Bug#770372: RFA: rc -- implementation of the AT&T Plan 9 shell

2017-09-04 Thread Jakukyo Friel
No. (I am not using dash now.) On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:53 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Michał Lach , 2016-01-01, 16:22: >> >> Do you still need person to adopt this package? > > > Jakukyo Friel expressed interest in taking over this package, but I haven't >

Bug#774573: RFS: rc/1.7.2-2 ITA

2015-01-04 Thread Jakukyo Friel
Sorry. I made a typo. It should be ITA instead. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#770372: RFA: rc -- implementation of the AT&T Plan 9 shell

2015-01-04 Thread Jakukyo Friel
> make it a maintainer upload Done. > would you mind filing an RFS bug #774573 > Did you upload your package to mentors.d.n? Sorry. The package has been uploaded: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rc/rc_1.7.2-2.dsc Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@

Bug#774573: RFS: rc/1.7.2-2 ITP

2015-01-04 Thread Jakukyo Friel
ereas RFS bugs are automatically forwarded to debian-mentors@lists.d.o - other people can learn from the reviews - other people can review the review Related wnpp bug #770372 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770372 Regards, Jakukyo Friel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs

Bug#770372: RFA: rc -- implementation of the AT&T Plan 9 shell

2014-12-28 Thread Jakukyo Friel
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > You should set yourself as the maintainer in debian/control and make it a > proper maintainer upload. :-) > How to make it a proper maintainer upload? (I am not DM.) Other issues are (hopefully) addressed. >> +This package provides syn

Bug#770372: RFA: rc -- implementation of the AT&T Plan 9 shell

2014-12-19 Thread Jakukyo Friel
Uploaded to m.d.n: http://mentors.debian.net/package/rc Please review. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#773531: vim-doc: typo in vim-policy

2014-12-19 Thread Jakukyo Friel
Package: vim-doc Version: 2:7.4.488-3 Severity: minor Tags: patch There is a typo in vim-policy. Below is a patch for vim-policy.txt. (This typo appears in the html version also.) --- vim-policy.txt.orig 2014-12-19 21:57:15.388753388 +0800 +++ vim-policy.txt 2014-12-19 22:13:20.296553799 +08

Bug#770372: RFA: rc -- implementation of the AT&T Plan 9 shell

2014-12-17 Thread Jakukyo Friel
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Cool! I'd love to see it integrated into the rc Debian package. I'm wonder which approach is better? - Integrate into rc.deb directly. (If it detects `vim` installed, copy the file to /usr/share/vim/addons/, etc) - Make a separate vim plugin

Bug#770372: RFA: rc -- implementation of the AT&T Plan 9 shell

2014-12-14 Thread Jakukyo Friel
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 21:00:39 +0100 Jakub Wilk wrote: > Package: wnpp Hi, I'm interested. I use rc for shell scripting (rc is much cleaner than bash). I also maintain rc syntax highlight vim plugin[1] [1]: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2880 > (Note that RFA != O. Talk to me

Bug#627423: bitcoind: fails to start

2011-10-14 Thread Jakukyo Friel
Sorry. My old PowerPC machine has retired, so I can not test it. (Maybe it's the time to close this bug?) On Friday, October 14, 2011, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hi weakish, > > On 11-05-20 at 09:46pm, weakish wrote: > > Package: bitcoind > > Version: 0.3.21~dfsg-1 > > Severity: normal > > > > Fa

Bug#626808: qemu: failed to find romfile

2011-05-17 Thread Jakukyo Friel
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > could you be more specific about the exact commandline options, .img and .iso > used? For example, `qemu -hda debian-live-6.0.1-i386-gnome-desktop.img` (image file is downloaded from live.debian.net) > if i use a working hd.img, or

Bug#613556: Why dash's local variable inherits its value from outter env?

2011-02-16 Thread Jakukyo Friel
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > Why do you consider it a bug? policy specifically says: >>         * `local' to create a scoped variable must be supported, including >>           listing multiple variables in a single local command and >>           assigning a value t

Bug#613556: Why dash's local variable inherits its value from outter env?

2011-02-16 Thread Jakukyo Friel
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > When there's no reason to behave otherwise, dash follows the > historical dash and ash behaviors, to give existing users a smooth > upgrade path. I see. Thanks for pointing out. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lis

Bug#611882: etckeeper: should ask user to select vcs

2011-02-04 Thread Jakukyo Friel
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Joey Hess wrote: > Instead, I made it easy to etckeeper uninit to > get back to a not-etckeepered git, and manually configure it. Agreed. This simple approach is better than the overcomplicated debconf approach. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-re