Hi!
On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 22:26:55 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 dpkg 1.20.7.1
> Control: retitle -1 dpkg: dpkg-realpath is broken
> Control: severity -1 grave
> Control: affects -1 + golang-github-coreos-bbolt-dev
> golang-github-xordataexchange-crypt-dev
> Control: tag
Hi!
On Mon, 2021-02-22 at 11:30:08 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:23:00AM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> > Source: debian-policy
> > Version: 4.5.1.0
> > Severity: wishlist
> > In Julian Andres Klode's blog I've [1] glimpsed:
> >
> > > New features
> > > [...]
>
Source: apitrace
Source-Version: 9.0+repack-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi!
The MD5 functions in libbsd have been superseded by the ones in the
libmd project, and they might be removed in the next SONAME bump. The
current implementations in libbsd are just wrappers for the real
functions from
libmd.
Attached a patch fixing this.
Thanks,
Guillem
From 4bebced8e1b654c915c473c4d85ef8dd26cc6c55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillem Jover
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 20:29:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Switch from libbsd to libmd
The MD5 functions in libbsd have been superseded by the ones
Control: reopen -1
Control: reassign -1 gcc-9,gcc-10,gcc-11
On Sat, 2021-02-13 at 13:07:12 +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> Version: 1:8.4.0-7+rm
> as the package gcc-8 has just been removed from the Debian archive
> unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
> that we
Package: ansible-lint
Version: 4.3.7-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
The ansible package has been split into ansible (where all the
collections can be found, and which is rather heavy), and
ansible-base where the core of ansible can be found.
It seems to me that ansible-lint can work with just
Package: autoconf
Version: 2.69-14
Severity: normal
Hi!
This package ships identical NEWS and NEWS.Debian file. This means no
upstream NEWS file is shipped, where all new features are described
in a concise way.
Thanks,
Guillem
On Fri, 2021-02-12 at 01:05:21 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2021, 12:52 am Guillem Jover, wrote:
> > Then there's the problem with changing contents for already seen
> > files, which seems like a dak bug. It does not allow to change a
> > tarball once it has
Hi!
On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 21:59:42 +0100, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
> Package: general
> Severity: normal
> User: de...@kali.org
> Usertags: origin-kali
> X-Debbugs-Cc: hert...@debian.org, debian-d...@lists.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 ftp.debian.org dpkg-dev
> After having been bitten (in
Control: tag -1 patch
Hi!
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 18:28:45 +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
> Package: devscripts
> Version: 2.10.18.1
> Severity: wishlist
> I'd like a script to transfer data to and login to the Debian porting
> machines that are up and available to me. The script could:
>
> *
Hi!
On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 13:42:59 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.104.0
> Severity: wishlist
>
> The systemd unit file directive SystemCallArchitectures is
> incompatible with Multi-Arch:foreign markings in a package, as that
> means once you
Package: lintian
Version: 2.104.0
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
The systemd unit file directive SystemCallArchitectures is
incompatible with Multi-Arch:foreign markings in a package, as that
means once you install such foreign package, systemd will refuse to let
it run.
Please tag this as an error.
On Mon, 2021-02-08 at 14:54:28 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-02-08 at 14:07:08 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Feel free to let us know about a source package/git repository so that
> > we have a chance of experimenting with it before or while it's being
> &g
On Mon, 2021-02-08 at 14:07:08 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Guillem Jover (2021-02-08):
> > On Mon, 2021-02-08 at 02:25:01 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Source: libbsd0-udeb
> > > Version: 0.11.1-1
> > > Severity: serious
> > >
Hi!
On Mon, 2021-02-08 at 02:25:01 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Source: libbsd0-udeb
> Version: 0.11.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: makes debian-installer FTBFS
> The "new upstream" upload of libbsd builds a udeb that depends on a
> non-udeb:
>
> The following packages have unmet
Control: affects -1 msmtp
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 09:20:44 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Feb 2021 at 19:19:41 -0500, Charles Malaheenee wrote:
> > But I'm asking myself - is it only gnome-keyring affected or this
> > "security hardening" could break other GNOME/MATE parts?
