Bug#1016850: vland: Dependency on telnet but not telnet-client

Source: vland Source-Version: 0.8-1 Severity: normal Usertags: inetutils-default-telnet-switch Hi! This package has a dependency on telnet (which denotes either a specific implementation or in the future the default one), but not on the generic telnet-client, which denotes any implementation.

Bug#1016849: lava: Dependencies on telnet but not telnet-client

Source: lava Source-Version: 2022.01.3-3 Severity: normal Usertags: inetutils-default-telnet-switch Hi! This package has dependencies on telnet (which denotes either a specific implementation or in the future the default one), but not on the generic telnet-client, which denotes any

Bug#1016847: tucnak: Dependency on telnet but not telnet-client

Source: tucnak Source-Version: 4.34-1 Severity: normal Usertags: inetutils-default-telnet-switch Hi! This package has a dependency on telnet (which denotes either a specific implementation or in the future the default one), but not on the generic telnet-client, which denotes any implementation.

Bug#1016844: mininet: Dependency on telnet but not telnet-client

Source: mininet Source-Version: 2.3.0-1 Severity: normal Usertags: inetutils-default-telnet-switch Hi! This package has a dependency on telnet (which denotes either a specific implementation or in the future the default one), but not on the generic telnet-client, which denotes any

Bug#1016846: zssh: Dependency on telnet but not telnet-client

Source: zssh Source-Version: 1.5c.debian.1-8 Severity: normal Usertags: inetutils-default-telnet-switch Hi! This package has a dependency on telnet (which denotes either a specific implementation or in the future the default one), but not on the generic telnet-client, which denotes any

Bug#987729: inetutils-telnet: provide upgrade path for orphan netkit-telnet

Hi! On Fri, 2022-08-05 at 22:13:15 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Guillem Jover writes: > > Sure. As per the plan on debian-devel, whenever you have some time, could > > you prepare the netkit-telnet update targeting experimental, which > > renames the binary packages to be

Bug#987729: inetutils-telnet: provide upgrade path for orphan netkit-telnet

Hi Simon! On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 20:40:01 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Guillem Jover writes: > > We'd need to send a mail to debian-devel, announcing the transition, > > to check whether there's any objection. I can prepare something during > > the weekend. Which I did,

Bug#989125: lists.debian.org: Request a mailing list named "debian-loongarch"

Hi! On Fri, 2021-05-28 at 08:16:42 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, 26 May 2021 18:02:59 +0800 JiaLingZhang wrote: > > > We have a new architecture named loongarch64, We have alreadly > > compelted loongarch64 debian port in our local workspace. Now, We plane to > > post > > it to debian for

Bug#526469: manpage missing for sysfs.conf

about something like the attached page? Thanks, Guillem # sysfs.conf manual page (sysfs.conf.5) # # Copyright © 2022 Guillem Jover # # This is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by # the Free Software Foundation; either

Bug#657711: please make COPYFILES more flexible

Control: forwarded -1 https://codeberg.org/shelter/reschroot/pulls/3 Control: tags -1 patch On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 09:26:03 +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > Package: schroot > Version: 1.4.24-1 > Severity: wishlist > maybe one wants to copy files to a chroot that are not active in the > host system.

Bug#1016135: devscripts: debdiff: Please add option to pass --no-check to dpkg-source

Package: devscripts Version: 2.22.2 Severity: wishlist Control: block 1016087 by -1 Hi! The debdiff command can compare a couple of Debian source packages (.dsc), but it needs to unpack them first with dpkg-source. That command will check the checksums and the signatures. The problem is that

Bug#1016087: apt-listdifferences: Indirectly calls dpkg-source w/o --no-check

Control: tag -1 - moreinfo Control: reassign -1 apt-listdifferences Control: retitle -1 apt-listdifferences: Indirectly calls dpkg-source w/o --no-check [ Replying to the initial report for some context. ] Hi! On Tue, 2022-07-26 at 14:24:41 -0500, Tim McConnell wrote: > Package: dpkg >

Bug#1016087: dpkg: errors about cannot verify signature for assorted packages

On Wed, 2022-07-27 at 11:10:13 -0500, tmcconnell...@gmail.com wrote: > >I assume you have something installed that downloads source packages > > (and perhaps builds them) as part of the upgrade? > Gnome Software and I left sources.list pretty much as it came from the > net install CD. Hmm, I've

