Hi!
On Sun, 2021-09-12 at 10:27:15 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.9
> Severity: wishlist
> Packages that have a plugin architecture, like glib2.0 and gdk-pixbuf,
> often want to know the multiarch tuple in their maintainer scripts so
> that they can enumerate
esystems and types of disks to see whether there would be
significant performance degradation/regression.
Thanks,
Guillem
From b93783b16b75eea334d82221cf5a71af5ba1ff99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillem Jover
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 01:26:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] libdpkg: Do not unnecessaril
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi!
On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 04:24:06 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Oops, missed the «-», but then that seems fine :), as earlier today I
noticed that a triggered autopkgtest for another package had failed,
so retriggered it as it looked l
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi!
On Tue, 2023-05-16 at 23:44:29 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
>
> On 2023-05-11 04:45:47 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.deb
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:dpkg
Hi!
Please pre-approve the dpkg 1.21.22 upload.
[ Reason ]
I got a report for a segfault privately (as the reporter
Hi!
On Sun, 2023-04-30 at 10:12:01 +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> If you talk about the baseline ABI according to hardware, yeah, this
> is still open.
> Thanks for more background here. I thought this might lead to a wider
> discussion before solid ABI as pabs' suggestion.
Given the ongoing discussion,
On Mon, 2023-05-08 at 08:48:49 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> […] I suspect Policy should say something stronger and more general,
> namely that no package in Debian should divert a file from another package
> unless this is arranged cooperatively between the packages to solve some
> specific
+
+ * New upstream release.
+- Remove patch, fixed upstream.
+
+ -- Guillem Jover Sun, 07 May 2023 02:10:00 +0200
+
pci.ids (0.0~2023.03.17-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release.
diff -Nru pci.ids-0.0~2023.03.17/debian/patches/0001-Fix-encoding-issues.patch
pci.ids-0.0
1.3/debian/changelog 2023-05-07 19:13:23.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+libbsd (0.11.3-1+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium
+
+ * Fix infinite loop when using MD5File() symbol due to missing symbol
+redirection. Thanks to Guillaume Morin .
+Closes: #1033671
+
+ -- Guillem Jover Sun,
possible in the near future.)
Thanks,
Guillem
From d71a98c23c43a06650e90480e864c0e3da344437 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bo YU
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 03:50:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] arch: Add support for riscv32 CPU
[guil...@debian.org:
- Adapt the test suite.
- Add ABI checking support. ]
Closes: #1034756
Signed-off-by: Gui
Hi!
On Sat, 2023-04-15 at 13:43:01 +0200, наб wrote:
> Package: attr
> Version: 1:2.5.1-4
> Severity: normal
> I would like to inspect the value of the system.posix_acl_access xattr.
> However, no matter which parameter I pass, I always get a forced prefix:
> -- >8 --
> # strace attr -g
+++ pci.ids-0.0~2023.03.17/debian/changelog 2023-03-22 23:56:31.0
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+pci.ids (0.0~2023.03.17-1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * New upstream release.
+- Refresh patch.
+
+ -- Guillem Jover Wed, 22 Mar 2023 23:56:31 +0100
+
pci.ids (0.0~2023.02.23-1) unstable
Package: sensible-utils
Version: 0.0.18
Severity: serious
Hi!
I installed this some time ago, and started seeing issues, but was
still wondering why no one had reported this already and whether this
was a local issue of mine, until I realized now this is an experimental
only upload. In any case,
Hi!
On Sat, 2023-03-25 at 21:24:44 +0100, David Heidelberg wrote:
> I see you recently pushed some code into git, do you plan to push the code
> also into Debian itself?
Given that it conflicts with the zlib package, and I'm not sure it
makes sense to upload just the zlib-ng specific library
Control: fixed -1 0.11.4-1
Control: severity -1 serious
On Wed, 2023-03-29 at 20:51:07 +0200, Guillaume Morin wrote:
> Package: libbsd0
> Version: 0.11.3-1
> Tags: patch,upstream,fixed-upstream,bullseye
> MD5File in bullseye is essentially an infinite loop. It just calls
> itself.
