Am Freitag, den 15.08.2008, 19:49 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2008-08/msg00442.html
Just like raid, lvm needs to scan all device. I think this is caused
when it try to open (fd0), and fails. The grub_errno is not cleared,
it's carried out
Am Freitag, den 15.08.2008, 03:18 -0700 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I should point out that when grub drops into the rescue prompt, it
coughs up the message error: unknown device fd0. Perhaps this is why
it goes into rescue mode?
Thanks for telling us.
This is a bit different then:
GRUB
Am Freitag, den 15.08.2008, 09:28 -0700 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would have mentioned it before, except that it didn't seem relevant,
because I don't have a floppy disk, and neither device.map nor
grub.cfg refer to it.
Aha, it doestn't seem relevant because you don't have a floppy drive
Am Freitag, den 15.08.2008, 10:51 -0700 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Forget it, I'll fix it myself, and send the patch to upstream.
Great, why didn't you do that first if you know everything better?
This does nothing to explain why grub is worried about (fd0), when
none
of its inputs
Am Mittwoch, den 13.08.2008, 19:13 -0700 schrieb Ian Bruce:
I installed grub because lilo wouldn't boot any more.
My root fs is on lvm; I don't know if this is related.
After running grub-install and rebooting, grub drops into the
grub rescue prompt. The pc, lvm, and ext2 modules are
Hello,
unfortunately neither Robert and me don't know how important this really
is.
On IRC we talked with Bean (one of upstream developers)
Unfortunately he didn't reply yet to the report, as I suggested.
He discovered that Debian has efibootmgr [0] and wanted even to look if
GRUB can include
Am Mittwoch, den 30.07.2008, 11:20 +0200 schrieb Sladan:
I did grub-install sda and selecting Windows in the Grub2 menu returns
invalid identifier.
I really don't know what I should do with your report.
Maybe you can reproduce this and tell us when exactly that is shown?
In the console it
Package: unifont
Version: 1:5.1.20080808-2
Severity: minor
Hello,
It's really great that you found a solution with Robert for our unifont.hex
problem.
I just noticed that the first line of it is now a bit wrong:
`This metapackage is a convenient way to install both the PCF bitmap version and
Am Montag, den 11.08.2008, 10:09 -0400 schrieb Edward Allcutt:
grub-setup fails in exactly the same way, however grub-fstest seems to
have no problem at all with the new core.img:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# grub-fstest -vvv /dev/sda1 cmp /grub/core.img \
/boot/grub/core.img; echo $?
0
Am I
Am Sonntag, den 10.08.2008, 13:10 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
* Felix Zielcke [Sun, 10 Aug 2008 01:01:25 +0200]:
The new upload for lenny will build-depend on the old version, so
hopefully all buildds will then use the lenny version to build the
packages.
They won't.
Ok, thanks
Am Sonntag, den 10.08.2008, 14:23 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
* Felix Zielcke [Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:22:05 +0200]:
Luckly we only need that unifont for amd64 and i386.
It isn't a problem for us to upload a binary for both.
That is normally frowned upon, but I'm ok if you do that for now
Am Sonntag, den 10.08.2008, 16:22 -0400 schrieb Edward Allcutt:
I looked at the changelog for 1.96+20080724-6 from sid but it doesn't
seem to contain anything relevant.
You could try current upstream SVN[0], which is a bit more recent (i.e.
last change today) then the 0724-X which we
Am Freitag, den 08.08.2008, 19:59 -0300 schrieb Henrique de Moraes
Holschuh:
On Fri, 08 Aug 2008, Felix Zielcke wrote:
I really should have sticked with my easy debugging method I already
mentioned in the report (that echo /tmp/x thingy)
I thought removing the greedy g on the regexps would
Hello,
Am Freitag, den 08.08.2008, 22:23 +0200 schrieb root:
grub-probe: error: Unknown device linux--vg-boot
Autodetection of a file system module failed
Please specify the module with the option --modules explicitly
I never used LVM before so maybe I did something wrong,
but I think the
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 09.08.2008, 12:26 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
fz-vm:~# ls /dev/mapper/
control linux--vg-lvol0
And again it wasn't that clear with my first mail :(
fz-vm:~# l /dev/linux* /dev/mapper/
/dev/linux-vg:
insgesamt 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 9. Aug 14:49 lvol0
- /dev
Am Samstag, den 09.08.2008, 16:54 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
It doestn't matter (at least for the lenny release) if this is a bug or
if that is intendet, we have to find a solution for this problem.