Bug#1015839: dpkg: Back-port ARC support in stable version

Hi! On Fri, 2022-07-22 at 12:27:01 +0200, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.20.11 > Severity: normal > The problem is even uploads of other packages in "unstable" > fail to build if they expect the build system system to know about ARC. > > Apparently newly uploaded packages

Bug#1016087: dpkg: errors about cannot verify signature fpr assorted packages

Control: reassign -1 dpkg-dev 1.21.9 Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi! On Tue, 2022-07-26 at 14:24:41 -0500, Tim McConnell wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.21.9 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: tmcconnell...@gmail.com > What led up to the situation? Normal upgrading of system > > What exactly

Bug#1015883: /usr/bin/update-alternatives: update-alternatives: manualy selected choice is overriden by apt-get dist-upgrade

Control: reassign -1 src:openjdk-11 Control: retitle -1 openjdk: Removes alternatives on deconfigure losing manual state [ Leaving enough context for the reassign. ] Hi! On Sat, 2022-07-23 at 02:00:15 +0200, Richard Z wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.20.11 > Severity: normal > File:

Bug#1001330: sqop: Provide a sop alternative for sqop

Control: tag -1 patch Hi! On Wed, 2021-12-08 at 20:39:52 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > Package: sqop > Version: 0.22.2-2 > Severity: wishlist > One of the main advantages of the SOP CLI is that it is a standardized > interface, which means having to hardcode specific implementa

Bug#1015272: liburing autopkgtest started to hang containers in Debian and Ubuntu since ~2022-07-11

Hi! On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 21:07:28 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Source: liburing > Version: 2.1-2 > Severity: important > X-Debbugs-Cc: br...@ubuntu.com > Some days ago (approximately 7) the autopkgtest of liburing started to > behave badly on the Debian and Ubuntu infrastructure. It's not

Bug#858331: dpkg -S doesn't work properly with usrmerge

Control: tags -1 - patch On Sun, 2022-07-17 at 00:26:46 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > Control: tags -1 patch > The attached patch from user uau is a working solution that would allow > to lift this moratorium and also solve this bug. It is shared as-is, > with permission and under the same

Bug#1014658: DAK cannot handle signatures with keyserver-url

made Fri Jul 8 22:16:56 2022 CEST gpg:using RSA key 4F3E74F436050C10F5696574B972BF3EA4AE57A3 gpg: Good signature from "Guillem Jover " [ultimate] gpg: aka "Guillem Jover " [ultimate] gpg: Preferred keyserver: https://www.hadrons.

Bug#987729: inetutils-telnet: provide upgrade path for orphan netkit-telnet

Hi! On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 19:11:11 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Package: inetutils-telnet > Severity: wishlist > As discussed in https://bugs.debian.org/982253 netkit-telnet is not > (actively) maintained upstream or in Debian. Inetutils may not be the > state of the art as a well-maintained

Bug#1013992: ITP: session-migration -- tool to migrate in user session settings

On Tue, 2022-06-28 at 21:51:44 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 8:07 PM Guillem Jover wrote: > > > Package: session-migration > > > Description: Tool to migrate in user session settings > > > This tool is used to migrate in session user data whe

Bug#1014206: bullseye-pu: package dpkg/1.20.11

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi! [ Reason ] This request includes several targeted minimal fixes for issues found in dpkg 1.20.10, including one regression introduced in the security update. I mentioned to

Bug#1013992: ITP: session-migration -- tool to migrate in user session settings

Hi! On Tue, 2022-06-28 at 11:02:29 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, > pkg-ayatana-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Owner: jeremy.bi...@canonical.com > Package Name: session-migration > Version: 0.3.7 > Upstream Author:

Bug#1012195: dpkg: lintian autopkgtest *may* have spotted a regression in security update of dpkg

On Sat, 2022-06-25 at 22:09:12 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > In fact I think this regression can be included as fix in the upcoming > point releases if SRM agree, and so avoid an out of order dpkg update > again to fix this rather edge-case regression (and instread batch it > with other

Bug#995492: lintian: Broken --fails-on=none as default never got reverted

Hi! On Tue, 2022-06-14 at 01:26:02 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > Guillem Jover wrote: > > So the problematic --fail-on default change never got actually reverted > > as the patch applied in commit 3758bfafd5dd742c327f2312dac8e3a71b1f036e > > omitted the relevant part th

Bug#835146: dpkg: please enable bindow hardening flag by default

Hi! On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 16:04:27 +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote: > With LTO being considered to be enabled by default [1] can this please > also get another deliberation. If you want to see this enabled by default, please bring it up again on debian-devel. AFAIR last time there was push back.

