fine for me, I have a vanilla squeeze/sid system.
$ uname -a
Linux debian 2.6.30-1-486 #1 Sat Aug 15 18:14:04 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
$ cat /etc/debian_version
squeeze/sid
$ apt-cache showpkg pida
Package: pida
Versions:
0.5.1-5
(/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.or
I have built and tested a new version, (current upstream version)
I also submitted a RFS, details on both here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2009/03/msg00547.html
+David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Package: git
Version: 4.9.4-1
Followup-For: Bug #507014
I would expect apt-get install git would be the equilivent of
'sudo aptitude install git-core git-buildpackage pristine-tar'
dwri...@debian:~/$ which git
dwri...@debian:~/$ sudo apt-get install git
dwri...@debian:~/$ which git
dwri...@debia
21 matches
Mail list logo