>
> The
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
My DDPO page using the login selector (guillem) includes packages as
being maintained by my work address which is not referenced from my
OpenPGP key. These package I maintain with my work address but "sponsor"
them myself with my Debian address. It
Hi!
On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 22:52:41 +0100, Xavier Guimard wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.7.1
> Severity: normal
> I made an error using master alternatives to install some manpages, but
> I can't change this because update-alternatives refuse to replace a
> master alternative into a slave
,
describe the problem in further detail.
Thanks,
Guillem
From f9505104123664c45b762b8a7bb15406c205c01d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillem Jover
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:34:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Send the readiness notification when we are ready to accept
connections
On a replica we do
they contain a «go.mod» file. Adding it
to the third-party list makes it possible to remove, in many
cases, the explicit --buildsystem argument to dh.
Attached patch.
Thanks,
Guillem
From 829966816cad14fd18f9238c4603f18105daacdc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillem Jover
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 05:10:18
On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 09:55:12 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 01:56:02AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I'm assuming you have this configured in ~/.devscripts with
> > DEBSIGN_KEYID. You should be able to get similar results for
> > dpkg-buildpack
Hi!
On Sun, 2021-01-24 at 10:39:20 +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.20.7.1
> Severity: minor
> I just stumbled in this annoying situation. I do not know
> if this may be classified as a bug in dpkg-buildpackage or in gpg.
>
> If I call dpkg-buildpackage to build my
Hi!
On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 22:15:24 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 4.5.0.0
> Severity: minor
>
> This is a bit of a nit pick, but I think it is a special case worth
> mentioning in Policy.
>
> I am basing this on
>
On Mon, 2021-01-18 at 18:25:55 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Thu 03 Dec 2020 at 05:08AM +03, Anatoli Babenia wrote:
> > diff --git a/policy/ch-source.rst b/policy/ch-source.rst
> > index edae8c1..1265c5e 100644
> > --- a/policy/ch-source.rst
> > +++ b/policy/ch-source.rst
> > @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
), as the boot process will definitely not honor any
invoke-rc.d policy anyway.
Attached a patch fixing this.
Thanks,
Guillem
From 626b7965b70c94cb487a6f6d640f2f8f2c7b1d46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillem Jover
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 20:02:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Do not use invoke-rc.d
Hi!
On Sat, 2021-01-09 at 17:04:07 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: src:ddd
> Version: 1:3.3.12-5.1
> Tags: ftbfs
> This package FTBFS randomly when built with sbuild, because sbuild
> chooses a build directory called ddd-.
>
> When starts with capital "O", the build fails:
>
> make[5]:
is switched, so backwards compatibility will
be preserved.
Thanks,
Guillem
From 1b19c638ea8c65425a9e5c4f6e5f34f983b124a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillem Jover
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2021 21:24:43 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Define LIBBSD_OPENBSD_VIS to select OpenBSD vis function
variants
The NetBSD
Ahem,
On Sat, 2021-01-09 at 21:08:20 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 05:20:54 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Package: csh
> > Version: 20110502-2
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: patch
>
> > Here's a patch (only built tested) removing
Hi!
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 05:20:54 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Package: csh
> Version: 20110502-2
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> Here's a patch (only built tested) removing some of the delta with
> upstream by using the libbsd overlay, which transparently augments
&g
Control: tag -1 pending
Hi!
On Fri, 2021-01-01 at 18:19:52 +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.5
> Severity: minor
> the manpages for dpkg and dpkg-trigger contin a substitution
> variable %PKGDOCDIR% - possibly this should have been replaced with
> /usr/share/doc/dpkg
Control: tag -1 pending
Hi!
On Thu, 2020-07-09 at 23:16:14 +0200, Didier Vidal wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: N/A
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch l10n
> Please find attached the French documentation translation, proofread by
> the debian-l10n-french mailing list contributors.
Thanks!
Package: resolvconf
Version: 1.86
Severity: normal
Hi!
This package used to ship the /etc/resolvconf/update.d/dnscache conffile,
which stopped being shipped in version 1.75, but the conffile was
never cleaned up in the maintainer scripts, so it is left behind in
the system and marked as obsolete
Package: resolvconf
Version: 1.86
Severity: normal
Hi!