Bug#1013876: webext-keepassxc-browser: Version 1.8.0+repack1-2 fail to load in chromium

Package: webext-keepassxc-browser Version: 1.8.0+repack1-2 Severity: serious Hi! This version seems to fail load on chromium 103.0.5060.53-1, with the following warnings and errors shown on the extensions settings page: (W) Unrecognized manifest key 'applications'. (W) Manifest version 2 is

Bug#1012544: libworkflow1: Broken shared library packaging

Package: libworkflow1 Version: 0.9.10-1 Severity: serious Hi! This package has several problems: - It contains a shared library without a SOVERSION ,--- $ objdump -p /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libworkflow.so | grep SONAME SONAME libworkflow.so `--- This means any

Bug#1012004: srpc: Unorthodox binary package content organization

On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 14:03:06 +, Lance Lin wrote: > > Ideally the .a archive and the .so linked script (which just redirects > > the linker to always use the .a archive, so there's no actual shared > > library), should be moved into the libsrpc-dev package as the usual > > convention. The

Bug#1012195: dpkg: lintian autopkgtest *may* have spotted a regression in security update of dpkg

Hi! On Tue, 2022-05-31 at 22:10:29 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Source: dpkg > Version: 1.20.10 > Severity: important > Our proposed-updates queue [1] show regressions in the autopkgtest of > lintian with the security version of dpkg. Looking at the logs [2], it > appears to me that the file

Bug#1012034: dpkg: warning: unknown dpkg database file /var/lib/dpkg/format is not a misplaced alternative state

Hi! On Sun, 2022-05-29 at 09:07:25 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.21.8 > Severity: normal > On a host running Testing, I got the message below this morning: > > Unpacking dpkg (1.21.8) over (1.21.7) ... > Setting up dpkg (1.21.8) ... > dpkg: warning: unknown dpkg

Bug#1011510: dpkg-statoverride does *not* run chmod

Hi! On Tue, 2022-05-24 at 09:36:45 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.20.9 > Severity: wishlist > To avoid confusion the man page to dpkg-statoverride should > mention explicitly that it does *not* run chmod or others to > actually change the access permissions to already

Bug#1011191: dpkg: let buildinfo record whether host architecture binaries can be executed when cross-compiling

Hi! On Wed, 2022-05-18 at 07:26:02 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.21.7 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@debian.org > when cross compiling, one property of the build system that can > influence the contents of the generate

Bug#1012004: srpc: Unorthodox binary package content organization

Source: srpc Source-Version: 0.9.6-1 Severity: normal Hi! This package has a rather unorthodox package contents organization. There are two binary packages generated: a) libsrpc-dev: Contains the usual headers (but no .a archive nor .so symlink or linker script). b) libsrpc: Is an

Bug#1010685: dpkg-buildflags: Please enable -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero

Hi! On Fri, 2022-05-06 at 20:50:08 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Version: 1.21.7 > Severity: normal > Please add "-ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero" for GCC 12 (which is the first > release of GCC to provide this flag). > > It goes well with the other important security flaw

Bug#918914: add -fstack-clash-protection to default buildflags

Hi! On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 21:00:09 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:42:10AM -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote: > > Package: dpkg-dev > > Version: 1.19.2 > > Severity: wishlist > > Tags: security > > It would be Really Awesome (TM) if we could add the > >

Bug#1009859: sbuild does not download http(s) .dsc files if libwww-perl is not installed

Hi! On Tue, 2022-04-19 at 18:46:09 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > wow, I didn't even know sbuild could do this! > > I don't think it'd be wise to promote libwww-perl from a Suggests to a > Recommends because this far from an essential sbuild functionality and I only > see it as