It worries me that combinations with -git are a problem. -git wasn't handled
at all
Am Samstag, den 09.08.2008, 19:50 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
I'm not very concerned with distinguishing priorities other than what goes
before and after the empty string. I'd rather just put all those known
suffixes below the empty string and not care about their relative weights,
for the
tag 494460 pending
retitle 494460 i386 builds are missing fonts
thanks
Am Samstag, den 09.08.2008, 16:44 -0600 schrieb Javier Vasquez:
And there's a difference in here, since for i686:
# ls /usr/share/grub/
#
See 494473
The reason is that the unifont-bin package doestn't provide anymore
Am Samstag, den 09.08.2008, 17:38 -0600 schrieb Javier Vasquez:
So the reason might just be that things are done differently for these
2 architectures, and the bug is i386 exclusive, :)... I'm mentioning
this out of my ignorance, since I still don't get how things still
work for one
Just CC now both bug reports, although the difference between grub2's
and grub-legacy's update-grub should be handled differently.
Am Donnerstag, den 07.08.2008, 13:10 -0300 schrieb Henrique de Moraes
Holschuh:
I was about unsure if I should use 'lt' 'le' 'le-nl' or 'lt-nl'
You want to
I just stick now to the `cloned to grub2' bug, so Robert doestn't hit
me ;)
Am Freitag, den 08.08.2008, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
And I concentrate more on grub2 because that's the one we replace
grub-legacy hopefully soon.
@Henrique: As you can see below grub2's update-grub
Am Freitag, den 08.08.2008, 13:06 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
This produces me this:
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-amd64-mm1
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-amd64
Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.26-1-amd64
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-amd64
Am Freitag, den 08.08.2008, 13:06 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
I couldn't figure out with playing with this ~ thingy how to tell dpkg that
-rc1-git1 is higher then -rc1
So it seems like dpkg --compare-versions isn't that perfect for official
kernel.org patch numbering ;)
Ok I noticed I
Am Freitag, den 08.08.2008, 09:49 -0300 schrieb Henrique de Moraes
Holschuh:
On Fri, 08 Aug 2008, Felix Zielcke wrote:
I couldn't figure out with playing with this ~ thingy how to tell dpkg that
-rc1-git1 is higher then -rc1
khazad-dum:~$ dpkg --compare-versions 2.6.23.1-rc1-git3 gt
I really should have sticked with my easy debugging method I already
mentioned in the report (that echo /tmp/x thingy)
I thought removing the greedy g on the regexps would just solve the
problem for us, but it doestn't:
fz:/etc/grub.d# dpkg --compare-versions 2.6.26-1-amd64~rc1-git1 gt
Debconf specification says:
GO
Shows the current set of accumulated items to the user and lets them
fill in values, etc. If the backup capability is supported and the user
indicates they want to back up a step, this command returns the numeric
return code 30.
I looked now at a diff between
Am Dienstag, den 05.08.2008, 21:40 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
The grub2 packages have only one update-grub the one in /usr/sbin
Ok and a update-grub2 which exec's update-grub but it's in /usr/sbin
too.
Probable wasn't that clear so another try:
By switching to grub2 as default
Hello,
The 2 bugreports Robert mentioned in the last mail about your report
(419157) are fixed long ago now.
For the Xen handling there's now another wishlist bug: 469578
For setting the gfxmode variable and the background image: 493106
But we won't make the background image a variable, it
Hello,
Am Mittwoch, den 06.08.2008, 21:41 +0100 schrieb Ian Campbell:
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 15:41 +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
Attached is now a patch which ignores Xen kernels,
Unless I am misreading the patch it appears to ignore CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y
type Xen kernels which is wrong
Am Dienstag, den 05.08.2008, 00:48 -0300 schrieb Henrique de Moraes
Holschuh:
On Mon, 04 Aug 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
Why would you want something in /sbin to call something in /usr/s?bin ?
You need to port the algorithm.
update-grub is in /usr.
Crap. I just noticed it is
I just searched on the grub-devel archived for evms, if there was any
progress about it which didn't make it into this bug report.
The last message on this report is from Mathias dated 11. February.
I found this with evms on grub2's upstream changelog:
2008-07-25 Robert Millan [EMAIL
forwaded 488235
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2008-07/msg8.html
thanks
There are 2 threads about this topic but both with same Subject.