This package makes unconditional use of systemctl in at least the
/etc/dhcp/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/resolvconf script, which on a
sysvinit system then shows the following message:
,---
/sbin/dhclient-script: 19:
On Fri, 2021-01-01 at 00:41:54 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 08:01:16PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Source: libarchive
> > Source-Version: 3.4.0-2
> > Severity: important
> > User: a...@packages.debian.org
> > Usertag
Source: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl
Source-Version: 2.141
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi!
The former is more heavy weight and does not support bidirectional
serialization of newer TOML versions. Using the lighter and better
supported TOML::Tiny instead would be better IMO. :)
I submitted a MR,
Source: libzstd
Version: 1.4.5+dfsg-4
Severity: important
Tags: fixed-upstream
Forwarded: https://github.com/facebook/zstd/issues/
Hi!
There's a regression in the 1.4.5 release that is affecting several
other projects that use libzstd.
This has been reported and fixed in the latest upstream
+1,85 @@
+From d59ae433af8b6d9051d149ca2a745fc845e7c82d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Guillem Jover
+Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:45:07 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Perl, agent: Print the perl scalar flags on type mismatch
+ in setValue
+
+This makes it easier to debug why a type mismatch happened
Package: libbellesip-dev
Version: 1.6.3-5
Severity: important
Hi!
This package contains header files that further include header files
from libbctoolbox-dev, but that's an implementation detail, so users
of this package should not need to know that they need to depend on
that other package.
Hi!
On Mon, 2020-12-14 at 10:58:43 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 01:58:54AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-12-13 at 00:27:39 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > The command
> > > dpkg-query --show --showformat='${db-fsys:Fil
Hi!
On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 02:33:53 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-11-14 at 11:15:03 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > > Adding more hurdles does not help.
> > > I think this is a hurdle we do not need.
> >
> > To me, a one-line change in packagin
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi!
On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 07:29:26 +0100, Uwe Steinmann wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.5
> Severity: normal
> In line 547 of /usr/share/perl5/Dpkg/Source/Package.pm syserror()
> instead of syserr() is called.
>
> cp($src, $dst)
>
Control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible
Hi!
On Sun, 2020-12-13 at 00:27:39 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.5
> Severity: important
> The command
> dpkg-query --show --showformat='${db-fsys:Files}
> displays an extra spurious first line:
>
> (Reading database ...
On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 01:25:30 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I moved a configuration file kali.conf from the speech-dispatcher
> package to the speech-dispatcher-kali package (as well as others, but
> let's keep that example only).
>
> The thing is: speech-dispatcher does not depend on
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
* Package name: golang-github-victoriametrics-metricsql
Version : 0.8.0-1
Upstream Author : VictoriaMetrics
* URL : https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/metricsql
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Control: reassign -1 devscripts 2.20.5
[ See below for why I'm reassigning back. ]
On Fri, 2020-12-11 at 22:01:21 +0100, Xavier wrote:
> Le 11/12/2020 à 12:58, Guillem Jover a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 12:14:06 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >> A package ve
Control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible
On Thu, 2020-12-10 at 12:59:49 -0500, tom wrote:
> Package: dselect
> Version: 1.19.7
> Severity: important
>
> "libgnutls-dane0 depends on libgnutls30 (3.6.7-4+deb10u5)"
> breaks update using dselect.
Perhaps a temporary mirror glitch due to the recent
On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 12:14:06 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Package: devscripts
> Version: 2.20.5
> Severity: normal
> A package version 1.2.3+ds can be repackaged as 1.2.3+ds1 and again as
> 1.2.3~ds2.
>
> If adding a component group, synthesized version uses hardcoded delimiter +~.
>
> A
On Thu, 2020-11-26 at 08:55:21 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> AIUI the first year of contributions and the last year of contributions are
> important data points for each contributor for a project, and mostly only
> the last year as that might be used to calculate when a project becomes
> public
Control: merge 856216 -1
Control: retitle 856216 dpkg: Should fallback to use more(1) or less(1) if
pager(1) is not present
Control: user d...@packages.debian.org
Control: usertag 856216 - dpkg-query
Control: usertag 856216 + dpkg
Hi!