Bug#1009913: dpkg: when the user reverts to the package maintainer's version of a conffile, the execute bit is not propagated

Hi! On Wed, 2022-04-20 at 17:17:16 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.21.7 > Severity: normal > In an upgrade, the user may get a prompt like that and answer yes > to install the package maintainer's version of a conffile, thus > reverting all changes done he had done: >

Bug#1009915: sysvinit: Please align with manpages-l10n and afterwards activate man page translations

Hi! On Fri, 2022-04-22 at 20:16:02 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > On Fri, 22 Apr 2022, Mark Hindley wrote: > > > Or Replaces: but that has downsides on deinstallation. > > > > Yes. And I am unclear how dpkg would behave if sysvinit-core was installed > > Replacing the manpages-l10n versions but

Bug#1008443: golang-github-smartystreets-assertions: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && go test -vet=off -v -p 8 github.com/smartystreets/assertions github.com/smartystreets/assert

Hi! On Sat, 2022-04-16 at 23:06:39 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote: > I don't understand the version scheme for this package. > > The Debian version is 1.10.1, which was released 1 Apr 2019. > > After that, many more versions were released, but with "older" version > numbers. The most recent was

Bug#1009300: dpkg: allow symbol files to be excluded from install

On Mon, 2022-04-11 at 10:13:52 +0200, Ansgar wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.21.7 > Severity: wishlist > Someone wondered on IRC why we ship symbols files in shared library > packages instead of the associated -dev packages While there is in theory no technical limitation why these could not

Bug#892664: dpkg: Please add support for zstd (Zstandard) compressed packages

, Helmut Grohne wrote: > would you maybe reconsider adding zstd decompression support at this > time? I'm always open to reconsideration. :) > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 04:38:15AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > So, the items that come to mind (most from the dpkg FAQ [F]: > >

Bug#1008489: dpkg: postinst should not warn about Debian's default (and soon only supported) filesystem layout

On Sat, 2022-04-09 at 15:47:17 +0200, Ansgar wrote: > On Sun, 2022-03-27 at 14:34 +0200, Ansgar wrote: > > I think the warning emitted by dpkg's postinst script about Debian's > > default filesystem layout is not appropriate and at least partially > > misleading. Several other people agreed with

Bug#1009069: dpkg ignores --force-not-root in statoverride/main.c

mmitted the attached patch, which will be included in the upcoming 1.21.8 release. Thanks, Guillem From 4b6cb4b25974afeee9523623dbdf02621db8389e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 23:02:37 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] dpkg-statoverride: Add support for --force-not-root Wh

Bug#1008780: dpkg: protection shouldn't apply to foreign-arch packages

Hi! On Sun, 2022-04-03 at 19:00:33 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > On Sat, 2 Apr 2022 15:09:26 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > In principle shared libraries should never be marked Essential:yes nor > > Protected:yes, I think this was a special case, that will go away once > &g

Bug#1008780: dpkg: protection shouldn't apply to foreign-arch packages

Hi! On Fri, 2022-04-01 at 14:41:51 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.20.9 > Severity: normal > Protection is applied to foreign-arch packages (e.g. libgcc-s1:i386 on > amd64) even though they aren't relevant to the scenarios that > protection is designed to prevent (as I

Bug#1008764: dpkg: [dpkg-fsys-usrunmess] fails to copy /lib/modules directories, breaks

Control: severity -1 normal Hi! On Fri, 2022-04-01 at 07:27:26 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.21.6 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system The script does not break the whole system, it fails quite early during preparations before doing any

Bug#1008304: ITP: http-nio -- http/s file system provider for Java NIO.2

Hi! On Sat, 2022-03-26 at 14:59:17 +0100, Pierre Gruet wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Debian-med team > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org > > * Package name: http-nio > Version : 0.1.0 > Upstream Author : Daniel

Bug#1008316: dpkg-fsys-usrunmess breaks system boot

On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 09:34:35 +, Éric Valette wrote: > On 3/28/22 01:29, Guillem Jover wrote: > >> Invoquing the dkms postinstall script fails because it does not find > >> /lib/modules/x.y.z > >> > >> directories and rebooting without graphic dri