>
> The
Hi!
On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 10:28:07 +, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 09:54 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Control: forwarded -1
> > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/-/merge_requests/310
> > On Mon, 2023-01-02 at 13:02:08 +0100, Guillem Jover
Hi!
[ Was going over submitted reports pending replies or similar. :) ]
On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 11:26:22 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Package: hello-traditional
> > Version: 2.10-3
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: patch
&g
Hi!
[ Sorry had not seen the reply until now when I was doing a pass
over submitted bugs over the BTS web archive, as I was not CCed. ]
On Tue, 2022-05-03 at 16:52:03 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> While I think this change is a sensible idea, I'm a bit hesitant to apply it
> as it
:37:51.0
+0100
@@ -1,6 +1,20 @@
+glide (2002.04.10ds1-21) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Pass --build and --host to configure via chores.3dfx.
+
+ -- Guillem Jover Fri, 10 Mar 2023 02:37:51 +0100
+
+glide (2002.04.10ds1-20) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Use autoconf $host_cpu instead
On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 09:34:56 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> Control: tags -1 severity serious
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 07:44:06PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > ,---
> > AIDEUSER="${AIDEUSER:-$(id -u -n)}"
> > `---
>
> Yes that one is abs
Control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/-/merge_requests/310
Hi!
On Mon, 2023-01-02 at 13:02:08 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Package: devscripts
> Version: 2.22.2
> Severity: wishlist
> With dpkg 1.21.14 several functions and modules got deprecated,
On Wed, 2023-03-15 at 14:39:35 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-03-15 at 04:39:14 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-03-14 at 21:36:01 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > Where is it hardcoded? I have only seen code that honors what's read in
&
On Wed, 2023-03-15 at 04:39:14 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-03-14 at 21:36:01 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Where is it hardcoded? I have only seen code that honors what's read in
> > from defaults.
> >
> > That variable was renamed to AIDEUSER just
On Sun, 2023-03-12 at 21:53:14 +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> On 3/12/23 20:22, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> > Alejandro Colomar ezt írta (időpont: 2023. márc. 12., V, 16:52):
> >> On 3/12/23 16:38, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> 142 lines of a function definition are not something I'd consider easy to
On Tue, 2023-03-14 at 21:36:01 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 02:46:10PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I think this might have been a problem with the systemd service, which
> > does not seem to give the same POSIX capabilities as the capsh
> > invocation
On Thu, 2023-03-09 at 14:39:37 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 06:45:59PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > # added updating to 0.18-1
> > rm -rf /var/tmp/aide.cron.daily /var/tmp/aide.cron.daily.old.*
> >
> > -if dpkg --compare-versions "$2
Hi!
On Wed, 2023-03-08 at 14:26:13 +0100, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Mar 2023 at 14:11:05 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-03-08 at 14:04 +0100, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> >> No please don't, #-1 is RC so that would block transitioning into
> >> Bookworm which only
Hi!
On Thu, 2023-03-09 at 14:07:45 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 non-root check in dailyaidecheck might be unnecessary
> Control: tags -1 patch
> Control: severity -1 normal
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 07:14:14PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Something like
Package: debian-reference
Version: 2.100
Severity: important
Hi!
With the non-free-firmware changes, the text in §2.1.5 seems to need
an update. It reads like this:
,---
Debian is 100% free software because of the followings:
* Debian installs only free software by default to respect
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: normal
When reviewing lists, I get offered to review messages that have
already been categorized as spam and removed from the archives, so
in review2.pl I see:
,---
Spam message removed
The spam message that used to be here has been removed.
On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 20:36:01 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 05:31:16PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > The daily aide cron job warns that it cannot send mail as non-root
> > user. Was wondering why or how to change or workaround that, and
Hi!
On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 17:31:16 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Package: aide
> Version: 0.18-2
> Severity: important
> The daily aide cron job warns that it cannot send mail as non-root
> user. Was wondering why or how to change or workaround that, a
On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 17:18:00 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 04:00:26PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Package: aide
> > Version: 0.18-2
> > Severity: serious
>
> Justification?
