redistribution.
These files are located in
warmux-11.04/data/weapon/supertux/superman.png
warmux-11.04/data/weapon/supertux/supertux_ico.png
warmux-11.04/data/weapon/supertux/supertux.png
--
*Grant H.
*Email: sirgr...@member.fsf.org
*Ask me for my GPG key
*I'm an FSF member -- Help us su
Package: gkermit
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The description for the gkermit package states "The non-free package ckermit
adds connection establishment, character-set translation and scripting
features." However as of version 301-1 ckermit is now DFSG free and in the
main repository. We sh
I should also mention (sorry, forgot) I have tried to contact the
maintainer via email quite a while ago (a few months ago) with no
response. As far as I can gather he is MIA. Many bugs from this
package with his last response was in the early - mid 2000's.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b
I should also mention (sorry, forgot) I have tried to contact the
maintainer quite a while ago (a few months ago) with no response. As
far as I can gather he is MIA. Many bugs from this package with his
last response was in the early - mid 2000's.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-r
Package: earcandy
Version: 0.9+bzr12-2
Severity: wishlist
User: trisq...@trisquel.info
Usertags: libreplanet, trisquel
The current description of earcandy states[1] (also viewable via
apt-cache show earcandy):
"Features include: fade out music/video players on Skype call, [...]"
I believe we sho
Package: xchat
Version: 2.8.8
Description
Summary: Source package xchat refers to a non-free browser in its URL
handler section. This non-free browser is not even in the Ubuntu
repositories (free & non-free) so we should not be using it as a URL
handler. A URL-handler for an appropriate free s
Package: bnetd
Version: 0.4.25-8
Severity: wishlist
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* No maintainer upload in the last years (March 2
gt;> open and tag it as "wontfix", as the purpose of the bug reporting
>> exercise is to document this kind of issues and their current state in
>> Debian.
--
*Grant H.
*Email: sirgr...@member.fsf.org
*Ask me for my GPG key
*I'm an FSF member -- Help us support software freedom!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Modifying?
Redistributing (gratis or in exchange of a fee)?
Distributing modified copies?
None of these activities is explicitly permitted.
As a consequence, this license does not (clearly) meet the DFSG."
[1]http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/09/msg00018.html
--
*Grant H.
*Email: s
stablished free software license which will meet the DFSG.
He says he will release an updated tarball. I will ask him to possibly
contact you when that is complete for re-packaging.
On 09/11/2012 10:59 PM, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> "Grant H." writes:
>
>> After reviewing the c
://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/y/yforth/yforth_0.1beta-21/copyright
[2]http://packages.debian.org/source/squeeze/yforth
[3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/09/msg00017.html
--
*Grant H.
*Email: sirgr...@member.fsf.org
*Ask me for my GPG key
*I'm an FSF member -- Help us su
Severity: wishlist
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
sue you raise with LibreOffice
so I can't really comment.
4) I will mark this bug as wishlist as you instructed.
On 09/05/2012 10:32 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 10:24:30AM -0700, Grant H. wrote:
>> Sorry, also to just clarify the bug and what the
any Debian policy. It is a bug/wishlist against Stefano's idea to get
Debian endorsed by the GNU project.
[1]http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2012/07/msg00016.html
[2]https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
--
*Grant H.
*Email: sirgr...@member.fsf.org
*Ask me
ebian.org/cgi-bin/bts-usertags.cgi?tag=trisquel&user=trisquel%40trisquel.info
[2]http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2012/07/msg00016.html
--
*Grant H.
*Email: sirgr...@member.fsf.org
*Ask me for my GPG key
*I'm an FSF member -- Help us support software freedom!
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
I believe the direction of this bug should be changed slightly. Debian
shouldn't advise users to use non-free plug-ins at all. HPLIP should be
modified so it doesn't do that.
Stefano Zacchiroli is trying to get Debian on the GNU Projcet's endorsed
distro list[1]. A program recommending non-free
ent hence I
reported it which Stefano called for. I should also add that this is
just my personal opinion and not the FSF's.
--
*Grant H.
*Email: sirgr...@member.fsf.org
*Ask me for my GPG key
*I'm an FSF member -- Help us support software freedom!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: nvclock
Version: 0.8b4+cvs20100914-3
User: trisq...@trisquel.info
Usertags: trisquel libreplanet
Stefano Zacchiroli has called for a "Free-ness" assessment to work with
the FSF on getting Debian endorsed[1]. According to the Guidelines for
Free System Distributions a free system can't di
Package: psutils
Version: 1.17-32
Severity: serious
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet
The license file in the psutils source code [1] contains the statement
=Quote=
The included files, md68_0.ps and md71_
Severity: serious
This should be marked as "serious" because something being under a
non-commercial license is a violation of Debian Free Software Guidelines
--
*Grant H.
*Email: sirgr...@member.fsf.org
*Ask me for my GPG key
*I'm an FSF member -- Help us support software free
20 matches
Mail list logo