Bug#1008316: dpkg-fsys-usrunmess breaks system boot

Control: retitle -1 dpkg-fsys-usrunmess: Does not deal with untracked kernel modules Hi! On Sat, 2022-03-26 at 19:21:44 +0100, Eric Valette wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.21.4 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks the whole system > Gobally the scripts does a very good job but it

Bug#1008206: libdpkg-perl: debs_parse option to reduce invalid package names and version strings

On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 12:08:30 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 24-03-2022 12:06, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Hi Guillem, > > > > On 24-03-2022 11:50, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > Hmm, but that means autopkgtest will then miss packages that are > > > listed in

Bug#1008206: libdpkg-perl: debs_parse option to reduce invalid package names and version strings

Hi! On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 11:35:25 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Package: libdpkg-perl > Version: 1.21.2 > Severity: wishlist > Control: affects -1 autopkgtest > Recently I updated autopkgtest to handle tests that need their > Recommends installed in a different way than before [1]. autopkgtest

Bug#1008184: nmu: unknown packages affected by dpkg-dev bug #1000421

Package: release.debian.org Severity: important User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi! The objdump tool changed its output for copy relocations for versioned symbols (from @@ to @) in binutils 2.26 (uploaded on 2016-01). This has caused dpkg-shlibdeps to ignore some of

Bug#757607: dpkg-dev: unhelpful error message when quilt-patching debian/*

Hi! On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 13:18:12 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Control: found -1 1.18.2 > > * Guillem Jover , 2014-08-09, 20:45: > > > This is what happens when you add a debian/* file to a quilt patch > > > (which is apparently something newcomers sometimes do...)

Bug#1007255: khal: Emits warnings about deprecated localize tz method

Source: khal Source-Version: 1:0.10.4~ds-3 Severity: important Tags: upstream Hi! This package started to emit deprecation warnings once the python3-tzlocal got updated few days ago to version 4.1-1 (which depends transitively on python3-pytz-deprecation-shim). When running something like «khal

Bug#872381: dpkg-dev: optimize Makefile snippets for debian/rules

Hi! Thanks for the updated patches! I've gone over these and merged several of them, the others I've left out for now, as I wanted to get the current release out, which has been dragging for too long already while I was finalizing it. On Sun, 2022-02-13 at 18:38:19 +0100, Nicolas Boulenguez

Bug#1007116: dpkg: po: Update Swedish translation

Hi! On Fri, 2022-03-11 at 14:20:51 +0100, Peter Krefting wrote: > Package: dpkg > Severity: wishlist > Tags: l10n patch > I have now completed my update of the Swedish translation of the stable dpkg > version (bookworm branch). Both the patch from #1003799 (which I could not > see in the

Bug#1007087: vde2: Mismatched source format vs source version

Source: vde2 Source-Version: 2.3.2+r586-8 Severity: important User: debian-d...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dpkg-mismatch-source-vs-version-format Hi! This package uses a native source format, with a non-native version, which is rather confusing and subverts the semantics of both the source and

Bug#1007088: etbemon: Mismatched source format vs source version

Source: etbemon Source-Version: 1.3.6-1 Severity: important User: debian-d...@lists.debian.org Usertags: dpkg-mismatch-source-vs-version-format Hi! This package uses a native source format, with a non-native version, which is rather confusing and subverts the semantics of both the source and

Bug#1005959: mig-for-host:amd64 should not exist

Hi! On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 09:42:12 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Helmut Grohne, le ven. 18 févr. 2022 06:20:45 +0100, a ecrit: > > I'm quite surprised about the existence of mig-for-host:amd64 and > > mig-x86-64-linux-gnu. I'm also a little little surprised about > > mig:amd64. Are you sure

Bug#1005869: xdg-desktop-portal-wlr: Please provide xdg-desktop-portal-backend

Package: xdg-desktop-portal-wlr Version: 0.5.0-2 Severity: normal Hi! At least chromium has started now to depend on xdg-desktop-portal-backend which this package does not provide, so it requires installing one of the other desktop-portal implementations. It would be nice if this could provide

Bug#992862: libbsd-dev: Overlay mode breaks compilation of xorg server

Control: reassign -1 xorg-server Control: affects -1 - xorg-server Control: tags -1 patch upstream Hi! On Tue, 2021-08-24 at 14:05:16 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > Package: libbsd-dev > Version: 0.10.0-1 > Severity: important > On kfreebsd, FTBFS because of the libbsd overlay: > >