After upgrade, something that used to work stopped working, whi
Package: aide
Version: 0.18-2
Severity: important
Hi!
The daily aide cron job warns that it cannot send mail as non-root
user. Was wondering why or how to change or workaround that, and saw
commit e82b5c9112d95b5c813ee29c3234733ae0f2c862, but it is not clear
why mail from non-root was disabled,
Package: aide
Version: 0.18-2
Severity: serious
Hi!
Just upgraded a server to Debian bookworm, and noticed that aideinit
was not working anymore, giving the following error:
,---
# aideinit --yes --force
Running aide --init...
User [_aide] not known
AIDE --init return code 1
`---
Hi!
On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 12:12:06 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: fixed -1 5.10.162-1 6.1.8-1
> On Sun, 21 Aug 2022 21:35:58 +0200 Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 07:42:10PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > It seems like there was a regression w
Hi!
On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 17:11:26 +0800, Torrekie wrote:
> Package: libdpkg-perl
> Version: 1.21.19
> Source: dpkg
> Severity: minor
> When installing dpkg 1.21.19 from source, I got several pod2man
> warnings that indicates some of the documentations has not been
> correctly generated.
> $
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
Hi!
In the "Bugs, security issues and Quality Assurance Checks" table, the
bug counts seem to be including duplicate bugs, which seems unexpected.
I'd say it should preferably only list merged bug
On Sun, 2023-02-26 at 17:02:24 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2023, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > UDD now includes data about patches (see
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2023/01/msg2.html ). This data is
> > already exposed on https://udd.debian.org/patches.cgi and
> >
Hi!
On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 09:47:59 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Ah, was wondering the same few days before the toolchain freeze, as I
> was unsure whether to update some of the packages I maintain (in
> particular libmd, for which I was thinking of doing a new upstream
> release),
Hi!
On Sat, 2023-02-25 at 13:32:55 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 2023-02-25 04:57:58 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > User
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:dpkg
Hi!
Please pre-approve the dpkg 1.21.21 upload.
[ Reason ]
The loong64 arch support got reverted as there was a bug
Package: apt-file
Version: 3.3
Severity: normal
Hi!
The following seems to return bogus and truncated output with parts of
the filenames as if they were the package name prefix:
,---
$ apt-file list -x '.*' | head -n60
BDRV: /usr/share/projectM/presets/presets_tryptonaut/Hexcollie,
Hi!
On Mon, 2023-02-20 at 21:30:14 +0800, zhangdandan wrote:
> We decide to use "loongarch64-linux-gnu" as the value of the Debian loong64
> port's multiarch tuple.
> The reasons for using "loongarch64-linux-gnu" are as follows:
>
> Firstly, we note that many of the major architectures use the
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
Hi!
As mentioned in #1028503, the DMD shows a nice panel with patch
status, and which ones need work, but that seems to be failing to take
into account several of the other fields that signify that the
Hi!
On Sun, 2023-01-15 at 21:12:53 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I'm wondering why diverge from the patch metadata guidelines? If there's
> > a desire to change the field semantics, perhaps it would be better to
> > change the guidelines instead? :)
> >·
> > But given this interchange, perhaps
Package: lintian
Version: 2.116.3
Severity: normal
Hi!
I'm getting a false-positive (on the UDD lintian summary page) for a
binNMU due to the Binary-Only field in the changelog header line:
,---
debsig-verify (0.28+b1) sid; urgency=low, binary-only=yes
* Binary-only non-maintainer upload for
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
Hi!
There are some lintian tags (I know at least of
lacks-unversioned-link-to-shared-library), which require multiple
packages to be linted together for them to be emitted. In this case
libfooN and
Hi!
On Mon, 2023-02-13 at 11:51:05 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the cron package:
>
> #998399: cron: Use mktemp instead of tempfile
>
> It has been closed by Debian FTP Masters
> (reply to
Hi!
On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 09:01:44 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 06/02/2023 12:43, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Please pre-approve the dpkg 1.21.20 upload.
> Please go ahead. Late translations are also OK to include.
Thanks! Uploaded it yesterday.