On Sat, 2020-10-03 at 09:02:43 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 22:24:13 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 11/24/20 3:57 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > This is the second time something like this has happened to me with
> > git-review, so what I'm getting is that you don't want to deal with
> > valid bug reports
>
Control: retitle -1 dpkg-buildflags: Please add support for D compiler flags
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Thu, 2020-11-26 at 18:08:24 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2020-11-26 12:19 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Package: dpkg-dev
> > Version: 1.20.5
> >
> > as
On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 10:45:07 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:41:14 +0100
> From: Thomas Goirand
> To: 951077-d...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Fixed in 1.28.0 ?
> Message-ID:
> It looks like to me there's no much difference between the man page and
> the
exit status
> make[1]: *** [Makefile:676: sipsak] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
> make: *** [debian/rules:41: build-arch] Error 2
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build subprocess returned exit status 2
I've fixed this with the attached patch.
Thanks
help and maybe temporarily drop them from the build-deps.
I've fixed the libpri FTBFS now with the included patch.
Thanks,
Guillem
Description: Fix zero-size struct member usage
Author: Guillem Jover
These zero-members are not at the end of the struct, which is an old
convention/extension to imp
Hi!
On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 18:30:43 -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.20.5
> Severity: important
> Today while working on the autopkgtests of an ITP of mine I discovered
> that apt fails to install packages from the local repo, seemingly
> because of missing sha512
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: golang-github-ncabatoff-fakescraper
Version : 0.0~git20201102.4b37ba6-1
Upstream Author : Nick Cabatoff
* URL : https://github.com/ncabatoff/fakescraper
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: golang-github-ncabatoff-go-seq
Version : 0.0~git20180805.b08ef85-1
Upstream Author : Nick Cabatoff
* URL : https://github.com/ncabatoff/go-seq
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description : sequence
On Sat, 2020-11-07 at 13:30:13 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Could I ask you to explain your wanting to reduce the Essential set for
> the sake of small installation size in more detail, including some
> numbers, please? It would be good to get to the bottom of Bill's worry
> about this change,
On Wed, 2020-09-30 at 18:34:06 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > > Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > > This change does not propose eliminating the concept of Essential, nor
> > > > does it propose that any specific package become non-Essential.
> > >
> >
On Sun, 2020-10-18 at 11:43:18 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 11:56:19AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > More specifically, it's the right first three steps.
> >
> > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#dependencies
> > currently says
> >
> >
On Sat, 2020-11-14 at 11:15:03 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2020-11-14, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > Unfortunately, only like 10% of the relevant packages have test suites
> > enabled and run, because gettings things to work reliable is sometimes
> > hard.
> So, based on your estimate and the
cf6a424e6cbfb3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guillem Jover
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 19:32:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?doc,=20man:=20Clarify=20that=20R=C2=B3=20values?=
=?UTF-8?q?=20are=20case=20sensitive?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8b
Hi!
On Tue, 2020-11-03 at 19:32:03 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: colord-sensor-argyll
> Severity: serious
>
> argyll is filed for removal from the archive (#966416), but
> colord-sensor-argyll
> depends on it.
The RC bugs filed against argyll have all been fixed now.
Thanks,
On Mon, 2020-08-10 at 17:02:31 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Fri 07 Aug 2020 at 12:21PM +02, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> > the Upstream Release 2.1.2 has the same errors. Buildlog is attached.
>
> Thanks for confirming.
>
> Please remove the 'moreinfo' tag once there are no more reverse
>
On Mon, 2020-11-02 at 21:08:11 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On 2020-11-02 17:50, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-11-02 at 14:31:31 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > Now it does not even report "...orig.tar.gz: No such file or
> > > directory" !!
> >
Package: python3-genshi
Version: 0.7.4-1
Severity: normal
Hi!
While upgrading I got this warning:
Setting up python3-genshi (0.7.4-1) ...
