currently testing a solution and plan to file a bug reports
soon, hopefully with a proposed workaround).
Regards,
On 2024-04-11 20:33, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 09:39:40PM -0700, Flavio Veloso Soares wrote:
Hi Noah - I guess I'll be doing bullseye->bookworm insta
2024 at 06:48:56PM -0700, Flavio Veloso Soares wrote:
Is this the correct forum to report issues/ask question about the official
Debian images on AWS?
The BTS isn't really the correct forum to ask questions about any Debian
topics, but it is the right place to report issues.
Note that
Hi,
Any update on this?
Is this the correct forum to report issues/ask question about the
official Debian images on AWS?
On 2024-02-18 13:09, Flavio Veloso Soares wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Bookworm's release notes clearly states that "systemd-resolved was
> not, and still i
Package: cloud.debian.org
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: flavi...@magnux.com
Hello,
Bookworm's release notes clearly states that "systemd-resolved was
not, and still is not, the default DNS resolver in Debian"
(https://www.debian.org/releases/bookworm/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html
Sorry, please disregard the last email. It was sent in error.
FYI:
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Why is a negative review showing on V2 profile page for
Star Orthodontics?
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 11:28:06 -0700
From: Nadeem Kassam
To: James R
CC: Flavio Veloso Soares , Malcolm Turner
(...)
When reviewing the profile
myself now. From a pure technical POV, I think that the current choice
-- a kernel tuned up for desktop use -- is the one that should require a
benchmark to be adopted, but I get the message.
On 2020-11-22 5:49 p.m., Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 03:53:32PM -0800, Flavio Veloso So
On 2020-11-22 2:28 p.m., Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 13:45 -0800, Flavio Veloso Soares wrote:
[Resending: just noticed that the reply I sent on Oct 23 didn't include
b.d.o]
I don't think the article is about the same thing we're talking here.
CONFIG_PREEMPT* opti
[Resending: just noticed that the reply I sent on Oct 23 didn't include
b.d.o]
I don't think the article is about the same thing we're talking here.
CONFIG_PREEMPT* options control the compromise between latency and
throughput of *system calls* and *scheduling of CPU cycles spent in
kernel mo
Or uncheck the box "Allow Thunderbird to send technical and interaction
data to Mozilla" within the Edit - Preferences - Privacy & Security menu.
Shouldn't this be the default?
I was shockingly surprised to see this enabled after TB upgraded. If
memory serves me, telemetry is always off by def
10 matches
Mail list logo