Regards,
Guillem
On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 20:00:06 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2023-02-07 17:50 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 16:41:47 +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> >> I suspect this was added to improve reproducibility. Ironically, it makes
> >> packages tha
Hi!
On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 16:41:47 +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> When building packages, a -ffile-prefix-map option is automatically injected
> into CFLAGS. Where does it come from? Since when?
This is coming from dpkg-buildflags (in this case probably indirectly
via debhelper). AFAICS it was
On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 19:18:41 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 12:43:37 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: d..
Hi!
On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 19:57:02 +0100, Bruno Kleinert wrote:
> neither revision gets properly loaded by Chromium as of today.
>
> As the freeze approaches, I will remove the Chromium package relation
> and the symbolic link to the Web Extension
>
Hi!
On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 12:43:37 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:dpkg
> Please pre-app
Control: found -1 1.8.4+repack1-1
Control: found -1 1.8.4+repack1-2
Hi!
On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 14:34:36 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 07:43:48PM +0100, Bruno Kleinert wrote:
> > I do not have time to investigate and fix the issue in the mid-term.
> > I'd appreciate if
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:dpkg
Hi!
Please pre-approve the dpkg 1.21.20 upload.
[ Reason ]
This dpkg release includes the translation updates for
Hi!
On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 15:52:09 +0100, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> Guillem Jover wrote on 01/02/2023 23:20:
> > Was there any other error during the unpack or installation in
> > general? Do you have the full log of that upgrade session? From what
> > version we
Hi!
On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 11:11:37 +0800, Tianyu Chen wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.19.7.11-1+dde
> Severity: normal
> When build dpkg 1.21.19 on Deepin 23 alpha, it shows that dpkg fails to
> build on dh_installchangelogs --no-trim. The --no-trim option was
> introduced in debhelper
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi!
On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 14:30:15 +0100, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.21.19
> Severity: normal
> upgrading the openjdk-17 packages on my system with
>
> # aptitude -t sid install ~Uopenjdk
>
> gives this error messages:
>
> dpkg: cycle found
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Wed, 2023-02-01 at 21:40:23 +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.21.19
> Severity: minor
> X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
> gpg: skipped "Thorsten Glaser ": secret key not available
> gpg: dpkg-sign.IRqYlate/dygraphs_2.2.0-4.dsc: clearsign failed:
in glibc was still being worked on. In any case,
thanks! I've queued the attached patch for 1.22.x, tracked at the branch
<https://git.hadrons.org/git/debian/dpkg/dpkg.git/log/?h=next/buildflags-future-time64>.
Thanks,
Guillem
From 78fd2b85741a4a8adc6c654635032cb38a50fab8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Package: apt
Version: 2.5.5
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
On a thread on debian-devel, Adrian Bunk brought up the potential
problem of packages with a Build-Conflicts against a
«Protected/Important: yes» package. To me it makes sense that the
tooling should be able to cover this theoretical problem
-12-27 at 23:29:30 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 03:11:06 +0200
> From: Guillem Jover
> To: sub...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: python-policy: Please require namespacing source python module
> packages
> Message-ID: <20150707011106.ga12...@gaar
On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 14:07:06 +0100, Ansgar wrote:
> Timo Röhling writes:
> > * Andreas Henriksson [2023-01-28 12:50]:
> >>Policy is not a religion. Policy has many bugs. Policy is very outdated.
> >>[...]
> >>Here's an example you could follow:
>
Package: gthumb
Version: 3:3.12.2-3
Severity: normal
Hi!
This is a revisit of #780322, but applied to the Recommends. At the time
the hardcoded dependencies got moved from Depends to Recommends, but it
looks like now they are not used anymore, since upstream removed the
picassaweb extension in
Control: reopen -1
Control: affects -1 - leafnode
Hi!
This seems to still be a valid concern for update-inetd. I think this
was probably closed in error as showing up in leafnode bugs page due
to the affects. Given that the new leafnode version does not use
update-inetd anymore, I'm removing the
On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 21:44:27 +, James Addison wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.21.18
> Followup-For: Bug #1028961
>
> Are SHA224 and SHA384 used widely by dpkg and/or Debian?