Bug#533639: dselect: beeps on window resize

Control: tag -1 - moreinfo unreproducible Hi! On Wed, 2022-02-09 at 22:12:43 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2022-02-08 22:52 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Control: tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible > > On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 16:16:28 +0200, Piotr Engelking wrote: > &

Bug#1004927: ITP: libtree -- ldd as a tree

Hi! On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 19:31:20 +0100, Gürkan Myczko wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Gürkan Myczko > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Hmm, thought I had replied already, now that I just saw this in NEW. > * Package name: libtree > Version :

Bug#966273: Bug#510368: libgamin0: libfam shlib dependency wrongly set to libfam0

Hi! On Mon, 2021-02-01 at 00:06:45 +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org > Control: retitle -1 RM: fam -- RoQA; replaced by gamin; unmaintained; > upstream dead > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > please remove fam. Upstream is long gone, and gamin is a maintained >

Bug#872381: dpkg-dev: optimize Makefile snippets for debian/rules

Hi! On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 21:53:59 +0100, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote: > Package: dpkg-dev > Followup-For: Bug #872381 > The --in-place sed option ([1]) may simplify scripts/mk/Makefile.am > much more than the do_make_subst variable provided by > build-aux/subst.am does. It is for now the only

Bug#533639: dselect: beeps on window resize

Control: tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible Hi! On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 16:16:28 +0200, Piotr Engelking wrote: > Package: dselect > Version: 1.15.2 > Severity: minor > 'dselect select' beeps when the terminal window is resized. > > Please don't beep on window resize. I cannot reproduce this, when

Bug#1005141: linux-perf: Removes diversions on upgrade breaking it

Package: linux-perf Version: 5.16.3-1~exp1 Severity: serious Hi! This package has code in its postrm maintscript, which unconditionally removes the diversion, which breaks as the rename cannot be performed due to linux-base owning the file, and dpkg-divert refusing to overwrite it. This is the

Bug#970827: ping: socket: Operation not permitted while apt dist-upgrade is in progress

Hi! On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 19:35:10 -0800, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > Control: reassign -1 src:dpkg > Control: severity -1 wishlist > > > root@debian:~# ls -l `which ping` > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 77432 Aug 23 19:08 /usr/bin/ping > > root@debian:~# getcap `which ping` > > /usr/bin/ping

Bug#1004879: acpitool: New upstream development?

Source: acpitool Source-Version: 0.5.1-6 Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream X-Debbugs-Cc: Al Stone Hi! I just noticed that Al Stone forked the upstream of this project at , collected several of the distro patches and prepared a 0.5.2 release. Although no more activity

Bug#1004372: dpkg-deb: Regression in --showformat with virtual source fields

Package: dpkg Version: 1.20.6 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: Uladzimir Bely [ Forwarding the report from Uladzimir, sent to the debian-dpkg list instead of the BTS. ] In Debian Bullseye dpkg-deb returns nothing when asked for some 'source:*' field, even if .deb file provides the package

Bug#1003799: dpkg: [PATCH] po: Update Swedish programs translation

Hi! On Sat, 2022-01-15 at 23:39:16 +0100, Peter Krefting wrote: > Package: dpkg > Severity: wishlist > Tags: l10n patch > Please find attach an update to the Swedish translation for the dpkg programs. Thanks! The .po files have since changed, so I applied the patches and they got some merge

Bug#824594: please support DPKG_ROOT in base-files' postinst

Hi! On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 22:15:44 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > There is one thing which I really dislike about the proposed change, which > is the fact that you are trying to support *broken* Debian systems (namely, > those having /etc/passwd with different UID than the target system). No, I >

Bug#1003987: mesa: Texture flicker and corruption with Intel UHD 620 Graphics

Source: mesa Source-Version: 21.3.0~rc1-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream patch Forwarded: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/14505 Hi! On Intel UHD 620 Graphics, mesa produces texture flickering and corruption, which was become unbearable with the latest 21.3.x

Bug#1003452: dpkg: missing alternatives for x-terminal-emulator

On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 14:17:17 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2022-01-12 13:13:23 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > From this log, it looks like on 2021-12-06 you upgraded, and probably > > got dpkg 1.20.0, which then lost the alternatives, and restored the > > ones for gn