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/genshi/filters/i18n.py:349: SyntaxWarning: "is
not" with a literal. Did you mean "!="? assert numeral is not '', "at
On Mon, 2020-11-02 at 14:31:31 +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.100.0
> Followup-For: Bug #849752
>
> lintian has regressed: the error message is now even more obscure than
> it was before when the orig tarball is missing:
>
> $ lintian
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/axboe/liburing/issues/228
Hi!
On Fri, 2020-10-23 at 12:20:30 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:33:41AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > https://github.com/axboe/liburing/commit/25bbcbef3e0a8bfba8044be55d08d5116c51dccd
> >
Hi!
On Mon, 2020-10-12 at 11:35:22 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Right. I've clarified this now locally for deb-changelog(5) as follows:
> > +Is a one- or two-digit day of the month (B<01>-B<
Hi!
On Thu, 2020-10-15 at 11:40:59 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Sat 2020-09-05 17:09:06 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I was trying out sqv, to potentially add native support for it into
> > dpkg-dev, but either it does not work as expected or I'm confused
Hi!
On Sat, 2020-10-10 at 23:44:19 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.97.0
> Severity: wishlist
> https://bugs.debian.org/971974, which is about the following two
> debian/changelog entry signatures over which aptitude-changelog-parser
> respectively
Control: reopen -1
On Wed, 2020-09-30 at 10:40:53 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Package: jhbuild
> Version: 3.38.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> This package is missing a binary dependency on python3-distutils:
> diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> index e7a8882..7d18b97 100644
Hi!
On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 01:51:51 -0400, hyiltiz wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.5
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: hyil...@gmail.com
> Some packages prompt for whether to accept the package manager's config file
> or
> keep the one in the system (like the one shown below). It is
Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo
On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 13:10:21 -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.19.7
> Severity: important
> Between versions 1.19.6 and 1.19.7 the behavior of the -P option for
> dpkg-buildpackage changed. At 1.19.6 if there was no string
Hi!
On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 22:53:13 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 08:58:00PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> > on amd64.
> >
> > > dpkg-source: error: pathname
> > >
Hi!
On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 20:44:54 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Control: reopen 970762
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 23.09.2020, 03:13 +0200 schrieb Guillem Jover:
> > ---
> > commit c2c28549a513b93898d8c49f6eb8cefc1670a1e2
> > Author: Guillem Jover
> > Date:
Hi!
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 03:07:33 +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Package: pciutils
> Version: 1:3.1.3-1
> Severity: normal
> File: /usr/bin/lspci
>
>
> 04:00.0 0300: 1002:3e50
> 04:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV380 0x3e50 [Radeon
> X600]
> 04:00.1 0380: 1002:3e70
>
dpkg-deb: error: maintainer script 'postrm' has bad
> > permissions 644 (must be >=0555 and <=0775)
> >
> > It has been closed by Guillem Jover .
> >
> > Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
> > If this explanation is unsatisfac
On Sat, 2020-09-19 at 09:33:25 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2020-09-18 19:29 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-09-18 at 18:26:34 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >> Quoting the ncurses NEWS file:
> >>
> >> ,
> >> | 20200817
> >
On Fri, 2020-09-18 at 18:26:34 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Am 18.09.2020 um 13:43 schrieb Helmut Grohne:
> > Source: dpkg
> > Version: 1.20.5
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: ftbfs
> >
> > dpkg FTBFS as of today:
> >
> > | In file included from ../../dselect/curkeys.cc:30:
> > | ./curkeys.h:168:5:
Hi!
On Tue, 2020-09-08 at 17:34:28 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 03:19:36 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Attached a working and tested packaging, where only the ITP bug number
> > needs to be filled in the debian/changelog, Maintainer changed, and
>
Hi!
On Fri, 2020-09-11 at 11:04:33 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:dpkg
> Version: 1.20.5
> Severity: minor
> symbols files with more than one space between the symbol name and the minor
> version are rejected. This should either be documented in deb-symbols(5), or
> accepted in
Hi!
On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 18:52:57 +0200, Francois Gouget wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.19.7
> Severity: normal
> dpkg-deb fails to create a package with a size greater than 2 GB.