Above one is the newer and larger one.
The original message from me to grub-devel about this can be found here:
tags 493744 + pending
thanks
Hello,
Am Sonntag, den 03.08.2008, 13:04 +0200 schrieb Christian Perrier:
The Spanish debconf translation (debian/po/es.po) recently added for grub2
unfortunately has a double escaping of double quotes on one line, which
turns it into an invalid file.
I just
Hello,
Am Sonntag, den 03.08.2008, 08:49 +0200 schrieb Kai Wasserbäch:
Hello Robert, hello Felix
Robert Millan wrote:
I see that Felix suspects this is a false positive when checking for
cross-disk
install. If you run sh -x grub-install and send us the output, we could
make sure about
Package: cdbs
Version: 0.4.52
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Not even a month before I started to co-maintaining the grub and grub2 packages
with Robert Millan, so I'm still new to this debian/ stuff.
We have a 9 month bug old filed against grub2 that the package wastes CPU cycles
of the
reassign 492897 grub2
#forgot that it applies to whole grub2 not just grub-probe
thanks
Hello,
Am Sonntag, den 03.08.2008, 21:09 +0200 schrieb Thomas Rösch:
Hey Felix
Sorry for needing so much time - too much work.
No problem, thanks for replying to both mails.
mdraids with default
retitle 487565 multibooting core.img leads to double prefix
thanks
Am Samstag, den 02.08.2008, 06:06 +0200 schrieb Kai Wasserbäch:
Followup-For: Bug #487565
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.96+20080724-2
Hello,
Hello,
I'm not using an LVM on this machine and still get the error that the file
Am Samstag, den 02.08.2008, 11:31 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
You use only /dev/hdd on your linux but it's (hd1) in device.map
If you're BIOS directly boots from hdd then change your device.map
please, it will only be regenerated if it doestn't exist or is clearly
wrong i.e. missing devices
Am Donnerstag, den 31.07.2008, 16:46 -0400 schrieb Joey Hess:
Once apt trigger deferral is implemented, all the triggers will run at
the very end of the apt run, which can be quite a long time after the
kernel packages are removed and installed.
What exactly is this apt trigger derral which
Am Freitag, den 01.08.2008, 12:44 -0400 schrieb Joey Hess:
Felix Zielcke wrote:
What exactly is this apt trigger derral which will be implemented?
#473461
A trigger which runs after every package has been extracted and not yet
configured should work fine for us, too.
You can't count
Please consider the wishlist bug against grub2 for implementing a
trigger (481542) before implementing this in apt.
Currently update-grub, which generates menu.lst/grub.cfg, gets called on
a kernel removal, a kernel install and on grub update itself.
As you can see in the report with current sid
tag 481542 wontfix
thanks
Am Freitag, den 01.08.2008, 19:03 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
Well, then I think this should be tagged wontfix and we just stay with
the current method, that the kernel .deb itself calls update-grub when
it's configured.
Ok I talked now with Robert and we both
Source: grub2
Severity: important
If you press e to edit the menu entry and then you want to boot it with Ctrl-x
then it can happen
that you get a crash with a malloc magic message
or that the text gets corrupted and if you fix it then the malloc magic crash
The original report on grub-devel
Attached is now a patch which ignores Xen kernels,
by grepping for the config options which uses grub-legacy to detect
them.
It seems [0] that Xen Dom0 support will be soon in the official kernel.
I don't know anything about the config options which will be then used.
So it could be that the
As I reported the bug I forgot that my TV Card with BT878 chip has an
ALSA audio module, too.
But now I tried it with any module removed which has oss snd or audio in
it's name or else sounds like it has something to do with that.
I removed and purged even every package which contains oss and
Am Donnerstag, den 31.07.2008, 13:58 +0200 schrieb spamgrinder:
My only change in 00_header script is set gfxmode=1024x768. It
overwrites default 640x480.
I would like to keep the gfxmode variable in /etc/default/grub.
Attached is a patch which adds GRUB_GFXMODE to /etc/default/grub
---
retitle 481542 please use triggers for update-grub
thanks
I looked now at the man-db package which is a very easy implementation
for triggers.
I think it would be enough for us to do it like they did.
debian/triggers:
interest /boot
debian/*.postinst:
if [ $1 = triggered ]; then
update-grub
Am Donnerstag, den 31.07.2008, 16:46 -0400 schrieb Joey Hess:
I didn't say that adding the new kernel failed. A later package could
fail.