I'd expect all (?) signatures for packaging artifacts in Debian to be
SHA512. This change sets an explicit
Hi!
On Sat, 2022-12-17 at 08:42:18 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 16-12-2022 02:40, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > I was looking at
> > https://release.debian.org/testing/essential-and-build-essential.txt
> >
> > trying to figure out which packages I'm involved in are covered by the
> > toolchain
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:dpkg
Hi!
(Even though I've noticed no blocking hints, given that the package
is supposed to be frozen, I'm requesting this
On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 11:28:55 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> The reasons for changing the ABI at this point in time are still not
> very clear to me (Helmut mentioned some reasons though), and the fact
> that this was submitted to the gcc package before any discussion seems
&g
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi!
On Mon, 2023-01-09 at 15:20:41 +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Severity: important
> Tags: lfs, hppa
> Version: 1.21.17
> Tags: hppa, patch, ftbfs
> This is a follow-up for #1020335 regarding "enabling LFS by default
> on hppa arch".
>
> It's
Hi!
On Sun, 2023-01-15 at 17:45:03 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-01-14 at 18:29:12 +0800, 张丹丹 wrote:
> > Package: dpkg
> > Version: 1.21.17
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: patch
> > User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: loongar
Hi!
On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 09:45:37 +0100, Enrik Berkhan wrote:
> thanks for fixing this in the Debian package.
>
> You might consider my (basically identical) upstream patch:
>
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/inetutils.git/commit/?id=c2cfa7889c09b6bd1ef7bc9967111e6509e610c7
Sorry, I guess
Hi!
On Mon, 2023-01-16 at 12:47:23 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2022-10-26 22:09, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > Note that the other official architecture still have a kernel
> > > compatibility set to 3.2, so that will make a difference between
> > > architectures.
On Sat, 2023-01-14 at 18:29:12 +0800, 张丹丹 wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.21.17
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: loongarch64
> - I have added loongarch64 architecture GNU triplet to match the change in
> gcc-12.
> This patch can fix
On Sun, 2023-01-15 at 11:30:25 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Am 15.01.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 10:14:24PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >> Am 13.01.2023 um 21:50 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> > Then this two things should be documented:
> >
> > 1. .asc files
On Sun, 2023-01-15 at 11:45:20 +0100, Ansgar wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.21.13
> Severity: serious
> Tags: security
> X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
> dpkg 1.21.13 introduced passing "--openpgp" to GnuPG by default […]. This
> causes GnuPG to use insecure cryptographic algorithms
Hi!
On Sat, 2022-12-17 at 17:24:57 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Sat 17 Dec 2022 at 04:43PM +01, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Sorry, probably my fault! As I tend to use «Fixes:» git pseudo-fields
> > for things that fix part of a bug, but are not intended yet to close it,
>
On Thu, 2023-01-12 at 12:05:51 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 12/01/23 at 01:57 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I just noticed though that it does
> > not recognize a "yes" value for the Forwarded field, while the
> > "Patch Tagging Guidelines" has thi
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
Hi!
The new patch data is great, thanks! I just noticed though that it does
not recognize a "yes" value for the Forwarded field, while the
"Patch Tagging Guidelines" has this to say about it:
*
Hi!
On Mon, 2023-01-09 at 11:59:17 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.21.17
> The dpkg-query(1) man page says about the -S option:
>
> > Hint: When machine parsing the output, it is customary to set the locale
> > to C.UTF-8 to get reproducible results.
>
> Assuming that
Control: reopen -1
Hi!
Although I've not tested nor checked the affected code, the fix done
to close this cannot possibly be correct, see below. :)
On Mon, 2023-01-09 at 21:27:06 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2023 07:12:58 -0500
> From: "Kevin P. Fleming"
> To:
Hi!
On Fri, 2023-01-06 at 16:58:44 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Package: libdpkg-perl
> Version: 1.21.13
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: z...@debian.org
> Given input `-flto=auto -flto=auto`, $bf->strip($flag, "-flto=auto") returns
> `-flto=auto`.
> However if given `-flto=auto
Hi!
