Bug#675705: libpst-dev: pkgconfig file points to nonexisting directory

2012-06-02 Thread Gert Michael Kulyk
Package: libpst-dev Version: 0.6.54-1 Severity: important libpst.pc announces /usr/include/libpst-4 as the includedir while the headers are installed in /usr/include/libpst. This causes e.g. an FTBFS of evolution, when the pst plugin is being build (as is planned for the next experimental relea

Bug#637300: Comment on Message #15

2012-01-05 Thread Gert Michael Kulyk
Hi Sergio, > I think gdm3 has some stuff hardcoded, like fonts, GTK theme and > cursor theme. No, that is not the case. You should be able to configure that via gsettings and gconf files (at least I can do it here). E.g. for the cursor theme modify/create the files /etc/gdm3/custom.gconf-default

Bug#645328: libgnome-media-profiles: existing translations are not shipped in debian packages

2011-10-14 Thread Gert Michael Kulyk
Source: libgnome-media-profiles Version: 3.0.0-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n None of the packages build from libgnome-media-profiles is shipping the translations. This is especially annoying when using gnome-audio-profiles-properties, knowing that translations exist. -- System Information:

Bug#644009: gnome-control-center 3.x wrongly depends on gnome-desktop-data

2011-10-01 Thread Gert Michael Kulyk
Source: gnome-control-center Version: 1:3.0.2-1 Severity: normal gnome-control-center shipped in experimental should no longer depend on gnome-desktop-data but rather on gnome-desktop3-data, but only if the data files still are needed, of course. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/si

Bug#644008: gtkmm-documentation: V3 package wrongly depends on libgtkmm-2.4-doc

2011-10-01 Thread Gert Michael Kulyk
Package: gtkmm-documentation Version: 3.0.3-1 Severity: normal The package gtkmm-documentation that can be found currently in sid ships a tutorial for libgtkmm-3.0, but the package does not depend on libgtkmm-3.0-doc but on libgtkmm-2.4-doc, what is obviouthat can be found currently in sid ships

Bug#639892: Bug not resolved in 1.0-2

2011-09-28 Thread Gert Michael Kulyk
In Package 1.0-2 the libpulse-mainlook-glib0 symbols file still contains a wrong package name, this time it points to a nonexisting libpulse-mainloop-mainloop-glib0 package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Bug#642041: p11-kit: modules with relative path are not getting loaded

2011-09-18 Thread Gert Michael Kulyk
Source: p11-kit Version: 0.6-1 Severity: normal Trying out the new gnome-keyring package (3.1.92) which is multiarch-friendly, I had to find out that while compiling p11-kit modules is working correctly, the loading does not due to a broken module-path hardcoded into the libraries. Instead for

Bug#624531: gnucash fails to start with latest guile-1.8-slib

2011-04-29 Thread Gert Michael Kulyk
After some investigation I've found out, that the postinst script is missing in the new packages and therefore /usr/share/guile/1.8/slibcat is not getting created. After running: guile-1.8 \ -c "(use-modules (ice-9 slib)) (require 'new-catalog)" manually, everything works as expected. -- T

Bug#624531: gnucash fails to start with latest guile-1.8-slib

2011-04-29 Thread Gert Michael Kulyk
Package: guile-1.8-slib Version: 1.8.8+1-2 Severity: normal Tags: sid When installing guile-1.8-slib version 1.8.8+1-1 or -2, gnucash fails to start with the following backtrace: Backtrace: In unknown file: ?: 0* [primitive-load-path "c-interface.scm"] In /usr/share/gnucash/scm/c-interface.s

Bug#599127: libdbi shouldn't be compiled with -ffast-math

2011-04-24 Thread Gert Michael Kulyk
Hi, after a couple of months this bug still is present in sid, so I thought things would speed up a bit providing a patch. Here it is. Regards, Gert Kulyk Index: libdbi-0.8.3+really0.8.2/configure === --- libdbi-0.8.3+really0.8.2.or

Bug#599127: libdbi shouldn't be compiled with -ffast-math

2010-12-31 Thread Gert Michael Kulyk
Package: libdbi Version: 0.8.3+really0.8.2-1 Severity: normal After building an up to date gnucash on i386, I had to find out that the new dbi backend is not working as expectecd, so I googled a bit and found a report, that libdbi when compiled with CFLAGS="-O20 -ffast-math" which is done by de

Bug#579592: concerning recent commit to svn

2010-04-28 Thread Gert Michael Kulyk
I've seen that there was an update to the rules file. Unfortunately there is a mistake again: instead of writing: ifneq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS), linux) the commit rev. 1599 was ifneq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS, linux)) which does not only not work, but lets dpkg fail. -- To UNSUBSCRI

Bug#579592: evolution: [packaging] typo in debian/rules causes compilation without nm-support on linux

2010-04-28 Thread Gert Michael Kulyk
Package: evolution Version: 2.30.1.1-1 Severity: normal Tags: experimental patch A typo in debian/rules causes that nm-support will get disabled even on linux. I'm attaching a patch to fix this. diff -Nrup evolution.orig/debian/rules evolution/debian/rules --- evolution.orig/debian/rules 2010-04-

Bug#578730: [i18n:de] German translation for debian specific changes to gdm3

2010-04-22 Thread Gert Michael Kulyk
> Thanks for the translation. Nothing to thank for, I thank you for pushing it into the package. > BTW there is a second file for the Debian-specific desktop file. Could > you also translate it? Do you mean the file you've already comitted? At least the changelog for 2.30.0-2 mentions my name :-

Bug#578730: [i18n:de] German translation for debian specific changes to gdm3

2010-04-22 Thread Gert Michael Kulyk
odule to unlock the GNOME key -- Configuration Files: /etc/gdm3/greeter.gconf-defaults changed [not included] -- debconf information excluded # German translations for gdm3 package # Copyright (C) 2010 THE gdm3'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER # This file is distributed under the same license as the gdm3 package.

Bug#385798: openoffice.org: font hinting still does not work with the current version of libfreetype

2006-09-26 Thread Gert Michael Kulyk
Hi, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> But all that 1) does is change one hard coded default to another one, > Yeah, I understand that so, too... In my opinion, if you simply hardcode another hinting-default, there will be others who are complaining that the change causes ugly fonts, e.