Or the power could fail before dpkg got around to calling the triggers.
Once apt trigger deferral is implemented, all the triggers will run at
the
(This is also potentially a problem with the initramfs-tools triggers, I
guess..)
I have now installed etch in a VM and then used aptitude to update it to lenny
As soon as the kernel is configured, there's a mkinitramfs-kpkg call
and after everything is finished the update-initramfs trigger is
Am Freitag, den 01.08.2008, 02:10 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
Do we really want this? I thought it was unnecessary because of those Linux
versions being obsolete.
Yeah now with grub2 and Debian stable lenny we shouldn't support any
old style Xen kernels.
Probable the best is to just wait
reassign 475585 grub-common
thanks
With current sid I wasn't able to just get the /dev/md/N devices,
but not the /dev/mdN too.
So how did you get it working?
Attached is a patch which I sent to grub-devel too.
Plaese reply, if it now works for you.
Index: util/getroot.c
Am Dienstag, den 29.07.2008, 08:39 +0200 schrieb martin f krafft:
also sprach Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.07.29.0014 +0200]:
debby:~# dmraid -r
[...]
I don't know enough about mdadm to determine whose fault is it.
But it seems this is really a corner case problem, and only
Am Dienstag, den 29.07.2008, 15:50 +0200 schrieb martin f krafft:
also sprach Felix Zielcke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.07.29.1541 +0200]:
There are hopefully not many people who use the normal linux
software raid to get there fake hardwarwe raid controllers to
work.
One should hope dmraid
clone 478228 -1
retitle -1 grub2 should support mdraid 1.X format of superblock
severity -1 wishlist
thanks
/proc/mdstat:
md9 : active raid1 sdc9[3] sda9[2]
979952 blocks super 1.0 [2/2] [UU]
md6 : active raid10 sdb6[0] sdd6[3] sdc6[2] sda6[1]
97658880 blocks super 1.0 128K chunks 2
From: Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But we have a check for this:
/* FIXME: Also support version 1.0. */
if (sb.major_version != 0 || sb.minor_version != 90)
{
grub_error (GRUB_ERR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED_YET,
Unsupported RAID version: %d.%d,
Package: debian-installer
Severity: minor
I have lenny installed with the weekly AMD64 DVD 1
in expert mode and PPPoE for the files not on the first DVD
I choose too install grub2 and it put in grub.cfg set root(hd0,0) for
chainloading Windows but with grub2 partitions start now with 1 and not
Hello,
grub-probe: info: opening md6
/home/rmh/hacking/grub/debian/upload/grub2-1.96+20080704/kern/disk.c:220:
Opening `md6'...
/home/rmh/hacking/grub/debian/upload/grub2-1.96+20080704/kern/disk.c:299:
Opening `md6' failed.
Am Montag, den 28.07.2008, 18:36 +0200 schrieb Henry-Nicolas Tourneur:
I have the same problem with the latest version available in testing
(same as sid).
What you mean with same as sid?
The Version currently in sid 1.96+20080724-2 just migrated to testing,
(I received the mail about it today at
Is there any character we could use for the regexp instead of /, that
is known
not to collide with any Linux cmdline options ?
If it can be simplified this way, I'd prefer that instead.
Note that I know of . The kernel documentation has no statement in
kernel-parameters.txt on this.
What
I'd rather have
/boot/grub cleaned up from any grub legacy cruft, everything imported
into grub2 and simply make grub2 bullet proof, so the chain-loading
workaround is no longer necessary
If you choose to chainload then debconf tells you to use
upgrade-from-grub-legacy which cleans up
Am Montag, den 28.07.2008, 21:03 +0200 schrieb Henry-Nicolas Tourneur:
Oh, I just mean that the version of this package is the same in sid and
in testing. I'v installed the package this afternoon and I'm using 1.96
+20080724-2.
Fine.
prefix = (hd1,1)(md1)/boot/grub
root=hd1,1
The prefix
Am Montag, den 28.07.2008, 22:36 +0200 schrieb Moritz Naumann:
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 25450 active sync /dev/dm-5
1 2542- spare /dev/dm-2
debby:~#
That's very strange.