Bug#1003664: fwupd: Too loose dependency on libfwupdN

Package: fwupd Version: 1.5.7-5 Severity: serious Hi! This package seems to use a too loose dependency on at least libfwupdN, but I suspect the same applies to libfwupdpluginM (or even libfwupdN from libfwupdpluginM). These are encoded as >=, which causes them to be upgradable on new upstream

Bug#1003452: dpkg: missing alternatives for x-terminal-emulator

Hi! On Mon, 2022-01-10 at 13:13:11 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.21.1 > Severity: important > I notice that /usr/bin/mlterm is missing from the alternatives > for x-terminal-emulator: > > cventin:~> update-alternatives --display x-terminal-emulator >

Bug#1003301: kxl: Uses self-referential Homepage field

Source: kxl Source-Version: 1.1.7-17 Severity: normal Hi! This package contains a Homepage field pointing to the Debian tracker (at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/kxl), which is not very useful really. So either make it point to http://triring.net/ps2linux/games/kxl/kxlgames.html or to

Bug#1003300: kxl: New upstream project and versions

Source: kxl Source-Version: 1.1.7-17 Severity: normal Hi! It seems the upstream for this package has somewhat disappeared, although its mirror is still available at , but that one does not contain 1.1.7, only up to 1.1.5. A new project with

Bug#1002626: debian-policy: building packages should not require to be root

On Sat, 2021-12-25 at 18:45:08 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Vincent Lefevre writes: > > On 2021-12-25 14:48:33 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > >> Vincent Lefevre writes: > >>> Here, the build via "debuild" is failing even when fakeroot is > >>> available (installed on the machine). Note that

Bug#998165: debian-policy: document and allow Description in the source paragraph

On Tue, 2021-12-21 at 17:53:31 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Sun 12 Dec 2021 at 06:47PM +01, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > > |--- a/policy/ch-controlfields.rst > > |+++ b/policy/ch-controlfields.rst > > |@@ -652,9 +654,14 @@ orderings. [#]_ > > | ~~~ > > | > > | In a source or binary

Bug#1002458: "version in VCS newer than in repository" might be a bit overzealous

On Wed, 2021-12-22 at 13:12:40 +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > Package: tracker.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > when I upload a package (for example, foo 1.0-1), I immediately create a > new changelog stanza for a new version foo 1.0.2~1 so that noone > accidentally makes a commit that might end up

Bug#1002056: ITP: zlib-ng -- optimized zlib compression library

On Mon, 2021-12-20 at 23:15:07 -0500, nick black wrote: > not that i expect you to have run extensive benchmarks or > anything, but how do you feel this compares to libdeflate? I don't think it matters, because libdeflate does not support a streaming API anyway, so it's of no use in many

Bug#1002056: ITP: zlib-ng -- optimized zlib compression library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Guillem Jover X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, Mark Brown * Package name: zlib-ng Version : 2.0.5 Upstream Author : zlib-ng Team * URL : http://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng * License : Zlib, Zlib-RFC, CC

Bug#886389: dpkg: conffile marked as obsolete after being taken over by different package

Hi! On Thu, 2021-12-16 at 11:53:06 +0100, Fabio Fantoni wrote: > Hi, I had the same issue when moving conffiles from one xapp package to > another (of the same source), I did a test also with rm_conffile but on > first upgrade remove the conffile of the new package remaining without the > file

Bug#1001331: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#1001331: gpg: Provide interface to inspect (detached) signatures

Hi! On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 22:58:22 +0100, Werner Koch wrote: > > I cannot stop using as I do not know of a publicly supported interface > > to inspect a (detached) signature to get its issuer fingerprint or > > keyid. > > You can do this: > > gpg --verify --status-fd 1 x.asc /dev/null

Bug#1000715: dpkg -S fails to identify package for coreutils files: says 'no path found matching pattern' instead

Hi! On Sun, 2021-11-28 at 19:09:37 +, Ray Dillinger wrote: > I suppose this means I don't actually understand how dpkg works at all.  > The files are there in /usr/bin, and SOMETHING, presumably an installer > run by dpkg the most recent time coreutils was updated, installed them.  > But dpkg

