Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: debian-testing-sparc-netinst.iso
03-Jun-2005
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.27-2-sparc64 #1 Mon Feb 14 19:11:37 PST 2005
sparc64
unknown
Date: 13:30 June 7th, 2005
Method: Network boot image from second sparc64 debian machine on local
LAN.
Machi
-0500
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+ghextris (0.9.0-1.3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Renamed #!/usr/bin/python2.3 to #!/usr/bin/python.
+ * Changed program to use random instead of whrandom which is depreciated.
+
+ -- Jason Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thurs, 21 Dec 200
rk for me.
2) The patch provided in the bug report will fix the problem of the symlinks
being removed for custom certificates NOT placed in /usr/share/ca-certificates.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Jason Harrison
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500,
and attached a patch.
Regards,
Jason Harrison
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.19
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-196
Package: am-utils
Version: 6.1.5
Followup-For: Bug #427260
Greetings,
I have attached a patch that seems to fix the problem. Please review and if
acceptable apply.
Regards,
Jason
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing')
Architecture:
Greetings,
Not sure why the attachment did not work. Anyways here it is again.
Regards,
Jason
--- acinclude.m4 2006-05-11 13:28:18.0 -0400
+++ acinclude.m4.new 2007-06-19 15:28:19.0 -0400
@@ -10158,6 +10158,7 @@
[
#include
#include
+#include
],
[
if (argc > 1)
@@ -10165,
> Er, have you attached the patch? Perhaps I'm being myopic but I
> can't see it...
>
> Tim
Greetings,
Yes I sent another email with the attachment. For some reason reportbug -A
am-utils-6.1.5.patch did not send the attachment. Not sure what went wrong.
Let me know if anything else is amiss.
Greetings,
I think this package also needs to now depend on one of the header packages
that provides /usr/include/linux/utsrelease.h. In my case the package that
enabled the package to build was linux-headers-2.6.21-1-k7.
I have also attached another patch file. I discovered that several othe
> Well, of course those other two files are derived files, so the
> acinclude file is actually the only one that needs modifying, as long
> as I modify the rules file to rebuild the configure script by running
> autoconf.
>
> The linux-headers thing is going to be a real headache. How do you
> bui
> I've just had a look at the daily CVS snapshot of am-utils, and they
> will have fixed this properly in 6.1.6. They're fixing autoconf, as
> per your original suggestion, but a different way - not using the
> utsrelease header, but using Fedora's code, which changes it to use a
> different symbo
Greetings,
Attached is a patch that introduces the change for build-deps on libwrap0-dev.
I have tested and the package builds successfully.
Please let me know if this is acceptable.
Regards,
Jason
diff -ur atftp-0.7.dfsg/debian/control testing/atftp-0.7.dfsg/debian/control
--- atftp-0.7.dfsg/d
Greetings,
I have attached a patch which fixes the build-deps for libwrap0-dev.
Please let me know if the patch is acceptable.
Regards,
Jason
diff -ur diald-0.99.4/debian/control testing/diald-0.99.4/debian/control
--- diald-0.99.4/debian/control 2007-08-18 17:59:11.0 -0400
+++ testing/d
Greetings,
Seems like this package needed to build-deps on libdts-dev. I added it to the
build-deps list in the control file. I have attached a patch.
Please let me know if the patch is acceptable.
Regards,
Jason
diff -ur dvr-3.2/debian/control testing/dvr-3.2/debian/control
--- dvr-3.2/debia
Greetings,
I have attached a patch that I believe fixes the build problem.
Please let me know if it is acceptable.
Regards,
Jason Harrison
diff -ru fireflier-1.1.6/gnomeclient/configure testing/fireflier-1.1.6/gnomeclient/configure
--- fireflier-1.1.6/gnomeclient/configure 2006-10-25 13:34
Greetings,
I realized that I created the patch for the wrong version. I should have been
patching fireflier-1.1.7 and not fireflier-1.1.6. Sorry for the mistake.
Regards,
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings,
I created a new patch for fireflier-1.1.7. It has the build-deps for
automake1.8 you mentioned as well as the other fix. I have patched and built
the package with the new patch and it builds ok.
Please let me know if the new patch is acceptable.
Regards,
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Greetings,
This time I have actually attached the patch file :).
Regards,
Jason
diff -ur fireflier-1.1.7/debian/control testing/fireflier-1.1.7/debian/control
--- fireflier-1.1.7/debian/control 2007-07-01 15:59:28.0 -0400
+++ testing/fireflier-1.1.7/debian/control 2007-07-17 17:35:38.
Greetings,
I have done some work and got most of the lintian warnings etc... cleared up.
There are two I am not sure what to do about so I just left them as is. They
are:
lintian fireflier-client-gtk_1.1.7_i386.deb
W: fireflier-client-gtk: zero-byte-file-in-doc-directory
usr/share/doc/firefli
18 matches
Mail list logo