Normally you
tag 491404 patch
thanks
Here's a patch against current cvs of webwml/english/devel/index.html
Index: english/devel/index.wml
===
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/devel/index.wml,v
retrieving revision 1.208
diff -u -r1.208
Am Montag, den 28.07.2008, 21:27 +0200 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
The original report was with:
invalid file '(md0)/boot/grub//normal.mod'
Not a double prefix like you have.
I just tried it out now myself in VMware.
This wrong double prefix is clearly introduced by chainloading.
You won't
Am Sonntag, den 27.07.2008, 15:07 +0200 schrieb Moritz Naumann:
Unfortunately, it doesn't work with 1.96+20080724-2 either:
I just saw that PATH contains /usr/local before /usr, I always thought
it would be the other way round.
So please remove any old grub files lyning there around and maybe
Package: wine-bin
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/winecfg
I have a Creative X-Fi Soundcard with OpenSoundSystem 4.0 installed from the
Linux 2.6 AMD64 DEB from http://www.opensound.com/download.cgi
winecfg crashes if I click on Audio, attached is the output
My sound devices in
Package: evolution
Version: 2.22.3.1-1
Severity: wishlist
As you can see below my locale is german, when I reply to an email evolution
writes Am date schrieb name
I would like to have this in english without having whole evolution in english.
That's an option I miss from Outlook and Windows Mail
Am Samstag, den 26.07.2008, 18:00 +0200 schrieb Moritz Naumann:
debby:~# dpkg-query -W -f '${Package} ${Status} ${Version}\n' grub\*
grub-common install ok installed 1.96+20080724-1
Am I missing something? Should I take additional measures before retrying?
Please see the message above in
reassign 477304 grub
fixed 477304 0.97-37
thanks
Hello,
From: Nick Hastings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interesting but not related to this bug.
Yes, I just tried to reproduce it and as you can see on a fresh install with
sid version of grub-legacy
there's no problem.
This is *not*
You didn't replied yet unfortunately
But anyway:
I tested it now with 1.96+20080724-1 currently in unstable in VMware
Workstation 6.5 Beta build 99530
with other Linux 2.6 64bit as OS
As I already said for me both configs show the menu in grub-emu when I place
them in /boot/grub/grub.cfg and
notfound 492204 1.96+20080626-1
thanks
I don't like to have 2 versions found with this bug.
This applies now only for current sid version.
Probable Robert and me the only people who read this, but just in case :)
VMware SCSI Disks are numbered X:Y
X means controller, can be 0-3
I only use one
From: Felix Zielcke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have a harddisk as 0:0 booted kernel with root=/dev/sda1
then grub-install /dev/sda
then change in VMware this disk to 0:1 and in BIOS to boot first from 0:1
grub boots fine
If you boot the system as above
Shame on me, I wanted to make it very
From: Shams Fantar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/boot/grub/device.map :
(hd0) /dev/hda
(hd1) /dev/sda
/etc/fstab :
Now we know why grub thinks hd1 is your /
try grub-install with --recheck if that creates device.map right
else you have to change device.map manually and then update-grub works
forwarded 467501
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2008-07/msg00435.html
retitle 467501 grub uses fd prefix even if it's neither in device.map nor
grub.cfg
thanks
Seems like the original problem reported is still not fixed. [0]
I just had a fd prefix myself, even though I don't use
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.96+20080626-1
Severity: important
grub-install /dev/sdb
swap hard disks boot order in BIOS so sdb gets booted
prefix for grub is fd instead of hd
grub.cfg has it right with hd0
set shows
root=fd0,1
prefix=(fd0,1)/boot/grub
ls shows (hd0) (hd0,1) (hd1) (hd1,0)
This is from 20. January:
Peter Hicks wrote :
Robert Millan wrote:
This makes a good candidate to start a README.Debian. Will you provide a patch?
Sure, it shouldn't be too difficult. I'll crack on with it shortly.
Did you have in the meantime something for README.Debian of grub2 ?
From: Nick Hastings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I was very suspicious that it had left my system in an unbootable
state, with nothing in /usr/share/doc/grub-common to indicate how to make
it bootable ... no README.Debian etc
Yeah the documentation for grub2 isn't that good as for grub-legacy
but
In either case, whenever you want GRUB 2 to be loaded directly from MBR,
you can do so by issuing (as root) the following command:
.
upgrade-from-grub-legacy
That sounds like you should be able to just run it and reboot, wether you
choose to chainload or not.
