Bug#856283: python-inotifyx: add python3 support

2017-03-02 Thread Forest Bond
oes not allow new packages to enter into the > archive. > > > > Dear Forest, > > Hope you are doing good. Could you please review patches on this bug report ? Hey yes, I'm well! I'm afraid I haven't done a very good job keeping up with inotifyx maintenance. I w

Bug#578207: b43-fwcutter.config checks DEBCONF_FRONTEND, should check DEBIAN_FRONTEND

2010-04-17 Thread Forest Bond
/bin/wget ]; then This hasn't caused any real problems for me personally, but it could conceivably cause problems for someone. Thanks, Forest -- Forest Bond http://www.alittletooquiet.net http://www.pytagsfs.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#484674: mldonkey: Packaging too complex

2009-03-12 Thread Forest Bond
Hi, On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:54:10AM +0100, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 05:32:48PM -0400, Forest Bond wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:14:25PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 0, Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net wrote: * Why all of the Debian-specific

Bug#484674: mldonkey: Packaging too complex

2009-03-12 Thread Forest Bond
Hi, On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:06:33AM +0100, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 09:39:20AM -0400, Forest Bond wrote: * Why does mldonkey-server need an init script? Yes, it's a daemon, but that is merely an implementation detail. When it comes down to it, mldonkey

Bug#484674: mldonkey: Packaging too complex

2009-03-12 Thread Forest Bond
Hi, On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:54:10AM +0100, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 05:32:48PM -0400, Forest Bond wrote: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:14:25PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 0, Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net wrote: * Why all of the Debian-specific

Bug#484674: mldonkey: Packaging too complex

2009-03-11 Thread Forest Bond
and it compiled w/o errors. Right, it seems to depend on the system. But upstream doesn't recommend running `make utils opt', they recommend running just `make', so it seems senseless to bring the problem to them. -Forest -- Forest Bond http://www.alittletooquiet.net http://www.pytagsfs.org

Bug#484674: mldonkey: Packaging too complex

2009-03-11 Thread Forest Bond
Hi, On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:14:25PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 0, Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net wrote: mldonkey packaging is way to complicated and bloated. This is unnecessary and causes bugs. * Why so many debconf questions? You're right. Maybe we can simplify

Bug#484674: (no subject)

2009-03-11 Thread Forest Bond
Hi, Forest Bond schrieb: Can you point me to some documentation of the multiuser functionality? http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/mldonkey/distrib/multiuser.txt?root=mldonkeyview=markup Thanks. It is interesting that mldonkey supports this. However, I have to imagine that it is probably

Bug#398010: (no subject)

2008-08-25 Thread Forest Bond
Hi Alastair, Any news on this? Thanks, Forest -- Forest Bond http://www.alittletooquiet.net http://www.pytagsfs.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#484674: mldonkey: Packaging too complex

2008-06-05 Thread Forest Bond
, 'hardy-updates'), (500, 'hardy-security'), (500, 'hardy-backports'), (500, 'hardy'), (500, 'gutsy') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-14-generic (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Forest Bond http

Bug#470711: Fixed debdiff

2008-03-13 Thread Forest Bond
Previous debdiff broke installation of examples. This one fixes it. -Forest -- Forest Bond http://www.alittletooquiet.net diff -u python-fuse-0.2-pre3/debian/changelog python-fuse-0.2-pre3/debian/changelog --- python-fuse-0.2-pre3/debian/changelog +++ python-fuse-0.2-pre3/debian/changelog

Bug#470711: [PATCH] modules not built/installed for all Python versions

2008-03-12 Thread Forest Bond
Package: python-fuse Version: 1:0.2-pre3-3 Refs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-fuse/+bug/199618 Looks like this was partially dealt with in the past, but aren't Python modules supposed to be usable by *all* support Python versions? debdiff attached. -Forest -- Forest Bond

Bug#398010: Please upgrade package

2008-02-05 Thread Forest Bond
Hi, I understand that Debian is trying hard to maintain a delta from upstream with this package, and that that is likely the cause of delay. Can we drop the delta and get this package upgraded, or is that not an option? Thanks, Forest -- Forest Bond http://www.alittletooquiet.net

Bug#398010: New upstream version with fix

2007-06-27 Thread Forest Bond
New upstream version 0.52.6 resolves this issue, as the patch was accepted. The new tarball can be extracted from this SRPM: ftp://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/test/6.93/source/SRPMS/newt-0.52.6-3.fc7.src.rpm -Forest signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#398010: patch accepted by upstream developers

2007-02-16 Thread Forest Bond
This patch (in a slightly modified form, most likely) has been applied by the upstream maintainer, but not yet released. -Forest signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#398010: wishlist: popWindow with no refresh

2006-11-10 Thread Forest Bond
Package: newt Version: 0.52.2-5.1 It is quite possible, although slightly awkward to display multiple windows using newt/snack, and update an arbitrary window. To do so, one must pop windows until the window needing updating is the current window, redraw it, and push the popped windows back on