On Mon, 2023-01-02 at 09:56:56 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.21.12
> Severity: wishlist
> dpkg's changelog.gz keeps growing. For the changelog.Debian.gz,
> debhelper has started pruning old entries. At this time, the changelog
> contributes one 7th of dpkg's
Control: reopen -1
Control: reassign -1 devscripts
Control: retitle -1 devscripts: Wrong usage of pylint as a module breaks
Hi!
On Thu, 2023-01-05 at 00:18:13 -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > Package: pylint
> > Version: 2.15.9-1
> > Severity: serious
> > It looks like the recent release is
Control: tags -1 - patch
Hi!
On Sat, 2016-06-18 at 23:19:16 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> Here is tiny patch which adds new option dpkg-deb --compress-program=
> Program is executed as a filter with single argument: compression level -0 ..
> -9
The code is not reaping the child, nor
Control: found -1 1.21.10
On Thu, 2023-01-05 at 11:23:30 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.21.16
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bookworm
> see
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=cross-toolchain-base-ports=all=60=1672912429=0
>
> touch
Source: rust-sequoia-sop
Source-Version: 0.27.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Hi!
This version is supposed to fix the issue that prevented it from being
used by dpkg-dev for its SOP OpenPGP backend. I'm only filing this
because it would be nice to add support for it for the upcoming Debian
Package: pylint
Version: 2.15.9-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
It looks like the recent release is missing a dependency on
python3-tomli when the python used is not at least 3.11. Seen on
test suite failures locally and on the devscripts CI pipelines:
Package: dgit
Version: 10.4
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
With dpkg 1.21.14, the Dpkg::Compression module got some improvements,
the one that seems relevant to dgit, is that you can now fetch the
command-line to execute from a Dpkg::Compression getter instead of
having to create a
Package: sbuild
Version: 0.84.2
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
With dpkg 1.21.14 several functions and modules got deprecated,
including deprecation warnings, but those were causing autopkgtest
failures which would prevent dpkg from migrating so I silenced them
for now. It would still be nice to switch
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.22.2
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
With dpkg 1.21.14 several functions and modules got deprecated,
including deprecation warnings, but those were causing autopkgtest
failures which would prevent dpkg from migrating so I silenced them
for now. It would still be nice to
On Sat, 2022-12-17 at 12:07:22 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 13:13:34 -0500 Garrett Kajmowicz wrote:
> > One other possibly-related item of note (I can file a separate bug if you
> > like)
> > and which may have an existing solution:
> > Passing in --buildinfo-option=-u/out
Hi!
On Sat, 2022-12-17 at 12:07:22 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 13:13:34 -0500 Garrett Kajmowicz wrote:
> > Package: debhelper
> > Version: 13.6ubuntu1
> > Severity: wishlist
> I have CC'ed Guillem Jover because *if* this is a change to be support
Hi!
On Sun, 2022-12-18 at 16:03:01 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.21.12
> Severity: wishlist
> for me it seems "obvious" that the way, in which build profiles are set,
> is documented in dpkg-buildflags(1). But it isn't. It's only mentioned
> dpkg-checkbuilddeps(1)
Control: forcemerge 20471 -1
Hi!
On Sun, 2022-12-18 at 14:43:05 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.21.12
> Severity: important
> libuno-cppuhelpergcc3-3 has
>
> Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}, uno-libs-private (=
> ${binary:Version})
>
> which then boils
Package: kanshi
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
There seems to be a kanshictl program to control kanshi. It would be
nice if it was shipped (alongside its man page) in the package too.
Thanks,
Guillem
Hi!
On Sun, 2022-12-18 at 18:10:16 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 06:31:41PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Package: vagrant
> > Version: 2.2.19+dfsg-2
> > Severity: serious
> > Since virtualbox 7.0.4 got uploaded, vagrant is no longer insta
ase, hope this is all not too inconvenient!)
> Guillem Jover writes:
> > And for some reason I think I also got the impression, even though
> > the stanza changes had been committed, they could still be backed out.
> > (BTW I've now gone over the wiki and updated all parag
201 - 300 of 4830 matches
Mail list logo