> To reproduce this issue use the attached file to create a 2.4 GB
> package, this despite being on a 64-bit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
* Package name: libtoml-tiny-perl
Version : 0.09
Upstream Author : Jeff Ober
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/TOML-Tiny
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : minimal, pure
Package: sqop
Version: 0.17.0-2
Severity: normal
Hi!
I was trying out sqop, to potentially add native support for it into
dpkg-dev, but when trying to verify a signature, it does not seem work
as expected and I'm at a loss due to the lack of man page (see the
other report :).
$ apt source
Package: sqop
Version: 0.17.0-2
Severity: normal
Hi!
The program is missing a man page. And while the command help is
certainly useful, it does not cover all details one would expect.
Thanks,
Guillem
Package: sqv
Version: 0.17.0-1
Severity: normal
Hi!
I was trying out sqv, to potentially add native support for it into
dpkg-dev, but either it does not work as expected or I'm confused by
the docs. :)
$ apt source libbsd
$ sqv -v --keyring libbsd-0.10.0/debian/upstream/signing-key.asc \
Hi!
On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 09:19:52 +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.19.7
> Tags: patch
> When a package contains a symlink that reaches into a filesystem that can't
> be accessed by root (due to missing key, errno=ENOKEY), installation works,
> removal works, but upgrade
Control: reassign -1 libdpkg-perl
Control: forcemerge 966083 -1
On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 20:30:22 +0100, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 12:13:06PM +0200, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
> > Package: perl
> > Version: 5.30.3-4
> > Severity: important
> > User: de...@kali.org
> > Usertags:
Hi!
On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 11:43:02 -0400, David Rayna wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.18.25
> 1st loop in /etc/cron.daily/dpkg treats missing file as a reason to backup.
> 2nd loop does handle missing files okay.
>
> Result is without any arch file, unchanged files are backed up daily which
On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 14:58:15 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Guillem Jover , 2020-08-25, 11:26:
> > This seems to be an increasing regression in make:
>
> I don't belive it is.
Indeed! Sorry bad testing procedure from my side.
> > $ cat a.mk
> > include /usr
On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 13:06:56 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 03:00:43PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2020-08-27 13:25, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > Package: buildd.debian.org
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > > User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> > >
Hi!
On Sat, 2020-08-15 at 07:29:42 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.5
> Severity: normal
> During a routine 'apt-get dist-upgrade' against testing, I got (in
> part):
>
>
> Preparing to unpack .../73-locales-all_2.31-3_amd64.deb ...
> Unpacking locales-all (2.31-3)
Hi!
On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 09:53:32 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Jakub Wilk , 2020-08-24, 18:41:
> > /usr/share/dpkg/architecture.mk is very slow:
> >
> > $ time printf 'include /usr/share/dpkg/architecture.mk\nall:\n\ttrue\n' |
> > make -f - > /dev/null
> >
> > real0m1.161s
> > user
Hi!
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 10:54:07 +0200, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 04:13:40AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > The libsecret dependency seems lightweight, and not really GNOME
> > specific (well it pulls in glib but that's pretty common nowadays
Control: found -1 1.20.1
Hi!
On Fri, 2020-08-14 at 10:00:23 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.5
> Severity: normal
> When I attempt to file a bug report against dpkg with reportbug, I get
> the following output:
>
>
> The package bug script /usr/share/bug/dpkg exited
On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 00:58:27 +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 23:50 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 13:56:45 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > Ansgar writes:
> > > > 10.9 Permissions and owners currently says
> > >
On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 13:56:45 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ansgar writes:
> > 10.9 Permissions and owners currently says
>
> > | Files should be owned by root:root, and made writable only by the
> > | owner and universally readable (and executable, if appropriate),
> > | that is mode 644 or
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi!
On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 20:09:05 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Package: aptitude
> Version: 0.8.13-1+b1
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: Sven Joachim , Guillem Jover
>
> When viewing the Debian changelog of bash in aptitude's TUI, I saw
Package: debhelper
Version: 13.2
Severity: normal
Hi!
On Fri, 2020-07-31 at 08:44:56 +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> I've been unsuccessful in having different 'hardening' settings for different
> parts of the build process of one package. In this specific example,
> part of the build is Linux
601 - 700 of 4830 matches
Mail list logo