Bug#1001054: /sbin/start-stop-daemon: start-stop-daemon --exec should fall back to other methods if readlink fails

Hi! On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 09:56:34 +0100, Andrej Shadura wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.20.9 > Severity: normal > File: /sbin/start-stop-daemon > I was debugging an init script in a Debian Docker container, and found > it always fails to stop the daemon. Upon a closer inspection, I found >

Bug#1001695: dpkg.postinst fails to handle /var/lib/dpkg/lost+found

Hi! On Tue, 2021-12-14 at 21:00:40 +0800, Mad Horse wrote: > Package: dpkg > Version: 1.21.1 > Severity: important > On my system, /var/lib/dpkg is an dedicated file system mounted there, so > there > is an directory /var/lib/dpkg/lost+found, and fixup_misplaced_alternatives() > within

Bug#1001671: RM: xfstt -- ROM; low utility in Debian

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi! I'm both the upstream and the maintainer in Debian. The X servers in Debian have disabled X Font Server support for a long time now, so this package is mostly of use to serve fonts for other non-Debian (or derivative) systems. In addition I've since

Bug#1001331: gpg: Provide interface to inspect (detached) signatures

Package: gpg Version: 2.3.1-1 Severity: wishlist Hi! With the latest debsig-verify I switched one of its gpg uses away from «--list-packets» to «--with-colons --show-keys». But the remaining one I cannot stop using as I do not know of a publicly supported interface to inspect a (detached)

Bug#1001330: sqop: Provide a sop alternative for sqop

Package: sqop Version: 0.22.2-2 Severity: wishlist Hi! One of the main advantages of the SOP CLI is that it is a standardized interface, which means having to hardcode specific implementations in code kind of defeats the point of that interface. It would be nice to be able to by default just use

Bug#1000146: Bug#1000421: Bug#1000146: cppcheck: incorrect dependencies: libc6 should be >= 2.32

Hi! On Sat, 2021-12-04 at 23:09:19 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Joachim: > > I'm aware of that. And "shortly" definitely means "before the > > autoremoval" (which is currently scheduled for 2022-01-01). > > The real deadline is when I ought to take action myself, as someone > adversely affected

Bug#895570: devscripts: wrap-and-sort should default to -ast

On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 11:47:12 +, Phil Morrell wrote: > As a user of -satb, I'd like to point out that the flags are not all > equal. Two of them support a (more objective?) desire that "addition to > a list in line-based VCS should have no deletions". That is -at, whereas > -s is a subjective

Bug#1000557: dpkg-source should fail if maintainer is not ubuntu and DEBEMAIL contains canonical.com

llem From ca991d0c7c844fa2ea86ffddc66089d08c26c246 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:48:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Dpkg::Vendor::Ubuntu: Update Maintainer field logic to include canonical Some Ubuntu maintainers use addresses with @canonical.com, handle those

Bug#1000421: dpkg-shlibdeps: Wrong minimum version requirement on libc6

her arches and if they use the same symbol format. But at least it should improve things and not cause regressions as it will try both formats. Thanks, Guillem From a9c4f1806f1927a2da42712658f4cfdd37f73e50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillem Jover Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 02:26:50 +0100 Subject:

Bug#872146: in package dpkg marked as pending

Control: tag -1 - pending Hi! On Mon, 2021-11-22 at 01:07:16 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > Control: tag 872146 pending > Bug #872146 in package dpkg reported by you has been fixed in > the dpkg/dpkg.git Git repository. You can see the changelog below, and > you can check the dif

Bug#998039: ITP: makedeb -- The modern packaging tool for Debian archives.

[ Sorry, have not seen this up to now as the Debian BTS does not automatically CC people, that needs to be done explicitly. ] Hi! On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 08:44:57 -0700, LEO PUVILLAND wrote: > What do you mean by hardcoded dependencies? AFAICS with makedeb you hardcode f.ex. shared libraries in

Bug#999768: lintian: false report: adopted-extended-field XS-Autobuild

On Tue, 2021-11-16 at 13:11:26 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: lintian > Version: 2.112.0 > Severity: serious > > Lintian now reports > > I: nvidia-graphics-drivers source: adopted-extended-field XS-Autobuild (in > section for source) [debian/control:26] > > but that field is not

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >