in the git checkout and got a working
package a few seconds later.
Thanks for your interest.
Han Boetes
Package: monit
Version: 1:5.26.0-1~bpo10+1
Severity: important
The current monit package does not include a systemctl file, often resulting in
monit not running. If I'd check the status with systemctl the result was:
active(exited) see also: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/241970/what-
>
> Source: linux
> Source-Version: 4.13.10-1
> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
> linux, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
Dear maintainer,
With every new kernel release I hope these simple instructions from the
dmesg are followed:
process with ps auxww even
though it really was running and was visible as the admin user.
Please try to reproduce this problem, it shouldn't be hard. Thanks.
With regards,
Han Boetes.
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 4.0.0-1-amd64 (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc version
Since I still see this problem I searched around a bit: Is this patch the fix
for this problem? Please also check the reply, it mentions one change too much
has been made.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-December/msg00304.html
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Han Boetes
Hi Trent, Peter,
Finaly I got some time! Thanks for the input and the great patches. I
rolled a new release just now.
Peter, util.h is not dead code on bsd systems. I try to make mg work on
all platforms, not just on Linux. So I didn't remove the include, I just
made it conditional on libbsd
On 20-06-12 09:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 19.06.2012 17:57, schrieb Han Boetes:
Alright. Since I consider CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS quite harmless, could you
please leave them as they are and rebuild another time with only CFLAGS
reset to an empty string?
Most certainly. With only the CFLAGS
With CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat
-Werror=format-security
it fails and with CFLAGS=-g -O2 it works fine indeed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Your patch seems to fix the issue.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_variable#Definition.2C_declaration_and_the_extern_keyword
# Han
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
That is exactly the difference between a working and a non-working
binary. You're on the right track.
I've repeated the buildprocess twice so that the only diffence is the
proposed flag changes.
# Han
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
So if there is a difference between the two packages it should be in
this diff.
And when looking at it: the differences in libmpcdec6.install... Does it
really mean the installed binaries are the ones found in /usr/lib rather
than in the fake installation directory?
diff -upwr
Package: squid3
Severity: normal
As described in http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Wccp2 Squid supports the
wccpv2 protocol. This is a very interesting feature for a lot of setups albeit
little known. It's not enabled in the debian package.
Hereby my request to enable this feature. All it
Package: lxc
Version: 0.7.2-1
Severity: normal
This diff fixes the issues and also adds support for generating a random
password. Such a pretty one-liner.
--- /usr/lib/lxc/templates/lxc-debian 2010-08-04 19:27:58.0 +0200
+++ /usr/lib/lxc/templates/lxc-squeeze 2011-06-16
Package: grub-common
Version: 1.98+20100804-14
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
/etc/grub.d/10_linux also includes xen-kernels which are properly detected by
20_linux_xen. This results in duplicate entries for xen kernels and a lack of
controlability -- by modifying the leading number -- of the
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
tags 603801 - wontfix
thanks
J???rg-Volker Peetz dixit:
It would be only a modification of this requested feature: As
long as the cursor is not moved it will work as requested,
similar to zsh and bash. Only in the case the cursor is moved
inbetween, the next M-.
The point of /sbin/noreply is to put up a decent message telling
the guy who logged in that the account is disabled and then return
1. Read the code and see for yourself. It's not more or less
secure than /bin/false, it's just less annoying than logging in
and getting kicked out again without an
16 matches
Mail list logo