I have now commited a fix for it,
tags 492056 + pending
thanks
From: Martin Agren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please find attached the Swedish debconf templates translation.
Thanks very much.
I just commited it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Moritz Naumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
About the md issue: The patch does not seem to fix it (assuming, after
'make install', invoking the the freshly built ./update-grub is the
right way to invoke it, and I'm also calling grub-probe the right way):
./configure; make install installs
From: Moritz Naumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debby:~/grub2-1.96+20080704# ./grub-probe -v -d /dev/dm-5
Urm sorry didn't see that you invoked it with ./
and update-grub just generates grub.cfg.
grub-install uses grub-probe.
grub-probe: error: Cannot find a GRUB drive for /dev/dm-5. Check your
From: Teodor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At the configuration question I've answered no for the chainloading
from grub-legacy. I've rebooted the machine to see if it works and the
surprise was that the boot menu was the same, that is from grub-legacy
instead of grub2 (with xen options too). The only
From: Chris Knadle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sorry for the additional copy; forgot to CC the BTS]
No problem.
On Monday 21 July 2008 06:44:45 pm, Felix Zielcke wrote:
Is this still a problem with grub2 1.96+20080704-2 currently in
testing/unstable ?
Yes, unfortunately it is. I just tested
Will list any vmlinu* entry, including xen kernels... ideally it should
exclude xen, as they will have to be handled differently.
I've never used Xen, but i thought the -xen kernel should be run on domU and
dom0.
So how should they be handled, can you please be more specific ?
Below is a patch
block 491872 by 476184
severity 491872 wishlist
thanks
Ok I talked with Robert.
It was already recommended and then was changed to suggest because of #476184
See also bug #476684
Thanks for reporting :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
From: Thomas Rösch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I am sorry, i have removed this version and use the old grub again since some
month.
grub-probe is in grub-common and the old grub depends on it since version
0.97-33
So can you please make sure you have grub-common 1.96+20080704-2 installed
and
Urm sorry, i think my last mail wasn't that clear :)
I forgot that you did reported this against grub-legacy.
You can install grub-common without problems with an old grub-legacy even if it's
0.97-33
It only contains grub-probe and grub-mkdevicemap [0] and it doestn't conflict
with any
Hello,
From: Nick Hastings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seems to be no errors but it seems that /boot/boot/ is being completely
ignored. Please see the results of the install, linux-image reconfigure
and file listing under /boot below.
I used grub-legacy long ago, and I think I never used it with a
Hello,
I have tried but the list keeps rejecting my mails.
You need to subscribe to send mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do this and start a discussion about this there.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
From: Teodor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 11:00 PM
To: Felix Zielcke [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Gavin Bravery [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#469578: 10_linux creates xen boot entries that don't work
The same problem I reported for grub
Can you please check with current version in testing/unstable if that's still
an issue and please check the patch from Robert [0]
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=8;filename=md.diff;att=1;bug=486624
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
You have reported it twice that you have updated translations, both with
postgresql-common_88_pt.po attached
One went to progesql-common where it belonged to and is already fixed #488570
and one (this one #488571) assigned to grub2
So please reply if you have a portuguese translation for grub2
Running grub-install will wipe the grub1 install and leave me with
grub2, right? Is that more likely to work than the existing chainloading
grub2 from grub1 approach?
Yes, grub-install will replace grub-legacy with grub2.
I don't know if that works better then chainloading.
If you have a rescue
Is this still a problem with grub2 1.96+20080704-2 currently in testing/unstable ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.96+20080621-1
ii grub-common 1.96+20080512-1 GRand Unified Bootloader, version
Please try update both packages to 1.96+20080704-2 currently in testing and unstable and try it again.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Is this still an issue with the current 1.96+20080704-2 in unstable?
If you still didn't provide a raw backtrace as Robert Millan told you on 10.
March in the Bugreport then please do so
http://grub.enbug.org/HowToDebug
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Is this still an issue with the current 1.96+20080704-2 in testing/unstable?
Have you tried out Robert Millan's patch?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does this still aplly with 1.96+20080704-2 currently in testing/unstable or
even with current SVN?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this still an issue? Can you please try it with grub-pc 1.96+20080704-2 currently in testing/unstable
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does this problem still exist with grub-pc 1.96+20080704-2 currently in
testing/unstable ?
If so can you reproduce this in grub-emu ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
601 - 700 of 731 matches
Mail list logo
